I have a 3rd party development tool that was written in Golang. My company uses Netskope which injects self-signed certificates in any SSL traffic from my machine so they can monitor all traffic for security purposes. The application is failing with the error
"self signed certificate in certificate chain" when it tries to connect out to a site on the public internet, I assume because of these self-signed certificates in the chain
I found some comments that say the logic for certification verification on Windows can be found in https://go.dev/src/crypto/x509/root_windows.go, but I cannot find any documentation for Windows about this (only Linux). From looking at that code, my understanding is I need to have the CA certification set up in the local machine store as a Trusted Root CA but that isn't working for me. The screenshot here shows the CA certificates in my Local Machine trusted root CA store. I deploy to Linux containers, in JVM or other applications to allow them to trust these self-signed certificates.
Am I doing something wrong in setting up the CA certs in my Certificate Store? Is there any documentation on this? Is there another way I can configure on Windows any Golang application running on my machine to trust the CA for these self-signed certificates? I see on Linux you can similarly add the CA to your store, or use environment variables SSL_CERT_FILE and SSL_CERT_DIR, and I've been able to do this for other Golang applications in Linux containers.
Related
I am developing web app using Spring Boot and React. I want to deploy it on local server and make it accessible only through local network, but I want to make it secure, so I need SSL certificate to enable HTTPS. If I use self-signed certificate then I get error on clients browsers (not secure), because this certificate is not in their trust store. Is there any way to get certificate for localhost, I think that Let's Encrypt don't give certificates for localhost?
Generate Self signed root CA certificate.
Install your root CA in all client machines (enterprises root)
sign certificate with your root ca and install in web server
this certificate will be trusted.
I have a Windows image that uses the PowerShell execution policy AllSigned
I also have a PowerShell script that is signed by a signing certificate issued by an internal CA
The certificate of the issuing CA is installed/trusted on the target machine
When I sign the PowerShell script, I am including the full certificate chain (IncludeChain = 'All')
The certificate chain looks like this:
|- Issuing CA Certificate
|- Signing Certificate
The PowerShell script is signed by the Signing Certificate, but we are not installing that certificate on our target machine. We are only installing the Issuing CA Certificate into the Trusted Publishers and other certificate stores.
This method works when we sign our custom application binaries using the Signing Certificate (we use Windows Defender Application Control to ensure that any applications running on our target are signed by trusted publishers) but it does not work when running PowerShell scripts.
According to this MSDN community post, PowerShell uses Known Publisher rules, which state that the Signing Certificate itself has to be in the Trusted Publishers certificate store.
This is not ideal, as the signing certificate we use to sign the PowerShell scripts is not something we want to ship out, nor will it be valid anymore by the time our product ships.
I understand that if I use a timestamp server when signing the PowerShell scripts, that the signature will still be considered valid if the signature was generated within the validity window of the signing certificate, but this is not our preferred solution.
Ideally I would like to know if it is possible, and how, to have PowerShell use the Issuing CA Certificate to validate the signed PowerShell scripts. (i.e. Known Issuer rules)
In the case that it's not possible, I would like to know why Microsoft departed from the practice of allowing you to validate signatures without explicitly trusting the signing certificate (i.e. using the issuing certificate to validate it).
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
There is a difference between deployment and the running of PowerShell scripts.
The confusion is that Windows Defender Application Control can use code signing 2 different ways, for 2 different reasons, and PowerShell has only ever supported one. Windows Defender Application Control can use code signing:
With a trusted Issuing CA Certificate to authenticate applications. This is the situation when your company wants to share many internal applications among all employees easily. It is also used for "trusted" Microsoft Store applications.
Because "normal" people don't blindly trust all applications and generic certificate authorities, you can instead deploy based off of trusting just the Signing Certificate for verification. (see Catalog Files). This is so that you could deploy applications with certificates that may not have an accessible CA. e.g. if you singed the application with an internal CA and you sell it to another company, or if you are using a self signed certificate.
Windows Defender Application Control primary purpose is for Application deployment/control, and a byproduct is that it can do PowerShell scripts as well. Most "normal" applications can run with "invalid" or "broken" certificates with incomplete certificate chains. The certificate was only used to control the distribution of the code and validation that the application was not tampered with/changed, and has nothing to do with the active "running" of the code.
PowerShell, on the other hand, when running with AllSigned, always validates the entire chain before running. It doesn't care about the distribution, it cares about what it runs. That means that the entire certificate chain needs to be present and trusted on the running machine. Yes, that means that if you sign with an internal CA, you need the Issuing CA Certificate, and the Signing Certificate distributed and trusted by the running party.
This leads you to 3 options:
Self signed certificate - This is ok for personal/development projects, and marginally better than distributing unsigned code.
Internal CA certificate - This is ok for internal projects. In this case, yes, you would have to share the entire certificate chain if you wanted to distribute.
Global/Public CA Certificate - This is the recommended method if you are distributing publicly/commercially. The Public CA's are trusted, and code signing certificates can be bought from places like DigiCert and can last 3 years. I know, for me, I would feel much more comfortable running code signed by a DigiCert over having to mess with internal or self signed certificates.
That doesn't make sense.
If the internal root CA certificate is in your trusted root CA store and the intermediate in your trusted intermediate store. Then a PS script is signed by a certificate with a trusted chain back to the trusted root, it should trust the signing of the certificate.
There should be no difference between an internal trusted CA and a public trusted CA.
If anything a code signing certificate issued by an internal CA is more trustworthy than a public signed one. Internal processes and controls mean only actual trusted internal publsihers can get one, unlike a public code signing cert bought for a small amount.
I want to have a certificate that has a different CA cert for it.
Reason? - For self signed certs, most browsers handle this as a invalid certificate. I know I can ignore those warnings but I just don't want to get them in the first place.
I tried googling how to create such a certificate but found so many sites where only a self signed certificate is created.
Therefore, how can such a certificate + CA certificate be generated and is there a better synonym for such a certificate pair?
If you need certificate signed by trusted CA there are two options:
You can get free letstencrypt certificate.
This certificate will work everywhere, not only your testing machine.
To get such certificate you need to own (e.g. buy) some domain, so you can pass certbot ownership challenge.
If you need to test local server, you can get certificate for subdomain (e.g. local-test.example.com is subdomain of example.com) and map that subdomain to 127.0.0.1 in /etc/hosts.
For purpose of local testing, certificate signed by self-signed CA can be sufficient.
Google Chrome and most other applications will accepts such certificate after you install/trust your self-signed CA (some applications may require restart).
There are some convenient tools written in go and js.
I deploy my CA cert via GPO into Trusted Root Certification Authorities, which I can see is deployed to my client machines. I know this part is working as Chrome no longer moans when browsing to sites using my signed SSL certs.
However, when I try and git clone or push to any repositories behind an SSL cert signed by this CA, git-for-windows bawlks and says this:
schannel: next InitializeSecurityContext failed: Unknown error
(0x80092012) - The revocation function was unable to check revocation
for the certificate.
As you can see, I've got schannel enabled, but git-for-windows is clearly not reading my CA cert from the Certificate Store in Windows. Any one know how I make gfw read from the Certificate Store in Windows? I can't manually copy this cert onto all my Windows clients, that'd take forever.
Perhaps worth noting I'm using multiple Samba 4 instances as Domain Controllers, but I don't have access to Windows Server tools such as AS Certificate Services.
nb. I know I can disable tls verification, but that surely defeats the purpose.
I am working in Ec2 instance. I have connected my php files like http://13.57.220.172/phpinsert.php. But it is not secured site. So i want to convert http into https://13.57.220.172.
I have cloudflare ssl. When i try to add ssl certificate. It shows
com.amazonaws.pki.acm.exceptions.external.ValidationException: Provided certificate is not a valid self signed. Please provide either a valid self-signed certificate or certificate chain. Choose Previous button below and fix it.
i have enclose the image with it.
So how can i get the self signed certificate. is there any online tool available.
I think the error message your seeing has to do with this sentence:
If your certificate is signed by a CA, you must include the
certificate chain when you import your certificate.
from https://docs.aws.amazon.com/acm/latest/userguide/import-certificate-prerequisites.html.
Since it sounds like you're not yet in "production" mode, I'm guessing you're not particularly attached to your existing certificate, but just want a certificate to be able to do HTTPS on your web server (and don't really care if it's self-signed).
If you want to use AWS Certificate Manager, I think it would be easier to just let them (AWS) issue you a certificate instead of trying to import one from somewhere else. AWS doesn't charge anything for certificates. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/acm/latest/userguide/acm-billing.html
Even if you get the certificate setup in AWS Certificate Manager, that's not going to be installed directly on your EC2 instance, but rather (most likely) on a load balancer in front of your web server, which will add a little complexity to your setup. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/acm/latest/userguide/acm-services.html
If all you want to do is use HTTPS on your web server, Let's Encrypt (also free) is probably a simpler option. If you are using AWS Linux 2, there are instructions for getting a certificate here - https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/SSL-on-amazon-linux-2.html
Well, add to the points which #jefftrotman has already mentioned.
If your expectation is to just secure your IP address using HTTPS you can achieve that using the below approaches:
A SELF SIGNED certificate that you can create using OpenSSL.
You can also get an SSL certificate from a trust signing authority like (GoDaddy or VeriSign) or Let's encrypt.
The only requirement in the second point is that for getting a certificate from a valid signing authority you need to have a domain name like "myphpapp.com" and then use this domain to get the SSL certificate.
The below details are in case you want to use AWS ACM(Amazon Certificate Manager)
If you prefer ACM, you can get the free Public SSL certificate which you can map to the IP address and your web application will be secured.
If your requirement is to add SSL certificates (like PEM files) to a web server like
NGINX or Apache then you first need to create a Private CA using in ACM and then you using this CA you will be able to create Private SSL certificates. After creating those you can export the files and add those files to the configuration file. (try to use Amazon Linux 2) ec2 image for ease.