Used HybridRelations to store user notifications in mongoDB instead of mysql and imported 3million records and now user->notifications()->take(5)->get() or user->notifications()->paginate(5) takes over 30 seconds.
any idea how to speed it up?
on mysql with same amount of records it took 200 milliseconds.
notificaiton model has user_id and description and priority and read flag and user_id is set as an index.
Maybe this suggestion can help you.
When use user->notifications() means the query like that
db.notificaiton.find( {"user_id": <?> } )
That will get all record by user_id.
You can dump the user->notifications() and check. That should be Collection type and contains more than 5 records.
The solution is this.
You can write specific method to ensure what your mongo query expression.
The problem was the column that you are sorting by should be an index as well as the columns you use where clause on.
Related
I have one table that has many fields,
Is it possible to count how many fields that filled?
I tried count() but seems doesnt work correctly, it only count the rows of the table
The purpose is i want to take the percentage of each student's completed task
This is the view from the page
This is the table
I think your table structure is messy.
why not, setup a one to many relation instead of doing that.
https://laravel.com/docs/8.x/eloquent-relationships#one-to-many-inverse
I would also suggest you use increment, every new task completed you increment the value. Please refer to this https://laravel.com/docs/8.x/queries.
I have a table with an enumerated column named "status". I am implementing an endpoint to get statistics about active and inactive entries. It will return a response like this
{ "activeCount" : 10, "inactiveCount" : 10 }
There are 4 possible status for each entry (active, inactive, awaitingApproval, suspicious). activeCount = amount of entries with active status.
inactiveCount = amount of entries with inactive/awaitingApproval/suspicious status.
I am using controller-service-repository pattern and H2 in-memory database. I need this to be as fast as possible. Also assume that this table will hold massive amount of data in the future so getting all entries into memory and calculating the status statistics is not possible.
What are your best practice suggestions?
Thanks for help in advance.
Just use a query like select e.status, count(*) from Entity e group by e.status. If this is not fast enough for you, you will have to maintain a current count per group somehow in a dedicated table and just query that. That obviously requires you to change the count respectively for every status change or insert/delete. Usually, this can be done by using triggers.
I have AWS DynamoDB table called "Users", whose hash key/primary key is "UserID" which consist of emails. It has two attributes, first called "Daily Points" and second "TimeSpendInTheApp". Now I need to run a query or scan on the table, that will give me top 50 users which have the highest points and top 50 users which have spend the most time in the app. Now this query will be executed only once a day by cron aws lambda. I am trying to find the best solutions for this query or scan. For me, the cost is most important than speed/or efficiency. As maintaining secondary global index or a local index on points can be costly operations, as I have to assign Read and Write units for those indexes, which I want to avoid. "Users" table will have a maximum of 100,000 to 150,000 records and on average it will have 50,000 records. What are my best options? Please suggest.
I am thinking, my first option is, I can scan the whole table on Filter Expression for records above certain points (5000 for example), after this scan, if 50 or more than 50 records are found, then simply sort the values and take the top 50 records. If this scan returns no or very less results then reduce the Filter Expression value (3000 for example), then again do the same scan operation. If Filter Expression value (2500 for example) returns too many records, like 5000 or more, then reduce the Filter Expression value. Is this even possible, I guess it would also need to handle pagination. Is it advisable to scan on a table which has 50,000 record?
Any advice or suggestion will be helpful. Thanks in advance.
Firstly, creating indexes for the above use case doesn't simplify the process as it doesn't have solution for aggregation or sorting.
I would export the data to HIVE and run the queries rather than writing code to determine the result especially as it is going to be a batch executed only once per day.
Something like below:-
Create Hive table:-
CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE hive_users(userId string, dailyPoints bigint, timeSpendInTheApp bigint)
STORED BY 'org.apache.hadoop.hive.dynamodb.DynamoDBStorageHandler'
TBLPROPERTIES ("dynamodb.table.name" = "Users",
"dynamodb.column.mapping" = "userId:UserID,dailyPoints:Daily_Points,timeSpendInTheApp:TimeSpendInTheApp");
Queries:-
SELECT dailyPoints, userId from hive_users sort by dailyPoints desc;
SELECT timeSpendInTheApp, userId from hive_users sort by timeSpendInTheApp desc;
Hive Reference
I have a product search engine using Coldfusion8 and MySQL 5.0.88
The product search has two display modes: Multiple View and Single View.
Multiple displays basic record info, Single requires additional data to be polled from the database.
Right now a user does a search and I'm polling the database for
(a) total records and
(b) records FROM to TO.
The user always goes to Single view from his current resultset, so my idea was to store the current resultset for each user and not have to query the database again to get (waste a) overall number of records and (waste b) a the single record I already queried before AND then getting the detail information I still need for the Single view.
However, I'm getting nowhere with this.
I cannot cache the current resultset-query, because it's unique to each user(session).
The queries are running inside a CFINVOKED method inside a CFC I'm calling through AJAX, so the whole query runs and afterwards the CFC and CFINVOKE method are discarded, so I can't use query of query or variables.cfc_storage.
So my idea was to store the current resultset in the Session scope, which will be updated with every new search, the user runs (either pagination or completely new search). The maximum results stored will be the number of results displayed.
I can store the query allright, using:
<cfset Session.resultset = query_name>
This stores the whole query with results, like so:
query
CACHED: false
EXECUTIONTIME: 2031
SQL: SELECT a.*, p.ek, p.vk, p.x, p.y
FROM arts a
LEFT JOIN p ON
...
LEFT JOIN f ON
...
WHERE a.aktiv = "ja"
AND
... 20 conditions ...
SQLPARAMETERS: [array]
1) ... 20+ parameters
RESULTSET:
[Record # 1]
a: true
style: 402
price: 2.3
currency: CHF
...
[Record # 2]
a: true
style: 402abc
...
This would be overwritten every time a user does a new search. However, if a user wants to see the details of one of these items, I don't need to query (total number of records & get one record) if I can access the record I need from my temp storage. This way I would save two database trips worth 2031 execution time each to get data which I already pulled before.
The tradeoff would be every user having a resultset of up to 48 results (max number of items per page) in Session.scope.
My questions:
1. Is this feasable or should I requery the database?
2. If I have a struture/array/object like a the above, how do I pick the record I need out of it by style number = how do I access the resultset? I can't just loop over the stored query (tried this for a while now...).
Thanks for help!
KISS rule. Just re-query the database unless you find the performance is really an issue. With the correct index, it should scales pretty well. When the it is an issue, you can simply add query cache there.
QoQ would introduce overhead (on the CF side, memory & computation), and might return stale data (where the query in session is older than the one on DB). I only use QoQ when the same query is used on the same view, but not throughout a Session time span.
Feasible? Yes, depending on how many users and how much data this stores in memory, it's probably much better than going to the DB again.
It seems like the best way to get the single record you want is a query of query. In CF you can create another query that uses an existing query as it's data source. It would look like this:
<cfquery name="subQuery" dbtype="query">
SELECT *
FROM Session.resultset
WHERE style = #SelectedStyleVariable#
</cfquery>
note that if you are using CFBuilder, it will probably scream Error at you for not having a datasource, this is a bug in CFBuilder, you are not required to have a datasource if your DBType is "query"
Depending on how many records, what I would do is have the detail data stored in application scope as a structure where the ID is the key. Something like:
APPLICATION.products[product_id].product_name
.product_price
.product_attribute
Then you would really only need to query for the ID of the item on demand.
And to improve the "on demand" query, you have at least two "in code" options:
1. A query of query, where you query the entire collection of items once, and then query from that for the data you need.
2. Verity or SOLR to index everything and then you'd only have to query for everything when refreshing your search collection. That would be tons faster than doing all the joins for every single query.
To improve my skills on Hector and cassandra I'm trying diffrent methods to query data out of cassandra.
Currently I'm trying to make a simple message system. I would like to get the posted messages in chronological order with the last posted message first.
In plain sql it is possible to use 'order by'. I know it is possible if you use the OrderPreservingPartitioner but this partioner is deprecated and less-efficient than the RandomPartioner. I thought of creating an index on a secondary column with a timestamp als value, but I can't figure out how to obtain the data. I'm sure that I have to use at least two queries.
My column Family looks like this:
create column family messages
with comparator = UTF8Type
and key_validation_class=LongType
and compression_options =
{sstable_compression:SnappyCompressor, chunk_length_kb:64}
and column_metadata = [
{column_name: message, validation_class: UTF8Type}
{column_name: index, validation_class: DateType, index_type: KEYS}
];
I'm not sure if I should use DataType or long for the index column, but I think that's not important for this question.
So how can I get the data sorted? If possible I like to know hows its done white the CQL syntax and whitout.
Thanks in advance.
I don't think there's a completely simple way to do this when using RandomPartitioner.
The columns within each row are stored in sorted order automatically, so you could store each message as a column, keyed on timestamp.
Pretty soon, of course, your row would grow large. So you would need to divide up the messages into rows (by day, hour or minute, etc) and your client would need to work out which rows (time periods) to access.
See also Cassandra time series data
and http://rubyscale.com/2011/basic-time-series-with-cassandra/
and https://www.cloudkick.com/blog/2010/mar/02/4_months_with_cassandra/
and http://pkghosh.wordpress.com/2011/03/02/cassandra-secondary-index-patterns/