I want to use quorum queue in our application but I found that spring doesn't create the queue automatically as he does with classique queue.
I didnt find such information about auto creation of quorum queue.
Can someone help me?
Regard
See quorum.enabled and related properties
https://docs.spring.io/spring-cloud-stream-binder-rabbit/docs/3.2.1/reference/html/spring-cloud-stream-binder-rabbit.html#_rabbitmq_consumer_properties
quorum.enabled
When true, create a quorum queue instead of a classic queue.
Default: false
Related
I have a set of microservices using springboot rest. These microservices will be deployed in a autoscaled and load balanced environment. One of these services is responsible for managing the system's configuration. When other microservices startup, they obtain the configuration from this service. If and when the configuration is updated, I need to inform all currently running microservices instances to update their cached configuration.
I am considering using RabbitMQ with a fanout exchange. In this solution, each instance at startup will create its queue and bind that queue to the exchange. When there is a configuration change, the configuration service will publish an update to all queues currently bound to that exchange.
However, as service instances are deleted, I cannot figure out how would I delete the queue specific to that instance. I googled but could not find a complete working example of a solution.
Any help or advise?
The idea and solution is correct. What you just miss that those queues, created by your consumer services could be declared as auto-delete=true: https://www.rabbitmq.com/queues.html. As long as your service is UP, the queue is there as well. You stop your service, its consumers are stopped and unsubscribed. At the moment the last consumer is unsubscribed the queue is deleted from the broker.
On the other hand I would suggest to look into Spring Cloud Bus project which really is aimed for tasks like this: https://spring.io/projects/spring-cloud-bus.
I am writing a service with Spring and I am using Spring AMQP in order to connect to Rabbitmq.
I have two rabbitmq clusters, one is only for publishing messages(the messages are sent to the other cluster via the federation plugin) and the other cluster is for declaring queues that end users will consume from.
The nodes sit behind aws lb, each cluster has a lb.
I am using CachingConnectionFactory and RabbitTemplate,RabbitAdmin in my code and I want to have connections to all the nodes so I can use them.
For the cluster that will contain the queues I added to the config the queue-master-locator=random so new queues will be declared in all the nodes in the cluster even if my service does not have a connection to them.
With the cluster that publishes messages I have more of a problem because I need a direct connection in my service to each of the nodes so I will be able to separate the load between the nodes.
So my problem is, how do I create connections in my service to all the nodes in the cluster so they will all be used for declaring queues and sending messages?
Now, after I will have some sort of solution to this issue, the next issue will be what happens when a new node is added to the cluster? How can I create a connection to it and start using it as well?
I am using Rabbitmq - 3.7.9, Spring - 2.0.5, Spring AMQP - 2.0.5
Thanks alot!
There is currently no mechanism to do anything like that.
By default, Spring AMQP opens only one connection (optionally two, one for publishing, one for consuming).
Even when using CacheMode.CONNECTION, you'll get a new connection for each consumer (and connections will be created and cached on demand for producers), you won't get any control as to which node it connects to; that's a function of the LB.
The framework does provide the LocalizedQueueConnectionFactory which will try to consume from the node that hosts a queue, but it won't work with a load balancer in place.
In general, however, such optimization is rarely needed.
Are you trying to solve an actual problem you are experiencing now, or something that you perceive that might be a problem?
It is generally best not to perform premature optimization.
When using RabbitMQ + Spring cloud stream you can define the following properties in application.properties file:
spring.cloud.stream.bindings.input1.destination=someDest
spring.cloud.stream.bindings.input1.group=someGroup
I guess that "destination" means the RabbitMQ queue, but what does it mean "group" here?
Thanks!
The destination means topic exchange. The group means a queue bound to that exchange. So, several apps may subscribe to the same destination and get the same message if they use different groups. If group is the same, only one consumer instance it going to get one message.
See documentation for more info: http://cloud.spring.io/spring-cloud-static/spring-cloud-stream-binder-rabbit/2.1.0.RC4/single/spring-cloud-stream-binder-rabbit.html#_rabbitmq_binder_overview
Actually, the destination is the exchange name; the queue someDest.someGroup will be bound to the exchange someDest.
When a group is provided, multiple instances of the app will compete for messages.
If there is no group, the queue will be an anonymous auto-delete queue.
I am trying to use a queue in activemq to dequeue messages from a virtual topic. I tried sending some messages and it is showing up in the topic under "message enqueued" but it is not able to be consumed.
The virtual topic name that i created was VirtualTopic.AA and the consumer is called Consumer.client1.VirtualTopic.AA.
In the consumer.client1.VirtualTopic.AA, i can see that there is a consumer but it is just not able to dequeue messages from the virtual topic.
Anyone knows why this is happening ? Do i need to change some settings in the configuration in the xml file ?
When you publish to a virtual topic using Spring's JmsTemplate, you need to configure it for a topic by setting the pubSubDomain property to "true".
From the JmsTemplate documentation:
If you want to use dynamic destination creation, you must specify the type of JMS destination to create, using the "pubSubDomain" property. For other operations, this is not necessary. Point-to-Point (Queues) is the default domain.
And in JmsDestinationAccessor#setPubSubDomain:
pubSubDomain - "true" for the Publish/Subscribe domain (Topics), "false" for the Point-to-Point domain (Queues)
I am using ActiveMQ messaging broker and I have a requirement where the producer application would want to know if the consumer application consuming on the particular destination is up or not?
How can I achieve this?
Thanks!
You should checkout Advisory messages. It's a topic you can subscribe to if you want updates on such events.
Specifically the topic: ActiveMQ.Advisory.NoConsumer.Queue should be of interest. You need to enable it broker side though using the destination policy property: sendAdvisoryIfNoConsumers.
You can do that by using java code as follows:
Destination class has a method getConsumers() which will return List of Subscriptions to that destination,and it will in turn give you consumer information, by this you can check whether your required consumer is active or not.
Good luck!