I see it as a tool I can add, yet I do not know what it does. I have tried googling, but could not see an answer. Surely this is documented somewhere. Or someone knows and has published it.
Conformance View lets you compile without viewing assembly. This is useful to ensure that your code passes all these compilers, but without the need to have 10 windows open.
Source:
Couldn't find this on Google but I COULD find it by following the Discuss C++ on the Cpplang Slack link at the top of godbolt.org.
I searched for the conformance viewer tool and saw the messages:
June 21st 2017
Rubén
Woop! So with this update there's now a conformance view which you can use to quickly see whether or not the code compilers/generates warnings on different compilers. Like in this dumb example https://godbolt.org/g/16CqgT
Matt Godbolt
And thanks to Rubén for implementing it!
September 10th 2018
Rubén
#steveire conformance view lets you compile a source with up to 10 compilers at the same time, so you dont have to open 10 compiler views
It lets you see if they compiled/produced warnings/did not compile
No asm though
Related
I have a website teaching C for beginners.
I'm trying to have a C compiler online version so that a user could easily compile their code online itself.
Are there any compilers available? If available, which is the best one?
I have found some compilers, but they have got no capability of taking input from the user, but they have the capability of just displaying the output.
There is no package that can just be added to a blog so people can try C online and see the results.
You could provide a link to gcc or another compiler so your readers can try it themselves.
If you were really serious, a CGI script could be created on the server side which:
Runs in a sandbox (this is critical to get right and is potentially dangerous if done incorrectly)
Compiles the source code
Runs the compiled code
Returns the results
Sorry that I can't give you an easy answer, but there it is.
I'm using VC++ as professional developer for more than 10 years and it has been good to me, now I'm trying to broaden my horizons and learn C++ development on Linux.
On Windows things are simple, VC++ does it all (editing, project management, help, debugging), but on linux things are different, you have assemble your development environment from different tools.
I'm still trying to tie things together, and one thing I still haven't figured out is how to decipher GCC (G++) errors when compiling/linking C++ apps on Linux (although I realize GCC is multi-platform, I'll refer to my linux experience here only).
In VC++, things are very clear: If during compilation VC++'s compiler encounters error in program, it will create new entry in 'output' window with the 'compiler error ID'. Example:
c:\projectA\fileB.cpp(38) : error C2228: left of '.cout' must have class/struct/union
From here, you can click on the line in question in 'output' window, press F1, and 'Microsoft Document Browser' app will start (if it wasn't started already), which will load MSDN help file describing compile error connected to the compiler error ID (in example it's C2228), usually with sample you can check out to figure out what's wrong with your code. If you don't have MDB installed, you can always search on the web for C2228 and get the same help page, optionally finding other people's web pages describing their experience with this error.
The same thing is with linking, you'll get 'linker error ID' (e.g. LNK1123), which you can use to find help either locally or on web.
Try as I might, I can't find this kind of functionality in GCC's G++. All I can see is bunch of less experienced GCC developers asking another bunch of more experienced GCC developers to analyze their code based on descriptive compiler/linker errors with no associated error IDs.
Is there tool(set) that provides VC++ compiler-style help on GCC G++ compile/link errors for linux?
You may try to use qtcreator. At least it can show the errors in a more comprehensive way comparable to the VC++, that is, it can locate the error position and highlight the error line and variables.
If you can an alternative might be to use Clang instead. It gives much better error messages than g++. It compiles most code these days (but it still a work in progress). Highly recommended.
Alternatively (as another poster has mentioned) you could use an IDE such as Eclipse to capture the error messages, though I don't think that adds anything beyond taking you to the line number on double-click.
I'm looking to write a tool that aims to convert debug symbols of one format to another format that's compatible for use under GDB. This seems like a tedious and potentially complex project so I'm not exactly sure how to tackling it.
Intially I'm aiming to convert the Turbo Debug Symbol table(TDS) emitted from borland compilers into something like stabs or dwarf format(seems like dwarf is prefer from my research). But ideally I want to design my tool to be easy enough to extend so it could convert other formats too later on. e.g. codeview4 or maybe even pdb.
My primary motivation for creating this are:
Interoperability. If I can convert a foreign debug format into a form gdb can work with then source-level debugging would be possible on binaries compiled from another compiler other than gcc. This means any frontend debugging interface that uses gdb as a backend will work as well.
No other tools exist. I did a google searching around for similar tools and the closest I've found is tds2dbg. But it doesn't quite do what I'm looking for.
What I have to work with at the moment:
I already have a debug hook API that can understand the TDS debug format. I can use that to help me get at the needed information from the source format I'm converting from.
For the scope of this project, I'm mainly interested in getting this to work under the win32 environment. Other platforms and tools I'm not really concerned about.
The target dwarf debug format I'm converting to. This one I'm really not familiar with at all. I have used gcc ported compilers like MinGW before and debugged them with gdb with the dwarf format. But I don't have any idea how this format is implemented on windows.
The last point is the one I'm concerned about. I'm reading through the dwarf spec documentation but I find I'm having trouble really understanding and comprehending how it works. There's so much detail in there but at the same time it doesn't have any details about how dwarf gets implemented on object files and image files on a platform that doesn't use ELF natively -- namely the PE-COFF format that windows uses. The documentation is also a very dry read, long sentences make it hard to understand and diagrams and illustrations are sparse. I came across an API called libDwarf that should take most of the parsing work out of interpreting dwarf. The problem is I'm still trying to get it to build and I don't know yet how it will work out.
I haven't written any code yet since I don't fully understand what it is I need to build. I have a feeling the biggest hurtle will be figuring out how to work with dwarf due to it's complexity. Googling for information on how dwarf works under windows hasn't turned up anything helpful either. Like for example, there's no information about the 'glue' code that's needed to contain dwarf within a PE executable image file. How are the dwarf sections exactly layed out? Are there any header information for each section? GDB clearly doesn't just take a 'raw' dwarf debug file and use it as is. So what kind of format does gdb expect the debug file to be in for it to be able to work with it?
My question is, how can I start on such a project? More importantly, where can I turn to for help when I inevitably get stuck on a problem?
Affinic Assembler for Windows
Affinic Assembler is an x86/x86-64 assembler for Windows that takes GAS-syntax assembly source with DWARF debug information and generates corresponding CodeView format sections in object file in order to make the linked program debuggable in Visual Studio. This program is good for Cygwin and MinGW users to port Linux code to Windows.
http://www.affinic.com/?page_id=48
You are asking several questions here :-)
I think you are heading in the right direction, using libdwarf.
BUT, have you taken a look at objcopy to see if this tool can do some of the work for you? It probably doesn't support borland, pdb or codeview4, but it might be worth looking into. (Another approach may be to extend objcopy to support the formats you are trying to convert between.)
I have used the dwarf-discuss mailing list sometimes when I have become stuck.
http://lists.dwarfstd.org/listinfo.cgi/dwarf-discuss-dwarfstd.org
As for the questions on dwarf, split them into separate questions and I will do my best to
answer them. :-)
I'm in an Assembly class focusing on the intel 8086 architecture (all compiling / linking / execution comes from running DOS on win7 via DOS-Box).
I've finished programming the latest assignment, but as I have yet to program any program successfully the first time through, I am now stuck trying to debug my code.
I have visual studio 2010 and was wondering if there was some built in feature that would help me debug my assembly code, specifically, I'm looking to track the value of a variable.
Failing that, instructions pointing to a DOS-Box debugger (and instructions!) would be much appreciated. (I think I've been able to run codeview debug, but I couldn't figure out how to do what I was looking for).
You are generating 16-bit code, you have to break into a museum to find better tooling. Try Borland's, maybe the debugger included with Turbo C.
Yes, indeed, you can use the debugger in VS to examine pretty much everything. Irvine's site has a section specifically on using the debugger here. You can examine registers, use the watch window, etc. He also has a guide for highlighting asm keywords if you need that.
Edit: as Hans pointed out, if you are using 16-bit instead of 32-bit protected, you'll need different tools. There are several choices, listed here.
Borland's tools for DOS were called tasm, tlink, and tdebug.
I've been doing some MSIL work and have come across references to these three debuggers.
What's the difference between them?
Is one of them better than the others wrt. functionality?
Are there others that I have missed?
I'm assuming you meant DbgClr not Clt and mdbg not mdbug?
DbgClr uses the VS shell so you get a nice GUI.
mdbg is the command line managed debugger.
cordbg was an old sample that sorta shipped, but now it's just a wrapper for mdbg. http://blogs.msdn.com/jmstall/archive/2005/11/07/views_on_cordbg_and_mdbg.aspx
Visual Studio is one you missed, but DbgClr should have the same functionality. http://blogs.msdn.com/andypennell/archive/2005/02/21/377621.aspx.
You can also use windbg with SOS extensions to do managed debugging from Windows debugger. SOS is also helpful when using VS since it lets you inspect memory and so on.
To see source level MSIL debugging, try using ilasm with the /debug option. Last time I checked, VS will let you step through the .il source just like C# or any other language.
MSDN blogs have a ton of content about debugging .NET apps -- I suggest you search further there.