I have created an app where I try to insert a record with the latest order number increased by one.
The main function is triggered from Activity, however, the whole process is in my ViewModel.
Issue no 1, After I insert a new record the order by number is not updated.
Issue no 2, When I insert first record the order by number is null, for that reason I am checking for null and setting the value to 0.
My goal here is to get the latest order_by number from Entity in my ViewModel, increased by 1 and add that new number to my new record using fun addTestData(..).
Entity:
#Entity(tableName = "word_table")
data class Word(
#ColumnInfo(name = "id") val id: Int,
#ColumnInfo(name = "word") val word: String,
#ColumnInfo(name = "order_by") val orderBy: Int
Dao:
#Query("SELECT order_by FROM word_table ORDER BY order_by DESC LIMIT 1")
suspend fun getHighestOrderId(): Int
Repository:
#Suppress("RedundantSuspendModifier")
#WorkerThread
suspend fun getHighestOrderId(): Int {
return wordDao.getHighestOrderId()
}
ViewModel:
private var _highestOrderId = MutableLiveData<Int>()
val highestOrderId: LiveData<Int> = _highestOrderId
fun getHighestOrderId() = viewModelScope.launch {
val highestOrderId = repository.getHighestOrderId()
_highestOrderId.postValue(highestOrderId)
}
fun addTestData(text: String) {
for (i in 0..1500) {
getHighestOrderId()
var highestNo = 0
val highestOrderId = highestOrderId.value
if (highestOrderId == null) {
highestNo = 0
} else {
highestNo = highestOrderId
}
val addNumber = highestNo + 1
val word2 = Word(0, text + "_" + addNumber,addNumber)
insertWord(word2)
}
}
Activity:
wordViewModel.addTestData(text)
I'm trying to map entities to dtos and return a result, but it return as null for some reason. What am I doing wrong?
#PutMapping("/contract")
fun getContract(#RequestParam itemId: Int, #RequestParam id: Int): InventoryItemDTO {
var item: InventoryItem = inventoryItemService.getInventoryItemById(itemId)
val i = convertToItemDTO(item)
var con = contractService.getContractById(id)
val c = convertToContractDTO(con)
item.contract = con
i.contractDTO = c
//inventoryItemService.saveInventoryItem(i)
return i
}
fun convertToItemDTO(item: InventoryItem): InventoryItemDTO {
val itemDTO = modelMapper.map(item, InventoryItemDTO::class.java)
itemDTO.contractDTO = convertToContractDTO(item.contract!!)
return itemDTO
}
fun convertToContractDTO(contract: Contract): ContractDTO {
return modelMapper.map(contract, ContractDTO::class.java)
}
I have a method with a projection
public IQueryable<EmpDTO> GetEmployee(Func<Employee, EmpDTO> projection = null)
{
if(projection == null)
projection = emp => new EmpDTO {
Id = emp.Id,
Name = emp.Name,
Salary = emp.Salary,
};
return entities.Employees.Where(e => e.Salary > 10000).Select(projection);
}
It can be extended as follows:
query = classInstance.GetEmployee(emp => new EmpDTO {
Id = emp.Id,
Name = emp.Name,
Salary = emp.Salary,
Address = emp.Address
});
How can I APPEND only the "Address" field to the Func without
rewriting the entire fields (repeated fields Id, Name, Salary)
Using Expression, you can build a new lambda to initialize the fields:
public IQueryable<EmpDTO> GetEmployee(Expression<Func<Employee, EmpDTO>> addProj = null) {
Expression<Func<Employee, EmpDTO>> projection = emp => new EmpDTO {
Id = emp.Id,
Name = emp.Name,
Salary = emp.Salary,
};
if (addProj != null) {
var pBody = ((MemberInitExpression)projection.Body);
var newBindings = new ReadOnlyCollection<MemberBinding>(pBody.Bindings.Concat(((MemberInitExpression)addProj.Body).Bindings).ToList());
var newBody = Expression.MemberInit(pBody.NewExpression, newBindings);
projection = (Expression<Func<Employee, EmpDTO>>) Expression.Lambda(newBody, projection.Parameters);
}
return entities.Employees.Where(e => e.Salary > 10000).Select(projection);
}
You could also build the entire lambda from scratch, but that seemed like more work to me. Plus you can encapsulate the combine init logic into an extension method:
public static Expression<Func<TIn, TOut>> Add<TIn, TOut>(this Expression<Func<TIn, TOut>> proj, Expression<Func<TIn, TOut>> addProj = null) {
if (addProj != null) {
var pBody = ((MemberInitExpression)proj.Body);
var newBindings = new ReadOnlyCollection<MemberBinding>(pBody.Bindings.Concat(((MemberInitExpression)addProj.Body).Bindings).ToList());
var newBody = Expression.MemberInit(pBody.NewExpression, newBindings);
proj = (Expression<Func<TIn, TOut>>)Expression.Lambda(newBody, proj.Parameters);
}
return proj;
}
which reduces the GetEmployee body to:
public IQueryable<EmpDTO> GetEmployee(Expression<Func<Employee, EmpDTO>> addProj = null) {
Expression<Func<Employee, EmpDTO>> projection = emp => new EmpDTO {
Id = emp.Id,
Name = emp.Name,
Salary = emp.Salary,
};
if (addProj != null)
projection = projection.Add(addProj);
return entities.Employees.Where(e => e.Salary > 10000).Select(projection);
}
I have a collection of items that contain an Enum (TypeCode) and a User object, and I need to flatten it out to show in a grid. It's hard to explain, so let me show a quick example.
Collection has items like so:
TypeCode | User
---------------
1 | Don Smith
1 | Mike Jones
1 | James Ray
2 | Tom Rizzo
2 | Alex Homes
3 | Andy Bates
I need the output to be:
1 | 2 | 3
Don Smith | Tom Rizzo | Andy Bates
Mike Jones | Alex Homes |
James Ray | |
I've tried doing this using foreach, but I can't do it that way because I'd be inserting new items to the collection in the foreach, causing an error.
Can this be done in Linq in a cleaner fashion?
I'm not saying it is a great way to pivot - but it is a pivot...
// sample data
var data = new[] {
new { Foo = 1, Bar = "Don Smith"},
new { Foo = 1, Bar = "Mike Jones"},
new { Foo = 1, Bar = "James Ray"},
new { Foo = 2, Bar = "Tom Rizzo"},
new { Foo = 2, Bar = "Alex Homes"},
new { Foo = 3, Bar = "Andy Bates"},
};
// group into columns, and select the rows per column
var grps = from d in data
group d by d.Foo
into grp
select new {
Foo = grp.Key,
Bars = grp.Select(d2 => d2.Bar).ToArray()
};
// find the total number of (data) rows
int rows = grps.Max(grp => grp.Bars.Length);
// output columns
foreach (var grp in grps) {
Console.Write(grp.Foo + "\t");
}
Console.WriteLine();
// output data
for (int i = 0; i < rows; i++) {
foreach (var grp in grps) {
Console.Write((i < grp.Bars.Length ? grp.Bars[i] : null) + "\t");
}
Console.WriteLine();
}
Marc's answer gives sparse matrix that can't be pumped into Grid directly.
I tried to expand the code from the link provided by Vasu as below:
public static Dictionary<TKey1, Dictionary<TKey2, TValue>> Pivot3<TSource, TKey1, TKey2, TValue>(
this IEnumerable<TSource> source
, Func<TSource, TKey1> key1Selector
, Func<TSource, TKey2> key2Selector
, Func<IEnumerable<TSource>, TValue> aggregate)
{
return source.GroupBy(key1Selector).Select(
x => new
{
X = x.Key,
Y = source.GroupBy(key2Selector).Select(
z => new
{
Z = z.Key,
V = aggregate(from item in source
where key1Selector(item).Equals(x.Key)
&& key2Selector(item).Equals(z.Key)
select item
)
}
).ToDictionary(e => e.Z, o => o.V)
}
).ToDictionary(e => e.X, o => o.Y);
}
internal class Employee
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Department { get; set; }
public string Function { get; set; }
public decimal Salary { get; set; }
}
public void TestLinqExtenions()
{
var l = new List<Employee>() {
new Employee() { Name = "Fons", Department = "R&D", Function = "Trainer", Salary = 2000 },
new Employee() { Name = "Jim", Department = "R&D", Function = "Trainer", Salary = 3000 },
new Employee() { Name = "Ellen", Department = "Dev", Function = "Developer", Salary = 4000 },
new Employee() { Name = "Mike", Department = "Dev", Function = "Consultant", Salary = 5000 },
new Employee() { Name = "Jack", Department = "R&D", Function = "Developer", Salary = 6000 },
new Employee() { Name = "Demy", Department = "Dev", Function = "Consultant", Salary = 2000 }};
var result5 = l.Pivot3(emp => emp.Department, emp2 => emp2.Function, lst => lst.Sum(emp => emp.Salary));
var result6 = l.Pivot3(emp => emp.Function, emp2 => emp2.Department, lst => lst.Count());
}
* can't say anything about the performance though.
You can use Linq's .ToLookup to group in the manner you are looking for.
var lookup = data.ToLookup(d => d.TypeCode, d => d.User);
Then it's a matter of putting it into a form that your consumer can make sense of. For instance:
//Warning: untested code
var enumerators = lookup.Select(g => g.GetEnumerator()).ToList();
int columns = enumerators.Count;
while(columns > 0)
{
for(int i = 0; i < enumerators.Count; ++i)
{
var enumerator = enumerators[i];
if(enumator == null) continue;
if(!enumerator.MoveNext())
{
--columns;
enumerators[i] = null;
}
}
yield return enumerators.Select(e => (e != null) ? e.Current : null);
}
Put that in an IEnumerable<> method and it will (probably) return a collection (rows) of collections (column) of User where a null is put in a column that has no data.
I guess this is similar to Marc's answer, but I'll post it since I spent some time working on it. The results are separated by " | " as in your example. It also uses the IGrouping<int, string> type returned from the LINQ query when using a group by instead of constructing a new anonymous type. This is tested, working code.
var Items = new[] {
new { TypeCode = 1, UserName = "Don Smith"},
new { TypeCode = 1, UserName = "Mike Jones"},
new { TypeCode = 1, UserName = "James Ray"},
new { TypeCode = 2, UserName = "Tom Rizzo"},
new { TypeCode = 2, UserName = "Alex Homes"},
new { TypeCode = 3, UserName = "Andy Bates"}
};
var Columns = from i in Items
group i.UserName by i.TypeCode;
Dictionary<int, List<string>> Rows = new Dictionary<int, List<string>>();
int RowCount = Columns.Max(g => g.Count());
for (int i = 0; i <= RowCount; i++) // Row 0 is the header row.
{
Rows.Add(i, new List<string>());
}
int RowIndex;
foreach (IGrouping<int, string> c in Columns)
{
Rows[0].Add(c.Key.ToString());
RowIndex = 1;
foreach (string user in c)
{
Rows[RowIndex].Add(user);
RowIndex++;
}
for (int r = RowIndex; r <= Columns.Count(); r++)
{
Rows[r].Add(string.Empty);
}
}
foreach (List<string> row in Rows.Values)
{
Console.WriteLine(row.Aggregate((current, next) => current + " | " + next));
}
Console.ReadLine();
I also tested it with this input:
var Items = new[] {
new { TypeCode = 1, UserName = "Don Smith"},
new { TypeCode = 3, UserName = "Mike Jones"},
new { TypeCode = 3, UserName = "James Ray"},
new { TypeCode = 2, UserName = "Tom Rizzo"},
new { TypeCode = 2, UserName = "Alex Homes"},
new { TypeCode = 3, UserName = "Andy Bates"}
};
Which produced the following results showing that the first column doesn't need to contain the longest list. You could use OrderBy to get the columns ordered by TypeCode if needed.
1 | 3 | 2
Don Smith | Mike Jones | Tom Rizzo
| James Ray | Alex Homes
| Andy Bates |
#Sanjaya.Tio I was intrigued by your answer and created this adaptation which minimizes keySelector execution. (untested)
public static Dictionary<TKey1, Dictionary<TKey2, TValue>> Pivot3<TSource, TKey1, TKey2, TValue>(
this IEnumerable<TSource> source
, Func<TSource, TKey1> key1Selector
, Func<TSource, TKey2> key2Selector
, Func<IEnumerable<TSource>, TValue> aggregate)
{
var lookup = source.ToLookup(x => new {Key1 = key1Selector(x), Key2 = key2Selector(x)});
List<TKey1> key1s = lookup.Select(g => g.Key.Key1).Distinct().ToList();
List<TKey2> key2s = lookup.Select(g => g.Key.Key2).Distinct().ToList();
var resultQuery =
from key1 in key1s
from key2 in key2s
let lookupKey = new {Key1 = key1, Key2 = key2}
let g = lookup[lookupKey]
let resultValue = g.Any() ? aggregate(g) : default(TValue)
select new {Key1 = key1, Key2 = key2, ResultValue = resultValue};
Dictionary<TKey1, Dictionary<TKey2, TValue>> result = new Dictionary<TKey1, Dictionary<TKey2, TValue>>();
foreach(var resultItem in resultQuery)
{
TKey1 key1 = resultItem.Key1;
TKey2 key2 = resultItem.Key2;
TValue resultValue = resultItem.ResultValue;
if (!result.ContainsKey(key1))
{
result[key1] = new Dictionary<TKey2, TValue>();
}
var subDictionary = result[key1];
subDictionary[key2] = resultValue;
}
return result;
}
I have 2 objects (lists loaded from XML) report and database (showed bellow in code) and i should analyse them and mark items with 0, 1, 2, 3 according to some conditions
TransactionResultCode = 0; // SUCCESS (all fields are equivalents: [Id, AccountNumber, Date, Amount])
TransactionResultCode = 1; // Exists in report but Not in database
TransactionResultCode = 2; // Exists in database but Not in report
TransactionResultCode = 3; // Field [Id] are equals but other fields [AccountNumber, Date, Amount] are different.
I'll be happy if somebody could found time to suggest how to optimize some queries.
Bellow is the code:
THANK YOU!!!
//TransactionResultCode = 0 - SUCCESS
//JOIN on all fields
var result0 = from d in database
from r in report
where (d.TransactionId == r.MovementID) &&
(d.TransactionAccountNumber == long.Parse(r.AccountNumber)) &&
(d.TransactionDate == r.MovementDate) &&
(d.TransactionAmount == r.Amount)
orderby d.TransactionId
select new TransactionList()
{
TransactionId = d.TransactionId,
TransactionAccountNumber = d.TransactionAccountNumber,
TransactionDate = d.TransactionDate,
TransactionAmount = d.TransactionAmount,
TransactionResultCode = 0
};
//*******************************************
//JOIN on [Id] field
var joinedList = from d in database
from r in report
where d.TransactionId == r.MovementID
select new TransactionList()
{
TransactionId = d.TransactionId,
TransactionAccountNumber = d.TransactionAccountNumber,
TransactionDate = d.TransactionDate,
TransactionAmount = d.TransactionAmount
};
//Difference report - database
var onlyReportID = report.Select(r => r.MovementID).Except(joinedList.Select(d => d.TransactionId));
//TransactionResultCode = 1 - Not Found in database
var result1 = from o in onlyReportID
from r in report
where (o == r.MovementID)
orderby r.MovementID
select new TransactionList()
{
TransactionId = r.MovementID,
TransactionAccountNumber = long.Parse(r.AccountNumber),
TransactionDate = r.MovementDate,
TransactionAmount = r.Amount,
TransactionResultCode = 1
};
//*******************************************
//Difference database - report
var onlyDatabaseID = database.Select(d => d.TransactionId).Except(joinedList.Select(d => d.TransactionId));
//TransactionResultCode = 2 - Not Found in report
var result2 = from o in onlyDatabaseID
from d in database
where (o == d.TransactionId)
orderby d.TransactionId
select new TransactionList()
{
TransactionId = d.TransactionId,
TransactionAccountNumber = d.TransactionAccountNumber,
TransactionDate = d.TransactionDate,
TransactionAmount = d.TransactionAmount,
TransactionResultCode = 2
};
//*******************************************
var qwe = joinedList.Select(j => j.TransactionId).Except(result0.Select(r => r.TransactionId));
//TransactionResultCode = 3 - Transaction Results are different (Amount, AccountNumber, Date, )
var result3 = from j in joinedList
from q in qwe
where j.TransactionId == q
select new TransactionList()
{
TransactionId = j.TransactionId,
TransactionAccountNumber = j.TransactionAccountNumber,
TransactionDate = j.TransactionDate,
TransactionAmount = j.TransactionAmount,
TransactionResultCode = 3
};
you may try something like below:
public void Test()
{
var report = new[] {new Item(1, "foo", "boo"), new Item(2, "foo2", "boo2"), new Item(3, "foo3", "boo3")};
var dataBase = new[] {new Item(1, "foo", "boo"), new Item(2, "foo22", "boo2"), new Item(4, "txt", "rt")};
Func<Item, bool> inBothLists = (i) => report.Contains(i) && dataBase.Contains(i);
Func<IEnumerable<Item>, Item, bool> containsWithID = (e, i) => e.Select(_ => _.ID).Contains(i.ID);
Func<Item, int> getCode = i =>
{
if (inBothLists(i))
{
return 0;
}
if(containsWithID(report, i) && containsWithID(dataBase, i))
{
return 3;
}
if (report.Contains(i))
{
return 2;
}
else return 1;
};
var result = (from item in dataBase.Union(report) select new {Code = getCode(item), Item = item}).Distinct();
}
public class Item
{
// You need also to override Equals() and GetHashCode().. I omitted them to save space
public Item(int id, string text1, string text2)
{
ID = id;
Text1 = text1;
Text2 = text2;
}
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Text1 { get; set; }
public string Text2 { get; set; }
}
Note that you need to either implement Equals() for you items, or implement an IEqualityComparer<> and feed it to Contains() methods.