How to mock graphql subscription in cypress using mock-socket library? - graphql

I am trying to use mock-sockets with Cypress, to mock graphql subscription.
I tried this code but it doesn’t work with Apollo Client because Apollo use ‘WebSocketLink’ instead of 'WebSocket'.
import {
Server,
WebSocket,
} from 'mock-socket';
it('test', () => {
cy.visit('/', {onBeforeLoad(window) {
cy.stub(window, 'WebSocket', url => {
if (mockServer) {
mockServer.stop();
}
mockServer = new Server(url);
mockServer.on('connection', socket => {
mockSocket = socket;
});
mockSocket = new WebSocket(url);
return mockSocket;
});
My question is what is the object of ‘WebSocketLink’ that I need to stub (instead of window)? Or, is there another way to mock graphql web socket?

Related

How to inject CacheManager inside Websocket Adapter in Nest JS?

I want to ask for an advice.
In my Nest application, I store all sessions in Redis Database. And I have CacheModule that works with redis so I am able to manually check sessions in DB.
I need to inject CacheModule in WebsocketAdapter class, cause I need to validate sessiondId inside cookie with existing session in my Redis cache.
Here is current version of the WebsocetAdapter class. For now I just decided to tag socket with sessionId and validate it later, but it is not what I want.
export class WebsocketAdapter extends IoAdapter {
createIOServer(port: number, options?: any) {
const server = super.createIOServer(port, options);
server.use(async (socket: AuthenticatedSocket, next) => {
const { cookie: clientCookie } = socket.handshake.headers;
if (!clientCookie) return next(new Error('Не аутентифицирован. Запрос без cookie'));
const { ['connect.sid']: sessionId } = cookie.parse(clientCookie);
if (!sessionId) return next(new Error('Запрос без sessionId'));
socket.user = sessionId;
next();
});
return server;
}
}
I cannot inject CacheModule with constructor, since I extended IoAdapter class and applying WebsocketAdapter like this:
async function bootstrap() {
const app = await NestFactory.create(AppModule);
app.enableCors({ credentials: true, origin: true });
const adapter = new WebsocketAdapter(app);
app.useWebSocketAdapter(adapter);
await app.listen(9001);
}
Maybe, I shall apply this adapter as a Middleware to websocket route, but I don't know how to do this.
Can you help me out with this?

How to set up a socket connection on a strapi server

I am trying to integrate socket.io with strapi. But unfortunately I have been unable to do so without any proper tutorial or documentation covering this aspect.
I followed along with the only resource I found online which is:
https://medium.com/strapi/strapi-socket-io-a9c856e915a6
But I think the article is outdated. I can't seem to run the code mentioned in it without running into tonnes of errors.
Below is my attempt to implement it and I have been trying to connect it through a chrome websocket plugin smart websocket client But I am not getting any response when I try to run the server.
I'm totally in the dark. Any help will be appreciated
module.exports = ()=> {
// import socket io
var io = require('socket.io')(strapi.server)
console.log(strapi.server) //undefined
// listen for user connection
io.on('connect', socket => {
socket.send('Hello!');
console.log("idit")
// or with emit() and custom event names
socket.emit('greetings', 'Hey!', { 'ms': 'jane' }, Buffer.from([4, 3, 3, 1]));
// handle the event sent with socket.send()
socket.on('message', (data) => {
console.log(data);
});
// handle the event sent with socket.emit()
socket.on('salutations', (elem1, elem2, elem3) => {
console.log(elem1, elem2, elem3);
});
});
};
So I found the solution. Yay. I'll put it here just in case anybody needs it.
boostrap.js
module.exports = async () => {
process.nextTick(() =>{
var io = require('socket.io')(strapi.server);
io.on('connection', async function(socket) {
console.log(`a user connected`)
// send message on user connection
socket.emit('hello', JSON.stringify({message: await strapi.services.profile.update({"posted_by"})}));
// listen for user diconnect
socket.on('disconnect', () =>{
console.log('a user disconnected')
});
});
strapi.io = io; // register socket io inside strapi main object to use it globally anywhere
})
};
Found this at: https://github.com/strapi/strapi/issues/5869#issuecomment-619508153_
Apparently, socket.server is not available when the server starts. So you have to make use of process.nextTick that waits for the socket.server to initialize.
I'll also add a few questions that I faced when setting this up.
How do i connect from an external client like nuxt,vue or react?
You just have to connect through "http://localhost:1337" that is my usual address for strapi.
I am using nuxt as my client side and this is how set up my socketio on the client side
I first installed nuxt-socket-io through npm
Edited the nuxt.config file as per it's documention
modules:[
...
'nuxt-socket-io',
...
],
io: {
// module options
sockets: [
{
name: 'main',
url: 'http://localhost:1337',
},
],
},
And then i finally added a listener in one of my pages.
created() {
this.socket = this.$nuxtSocket({})
this.socket.on('hello', (msg, cb) => {
console.log('SOCKET HI')
console.log(msg)
})
},
And it works.
A clean way to integrate third-party services into Strapi is to use hooks. They are loaded once during the server boot. In this case, we will create a local hook.
The following example has worked with strapi#3.6.
Create a hook for socket.io at ./hooks/socket.io/index.js
module.exports = strapi => {
return {
async initialize() {
const ioServer = require('socket.io')(strapi.server, {
cors: {
origin: process.env['FRONT_APP_URL'],
methods: ['GET', 'POST'],
/* ...other cors options */
}
})
ioServer.on('connection', function(socket) {
socket.emit('hello', `Welcome ${socket.id}`)
})
/* HANDLE CLIENT SOCKET LOGIC HERE */
// store the server.io instance to global var to use elsewhere
strapi.services.ioServer = ioServer
},
}
}
Enable the new hook in order for Strapi to load it - ./config/hook.js
module.exports = {
settings: {
'socket.io': {
enabled: true,
},
},
};
That's done. You can access the websocket server inside ./config/functions/bootstrap.js or models' lifecycle hooks.
// ./api/employee/models/employee.js
module.exports = {
lifecycles: {
async afterUpdate(result, params, data) {
strapi.services.ioServer.emit('update:employee', result)
},
},
};
For those who are looking the answer using Strapi version 4
var io = require("socket.io")(strapi.server.httpServer)

Using Cypress with `mock-sockets`

I am trying to use mock-sockets with Cypress, setting up the mock in the onBeforeLoad hook for cy.visit() in my beforeEach block. I can get one test to work but when the mock setup runs on the next beforeEach I get an error that A mock server is already listening on this url.
code under test:
(called from my React app's componentDidiMount)
subscribeToSettings(url: string): W3CWebSocket {
let settingsSubscription = new W3CWebSocket(url);
settingsSubscription.onopen = () => console.log('WebSocket Client Connected (settings)');
settingsSubscription.onclose = () => console.log('WebSocket Client Disconnected (settings)');
settingsSubscription.onmessage = (message: MessageEvent) => this.handleSettingsMessage(message);
return settingsSubscription;
}
/**
* Handler for websocket settings messages, which updates the local settings values.
* #param message the websocket message
*/
handleSettingsMessage(message: MessageEvent) {
const updatedValues = JSON.parse(message.data);
console.log('A message was received on the settings channel.', updatedValues);
this.props.updateSettingsFromBackend(updatedValues);
}
cypress tests
import { Server } from 'mock-socket'
import { defaultSettingsState } from "../../src/reducers/settings.reducer";
import { _createSettingsApiPutPayload } from "../../src/actions/settings.actions";
describe('mock socket method 1', () => {
let mockSocket;
let mockServer;
beforeEach(() => {
cy.visit('/', {
onBeforeLoad(win: Window): void {
// #ts-ignore
cy.stub(win, 'WebSocket', url => {
mockServer = new Server(url)
mockServer.on('connection', socket => {
console.log('mock socket connected');
mockSocket = socket;
});
mockSocket = new WebSocket(url);
return mockSocket
});
},
});
});
afterEach(() => {
mockSocket.close()
mockServer.stop()
});
it('gets a message', () => {
cy.contains('SETTINGS').click()
const object = _createSettingsApiPutPayload(defaultSettingsState)
mockSocket.send(JSON.stringify(object));
cy.contains('Motion threshold')
});
it('gets another message', () => {
cy.contains('SETTINGS').click()
const object = _createSettingsApiPutPayload(defaultSettingsState)
mockSocket.send(JSON.stringify(object));
cy.contains('Motion threshold')
});
});
Here are the logs from my console:
WebSocket Client Connected (settings)
mock socket connected at url ws://localhost:8702/PM_Settings
A message was received on the settings channel. {…}
mock socket connected at url ws://localhost:3000/sockjs-node/949/mhuyekl3/websocket
The development server has disconnected.
Refresh the page if necessary.
Uncaught Error: A mock server is already listening on this url
I wonder if it has to do with that second call which is for some mystery url.
(Note: calling cy.contains('SETTINGS').click() at the end of beforeEach somehow doesn't work, even in that first test. Even when I have my app set to start on the settings page (instead of having to click to it from inside the tests), clicking on SETTINGS from beforeEach still doesn't work even though we're already there. So that's kind of weird)
These cypress logs may also be helpful:
It only worked for me, when I moved server stopping into WebSocket stub:
cy.stub(window, 'WebSocket', url => {
if (mockServer) {
mockServer.stop();
}
mockServer = new Server(url);
mockServer.on('connection', socket => {
mockSocket = socket;
});
mockSocket = new WebSocket(url);
return mockSocket;
});
Im probably wrong, but I guess afterEach or mockServer.stop(); is async thats why mock server fails to stop before new init

How to send the result of graphql query as a file?

I am implementing a graphQL server using Apollo server. I want to send the response of the queries as a text file instead of JSON response. Can anyone help me how to do it in Apollo server.I am using NodeJS for server implementation.
If you would like to use Apollo Server instead of the vanilla graphql library, try adding a plugin into plugins config:
const server = new ApolloServer({
typeDefs,
resolvers,
// You can import plugins or define them in-line, as shown:
plugins: [
{
requestWillStart(reqCtx) {
return {
willSendResponse(ctx) {
ctx.response.http.headers.set('Content-Disposition', 'attachment; filename=result.json');
}
}
}
}
],
})
Reference: https://www.apollographql.com/docs/apollo-server/integrations/plugins/#willsendresponse
For sending File with app Express js :
app.get('/URL', (req, res) => res.download('./yourFile.txt'))
And to write your graphql query result to yourFile.txt
var fs = require("fs");
var data = "your_data_graphql";
fs.writeFile("temp.txt", data, (err) => {
if (err) console.log(err);
console.log("Successfully Written to File.");
});

GraphQL subscription using server-sent events & EventSource

I'm looking into implementing a "subscription" type using server-sent events as the backing api.
What I'm struggling with is the interface, to be more precise, the http layer of such operation.
The problem:
Using the native EventSource does not support:
Specifying an HTTP method, "GET" is used by default.
Including a payload (The GraphQL query)
While #1 is irrefutable, #2 can be circumvented using query parameters.
Query parameters have a limit of ~2000 chars (can be debated)
which makes relying solely on them feels too fragile.
The solution I'm thinking of is to create a dedicated end-point for each possible event.
For example: A URI for an event representing a completed transaction between parties:
/graphql/transaction-status/$ID
Will translate to this query in the server:
subscription TransactionStatusSubscription {
status(id: $ID) {
ready
}
}
The issues with this approach is:
Creating a handler for each URI-to-GraphQL translation is to be added.
Deploy a new version of the server
Loss of the flexibility offered by GraphQL -> The client should control the query
Keep track of all the end-points in the code base (back-end, front-end, mobile)
There are probably more issues I'm missing.
Is there perhaps a better approach that you can think of?
One the would allow a better approach at providing the request payload using EventSource?
Subscriptions in GraphQL are normally implemented using WebSockets, not SSE. Both Apollo and Relay support using subscriptions-transport-ws client-side to listen for events. Apollo Server includes built-in support for subscriptions using WebSockets. If you're just trying to implement subscriptions, it would be better to utilize one of these existing solutions.
That said, there's a library for utilizing SSE for subscriptions here. It doesn't look like it's maintained anymore, but you can poke around the source code to get some ideas if you're bent on trying to get SSE to work. Looking at the source, it looks like the author got around the limitations you mention above by initializing each subscription with a POST request that returns a subscription id.
As of now you have multiple Packages for GraphQL subscription over SSE.
graphql-sse
Provides both client and server for using GraphQL subscription over SSE. This package has a dedicated handler for subscription.
Here is an example usage with express.
import express from 'express'; // yarn add express
import { createHandler } from 'graphql-sse';
// Create the GraphQL over SSE handler
const handler = createHandler({ schema });
// Create an express app serving all methods on `/graphql/stream`
const app = express();
app.use('/graphql/stream', handler);
app.listen(4000);
console.log('Listening to port 4000');
#graphql-sse/server
Provides a server handler for GraphQL subscription. However, the HTTP handling is up to u depending of the framework you use.
Disclaimer: I am the author of the #graphql-sse packages
Here is an example with express.
import express, { RequestHandler } from "express";
import {
getGraphQLParameters,
processSubscription,
} from "#graphql-sse/server";
import { schema } from "./schema";
const app = express();
app.use(express.json());
app.post(path, async (req, res, next) => {
const request = {
body: req.body,
headers: req.headers,
method: req.method,
query: req.query,
};
const { operationName, query, variables } = getGraphQLParameters(request);
if (!query) {
return next();
}
const result = await processSubscription({
operationName,
query,
variables,
request: req,
schema,
});
if (result.type === RESULT_TYPE.NOT_SUBSCRIPTION) {
return next();
} else if (result.type === RESULT_TYPE.ERROR) {
result.headers.forEach(({ name, value }) => res.setHeader(name, value));
res.status(result.status);
res.json(result.payload);
} else if (result.type === RESULT_TYPE.EVENT_STREAM) {
res.writeHead(200, {
'Content-Type': 'text/event-stream',
Connection: 'keep-alive',
'Cache-Control': 'no-cache',
});
result.subscribe((data) => {
res.write(`data: ${JSON.stringify(data)}\n\n`);
});
req.on('close', () => {
result.unsubscribe();
});
}
});
Clients
The two packages mentioned above have companion clients. Because of the limitation of the EventSource API, both packages implement a custom client that provides options for sending HTTP Headers, payload with post, what the EvenSource API does not support. The graphql-sse comes together with it client while the #graphql-sse/server has companion clients in a separate packages.
graphql-sse client example
import { createClient } from 'graphql-sse';
const client = createClient({
// singleConnection: true, use "single connection mode" instead of the default "distinct connection mode"
url: 'http://localhost:4000/graphql/stream',
});
// query
const result = await new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
let result;
client.subscribe(
{
query: '{ hello }',
},
{
next: (data) => (result = data),
error: reject,
complete: () => resolve(result),
},
);
});
// subscription
const onNext = () => {
/* handle incoming values */
};
let unsubscribe = () => {
/* complete the subscription */
};
await new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
unsubscribe = client.subscribe(
{
query: 'subscription { greetings }',
},
{
next: onNext,
error: reject,
complete: resolve,
},
);
});
;
#graphql-sse/client
A companion of the #graphql-sse/server.
Example
import {
SubscriptionClient,
SubscriptionClientOptions,
} from '#graphql-sse/client';
const subscriptionClient = SubscriptionClient.create({
graphQlSubscriptionUrl: 'http://some.host/graphl/subscriptions'
});
const subscription = subscriptionClient.subscribe(
{
query: 'subscription { greetings }',
}
)
const onNext = () => {
/* handle incoming values */
};
const onError = () => {
/* handle incoming errors */
};
subscription.susbscribe(onNext, onError)
#gaphql-sse/apollo-client
A companion package of the #graph-sse/server package for Apollo Client.
import { split, HttpLink, ApolloClient, InMemoryCache } from '#apollo/client';
import { getMainDefinition } from '#apollo/client/utilities';
import { ServerSentEventsLink } from '#graphql-sse/apollo-client';
const httpLink = new HttpLink({
uri: 'http://localhost:4000/graphql',
});
const sseLink = new ServerSentEventsLink({
graphQlSubscriptionUrl: 'http://localhost:4000/graphql',
});
const splitLink = split(
({ query }) => {
const definition = getMainDefinition(query);
return (
definition.kind === 'OperationDefinition' &&
definition.operation === 'subscription'
);
},
sseLink,
httpLink
);
export const client = new ApolloClient({
link: splitLink,
cache: new InMemoryCache(),
});
If you're using Apollo, they support automatic persisted queries (abbreviated APQ in the docs). If you're not using Apollo, the implementation shouldn't be too bad in any language. I'd recommend following their conventions just so your clients can use Apollo if they want.
The first time any client makes an EventSource request with a hash of the query, it'll fail, then retry the request with the full payload to a regular GraphQL endpoint. If APQ is enabled on the server, subsequent GET requests from all clients with query parameters will execute as planned.
Once you've solved that problem, you just have to make a server-sent events transport for GraphQL (should be easy considering the subscribe function just returns an AsyncIterator)
I'm looking into doing this at my company because some frontend developers like how easy EventSource is to deal with.
There are two things at play here: the SSE connection and the GraphQL endpoint. The endpoint has a spec to follow, so just returning SSE from a subscription request is not done and needs a GET request anyway. So the two have to be separate.
How about letting the client open an SSE channel via /graphql-sse, which creates a channel token. Using this token the client can then request subscriptions and the events will arrive via the chosen channel.
The token could be sent as the first event on the SSE channel, and to pass the token to the query, it can be provided by the client in a cookie, a request header or even an unused query variable.
Alternatively, the server can store the last opened channel in session storage (limiting the client to a single channel).
If no channel is found, the query fails. If the channel closes, the client can open it again, and either pass the token in the query string/cookie/header or let the session storage handle it.

Resources