I installed fzf for the zsh on my Mac
I usecd ** <Tab> , instead of getting a list of directories which can get into
I always get a long list of directories,such as
How to solve this problem?
when I search specific file, it always return a list of library container files of Mac file system, how to ignore them and just leave the real one.
it takes a very long time to get the top1 real result
BTW the first line numbers seems going infinite, why is that.
fzf default command search every files in your home diretory and follow every symbol links e.g. ~/Library/Container/*/Downloads which return files multi times.
According to the readme of fzf, you can specify FZF_DEFAULT_COMMAND and _fzf_compgen_path() _fzf_compgen_dir() to exclude directories what you don't want to see.
# Use fd (https://github.com/sharkdp/fd) instead of the default find
# remove -L of fzf default command
# export FZF_DEFAULT_COMMAND="find . -mindepth 1 -path '*/\.*\' -prune -o -type f -print -o -type l -print 2> /dev/null | cut -b3-"
export FZF_DEFAULT_COMMAND='fd --type f'
_fzf_compgen_path() {
fd --hidden --follow --exclude ".git" . "$1"
}
# Use fd to generate the list for directory completion
_fzf_compgen_dir() {
fd --type d --hidden --follow --exclude ".git" . "$1"
}
Just adding to the answer above:
install fd on your Mac via brew install fd
add the above mentioned code with FZF_DEFAULT_COMMAND to your .fzf.zsh (which you then need to load from your .zshrc via [ -f ~/.fzf.zsh ] && source ~/.fzf.zsh)
edit .fdignore file in your home dir to include dirs that you don't want to be included
Related
I am flattening a directory of nested folders/picture files down to a single folder. I want to move all of the nested files up to the root level.
There are 3,381 files (no directories included in the count). I calculate this number using these two commands and subtracting the directory count (the second command):
find ./ | wc -l
find ./ -type d | wc -l
To flatten, I use this command:
find ./ -mindepth 2 -exec mv -i -v '{}' . \;
Problem is that when I get a count after running the flatten command, my count is off by 46. After going through the list of files before and after (I have a backup), I found that the mv command is overwriting files sometimes even though I'm using -i.
Here's details from the log for one of these files being overwritten...
.//Vacation/CIMG1075.JPG -> ./CIMG1075.JPG
..more log
..more log
..more log
.//dog pics/CIMG1075.JPG -> ./CIMG1075.JPG
So I can see that it is overwriting. I thought -i was supposed to stop this. I also tried a -n and got the same number. Note, I do have about 150 duplicate filenames. Was going to manually rename after I flattened everything I could.
Is it a timing issue?
Is there a way to resolve?
NOTE: it is prompting me that some of the files are overwrites. On those prompts I just press Enter so as not to overwrite. In the case above, there is no prompt. It just overwrites.
Apparently the manual entry clearly states:
The -n and -v options are non-standard and their use in scripts is not recommended.
In other words, you should mimic the -n option yourself. To do that, just check if the file exists and act accordingly. In a shell script where the file is supplied as the first argument, this could be done as follows:
[ -f "${1##*/}" ]
The file, as first argument, contains directories which can be stripped using ##*/. Now simply execute the mv using ||, since we want to execute when the file doesn't exist.
[ -f "${1##*/}" ] || mv "$1" .
Using this, you can edit your find command as follows:
find ./ -mindepth 2 -exec bash -c '[ -f "${0##*/}" ] || mv "$0" .' '{}' \;
Note that we now use $0 because of the bash -c usage. It's first argument, $0, can't be the script name because we have no script. This means the argument order is shifted with respect to a usual shell script.
Why not check if file exists, prior move? Then you can leave the file where it is or you can rename it or do something else...
Test -f or, [] should do the trick?
I am on tablet and can not easyly include the source.
Is there a way to have the find command return a value when it does not find a match? Basically, I have an old backup, and I want to search for each of the files in it on my current computer. Here is a cheesy way I was going to do it:
first run the following from the home directory:
$ ls -lR * > AllFiles.txt;
This will build my listing of all of my files on the current computer.
Next run the following script for each file in the back up:
#! /bin/bash
if ! grep $1 ~/AllFiles.txt; then
echo file $1 not found;
exit 1;
fi
Of course this is clunky, and it does not account for filename changes, but it's close enough. Alternatively, I'd like to do a find command for each of the back up files.
You can use standard return value test if using a standard gnu find, such as:
find . ! -readable -prune -o -name 'filenameToSearch.ext'
then check for return value using:
echo $?
if any value other than 0 means it did not find a match.
If I understood you correctly;
grep -r valueORpatternToSearchinTEXT $(find . -type f) |wc -l
This will find for every file in the working/existing directory you are and its subdirs, search for what you need, then count for lines, if it is not found, you will get 0 at the end. Remove pipe and afterwards if you want to see what is found and where.
I was thinking if using a BASH script is possible without manually copying each file that is in this parent directory
"/Contents/Developer/Platforms/iPhoneOS.platform/Developer/SDKs/iPhoneOS7.0.sdk
/System/Library/PrivateFrameworks"
So in this folder PrivateFrameworks, there are many subfolders and in each subfolder it consists of the file that I would like to copy it out to another location. So the structure of the path looks like this:
-PrivateFrameworks
-AccessibilityUI.framework
-AccessibilityUI <- copy this
-AccountSettings.framework
-AccountSettings <- copy this
I do not want the option of copying the entire content in the folder as there might be cases where the folders contain files which I do not want to copy. So the only way I thought of is to copy by the file extension. However as you can see, the files which I specified for copying does not have an extension(I think?). I am new to bash scripting so I am not familiar if this can be done with it.
To copy all files in or below the current directory that do not have extensions, use:
find . ! -name '*.*' -exec cp -t /your/destination/dir/ {} +
The find . command looks for all files in or below the current directory. The argument -name '*.*' would restrict that search to files that have extensions. By preceding it with a not (!), however, we get all files that do not have an extension. Then, -exec cp -t /your/destination/dir/ {} + tells find to copy those files to the destination.
To do the above starting in your directory with the long name, use:
find "/Contents/Developer/Platforms/iPhoneOS.platform/Developer/SDKs/iPhoneOS7.0.sdk/System/Library/PrivateFrameworks" ! -name '*.*' -exec cp -t /your/destination/dir/ {} +
UPDATE: The unix tag on this question has been removed and replaced with a OSX tag. That means we can't use the -t option on cp. The workaround is:
find . ! -name '*.*' -exec cp {} /your/destination/dir/ \;
This is less efficient because a new cp process is created for every file moved instead of once for all the files that fit on a command line. But, it will accomplish the same thing.
MORE: There are two variations of the -exec clause of a find command. In the first use above, the clause ended with {} + which tells find to fill up the end of command line with as many file names as will fit on the line.
Since OSX lacks cp -t, however, we have to put the file name in the middle of the command. So, we put {} where we want the file name and then, to signal to find where the end of the exec command is, we add a semicolon. There is a trick, though. Because bash would normally consume the semicolon itself rather than pass it on to find, we have to escape the semicolon with a backslash. That way bash gives it to the find command.
sh SCRIPT.sh copy-from-directory .extension copy-to-directory
FROM_DIR=$1
EXTENSION=$2
TO_DIR=$3
USAGE="""Usage: sh SCRIPT.sh copy-from-directory .extension copy-to-directory
- EXAMPLE: sh SCRIPT.sh PrivateFrameworks .framework .
- NOTE: 'copy-to-directory' argument is optional
"""
## print usage if less than 2 args
if [[ $# < 2 ]]; then echo "${USAGE}" && exit 1 ; fi
## set copy-to-dir default args
if [[ -z "$TO_DIR" ]] ; then TO_DIR=$PWD ; fi
## DO SOMETHING...
## find directories; find target file;
## copy target file to copy-to-dir if file exist
find $FROM_DIR -type d | while read DIR ; do
FILE_TO_COPY=$(echo $DIR | xargs basename | sed "s/$EXTENSION//")
if [[ -f $DIR/$FILE_TO_COPY ]] ; then
cp $DIR/$FILE_TO_COPY $TO_DIR
fi
done
I have been given a list of folders which need to be found and copied to a new location.
I have basic knowledge of bash and have created a script to find and copy.
The basic command I am using is working, to a certain degree:
find ./ -iname "*searchString*" -type d -maxdepth 1 -exec cp -r {} /newPath/ \;
The problem I want to resolve is that each found folder contains the files that I want, but also contains subfolders which I do not want.
Is there any way to limit the recursion so that only the files at the root level of the found folder are copied: all subdirectories and files therein should be ignored.
Thanks in advance.
If you remove -R, cp doesn't copy directories:
cp *searchstring*/* /newpath
The command above copies dir1/file1 to /newpath/file1, but these commands copy it to /newpath/dir1/file1:
cp --parents *searchstring*/*(.) /newpath
for GNU cp and zsh
. is a qualifier for regular files in zsh
cp --parents dir1/file1 dir2 copies file1 to dir2/dir1 in GNU cp
t=/newpath;for d in *searchstring*/;do mkdir -p "$t/$d";cp "$d"* "$t/$d";done
find *searchstring*/ -type f -maxdepth 1 -exec rsync -R {} /newpath \;
-R (--relative) is like --parents in GNU cp
find . -ipath '*searchstring*/*' -type f -maxdepth 2 -exec ditto {} /newpath/{} \;
ditto is only available on OS X
ditto file dir/file creates dir if it doesn't exist
So ... you've been given a list of folders. Perhaps in a text file? You haven't provided an example, but you've said in comments that there will be no name collisions.
One option would be to use rsync, which is available as an add-on package for most versions of Unix and Linux. Rsync is basically an advanced copying tool -- you provide it with one or more sources, and a destination, and it makes sure things are synchronized. It knows how to copy things recursively, but it can't be told to limit its recursion to a particular depth, so the following will copy each item specified to your target, but it will do so recursively.
xargs -L 1 -J % rsync -vi -a % /path/to/target/ < sourcelist.txt
If sourcelist.txt contains a line with /foo/bar/slurm, then the slurm directory will be copied in its entiriety to /path/to/target/slurm/. But this would include directories contained within slurm.
This will work in pretty much any shell, not just bash. But it will fail if one of the lines in sourcelist.txt contains whitespace, or various special characters. So it's important to make sure that your sources (on the command line or in sourcelist.txt) are formatted correctly. Also, rsync has different behaviour if a source directory includes a trailing slash, and you should read the man page and decide which behaviour you want.
You can sanitize your input file fairly easily in sh, or bash. For example:
#!/bin/sh
# Avoid commented lines...
grep -v '^[[:space:]]*#' sourcelist.txt | while read line; do
# Remove any trailing slash, just in case
source=${line%%/}
# make sure source exist before we try to copy it
if [ -d "$source" ]; then
rsync -vi -a "$source" /path/to/target/
fi
done
But this still uses rsync's -a option, which copies things recursively.
I don't see a way to do this using rsync alone. Rsync has no -depth option, as find has. But I can see doing this in two passes -- once to copy all the directories, and once to copy the files from each directory.
So I'll make up an example, and assume further that folder names do not contain special characters like spaces or newlines. (This is important.)
First, let's do a single-pass copy of all the directories themselves, not recursing into them:
xargs -L 1 -J % rsync -vi -d % /path/to/target/ < sourcelist.txt
The -d option creates the directories that were specified in sourcelist.txt, if they exist.
Second, let's walk through the list of sources, copying each one:
# Basic sanity checking on input...
grep -v '^[[:space:]]*#' sourcelist.txt | while read line; do
if [ -d "$line" ]; then
# Strip trailing slashes, as before
source=${line%%/}
# Grab the directory name from the source path
target=${source##*/}
rsync -vi -a "$source/" "/path/to/target/$target/"
fi
done
Note the trailing slash after $source on the rsync line. This causes rsync to copy the contents of the directory, rather than the directory.
Does all this make sense? Does it match your requirements?
You can use find's ipath argument:
find . -maxdepth 2 -ipath './*searchString*/*' -type f -exec cp '{}' '/newPath/' ';'
Notice the path starts with ./ to match find's search directory, ends with /* in order to exclude files in the top level directory, and maxdepth is set to 2 to only recurse one level deep.
Edit:
Re-reading your comments, it seems like you want to preserve the directory you're copying from? E.g. when searching for foo*:
./foo1/* ---> copied to /newPath/foo1/* (not to /newPath/*)
./foo2/* ---> copied to /newPath/foo2/* (not to /newPath/*)
Also, the other requirement is to keep maxdepth at 1 for speed reasons.
(As pointed out in the comments, the following solution has security issues for specially crafted names)
Combining both, you could use this:
find . -maxdepth 1 -type d -iname 'searchString' -exec sh -c "mkdir -p '/newPath/{}'; cp "{}/*" '/newPath/{}/' 2>/dev/null" ';'
Edit 2:
Why not ditch find altogether and use a pure bash solution:
for d in *searchString*/; do mkdir -p "/newPath/$d"; cp "$d"* "/newPath/$d"; done
Note the / at the end of the search string, causing only directories to be considered for matching.
I am having some trouble in doing some comands on shell.
My problem is that I want to change directories more specifically to a directory which I don't know but that contains the file named xxx.
How can I change directly to that directory that contains that file?
If I knew the names of the directories that contained that file would be easier because I only had to use cd ~/Name of directory.
Can anyone help me?
thanks
If you have GNU find:
cd "$(find /startdir -name 'filename' -printf %h -quit)"
You can replace "/startdir" with any valid directory, for example /, . or `~/.
If you want to cd to a directory which is in the $PATH that contains an executable file:
cd "$(dirname "$(type -P "filename")")" # Bash
or
cd "$(f=$(type -P "ksh"); echo "${f%/*}")" # Bash
or
cd "$(dirname "$(which "filename")")"
If you don't know where a file is, go to the root of the system and find it:
cd /
find . -iname filename
In several linux systems you could do:
$ cd `find . -name "filename" | xargs dirname`
But change "filename" to the file you want to find.
BASH
cd `find . -name "*filename*" | head -1`
This is kind of a variation to Qiau answer. Finds the first file which contains the string filename and then change the current directory to its location.
* is a wild card, there may be something before and/or after filename.