Spring Boot mvc path match strategy - spring

How actually works next property in Spring Boot if we declare it explicitly?
spring:
mvc:
pathmatch:
matching-strategy: ANT_PATH_MATCHER
Question related to this issue https://github.com/springfox/springfox/issues/3462

See the Spring Boot documentation:
As of Spring Framework 5.3, Spring MVC supports several implementation strategies for matching request paths to Controller handlers. It was previously only supporting the AntPathMatcher strategy, but it now also offers PathPatternParser. Spring Boot now provides a configuration property to choose and opt in the new strategy:
spring:
mvc:
pathmatch:
matching-strategy: "path-pattern-parser"
For more details on why you should consider this new implementation, see the dedicated blog post.

Related

Are extra reflection configurations needed for custom Spring Boot starter libraries when using Spring Native?

I am in the process of building a set of shared libraries using custom Spring Boot starter auto configuration per guidance from https://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/2.6.7/reference/htmlsingle/#features.developing-auto-configuration. Great feature offered by Spring Boot by the way! My question is that how does Spring Native support these types of custom Spring Boot Starter libraries? Are extra reflection configurations or native hints required? I have been evaluating Spring Native and I am very excited about the performance boost it brings to Spring Boot apps! I am eagerly awaiting Spring Boot 3 GA to be released! Any advice on how Spring Boot 3 and/or Spring Native handles custom Spring Boot starter libraries and if any extra configurations are required will be greatly appreciated!
I reached out to Sébastien Deleuze, one of the members on Spring Native team, and his response to my question is as follows. Thanks Sébastien!
"Spring Native and the upcoming Spring Boot 3 should support this kind of autoconfiguration if they follow certain guidelines, like using #Configuration(proxyBeanMethods=false).
See https://docs.spring.io/spring-native/docs/current/reference/htmlsingle/#how-to-contribute-design for more details.
Spring Boot 3 will likely define more clearly the guidelines."

Spring MVC modules,subsystems and components

Let's say we have a Spring MVC project which is a banking web application. I am trying to identify the sub-systems ,modules and components of this project.
1.Subsystems - from what I have red the subsystems in MVC architecture are only 3- the Model,View and Controller is that correct?
2.Modules - are these a group of classes that do something particular as a group.For example LoginController.java,RegisterControler.java form a module let's call it Authentication
3.Components - for components I am not sure which they are in a Spring MVC project.
If someone can explain with examples in terms of a banking web application or other Spring MVC app it would be great!
Spring MVC follows the Model-View-Controller design pattern.
Model - A model contains the data of the application. A data can be a single object or a collection of objects.
Controller - A controller contains the business logic of an application. Here, the #Controller annotation is used to mark the class as the controller.
View - A view represents the provided information in a particular format. Generally, JSP+JSTL is used to create a view page. Although spring also supports other view technologies such as Apache Velocity, Thymeleaf and FreeMarker.
Spring Boot Framework has mainly four major Components.
Spring Boot Starters.
Spring Boot AutoConfigurator.
Spring Boot CLI.
Spring Boot Actuator.
Please check out : https://www.journaldev.com/7989/key-components-and-internals-of-spring-boot-framework
In project-specific terms,
Module: It can be something that can be built separately in an application. ex: Login Module, Sign-up module, Transactions module, etc., You can say a module is a group of components.
Sub-systems: As far as I know, subsystems are the service package related stuff.
Components: Annotating a class with #Component tells Spring that it is available for fulfilling injections.
Spring Component annotation is used to denote a class as a Component. It means that the Spring framework will autodetect these classes for dependency injection when annotation-based configuration and classpath scanning is used

Minimum version of spring for spring-boot v 1.3

I have an existing spring application built using spring framework version 3.1.2. I am trying to create a spring-boot application out of this existing application, but getting some dependency issues. So just wondering, what is the spring framework version, that is supported by spring-boot v 1.3.0.
Or to put it in another words, is it possible to have a spring-boot application from a spring 3.1.2 based application?
Spring boot has hard dependencies on classes in Spring 4 and could not be configured to work with Spring 3. If you are really interested in using Spring Boot the only way you can do this is to follow a migration path to Spring 4 and then add Spring Boot to your application.
It is worth mentioning that the "boot" in Spring Boot is meant to be short for bootstrapping, as in initial setup of an application. I'm not saying there would be zero benefits from migrating from Spring 4 vanilla to Spring Boot. But make sure you are migrating for the right reasons the main purpose of Spring Boot is easy bootstrapping of applications but here are some other features which might be worth making the move.
Spring Boot dev-tools (Auto restart on code changes)
Awesome spring boot plugins for maven and gradle to ease upgrading spring in the future (hint it upgrades many other dependencies for you)
Bootstrapping new features such as MongoDb through auto-configuration.
Migration from 3.1 to 3.2
https://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/3.2.x/spring-framework-reference/html/migration-3.2.html
Migration from Spring 3 to Spring 4.
https://spring.io/blog/2014/01/30/migrating-from-spring-framework-3-2-to-4-0-1
There are many features in spring boot that are dependent upon new features added to Spring 4. One primary example is the new list of annotations added to Spring 4 that allow conditional wiring/loading of beans. Which is the primary method of wiring configurations in a plugin-like way.
For example lets see the AutoConfiguration class for the H2 console
https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/blob/master/spring-boot-autoconfigure/src/main/java/org/springframework/boot/autoconfigure/h2/H2ConsoleAutoConfiguration.java
The first thing we see is it's wired to be a Configuration class. It will only load if WebServlet.class is on the classpath and if the property spring.h2.console is = true. It is also configured to load SecurityAutoConfiguration first as this is a dependency at least for securing the h2 console page.
#Configuration
#ConditionalOnWebApplication
#ConditionalOnClass(WebServlet.class)
#ConditionalOnProperty(prefix = "spring.h2.console", name = "enabled", havingValue = "true", matchIfMissing = false)
#EnableConfigurationProperties(H2ConsoleProperties.class)
#AutoConfigureAfter(SecurityAutoConfiguration.class)
public class H2ConsoleAutoConfiguration {
When this Configuration is loaded it will check these conditions and upon all conditions being true then and only then will it load in the beans defined in the class. In this case it wires the h2console servlet.
#Bean
public ServletRegistrationBean h2Console() {
String path = this.properties.getPath();
String urlMapping = (path.endsWith("/") ? path + "*" : path + "/*");
return new ServletRegistrationBean(new WebServlet(), urlMapping);
}
There is also the security configuration in that class which introduces one more concept of conditionally loading a configuration based on another class being loaded into the context. These annotations do not always need to be on a Configuration level but can also apply to the bean level.
These concepts are core to how Spring Boot is implemented and therefore could not work with Spring 3.
Spring 3 list of annotations
http://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/3.0.x/javadoc-api/org/springframework/context/annotation/
Spring 4 Conditional Annotations
https://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/current/javadoc-api/org/springframework/context/annotation/
Thanks Zergleb for posting detailed answer. I found a way to run the spring 3 app as an independent jar by created an uber jar with a little instrumentation to bootstrap spring through a java class.
It is explained nicely in a short post at https://mihhaillapushkin.wordpress.com/2013/02/18/spring-3-for-standalone-applications

What are the similarities between Spring and Spring Boot

I have a requirement that I have to use Spring Boot with JSF as user interface, as of now I am using JSF with spring other modules. So, I want know the similarities, differences and advantages of Spring boot over Spring other modules.
Long story short, Spring Boot is highly opinionated wrapper for Spring Framework with a lot of production and cloud ready features. It can significantly reduce amount of your configuration if you follow conventions.
Start reading here.
You can not compare spring boot and spring framework. Spring Boot is a new project aims to help spring development by auto configuration of things required to run the spring application.
So, if you have spring application, you can use spring boot to run your Spring application without worrying about writing the XML configuration.

Difference between Spring and Spring Boot

There are many people who advised me to use Spring Boot instead of Spring to develop REST web services.
I want to know what exactly the difference between the two is?
In short
Spring Boot reduces the need to write a lot of configuration and boilerplate code.
It has an opinionated view on Spring Platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum effort.
Easy to create standalone applications with embedded Tomcat/Jetty/Undertow.
Provides metrics, health checks, and externalized configuration.
You can read more here http://projects.spring.io/spring-boot/
Unfortunately and I mean this out of personal frustration with Spring boot, I have yet to see any real quantified list, where the differences are explicitly outlined.
There is only qualifications such as the rubbish sentence "...opinionated view..." which are bandied about.
What is clear, is that SpringBoot has wrapped up groups of Spring annotations into its own set of annotations, implicitly.
Further obfuscating, and making the need for anyone starting out in SpringBoot to have to commit to memory what a particular SpringBoot annotation represents.
My reply therefore is of no quantifiable benefit to the original question, which is analogous to that of the SpringBoot authors.
Those behind Spring IMO deliberately set-out to obfuscate, which reflects the obtuseness of their JavaDoc and API's (see SpringBatch API's as an example, if you think I am flaming) that makes one wonder the value of their open-source ethos.
My quest for figuring out SpringBoot continues.
Update. 22-08-2022
Read this (https://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/current/reference/html/using.html#using.auto-configuration) and you will figure out for yourself what "opinionated" means.
There are over 140 Config classes that Springboot can use for this opinionated view, depending on what is on your classpath.
yes, on your classpath.
Finally and bizzarely, the annotation #SpringBootApplication is a configuration annotation as it includes it.
Go figure :=)
Basically, Spring Boot is an opinionated instance of a Spring application.
Spring Boot is a rapid application development platform. It uses various components of Spring, but has additional niceties like the ability to package your application as a runnable jar, which includes an embedded tomcat (or jetty) server. Additionally, Spring Boot contains a LOT of auto-configuration for you (the opinionated part), where it will pick and choose what to create based on what classes/beans are available or missing.
I would echo their sentiment that if you are going to use Spring I can't think of any reasons to do it without Spring Boot.
Spring Boot is opinionated view of Spring Framework projects.Let's analyse it through one program taken from Spring Boot Documentation.
#RestController
#EnableAutoConfiguration
public class Example {
#RequestMapping("/")
String home() {
return "Hello World!";
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
SpringApplication.run(Example.class, args);
}
}
It's a very basic REST API and you need to add Spring-boot-starter-web in your POM.xml for the same. Since you have added starter-web dependency, the annotation
#EnableAutoConfiguration guesses that you want to develop a web application and sets up Spring accordingly.
Spring Boot auto-configuration attempts to automatically configure your Spring application based on the jar dependencies that you have added. For example, if HSQLDB is on your classpath, and you have not manually configured any database connection beans, then Spring Boot auto-configures an in-memory database.
It's opinionated like maven. Maven creates a project structure for you which it thinks is the general pattern of projects like it adds src/main/java folder or resource folder for you.
Spring boot helps in faster development. It has many starter projects that helps you get going quite faster. It also includes many non functional features like: embedded servers, security, metrics, health checks etc. In short, it makes, spring based application development easier with minimally invading code(Less configuration files, less no of annotations).
Reference: https://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/current-SNAPSHOT/reference/htmlsingle/#boot-documentation-about
For developing common Spring applications or starting to learn Spring, I think using Spring Boot would be recommended. It considerably eases the job, is production ready and is rapidly being widely adopted.
Spring Boot is supposedly opinionated, i.e. it heavily advocates a certain style of rapid development, but it is designed well enough to accommodate exceptions to the rule, if you will. In short, it is a convention over configuration methodology that is willing to understand your need to break convention when warranted
For Spring Framework, you need to configure your project using XML configuration or Java configuration.
But for Spring Boot, these are preconfigured according to Spring team's view for rapid development. That is why Spring Boot is said to be an "opinionated view" of Spring Framework. It follows Convention over Configuration design paradigm.
Note: These configurations include view resolvers for MVC, transaction managers, way of locating container managed beans (Spring beans) and many more. And of course you can override any of these preconfigurations according to your need.
Spring Boot supports embedded servlet containers like Tomcat, Jetty or Undertow to create standalone applications, which Spring Framework doesn't.
Spring eliminate boilerplate code.
Spring-boot eliminates boilerplate configurations.
more

Resources