Jooq order by not in jsonArrayArg - spring-boot

The query statement which need to be executed is
dslContext.select(
jsonObject(
key("id").value(ENTITY.ID),
key("name").value(ENTITY.NAME),
key("attributes").value(
coalesce(
select(
jsonArrayAgg(
jsonObject(
key("id").value(ATTRIBUTE.ID),
key("name").value(ATTRIBUTE.NAME),
key("indexValue").value(ATTRIBUTE.INDEX_VALUE)
)
)
).from(ATTRIBUTE)
.where(ATTRIBUTE.ENTITY_ID.eq(ENTITY.ID))
.orderBy(ATTRIBUTE.INDEX_VALUE.asc()),
jsonArray()
)
)
)
).from(ENTITY).fetchInto(EntityDto.class)
Response for the above query:
[
{
"id": 2,
"name": "Address",
"attributes": [
{
"id": 3,
"name": "Pincode",
"indexValue": 4
},
{
"id": 4,
"name": "Country",
"indexValue": 3
},
{
"id": 5,
"name": "City",
"indexValue": 2
},
{
"id": 6,
"name": "Address",
"indexValue": 1
}
]
}
]
The attributes are not sorting in ascending order with respect to indexValue.
How to make the attributes sort in the ascending order?

Use the ORDER BY clause on JSON_ARRAYAGG:
jsonArrayAgg(...).orderBy(...)

Related

Search by results of previous search in elasticsearch

It is possible to make a search by the results of another search?. For example:
// index: A
{ "ID": 1, "status": "done" }
{ "ID": 2, "status": "processing" }
{ "ID": 3, "status": "done" }
{ "ID": 4, "status": "done" }
// index: B
{ "ID": 1, "user": 1, "value": 10 }
{ "ID": 1, "user": 2, "value": 3 }
{ "ID": 2, "user": 1,"value": 1 }
{ "ID": 3, "user": 1, "value": 3 }
{ "ID": 4, "user": 1, "value": 7 }
Q1: Search in index "A" status == "done" and return the ID
RES: 1,3,4
Q2: From the results in Q1 search value > 5 and return the ID
RES: 1,4
My current solution is use two queries and download the results of "Q1" and make a second search in "Q2" but is very complicated because have 30k of results.
the problem to me seems to be more of a traditional union of filters in 2 indexes sort of a join , what we have in relational databases , not sure of the exact solution but recently had used a plug-in for the joins -> https://siren.io/siren-federate-20-0-introducing-a-scalable-inner-join-for-elasticsearch/ this might help

Orbeon: Static dropdown in repeated grid

I have a problem in repeated grid, I have a drop-down list where the users will choose what model they want.
Then I also have a JSON array which contains the model and other description of different cars.
How can I auto fill the appropriate JSON value to textField according to the chosen value in the drop-down list?
Like for example: The user chose the model Toyota, only the Toyota car model present in the JSON will be displayed at textField.
The form I've created is available at https://demo.orbeon.com/demo/fr/orbeon/builder/edit/3b1ebd5340007f245b34ccd468c36c188b376bd6. And here is the JSON:
{
"corppassUser": {
"corppassData": null,
"corppassEntity": {
"primaryActiviyDesc": "Marine insurance ",
"companyType": "A1",
"corppassPreviousNames": [],
"entityType": "LC",
"primaryActivityCode": "65121",
"businessExpiryDate": "",
"secondaryActivityCode": "93202",
"corppassShareholders": [
{
"allocation": 20000,
"personRef": {
"personName": "ANDY",
"nationality": "SG",
"id": 8,
"idno": "S6001111A"
},
"currency": "SGD",
"id": 3,
"entityRef": null,
"category": "1",
"shareType": "1"
},
{
"allocation": 10000,
"personRef": {
"personName": "TIMOTHY TAN",
"nationality": "SP",
"id": 6,
"idno": "S1112374E "
},
"currency": "SGD",
"id": 1,
"entityRef": null,
"category": "1",
"shareType": "1"
},
{
"allocation": 10000,
"personRef": {
"personName": "CLARISSA LIN",
"nationality": "SG",
"id": 7,
"idno": "S3212386E"
},
"currency": "SGD",
"id": 2,
"entityRef": null,
"category": "1",
"shareType": "1"
}
],
"uen": "T15LP0005A"
},
"id": 1
}
}

Trying to get foraign key records where every connected records are deactive ( Laravel elequent query )

I have 2 tables
Category's ( id, name )
Sub_categories ( id, key, value, category_id )
I'm trying to get all Category's whose all sub_categories are deactivated ( means are soft-deleted )
let me explain more
i have sub_categories data like this
[
{
"id": 1,
"category_id": 1,
"key": "sub 1",
"value": "sub_1",
"deleted_at": null
},
{
"id": 2,
"category_id": 1,
"key": "sub 2",
"value": "1",
"deleted_at": null
},
{
"id": 4,
"category_id": 1,
"key": "sub 3",
"value": "1",
"deleted_at": "2019-07-09 06:06:01"
},
{
"id": 5,
"category_id": 2,
"key": "sub 1",
"value": "33",
"deleted_at": "2019-07-09 06:06:01"
},
{
"id": 6,
"category_id": 2,
"key": "sub 2",
"value": "33",
"deleted_at": "2019-07-09 06:06:01"
}
]
i want only category_id -> 2 ( where all sub_categories are softedeleted )
hear's category model code
public function subCategory() {
$this->makeVisible('deleted_at');
return $this->hasMany('App\SubCategory','category_id','id');
}
$categories = Categories::doesntHave('subCategory')->get();
you first have to define Relationship between Categorys and Sub_categories - https://laravel.com/docs/5.8/eloquent-relationships.
Then use query to get what you want https://laravel.com/docs/5.8/queries
Get IDs of categories with sub categories:
$categoryIdsWithSubCategories = SubCategory::get()->pluck('category_id')->toArray();
Get categories without sub categories:
$categoriesWithoutSubCategories = Category::whereNotIn('id', $categoryIdsWithSubCategories)->get();

Filter on aggregated bucket keys?

Given data model structure like this,
{
Id: 123,
"string_facet": [
{
"name": "make",
"value": "Audi"
},
{
"name": "carListType",
"value": "PERSON EU"
},
{
"name": "modelType",
"value": ""
},
{
"name": "engineBrand",
"value": "APT"
},
{
"name": "typeDescription",
"value": "8D2"
}
],
"number_facet": [
{
"name": "typeNumber",
"value": 4614
},
{
"name": "serialNumber",
"value": 2
},
{
"name": "engineSize",
"value": 18
},
{
"name": "horsePower",
"value": 125
},
{
"name": "kw",
"value": 92
},
{
"name": "engineVolume",
"value": 1781
},
{
"name": "listType",
"value": 0
}
],
"dateTime_facet": [
{
"name": "fromDate",
"value": "1999-04-01T00:00:00"
},
{
"name": "toDate",
"value": "2000-10-01T00:00:00"
}
]
}
I want to get aggregates facet names, and values per name. However, I'm only interested in facets that have specific names, such as: make and engineBrand. Note that facets are of type nested.
I have tried the following .NEST expression, but it still returns all of the facet names.
.Global("global", g => g
.Aggregations(ag => ag
.Filter("global_makes", f => f
.Filter(ff => ff
.Nested(n => n
.Path("string_facet")
.Filter(pf => pf.Term("string_facet.name", "make")))
)
.Aggregations(agg => agg
.Nested("nested_string_facet", nested => nested
.Path("string_facet")
.Aggregations(stringFacet => stringFacet
.Terms("name", nameAgg => nameAgg.Field("string_facet.name").Size(0)
.Aggregations(nameAggNext => nameAggNext
.Terms("value", valueAgg => valueAgg.Field("string_facet.value").Size(0))
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
);
I have a filter within global (to lose scope of a passed in query), and then filter only on string_facet.name which match "make", but results still include all other names as well. How do I filter out aggregation to include only buckets where name is "make"?
This helped. https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/4449
Essentially had to move filter part deeper into aggregation.

Update single value in sub sub array in RethinkDB

We are trying to update a single answer in our sub sub array.
However our query is causing the following error:
{
"deleted": 0 ,
"errors": 1 ,
"first_error": "Inserted value must be an OBJECT (got ARRAY):
[
{
"answers": [
{
"answer": "wassup",
"owner": 12201836
}
],
"question": "Vraag 1?",
"questionId": 0,
"time": "10"
},
{
"answers": [],
"question": "Vraag 2?",
"questionId": 1,
"time": "15"
},
{
"answers": [],
"question": "Vraga 3?",
"questionId": 2,
"time": "20"
}
]" ,
"inserted": 0 ,
"replaced": 0 ,
"skipped": 0 ,
"unchanged": 0
}
Our table structure looks like the following:
Youtube
- Id
- Course
- Unit
- Session
- Number
- Group
- Questions (array)
- Question Id
- Time
- Answers (array)
- Id
- Answer
- Owner
Our query:
r.db('GitSmurf')
.table('youtube')
.update(function (row) {
return row('questions').merge(function (q) {
return r.branch(q('questionId').eq(0), { "answers": q('answers').merge(function(answer) {
return r.branch(answer('owner').eq(12201836), {"answer": "wassup"}, {})} )},{})
})
})
Test content:
{
"completed": [ ],
"course": "swd" ,
"group": "dwa-group-b" ,
"id": "44443377-ed15-4358-a005-f561e7b6a42d" ,
"number": 1 ,
"session": 1 ,
"unit": 1,
"questions": [
{
"answers": [
{
"answer": "hallo" ,
"owner": 12201836
}
] ,
"question": "Vraag 1?" ,
"questionId": 0 ,
"time": "10"
} ,
{
"answers": [ ],
"question": "Vraag 2?" ,
"questionId": 1 ,
"time": "15"
} ,
{
"answers": [ ],
"question": "Vraga 3?" ,
"questionId": 2 ,
"time": "20"
}
] ,
}
Any help is greatly appreciated!
We forgot to return a new object in the update query.
When we added that it worked.
r.db('GitSmurf')
.table('youtube')
.update(function (row) {
return { questions: row('questions').merge(function (q) {
return r.branch(q('questionId'), { "answers": q('answers').merge(function(answer) {
return r.branch(answer('owner').eq(12201836), {"answer": "tom"}, {})
})},{})
})}
})

Resources