I put this code for my sprite to reverse the position according to its direction but it reverses the position and it looks skinny. How to fix this?
key_left = keyboard_check(ord("A"))
key_right = keyboard_check(ord("D"))
key_jump = keyboard_check(vk_space)
var move = key_right - key_left
hspd = move * spd;
vspd = vspd + grv;
if (hspd != 0) {
image_xscale = sign(hspd)
}
The code's correct. You must have resized the sprite in the room editor, delete the instance and put it in again and don't resize it, it should work.
Also if you need it a little bigger you can (If 1.5 doesn't satisfy you, feel free to use a bigger number).
image_xscale = sign(hspd) * 1.5;
The code seem to be correct, have you tried setting the origin point at the center? By default the origin point is on the top-left, and once it's set at the center of your sprite, it won't change positions when turning around.
You can set the origin point at the sprite window.
Related
I'm developing a mobile game in Unity3d which the player needs to move a stick that is placed just a little bit higher then the finger with transform.position and block a ball that is moved with Force.Mode2D.impulse. The problem is that the ball goes through the stick if the stick is moved too fast. Could anyone please teach me how to code the stick movement with Force (or any other way that works) that still moves according to the finger position on touch screen ( A.K.A Input.mousePosition) instead of using buttons?
The code goes as such if anyone needs the info;
Stick:
float defencePosX = Mathf.Clamp( Input.mousePosition.x / Screen.width * 5.6f - 2.8f , -2.8f, 2.8f);
float defencePosY = Mathf.Clamp( Input.mousePosition.y / Screen.height * 10 - 4f, -3.3f, -0.5f);
this.transform.position = new Vector3 (defencePosX, defencePosY, 0);
Ball:
projectileSpeed = Random.Range (maxSpeed, minSpeed);
projectileSwing = Random.Range (-0.001f, 0.001f);
rb.AddForce (new Vector2 (projectileSwing * 1000, 0), ForceMode2D.Impulse);
rb.AddForce (new Vector2 (0, projectileSpeed), ForceMode2D.Impulse);
a video of the bug:
https://youtu.be/cr2LVBlP2O0
basicly if i dont move the stick it hits but if i move it fast the ball goes right through. (the bouncing sound effect doesnt work if itss too fast as well)
When working with physics objects, you'll want to use just the Rigidbody component when moving them. Otherwise, it's interpreted as a teleport and no physics is applied and no movement is calculated.
Try using Rigidbody.MovePosition instead of transform.position.
Also, make sure the Rigidbody components on your stick AND ball both have collisionDetectionMode set to 'Continuous Dynamic'. That's how you get small fast-moving physics objects to hit one another in between frames.
float defencePosX = Mathf.Clamp( Input.mousePosition.x / Screen.width * 5.6f - 2.8f , -2.8f, 2.8f);
float defencePosY = Mathf.Clamp( Input.mousePosition.y / Screen.height * 10 - 4f, -3.3f, -0.5f);
rb.MovePosition(new Vector3 (defencePosX, defencePosY, 0));
Id recommend that you set the balls force to Vector3.zero before adding force to it, or that you use the collider of your blocking movement as a bounce pad for the ball.
Please remember to check that your colliders are scaled correctly according to the blocker.
A video displaying your issue would be helpful to understand it better.
I am presently learning C# and have chosen as a project to write a simple colour picker control ; however things have changed substantially since I last looked at writing code and I have struck this problem.
I am using the Mousedown event in my control to get the mouse coordinates as a Point - this is working fine and returns exactly what I would expect - the mouse coordinates relative to my control; however when I try and do a check against the control location I am returned a value as a Point showing the position of my control relative to the form which in certain cases the mouse coordinates will be outside the bounds of because their values will be less than the relative start position of the control I.E I click at pixel 1,1 in the control - the mouse position is 1,1 but because the control is located at 9,9 relative to the form the location of the mouse is less than the bounds of the control - I have absolutely no idea how to fix this, I have been attempting to sort it out with PointToClient and PointToScreen to no avail as they seem to come up with outlandish values can someone please help me out it's driving me insane.
I've managed to sort this out myself so thought I'd post the answer and it can hopefully help someone else. I was having problems getting Point values that were relative to the same pixel origin : this sorted it.
private void ColourPicker_MouseDown(object sender, MouseEventArgs e)
{ // Probably being paranoid but I am worried about scaling issues, this.Location
// would return the same result as this mess but may not handle
// scaling <I haven't checked>
Point ControlCoord = this.PointToClient(this.PointToScreen(this.Location));
int ControlXStartPosition = ControlCoord.X;
int ControlYStartPosition = ControlCoord.Y;
int ControlXCalculatedWidth = ((RectangleColumnsCount + 1) * WidthPerBlock ) + ControlXStartPosition;
int ControlYCalculatedHeight = ((RectangleRowsCount + 1) * HeightPerBlock) + ControlYStartPosition;
// Ensure that the mouse coordinates are comparible to the control coordinates for boundry checks.
Point ControlRelitiveMouseCoord = this.ParentForm.PointToClient(this.PointToScreen(e.Location));
int ControlRelitiveMouseXcoord = ControlRelitiveMouseCoord.X;
int ControlRelitiveMouseYcoord = ControlRelitiveMouseCoord.Y;
// Zero Relitive coordinates are used for caluculating the selected block location
int ZeroRelitiveXMouseCoord = e.X;
int ZeroRelitiveYMouseCoord = e.Y;
// Ensure we are in the CALCULATED boundries of the control as the control maybe bigger than the painted area on
// the design time form and we don't want to use unpaited area in our calculations.
if((ControlRelitiveMouseXcoord > ControlXStartPosition) && (ControlRelitiveMouseXcoord < ControlXCalculatedWidth))
{
if((ControlRelitiveMouseYcoord > ControlYStartPosition) && (ControlRelitiveMouseYcoord < ControlYCalculatedHeight))
{
SetEvaluatedColourFromPosition(ZeroRelitiveXMouseCoord, ZeroRelitiveYMouseCoord);
}
}
}
I'm new to XNA and would like to develop a light-weight 2D engine over it, with the entities organized into parent-child hierarchy. I think of matrix when drawing children, because their position, rotation and scale are depend on their parent.
If I use SpriteBatch.Begin(), my rectangles can be drawn on the screen, but when I change them into:
this.DrawingMatrix = Matrix.Identity;
this.SpriteBatch.Begin(SpriteSortMode.Deferred, BlendState.AlphaBlend, SamplerState.LinearClamp, DepthStencilState.None, RasterizerState.CullClockwise, null, this.DrawingMatrix);
nothing is drawn anymore. I even tried new Matrix() or Matrix.CreateTranslation(0, 0, 0) for DrawingMatrix.
My first question is: why doesn't it work? I'm not working with any camera or viewport.
Secondly, before drawing an entity, I call the PreDraw to transform the matrix (I will then reset to original state at PostDraw):
protected virtual void PreDraw(Engine pEngine)
{
pEngine.DrawingMatrix *=
Matrix.CreateTranslation(this.X, this.Y, 0) *
Matrix.CreateScale(this.ScaleX, this.ScaleY, 1) *
Matrix.CreateRotationZ(this.Rotation);
}
Please clarify the correction of above code. And I need to scale not at the origin, but at ScaleCenterX and ScaleCenterY, how can I achieve this?
ADDED: Here is an example of my engine's draw process:
Call these code:
this.DrawingMatrix = Matrix.CreateTranslation(0, 0, 0);
this.SpriteBatch.Begin(SpriteSortMode.Deferred, BlendState.AlphaBlend, SamplerState.LinearClamp, DepthStencilState.None, RasterizerState.CullClockwise, null, this.DrawingMatrix);
Call PreDraw(), with is:
protected virtual void PreDraw(Engine pEngine)
{
pEngine.DrawingMatrix *=
Matrix.CreateTranslation(this.X, this.Y, 0) *
Matrix.CreateScale(this.ScaleX, this.ScaleY, 1) *
Matrix.CreateRotationZ(this.Rotation);
}
Call Draw(), for example, in my Rect class:
protected override void Draw(Engine pEngine)
{
pEngine.SpriteBatch.Draw(pEngine.RectangleTexture, new Rectangle(0, 0, (int)this.Width, (int)this.Height), new Rectangle(0, 0, 1, 1), this.Color);
}
If I replace above Begin code with this.SpriteBatch.Begin(), the rectangle is drawn correctly, so I guess it is because of the matrix.
First issue is a simple bug: The default for SpriteBatch is CullCounterClockwise, but you have specified CullClockwise causing all your sprites to get back-face-culled. You can pass null if you just want to use the default render states - you don't need to specify them explicitly.
(You would need to change the cull mode if you used a negative scale.)
To answer your second question: You need to translate "back" to place the scaling origin (your ScaleCenterX and ScaleCenterY) at the world origin (0,0). Transformations always happen around (0,0). So normally the order is: translate sprite origin back to the world origin, scale, rotate, translate to place sprite origin at desired world position.
Also, I hope that your PostDraw is not applying the reverse transformations (you made it sound like it does). That is very likely to cause precision problems. You should save and restore the matrix instead.
I am having problems with the following piece of code:
def handle_image_flip(self, old_rect):
new_rect = self.last_frame.get_rect()
self.owner.rect = new_rect
self.owner.rect.y = old_rect.y
if self.owner.facing == -1:
self.owner.rect.right = old_rect.right
else:
self.owner.rect.x = old_rect.x
def animate(self, tick):
if tick - self.last_update > self.image_info[self.action]["frame_rate"]:
self.last_frame = self.get_next_frame(tick)
old_rect = self.owner.rect.copy()
self.owner.image = self.last_frame
self.handle_image_flip(old_rect)
self.last_update = tick
Where:
self.owner is the sprite this piece of code handles
self.owner.facing is the direction the sprite is facing
self.last_frame is the new image I want to display
Since the sprites have different widths, I am getting glitchy animations when facing
LEFT (-1).
There are no problems when moving RIGHT whatsoever.
Any ideas?
If you track player's location using Rect.center or Rect.centerx vs default of topleft then different widths can work.
Depending on your game, using sprite sheets may be beneficial.
in your if statement, in one case you change self.owner.rect.right, in the other case you change self.owner.rect.x.
This could be part of the problem since when you are moving left, you are changing .right rather than .x
I've written a home-brew view_port class for a 2D strategy game. The panning (with arrow keys) and zooming (with mouse wheel) work fine, but I'd like the view to also home towards wherever the cursor is placed, as in Google Maps or Supreme Commander
I'll spare you the specifics of how the zoom is implemented and even what language I'm using: this is all irrelevant. What's important is the zoom function, which modifies the rectangle structure (x,y,w,h) that represents the view. So far the code looks like this:
void zoom(float delta, float mouse_x, float mouse_y)
{
zoom += delta;
view.w = window.w/zoom;
view.h = window.h/zoom;
// view.x = ???
// view.y = ???
}
Before somebody suggests it, the following will not work:
view.x = mouse_x - view.w/2;
view.y = mouse_y - view.h/2;
This picture illustrates why, as I attempt to zoom towards the smiley face:
As you can see when the object underneath the mouse is placed in the centre of the screen it stops being under the mouse, so we stop zooming towards it!
If you've got a head for maths (you'll need one) any help on this would be most appreciated!
I managed to figure out the solution, thanks to a lot of head-scratching a lot of little picture: I'll post the algorithm here in case anybody else needs it.
Vect2f mouse_true(mouse_position.x/zoom + view.x, mouse_position.y/zoom + view.y);
Vect2f mouse_relative(window_size.x/mouse_pos.x, window_size.y/mouse_pos.y);
view.x = mouse_true.x - view.w/mouse_relative.x;
view.y = mouse_true.y - view.h/mouse_relative.y;
This ensures that objects placed under the mouse stay under the mouse. You can check out the code over on github, and I also made a showcase demo for youtube.
In my concept there is a camera and a screen.
The camera is the moving part. The screen is the scalable part.
I made an example script including a live demo.
The problem is reduced to only one dimension in order to keep it simple.
https://www.khanacademy.org/cs/cam-positioning/4772921545326592
var a = (mouse.x + camera.x) / zoom;
// now increase the zoom e.g.: like that:
zoom = zoom + 1;
var newPosition = a * zoom - mouse.x;
camera.setX(newPosition);
screen.setWidth(originalWidth * zoom);
For a 2D example you can simply add the same code for the height and y positions.