I'm trying to add 2 different discovery clients depending on my Env variable. I want to do that for easier local development, without running local k8s cluster.
cloud:
retry:
initial-interval: 10
max-interval: 20
kubernetes:
discovery:
enabled: ${!CONSUL_ENABLED:true}
consul:
host: ${CONSUL_HOST:localhost}
port: ${CONSUL_PORT:8500}
discovery:
enabled: ${CONSUL_ENABLED:false}
fail-fast: true
instance-id: ${spring.application.name}-${server.port}-${instance-id}
health-check-path: /actuator/health
health-check-interval: 20s
My gradle file:
implementation 'org.springframework.cloud:spring-cloud-starter-kubernetes'
implementation 'org.springframework.cloud:spring-cloud-starter-consul-discovery'
But this config fails with error:
Field registration in org.springframework.cloud.netflix.zuul.ZuulProxyAutoConfiguration required a single bean, but 2 were found:
- getRegistration: defined by method 'getRegistration' in class path resource [org/springframework/cloud/kubernetes/discovery/KubernetesDiscoveryClientAutoConfiguration.class]
- consulRegistration: defined by method 'consulRegistration' in class path resource [org/springframework/cloud/consul/serviceregistry/ConsulAutoServiceRegistrationAutoConfiguration.class]
Is there any way to do that?
Ok, i found way to do that, you must disable all k8s, not only discovery:
cloud:
retry:
initial-interval: 10
max-interval: 20
kubernetes:
discovery:
enabled: ${K8S_ENABLED:true}
enabled: ${K8S_ENABLED:true}
consul:
host: ${CONSUL_HOST:localhost}
port: ${CONSUL_PORT:8500}
discovery:
enabled: ${CONSUL_ENABLED:false}
fail-fast: true
instance-id: ${spring.application.name}-${server.port}-${instance-id}
health-check-path: /actuator/health
health-check-interval: 20s
But is there a way to combine K8S_ENABLED and CONSUL_ENABLED variable to one?
Related
Thanks for taking the time to read my post.
My issue is as such. I have 2 microservices (auth-service and image-service) deployed on Heroku, as well as a server Eureka and a gateway Zuul.
In local, all of this works.
However, when deployed, the same calls give me 404 errors : for example :
zuul is deployed on port 8762 in local,
so http://localhost:8762/images/user/create works, it points to http://localhost:8200/user/create of the image-service.
Deployed, https://croquis-time-image.herokuapp.com/user/create works, but https://croquis-time-zuul.herokuapp.com/images/user/create throws a 404 error.
On eureka however, all my services are registered, so the trouble doesn't come from there. I thought perhaps zuul didn't manage to get all the services from Eureka, but I'm not sure how to check.
More information :
application.yml of zuul deployed :
server:
port: 8762
eureka:
client:
serviceUrl:
defaultZone: https://croquis-time-eureka.herokuapp.com/eureka/
instance:
hostName: croquis-time-eureka.herokuapp.com
zuul:
#Service will be mapped under the /api URI
prefix: /api
# Uncomment to disable auto-registering all services read from Eureka
# ignoredServices: '*'
routes:
image-service:
path: /images/**
serviceId: image-service
auth-service:
path: /auth/**
serviceId: auth-service
stripPrefix: false
sensitiveHeaders: Cookie,Set-Cookie
spring:
application:
name: zuul-server
security:
jwt:
uri: /auth/**
prefix: Bearer
expiration: 86400
header: Authorization
secret: *****************
The application.yml of eureka deployed
server:
port: 8761
eureka:
instance:
hostname: croquis-time-eureka.herokuapp.com
client:
registerWithEureka: false
fetchRegistry: false
serviceUrl:
defaultZone: https://croquis-time-eureka.herokuapp.com/eureka/
spring:
application:
name: eureka-server
The image service I'm trying to call :
server:
port: 8200
eureka:
client:
serviceUrl:
defaultZone: https://croquis-time-eureka.herokuapp.com/eureka/
instance:
hostName: croquis-time-eureka.herokuapp.com
spring:
application:
name: image-service
jpa:
showSql: true
hibernate:
ddlAuto: update
datasource:
url: jdbc:mysql://***********:3306/croquis-time
username: ******************
password: ****************
I have tried removing and adding the "ignored-services" from zuul to see if that was the problem, but it didn't change anything.
I'm very willing to edit my question with more information if you require more, I'm not sure where is the origin of the problem, so I'm a bit at a loss as to what to add.
Thanks !
you have an issue with the configuration of .yml in zuul server
Your .yml of zuul server must be:
instance:
hostName: croquis-time-zuul.herokuapp.com
And your .yml of image must be:
instance:
hostName: croquis-time-image.herokuapp.com
because instance.hostname is the host of your application acting as the eureka client. if you need more information please visit: https://blog.heroku.com/managing_your_microservices_on_heroku_with_netflix_s_eureka
Similar question asked in Spring Cloud Load Balancer multiple configurations.
I want to use health-check and same-instance-preference configurations for spring cloud load balancer at the same time. Unable to give mutiple configurations.
I am using SimpleDiscoveryClient for listing out the instances. Additionally, if both these configurations are clubbed, can it be a replacement for sticky session loadbalancer rule?
Posting my yml here:
spring:
application:
name: sample
cloud:
discovery:
client:
health-indicator:
enabled: false
simple:
instances:
test-service:
- uri: http://localhost:8082
- uri: http://localhost:8081
loadbalancer:
# configurations: health-check
configurations: same-instance-preference
sticky-session:
add-service-instance-cookie: true
cache:
enabled: false
health-check:
path:
default: /actuator/health
interval: 10000
gateway:
routes:
- id: test_routing
path: /user/*
uri: lb://test-service
predicates:
- Method=GET,POST
- Path=/user/**
server:
port: 45000
I am introducing in microservices with spring and kubernetes.
I have gateway services made with spring-cloud-starter-netflix-zuul that works like an apigateway
I define Zull gateway like this:
server:
port: 8080
use-forward-headers: true
security:
basic:
enabled: false
oauth2:
resource:
jwk.key-set-uri: ${OAUTH_KEYSETURI}
spring:
config:
name: proxy-service
application:
name: proxy-service
zuul:
routes:
service-one:
path: /service-one/**
url: http://service-one:8080
serviceId: service-one
service-two:
path: /service-two/**
url: http://service-two:8080
serviceId: service-two
ribbon:
eureka:
enabled: false
eureka:
client:
enabled: false
error:
whitelabel:
enabled: false
But I found some problems, for example, that the requests have a limit per service, so I added the following lines:
zuul:
host:
max-per-route-connections: 100000
max-total-connections: 100000
I want to know. What is the most performant way to integrate spring-zuul with Kubernetes? I have read that it can also be integrated with spring-kubernetes-config, ribbon, and eureka. But doing it is more performant?
Recently I also read about spring-cloud-gateway. What is the difference with this project? Why spring has two gateway projects very similar? Are there differences in performance? Will both be supported in the future? What do you recommend to use?
Currently I am running Spring Boot Services with Discovery First.
Starting the services one after another works just fine, but I am having issues starting the services all at once via docker-compose.
The discovery first bootstrap seems to not work as I expected. I would assume that the service would halt / retry till he receives the configuration from the configuration service, which has been discovered via eureka. But currently it will try to resolve the configuration once and then the service will start immediately after - no matter if a configuration has been brought or not.
The service bootstrap looks as following:
spring:
application:
name: my-service
cloud:
config:
fail-fast: false
discovery:
enabled: true
service-id: configserver
retry:
initialInterval: 2000
multiplier: 1.5
maxInterval: 60000
maxAttempts: 10
server:
port: ${APPLICATION_PORT:16000}
eureka:
client:
serviceUrl:
defaultZone: http://${EUREKA_HOSTNAME:localhost}:15000/eureka/
The eureka config looks as following:
spring:
application:
name: manager
server:
port: 15000
eureka:
client:
registerWithEureka: true
fetchRegistry: false
serviceUrl:
defaultZone: http://${EUREKA_HOSTNAME:localhost}:15000/eureka/
Last but not least - the configserver config looks as following:
spring:
application:
name: configserver
cloud:
config:
fail-fast: true
server:
port: 15001
eureka:
client:
serviceUrl:
defaultZone: http://${EUREKA_HOSTNAME:localhost}:15000/eureka/
Anyone able to give any advice here?
I found the issue:
Actually I found two issues on our side. The first one is not having a suitable lease renewal interval. The client just retried receiving the configuration with the cached services.
Since the cached services did not contain a configuration service, he wasn't able to receive a proper configuration.
The second problem was to not wait for enough time. This has been fixed in raising the maxAttempts higher. So the config and discovery services do have enough time to come up.
The client Configuration looks like the following now:
spring:
application:
name: service
cloud:
config:
fail-fast: true
discovery:
enabled: true
service-id: CONFIGSERVER
retry:
initialInterval: 2000
multiplier: 1.5
maxInterval: 60000
maxAttempts: 100
server:
port: ${APPLICATION_PORT:16000}
eureka:
instance:
lease-renewal-interval-in-seconds: 10
client:
fetch-registry: true
serviceUrl:
defaultZone: http://${EUREKA_HOSTNAME:localhost}:15000/eureka/
I am trying to register an application available through https only. I have problem with correct configuration and links displayed in eureka's dashboard are not correct. I have tried some configurations but I can't get the right effect i.e. working dashboard links in Eureka.
My base configuration.
server:
port: 9999
context-path: /ctx
ssl:
key-store: classpath:keystore.jks
key-store-password: 'kspass'
key-password: 'kpass'
keyAlias: ssl
spring:
application:
name: app-ctx
cloud:
loadbalancer:
retry:
enabled: true
eureka:
client:
serviceUrl:
defaultZone: https://localhost:8761/eureka/
instance:
hostname: localhost
secure-port-enabled: true
non-secure-port-enabled: false
secure-port: ${server.port}
health-check-url: https://${eureka.hostname}:XYZ/ctx/health
status-page-url: https://${eureka.hostname}:XYZ/ctx/info
home-page-url: https://${eureka.hostname}:XYZ/ctx
I have tried following versions of health/status/home URLs:
Absolute URLs without port
Example: health-check-url: https://${eureka.hostname}/ctx/health
Result: https://localhost/ctx/info
Absolute URLs with ${server.port} replacement
Example: health-check-url: https://${eureka.hostname}:${server.port}/ctx/health)
Result: ${server.port} not resolved, url in dashboard is:
https://localhost:${server.port}/ctx/info
Relative URLs
Example: health-check-url-path: /ctx/health
Result:
http://localhost:9999/ctx/info, no https.
Last one is quite close to my expectations, but there is no https.
Finally I've got solution for my problem. Not sure it that's the best one because as far as I can see it doesn't work with random ports i.e. server.port = 0. In that case eureka registers application with port 0 and on dashboard there is link with port that does not forward to correct location and that's not expected behavior.
Instead of using ${server.port} placeholder that is related to current application we have to use eureka's part of configuration ${eureka.instance.secure-port} i.e.
server:
port: 9999
context-path: /ctx
ssl:
key-store: classpath:keystore.jks
key-store-password: 'kspass'
key-password: 'kpass'
keyAlias: ssl
spring:
application:
name: app-ctx
cloud:
loadbalancer:
retry:
enabled: true
eureka:
client:
serviceUrl:
defaultZone: https://localhost:8761/eureka/
instance:
hostname: localhost
secure-port-enabled: true
non-secure-port-enabled: false
secure-port: ${server.port}
health-check-url: https://${eureka.instance.hostname}:${eureka.instance.secure-port}/ctx/health
status-page-url: https://${eureka.instance.hostname}:${eureka.instance.secure-port}/ctx/info
home-page-url: https://${eureka.instance.hostname}:${eureka.instance.secure-port}/ctx