What does the syntax of the following cast to an object Page of struct WHISPERPACKET mean
typedef struct
{
unsigned char uchData[512];
unsigned char uchType;
unsigned char uchInfo;
unsigned short unSampleRate;
unsigned short unSamples;
}WHISPERPACKET;
typedef unsigned char BYTE;
WHISPERPACKET Page;
PageBuffer = (BYTE*)&Page;
edit:
BYTE* PageBuffer;
Related
I m trying to understand what the purpose of SKCIPHER_REQUEST_ON_STACK is.
I see it being used for encrypt/decrypt operations in the kernel.
I understand it is a compiler directive and will trigger FRAME_WARN warnings.
I do not understand the macro which looks like so -
#define SKCIPHER_REQUEST_ON_STACK(name, tfm) \
char __##name##_desc[sizeof(struct skcipher_request) + \
crypto_skcipher_reqsize(tfm)] CRYPTO_MINALIGN_ATTR; \
struct skcipher_request *name = (void *)__##name##_desc`
with "CRYPTO_MINALIGN_ATTR" defined as
struct crypto_alg {
struct list_head cra_list;
struct list_head cra_users;
u32 cra_flags;
unsigned int cra_blocksize;
unsigned int cra_ctxsize;
unsigned int cra_alignmask;
int cra_priority;
atomic_t cra_refcnt;
char cra_name[CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME];
char cra_driver_name[CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME];
const struct crypto_type *cra_type;
union {
struct ablkcipher_alg ablkcipher;
struct blkcipher_alg blkcipher;
struct cipher_alg cipher;
struct compress_alg compress;
} cra_u;
int (*cra_init)(struct crypto_tfm *tfm);
void (*cra_exit)(struct crypto_tfm *tfm);
void (*cra_destroy)(struct crypto_alg *alg);
struct module *cra_module;
} CRYPTO_MINALIGN_ATTR;
Websource.hpp
#ifndef WEBSOURCE_HPP
#define WEBSOURCE_HPP
#pragma once
class Colour
{
public:
unsigned char _ucRed;
unsigned char _ucGreen;
unsigned char _ucBlue;
Colour(unsigned char i_red, unsigned char i_green, unsigned char i_blue);
Colour(Colour& c);
Colour();
void setColour(unsigned char i_red, unsigned char i_green, unsigned char i_blue);
};
Colour::Colour(unsigned char i_red, unsigned char i_green, unsigned char i_blue)
{
this->setColour(i_red, i_green, i_blue);
}
Colour::Colour(Colour& c)
{
this->setColour(c._ucRed, c._ucGreen, c._ucBlue);
}
Colour::Colour()
{
this->setColour((unsigned char)0, (unsigned char)0, (unsigned char)0);
}
void Colour::setColour(unsigned char i_red, unsigned char i_green, unsigned char i_blue)
{
this->_ucRed = i_red;
this->_ucGreen = i_green;
this->_ucBlue = i_blue;
}
#endif
Website.hpp
#ifndef WEBSITE_HPP
#define WEBSITE_HPP
#pragma once
#include "Websource.hpp"
template <typename T, int N = 16>
class Page {
public:
static Colour c_logo; // logo colour
};
Colour website::Page<double>::Page::c_logo();
#endif
This code leads to Error 0147.
Severity Code Description Project File Line Suppression State Error
(active) E0147 declaration is incompatible with "Colour
website::Page::c_logo [with T=double, N=16]" (declared at line
31 of
"c:\Users\hasler\Documents\ga_design\Website.hpp") ga_design c:\Users\hasler\Documents\ga_design\Website.hpp 88
However, using another constructor works like a charm:
Colour website::Page<double>::Page::c_logo(0,0,0);
And I'm here struggling to understand why one constructor would work and another wouldn't.
To mark the question as answered: "It's a case of the most vexing parse in C++. Using Colour website::Page::Page::c_logo; will work." – R Sahu
I am trying to write a simple matrix operations API using go and expose the APIs as a shared library. This shared library will be used from Java(using JNA) and from C.
The documentation is very sparse about using any data type beyond simple int or string as function parameters.
My requirement is to expose functions with 1 or more 2D slices as parameters AND also as return types. I am not able to figure out if such a thing is supported.
Is this possible? Are there any examples for this?
I think the key point is to have a look to the c bindings of slice,string and int generated by go build tool. I not tried 2D slice, but it should no different to 1D slice with unsafe pointer converter, maybe just be one more time allocation and convertion.
I'm not sure it's the best way, but here's the example for 1D slice:
the go part:
import "C"
//export CFoo
func CFoo(content []byte) string{
var ret []byte
//blablabla to get ret
cbuf := unsafe.Pointer(C.malloc(C.size_t(len(ret))))
C.memcpy(cbuf, unsafe.Pointer(&ret[0]), C.size_t(len(ret)))
var finalString string
hdr := (*reflect.StringHeader)(unsafe.Pointer(&finalString))
hdr.Data = uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(cbuf))
hdr.Len = len(ret)
return finalString
}
compile with -buildmode=c-shared, to get libmygo.so.
I not know JNA, expecting it like JNI. the JNI part as well as pure C part:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <jni.h>
#include <string.h>
typedef signed char GoInt8;
typedef unsigned char GoUint8;
typedef short GoInt16;
typedef unsigned short GoUint16;
typedef int GoInt32;
typedef unsigned int GoUint32;
typedef long long GoInt64;
typedef unsigned long long GoUint64;
typedef GoInt32 GoInt;
typedef GoUint32 GoUint;
typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ GoUintptr;
typedef float GoFloat32;
typedef double GoFloat64;
typedef float _Complex GoComplex64;
typedef double _Complex GoComplex128;
typedef struct { const char *p; GoInt n; } GoString;
typedef void *GoMap;
typedef void *GoChan;
typedef struct { void *t; void *v; } GoInterface;
typedef struct { void *data; GoInt len; GoInt cap; } GoSlice;
JNIEXPORT JNICALL jbyteArray Java_com_mynextev_infotainment_app_myev_Native_foo(JNIEnv* env, jobject obj,jbyteArray content){
JNIEnv ienv = *env;
void * Ccontent = ienv->GetByteArrayElements(env, content, 0);
int Lcontent = ienv->GetArrayLength(env, content);
GoSlice Gcontent = {Ccontent, Lcontent, Lcontent};
if(!gret.n){
printf("jni CDoAESEnc");
return NULL;
}
jbyteArray ret = ienv->NewByteArray(env, gret.n);
ienv->SetByteArrayRegion(env, ret, 0, gret.n, gret.p);
free((void*)gret.p);
ienv->ReleaseByteArrayElements(env, content, Ccontent, JNI_ABORT);
return ret;
}
build it with libmygo.so.
finally you get two so files. one for C which can be used standalone; one for Java which must be used with libmygo.so together.
I'm working on a port from some old Delphi code to VC++ 2013, and I'm encountering an error that I feel should be an easy fix but cannot for the life of me figure out...
The problem is this: I have a number of common utility functions in a local file Utils.h that I am deploying as part of a windows form. Most (90%) of the functions in this header work as normal. GetMsg(...), however, throws a C3861 Identifier not found error...
Utils.h (snippet): GetMsg declared at bottom
#pragma once
/*------------------------------------------------------------------------*
Includes:
*------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
using namespace std;
/*------------------------------------------------------------------------*
Constants:
*------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
#define GET_MSG_TIMEOUT 2
/*------------------------------------------------------------------------*
Typedefs, Structs, Enums:
*------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
typedef union
{
unsigned long ui32;
unsigned char ui8[4];
} UI32_UI8;
typedef union
{
unsigned short ui16;
unsigned char ui8[2];
} UI16_UI8;
typedef union
{
float f;
unsigned char ui8[4];
} F_UI8;
typedef struct
{
string sName;
string sVersion;
string sCompany;
string sCopyright;
} PRODUCT_INFORMATION;
/*------------------------------------------------------------------------*
Prototypes:
*------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
unsigned short SwapShort(unsigned short aShort);
float SwapFloat(float aFloat);
unsigned long SwapLong(unsigned long aLong);
unsigned int ReadLine(unsigned char *msgBuf, SerialPort^ Hdl, bool ReturnLF);
void __stdcall FillTheBuffer(char *buf, String sss, int length);
string __stdcall FillTheString(string sss, int length);
unsigned int __stdcall GetMsg(SerialPort^ Hdl, unsigned char *msgBuf);
GetMsg Definition in Utils.cpp:
//---------------------------------------------------------
unsigned int __stdcall GetMsg(SerialPort^ Hdl, unsigned char *msgBuf)
{
...
}
And, finally, GetMsg usage in form file:
#include "Utils.h"
...
void MainForm::UploadButton_Click
(System::Object^ object, System::EventArgs^ e)
{
...
SwapShort(1); //Works fine, also declared in Utils.h
GetMsg(spCom, inBuf); //C3861 ERROR
...
}
Where spCom is a (SerialPort^) contained, configured, and opened within the windows form. inBuf is a simple array of characters (char*) to buffer the input. I've tried renaming the function, thinking that there may have been an unintentional conflict / overload in other files, to no avail.
Any advice? Thanks, in advance
Solved the problem -- As it turns out I needed to be more explicit in my function definitions. Changing the declaration to read
GetMsg(System::IO::Ports::SerialPort^ Hdl, unsigned char *msgBuf)
eliminated the C3861 error. It would seem that the lack of a specific namespace on the declaration passed Intellisense but confused the compiler, rendering it unable to determine which prototype to use with the function call.
Is there any way to get behavior like this?
// Some definition(s) of operator "" _my_str
// Some definition of function or macro MY_STR_LEN
using T1 = MY_STR_LEN("ape"_my_str);
// T1 is std::integral_constant<std::size_t, 3U>.
using T2 = MY_STR_LEN("aardvark"_my_str);
// T2 is std::integral_constant<std::size_t, 8U>.
It seems not, since the string literals are passed immediately to some_return_type operator "" _my_str(const char*, std::size_t); and never to a literal operator template (2.14.8/5). That size function parameter can't be used as a template argument, even though it will almost always be a constant expression.
But it seems like there ought to be some way to do this.
Update: The accepted answer, that this is not possible without an extra definition per literal, is accurate for C++11 as asked, and also C++14 and C++17. C++20 allows the exact result asked for:
#include <cstdlib>
#include <type_traits>
#include <string_view>
struct cexpr_str {
const char* ptr;
std::size_t len;
template <std::size_t Len>
constexpr cexpr_str(const char (&str)[Len]) noexcept
: ptr(str), len(Len) {}
};
// Essentially the same as
// std::literals::string_view_literals::operator""sv :
template <cexpr_str Str>
constexpr std::string_view operator "" _my_str () noexcept
{
return std::string_view(Str.ptr, Str.len);
}
#define MY_STR_LEN(sv) \
std::integral_constant<std::size_t, (sv).size()>
Reading C++11 2.14.8 carefully reveals that the "literal operator template" is only considered for numeric literals, but not for string and character literals.
However, the following approach seems to give you constexpr access to the string length (but not the pointer):
struct MyStr
{
char const * str;
unsigned int len;
constexpr MyStr(char const * p, unsigned int n) : str(p), len(n) {}
};
constexpr MyStr operator "" _xyz (char const * s, unsigned int len)
{
return MyStr(s, len);
}
constexpr auto s = "Hello"_xyz;
Test:
#include <array>
using atype = std::array<int, s.len>; // OK