I am attempting to set up Plaid in my app, and am following the Quickstart guide for Node.js and Express. When I call the client.linkTokenCreate function I am getting a status 400 Bad Request response. I believe my code exactly matches the quickstart, and I am using sandbox mode, so I am unsure where I am going wrong.
const { Configuration, PlaidApi, PlaidEnvironments, Products, CountryCode } = require("plaid");
const configuration = new Configuration({
basePath: PlaidEnvironments[process.env.PLAID_ENV],
baseOptions: {
headers: {
"PLAID-CLIENT-ID": process.env.PLAID_CLIENT_ID,
"PLAID-SECRET": process.env.PLAID_SECRET,
},
},
});
console.log(configuration)
const client = new PlaidApi(configuration);
router.post("/create_link_token", async (req, res) => {
// Get the client_user_id by searching for the current user
// const user = await User.find(...);
// const clientUserId = user.id;
const request = {
user: {
// This should correspond to a unique id for the current user.
client_user_id: "test123",
},
client_name: "Name Of App",
products: [Products.Auth],
language: "en",
webhook: 'https://app.com',
country_codes: [CountryCode.Us],
};
try {
console.log("request",process.env.PLAID_CLIENT_ID,process.env.PLAID_SECRET)
const createTokenResponse = await client.linkTokenCreate(request);
console.log("createTokenResponse", createTokenResponse);
res.status(200).json(createTokenResponse);
} catch (error) {
console.log("error", error.message)
res.send(error.message)
}
});
Related
I use nextjs with elastic search cloud, also use amplify and lambda created from amplify rest api.
This is my function:
export async function getServerSideProps(context) {
let esItems;
try {
const { query } = context.query;
const apiName = 'APINAME';
const path = '/searchlist';
const myInit = {
response: true,
queryStringParameters: { query: query }
};
const response = await API.get(apiName, path, myInit);
esItems = response;
} catch (err) {
console.log(err)
}
return {
props: {
allProducts: esItems ? esItems.data.items : [],
}
};
}
I return 50 products from elastic and get this error:
502 ERROR
The request could not be satisfied.
The Lambda function returned invalid JSON: The JSON output is not parsable. We can't connect to the server for this app or website at this time. There might be too much traffic or a configuration error. Try again later, or contact the app or website owner.
If you provide content to customers through CloudFront, you can find steps to troubleshoot and help prevent this error by reviewing the CloudFront documentation.
This is lambda function:
app.get('/searchlist', async (req, res) => {
const { query } = req.query;
const client = new Client({
node: "https://elastic-cloud....",
auth: {
username: process.env.USERNAME,
password: process.env.PASSWORD
}
});
const searchQuery = {
query: {
multi_match: {
query: query,
type: "phrase",
fields: [
'manufacturerTypeDescription^8',
'manufacturerName^6',
'ean^4',
'_id^2',
]
}
}
}
const typeSearch = {
index: "product",
size: 50,
body: searchQuery
}
const r = await client.search(typeSearch);
const hits = r.body.hits;
const items = hits.hits.map((hit) => ({
_id: hit._id,
...hit._source,
}))
res.json({
success: 'get call succeed!',
items
});
});
I have records in strapi. I am using strapi content API. In my front-end, I need to display only 2 records randomly. For limiting, I have used limit query from content API. But random fetching what keyword I need to use. The official documentation doesn't provide any details regarding this - https://strapi.io/documentation/v3.x/content-api/parameters.html#available-operators
There's no official Strapi API parameter for random. You have to implement your own. Below is what I've done previously, using Strapi v3:
1 - Make a service function
File: api/mymodel/services/mymodel.js
This will contain our actual random query (SQL), and wrapping it in a service is handy because it can be used in many places (cron jobs, inside other models, etc).
module.exports = {
serviceGetRandom() {
return new Promise( (resolve, reject) => {
// There's a few ways to query data.
// This example uses Knex.
const knex = strapi.connections.default
let query = knex('mydatatable')
// Add more .select()'s if you want other fields
query.select('id')
// These rules enable us to get one random post
query.orderByRaw('RAND()')
query.limit(1)
// Initiate the query and do stuff
query
.then(record => {
console.log("getRandom() record: %O", record[0])
resolve(record[0])
})
.catch(error => {
reject(error)
})
})
}
}
2 - Use the service somewhere, like a controller:
File: api/mymodel/controllers/mymodel.js
module.exports = {
//(untested)
getRandom: async (ctx) => {
await strapi.services.mymodel.serviceGetRandom()
.then(output => {
console.log("getRandom output is %O", output.id)
ctx.send({
randomPost: output
}, 200)
})
.catch( () => {
ctx.send({
message: 'Oops! Some error message'
}, 204) // Place a proper error code here
})
}
}
3 - Create a route that points to this controller
File: api/mymodel/config/routes.json
...
{
"method": "GET",
"path": "/mymodelrandom",
"handler": "mymodel.getRandom",
"config": {
"policies": []
}
},
...
4 - In your front-end, access the route
(However you access your API)
e.g. ajax call to /api/mymodelrandom
There is no API parameter for getting a random result.
So: FrontEnd is the recommended solution for your question.
You need to create a random request range and then get some random item from this range.
function getRandomInt(max) {
return Math.floor(Math.random() * Math.floor(max));
}
const firstID = getRandomInt(restaurants.length);
const secondID = getRandomInt(3);
const query = qs.stringify({
id_in:[firstID,secondID ]
});
// request query should be something like GET /restaurants?id_in=3&id_in=6
One way you can do this reliably is by two steps:
Get the total number of records
Fetch the number of records using _start and _limit parameters
// Untested code but you get the idea
// Returns a random number between min (inclusive) and max (exclusive)
function getRandomArbitrary(min, max) {
return Math.random() * (max - min) + min;
}
const { data: totalNumberPosts } = await axios.get('/posts/count');
// Fetch 20 posts
const _limit = 20;
// We need to be sure that we are not fetching less than 20 posts
// e.g. we only have 40 posts. We generate a random number that is 30.
// then we would start on 30 and would only fetch 10 posts (because we only have 40)
const _start = getRandomArbitrary(0, totalNumberPosts - _limit);
const { data: randomPosts } = await axios.get('/posts', { params: { _limit, _start } })
The problem with this approach is that it requires two network requests but for my needs, this is not a problem.
This seem to work for me with Strapi v.4 REST API
Controller, Get 6 random entries
"use strict";
/**
* artwork controller
*/
const { createCoreController } = require("#strapi/strapi").factories;
module.exports = createCoreController("api::artwork.artwork", ({ strapi }) => {
const numberOfEntries = 6;
return {
async random(ctx) {
const entries = await strapi.entityService.findMany(
"api::artwork.artwork",
{
populate: ["image", "pageHeading", "seo", "socialMedia", "artist"],
}
);
const randomEntries = [...entries].sort(() => 0.5 - Math.random());
ctx.body = randomEntries.slice(0, numberOfEntries);
},
};
});
Route
random.js
"use strict";
module.exports = {
routes: [
{
method: "GET",
path: "/artwork/random",
handler: "artwork.random",
config: {
auth: false,
},
},
],
};
API
http://localhost:1337/api/artwork/random
To match default data structure of Strapi
"use strict";
/**
* artwork controller
*/
const { createCoreController } = require("#strapi/strapi").factories;
module.exports = createCoreController("api::artwork.artwork", ({ strapi }) => {
const numberOfEntries = 6;
return {
async random(ctx) {
const entries = await strapi.entityService.findMany(
"api::artwork.artwork",
{
populate: ["image", "pageHeading", "seo", "socialMedia", "artist"],
}
);
const randomEntries = [...entries]
.sort(() => 0.5 - Math.random())
.slice(0, numberOfEntries);
const structureRandomEntries = {
data: randomEntries.map((entry) => {
return {
id: entry.id,
attributes: entry,
};
}),
};
ctx.body = structureRandomEntries;
},
};
});
There is also a random sort plugin.
https://www.npmjs.com/package/strapi-plugin-random-sort
This seem to work for me with Strapi v4.3.8 and graphql
src/index.js
"use strict";
module.exports = {
register({ strapi }) {
const extensionService = strapi.service("plugin::graphql.extension");
const extension = ({ strapi }) => ({
typeDefs: `
type Query {
randomTestimonial: Testimonial
}
`,
resolvers: {
Query: {
randomTestimonial: async (parent, args) => {
const entries = await strapi.entityService.findMany(
"api::testimonial.testimonial"
);
const sanitizedRandomEntry =
entries[Math.floor(Math.random() * entries.length)];
return sanitizedRandomEntry;
},
},
},
resolversConfig: {
"Query.randomTestimonial": {
auth: false,
},
},
});
extensionService.use(extension);
},
bootstrap({ strapi }) {},
};
graphql query:
query GetRandomTestimonial {
randomTestimonial {
__typename
name
position
location
description
}
}
generate random testimonial on route change/refresh
https://jungspooner.com/biography
Trying to follow the samples from https://github.com/Azure/ms-rest-nodeauth
When passing authresponse to a client to generate a client to ping resources, I end up getting:
Error: credentials argument needs to implement signRequest method
I am trying to read through the documents to see if I need to sign the token's I am getting back from the SDK/Azure AD, but the documentation for the new SDK doesnt show anything
Figured it out, have to call .credentials on the authresponse
Adding the code, using #azure/arm-billing, in case the full code file is helpful.
// auth.json
// Create auth file with Azure CLI:`az ad sp create-for-rbac --sdk-auth > auth.json`
{
"clientId": "",
"clientSecret": "",
"subscriptionId": "",
"tenantId": "",
"activeDirectoryEndpointUrl": "https://login.microsoftonline.com",
"resourceManagerEndpointUrl": "https://management.azure.com/",
"activeDirectoryGraphResourceId": "https://graph.windows.net/",
"sqlManagementEndpointUrl": "https://management.core.windows.net:8443/",
"galleryEndpointUrl": "https://gallery.azure.com/",
"managementEndpointUrl": "https://management.core.windows.net/"
}
// index.js
const msRest = require("#azure/ms-rest-js");
const msRestAzure = require("#azure/ms-rest-azure-js");
const msRestNodeAuth = require("#azure/ms-rest-nodeauth");
const armBilling = require("#azure/arm-billing");
const path = require('path');
// list billing information
const lists = async (client) => {
try {
let lists = [];
const enrollmentAccounts = await client.enrollmentAccounts.list();
lists.push(enrollmentAccounts);
const billingPeriods = await client.billingPeriods.list();
lists.push(billingPeriods);
const invoices = await client.invoices.list();
lists.push(invoices);
return lists;
} catch (err) {
console.log(err);
throw (err);
}
}
// sample auth file created from Azure CLI - removed PII
const authenticationFile = path.join(__dirname, "./auth.json");
const options = {
filePath: authenticationFile
};
// get subscriptionId from auth file
const subscriptionIdFromAuthFile = require('./auth.json').subscriptionId;
// authenticate and getting billing information
msRestNodeAuth.loginWithAuthFileWithAuthResponse(options).then(async (response) => {
console.log("authenticated");
// --- CHANGE response parameter to -> response.credentials
const client = new armBilling.BillingManagementClient(response.credentials, subscriptionIdFromAuthFile);
console.log("client created");
const results = await lists(client);
console.log(`The result is:${JSON.stringify(results)}`);
}).catch((err) => {
console.error(err);
});
We have implemented schema stitching where GraphQL server fetches schema from two remote servers and stitches them together. Everything was working fine when we were only working with Query and Mutations, but now we have a use-case where we even need to stitch Subscriptions and remote schema has auth implemented over it.
We are having a hard time figuring out on how to pass authorization token received in connectionParams from client to remote server via the gateway.
This is how we are introspecting schema:
API Gateway code:
const getLink = async(): Promise<ApolloLink> => {
const http = new HttpLink({uri: process.env.GRAPHQL_ENDPOINT, fetch:fetch})
const link = setContext((request, previousContext) => {
if (previousContext
&& previousContext.graphqlContext
&& previousContext.graphqlContext.request
&& previousContext.graphqlContext.request.headers
&& previousContext.graphqlContext.request.headers.authorization) {
const authorization = previousContext.graphqlContext.request.headers.authorization;
return {
headers: {
authorization
}
}
}
else {
return {};
}
}).concat(http);
const wsLink: any = new WebSocketLink(new SubscriptionClient(process.env.REMOTE_GRAPHQL_WS_ENDPOINT, {
reconnect: true,
// There is no way to update connectionParams dynamically without resetting connection
// connectionParams: () => {
// return { Authorization: wsAuthorization }
// }
}, ws));
// Following does not work
const wsLinkContext = setContext((request, previousContext) => {
let authToken = previousContext.graphqlContext.connection && previousContext.graphqlContext.connection.context ? previousContext.graphqlContext.connection.context.Authorization : null
return {
context: {
Authorization: authToken
}
}
}).concat(<any>wsLink);
const url = split(({query}) => {
const {kind, operation} = <any>getMainDefinition(<any>query);
return kind === 'OperationDefinition' && operation === 'subscription'
},
wsLinkContext,
link)
return url;
}
const getSchema = async (): Promise < GraphQLSchema > => {
const link = await getLink();
return makeRemoteExecutableSchema({
schema: await introspectSchema(link),
link,
});
}
const linkSchema = `
extend type UserPayload {
user: User
}
`;
const schema: any = mergeSchemas({
schemas: [linkSchema, getSchema],
});
const server = new GraphQLServer({
schema: schema,
context: req => ({
...req,
})
});
Is there any way for achieving this using graphql-tools? Any help appreciated.
I have one working solution: the idea is to not create one instance of SubscriptionClient for the whole application. Instead, I'm creating the clients for each connection to the proxy server:
server.start({
port: 4000,
subscriptions: {
onConnect: (connectionParams, websocket, context) => {
return {
subscriptionClients: {
messageService: new SubscriptionClient(process.env.MESSAGE_SERVICE_SUBSCRIPTION_URL, {
connectionParams,
reconnect: true,
}, ws)
}
};
},
onDisconnect: async (websocket, context) => {
const params = await context.initPromise;
const { subscriptionClients } = params;
for (const key in subscriptionClients) {
subscriptionClients[key].close();
}
}
}
}, (options) => console.log('Server is running on http://localhost:4000'))
if you would have more remote schemas you would just create more instances of SubscriptionClient in the subscriptionClients map.
To use those clients in the remote schema you need to do two things:
expose them in the context:
const server = new GraphQLServer({
schema,
context: ({ connection }) => {
if (connection && connection.context) {
return connection.context;
}
}
});
use custom link implementation instead of WsLink
(operation, forward) => {
const context = operation.getContext();
const { graphqlContext: { subscriptionClients } } = context;
return subscriptionClients && subscriptionClients[clientName] && subscriptionClients[clientName].request(operation);
};
In this way, the whole connection params will be passed to the remote server.
The whole example can be found here: https://gist.github.com/josephktcheung/cd1b65b321736a520ae9d822ae5a951b
Disclaimer:
The code is not mine, as #josephktcheung outrun me with providing an example. I just helped with it a little. Here is the original discussion: https://github.com/apollographql/graphql-tools/issues/864
This is a working example of remote schema with subscription by webscoket and query and mutation by http. It can be secured by custom headers(params) and shown in this example.
Flow
Client request
-> context is created by reading req or connection(jwt is decoded and create user object in the context)
-> remote schema is executed
-> link is called
-> link is splitted by operation(wsLink for subscription, httpLink for queries and mutations)
-> wsLink or httpLink access to context created above (=graphqlContext)
-> wsLink or httpLink use context to created headers(authorization header with signed jwt in this example) for remote schema.
-> "subscription" or "query or mutation" are forwarded to remote server.
Note
Currently, ContextLink does not have any effect on WebsocketLink. So, instead of concat, we should create raw ApolloLink.
When creating context, checkout connection, not only req. The former will be available if the request is websocket, and it contains meta information user sends, like an auth token.
HttpLink expects global fetch with standard spec. Thus, do not use node-fetch, whose spec is incompatible (especially with typescript). Instead, use cross-fetch.
const wsLink = new ApolloLink(operation => {
// This is your context!
const context = operation.getContext().graphqlContext
// Create a new websocket link per request
return new WebSocketLink({
uri: "<YOUR_URI>",
options: {
reconnect: true,
connectionParams: { // give custom params to your websocket backend (e.g. to handle auth)
headers: {
authorization: jwt.sign(context.user, process.env.SUPER_SECRET),
foo: 'bar'
}
},
},
webSocketImpl: ws,
}).request(operation)
// Instead of using `forward()` of Apollo link, we directly use websocketLink's request method
})
const httpLink = setContext((_graphqlRequest, { graphqlContext }) => {
return {
headers: {
authorization: jwt.sign(graphqlContext.user, process.env.SUPER_SECRET),
},
}
}).concat(new HttpLink({
uri,
fetch,
}))
const link = split(
operation => {
const definition = getMainDefinition(operation.query)
return (
definition.kind === 'OperationDefinition' &&
definition.operation === 'subscription'
)
},
wsLink, // <-- Executed if above function returns true
httpLink, // <-- Executed if above function returns false
)
const schema = await introspectSchema(link)
const executableSchema = makeRemoteExecutableSchema({
schema,
link,
})
const server = new ApolloServer({
schema: mergeSchemas([ executableSchema, /* ...anotherschemas */]),
context: ({ req, connection }) => {
let authorization;
if (req) { // when query or mutation is requested by http
authorization = req.headers.authorization
} else if (connection) { // when subscription is requested by websocket
authorization = connection.context.authorization
}
const token = authorization.replace('Bearer ', '')
return {
user: getUserFromToken(token),
}
},
})
I understand how to set the context object when creating a GraphQL server e.g.
const app = express();
app.use(GRAPHQL_URL, graphqlExpress({
schema,
context: {
foo: 'bar'
},
}));
so that the context object is passed to my resolvers when handling an incoming request.
However I'm not seeing this context object when the resolvers are triggered by a subscription (i.e. a client subscribes to a GraphQL subscription, and defines the shape of the data to be sent to them when the subscription fires); in that case the context appears to be an empty Object.
Is there way to ensure that my context object is set correctly when resolvers are called following a PubSub.publish() call?
I guess you are using the package subscription-transport-ws. In that case it is possible to add a context value in different execution steps.
See API. Two possible scenarios
If you have some kind of authentication. You could add a viewer in the context at the onConnect execution step. This is done at the first connection to the websocket and wont change until the connection is closed and opened again. See example.
If you want to add a context more dynamically you can add a kind of middleware before the execute step.It could look like this:
const middleware = (args) => new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
const [schema, document, root, context, variables, operation] = args;
context.foo = "bar"; // add something to context
resolve(args);
})
subscriptionServer = SubscriptionServer.create({
schema: executable.schema,
subscribe,
execute: (...args) => middleware(args).then(args => {
return execute(...args);
})
}, {
server: websocketServer,
path: "/graphql",
}, );
Here is my solution:
You can pass the context and do the authentication for graphql subscription(WebSocket )like this:
const server = new ApolloServer({
typeDefs,
resolvers,
context: contextFunction,
introspection: true,
subscriptions: {
onConnect: (
connectionParams: IWebSocketConnectionParams,
webSocket: WebSocket,
connectionContext: ConnectionContext,
) => {
console.log('websocket connect');
console.log('connectionParams: ', connectionParams);
if (connectionParams.token) {
const token: string = validateToken(connectionParams.token);
const userConnector = new UserConnector<IMemoryDB>(memoryDB);
let user: IUser | undefined;
try {
const userType: UserType = UserType[token];
user = userConnector.findUserByUserType(userType);
} catch (error) {
throw error;
}
const context: ISubscriptionContext = {
// pubsub: postgresPubSub,
pubsub,
subscribeUser: user,
userConnector,
locationConnector: new LocationConnector<IMemoryDB>(memoryDB),
};
return context;
}
throw new Error('Missing auth token!');
},
onDisconnect: (webSocket: WebSocket, connectionContext: ConnectionContext) => {
console.log('websocket disconnect');
},
},
});
You can pass the context argument of resolver using pubsub.publish method in your resolver like this:
addTemplate: (
__,
{ templateInput },
{ templateConnector, userConnector, requestingUser }: IAppContext,
): Omit<ICommonResponse, 'payload'> | undefined => {
if (userConnector.isAuthrized(requestingUser)) {
const commonResponse: ICommonResponse = templateConnector.add(templateInput);
if (commonResponse.payload) {
const payload = {
data: commonResponse.payload,
context: {
requestingUser,
},
};
templateConnector.publish(payload);
}
return _.omit(commonResponse, 'payload');
}
},
Now, we can get the http request context and subscription(websocket) context in
your Subscription resolver subscribe method like this:
Subscription: {
templateAdded: {
resolve: (
payload: ISubscriptionPayload<ITemplate, Pick<IAppContext, 'requestingUser'>>,
args: any,
subscriptionContext: ISubscriptionContext,
info: any,
): ITemplate => {
return payload.data;
},
subscribe: withFilter(templateIterator, templateFilter),
},
},
async function templateFilter(
payload?: ISubscriptionPayload<ITemplate, Pick<IAppContext, 'requestingUser'>>,
args?: any,
subscriptionContext?: ISubscriptionContext,
info?: any,
): Promise<boolean> {
console.count('templateFilter');
const NOTIFY: boolean = true;
const DONT_NOTIFY: boolean = false;
if (!payload || !subscriptionContext) {
return DONT_NOTIFY;
}
const { userConnector, locationConnector } = subscriptionContext;
const { data: template, context } = payload;
if (!subscriptionContext.subscribeUser || !context.requestingUser) {
return DONT_NOTIFY;
}
let results: IUser[];
try {
results = await Promise.all([
userConnector.findByEmail(subscriptionContext.subscribeUser.email),
userConnector.findByEmail(context.requestingUser.email),
]);
} catch (error) {
console.error(error);
return DONT_NOTIFY;
}
//...
return true;
}
As you can see, now we get the subscribe users(who establish the WebSocket connection with graphql webserver) and HTTP request user(who send the mutation to graphql webserver) from subscriptionContext and HTTP request context.
Then you can do the rest works if the return value of templateFilter function is truthy, then WebSocket will push message to subscribe user with payload.data, otherwise, it won't.
This templateFilter function will be executed multiple times depending on the count of subscribing users which means it's iterable. Now you get each subscribe user in this function and does your business logic to decide if push WebSocket message to the subscribe users(client-side) or not.
See github example repo
Articles:
GraphQL Subscription part 1
GraphQL Subscription part 2
If you're using Apollo v3, and graphql-ws, here's a docs-inspired way to achieve context resolution:
const wsContext = async (ctx, msg, args) => {
const token = ctx.connectionParams.authorization;
const currentUser = await findUser(token);
if(!currentUser) throw Error("wrong user token");
return { currentUser, foo: 'bar' };
};
useServer(
{
schema,
context: wsContext,
}
wsServer,
);
You could use it like so in your Apollo React client:
import { GraphQLWsLink } from '#apollo/client/link/subscriptions';
import { createClient } from 'graphql-ws';
const wsLink = new GraphQLWsLink(createClient({
url: 'ws://localhost:4000/subscriptions',
connectionParams: {
authorization: user.authToken,
},
}));