In a spring MVC app , by default all beans are singleton ,but what should be the standard scopes for below classes according to good programming practices:
1.DAO classes
2.Controller classes
3.DTO classes
4.Service classes
I have read that DAO and Controller classes should be singleton scoped and DTO classes should not be beans so not annotated, whenever required, DTO classes should be instantiated using "new".
What will be the scope of #Service classes ?
And Which classes will have the Request and Session scopes if none of the above classes are created in these 2 scopes?
First of all not classes, but Spring managed beans have a scope. Difference is that you can have classes in your application that you didn't configure to be managed by Spring (So for example you didn't provide #Component annotation)
For the Spring managed beans default scope is Singleton. That means Spring container will provide the same instance everytime you ask for that bean to be autowired.
You can change that default scope with for example #Scopeannotation. So to answer your question, all of the above mentioned choices would have default scope of singleton but you could changed that to be requestor sessionscope if you would like (only applicable in web applications though). You can read more about setting scopes here.
ps. DTO classes are usually not declared to be managed by Spring - letting Spring manage a simple data transfer object doesn't make much sense.
So basically two things to consider here. The 1st is that if a bean is required to be declared as a spring bean . It depends on if you need to use the spring features for this class such as #Transactional , #Async , #PreAuthorize , #Autowired (i.e dependency injection) , or ensure the bean has certain scope etc. If not , it is simpler not define it as a spring bean and simply create it by yourself.
So the following types of the classes are required to define them as spring bean in most cases:
DAO because most probably need to inject EntityManager or JdbcTemplate to it
Controller because it is a part of spring-mvc and you need to define it as a bean such that you can use #RequestMapping / #GetMapping / #PostMapping / #PutMapping / #DeletMapping / #PatchMapping etc. on its method.
Service class because you need to inject it into the controller and you need to use #Transactional to manage the DB transaction for its method.
For DTO , in most case you can create it by yourself since it is just a data container in nature and does not require to use any spring features.
The 2nd thing to consider is what scope does a bean should be. You mainly need to think about if an instance of that class is okay to be executed safely by multiple request (i.e thread) concurrently. If yes , you can simply use the default singleton scope. If not , you can think about if you want each HTTP request (i.e #RequestScope) or each HTTP session (i.e. #SessionScope) has their own instance of that class to work with. For example , if you are implementing some shopping cart , you most probably want that the HTTP session has their won instance of a shopping cart and so you should use #SessionScope for the shopping cart.
Related
My Scope of the object is in Method level, Is it good to decorate a POJO class with
#Componet or #Bean with scope request or prototype, So that we could inject it in the required class to avoid Object Instantiation by manual.
Is it a good practice?
What to annotate?
Within the Spring Framework, only use the #Bean annotation in classes marked with #Configuration.
Although possible to use the #Bean within #Component classes, it is not recommended, since you will be creating light beans (Which is considered bad practice and can lead to unintended side effects).
When to use #Bean vs #Component?
The golden rule, use #Component (Or #Service) in your own classed, and #Configuration + #Bean for third-party code.
What not to annotate with #Component or #Bean
Do not annotate domain classes or Entities (For example your person class), only classes that are considered to be stateless. (Like your ManagerPerson / **Service class).
Do not annotate your DTOs.
If you have any of these currently annotated, I would strongly recommend first jumping back to Spring Framework tutorials.
What about scope?
Go have a look at https://www.baeldung.com/spring-bean-scopes
There are only a couple namely:
Singleton (Default scope) Single Spring Bean Instance for the application - Same Instance that is being used all over the application.)
Prototype (New bean for where ever it is used)
Request (Spring Bean per Request only for Spring MVC)
Session (Spring Bean per Session only for Spring MVC)
Custom Scope (Yes you can create your own... but don't ;) )
This question is regarding the sample:
https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/blob/master/spring-boot-samples/spring-boot-sample-jersey/src/main/java/sample/jersey/Endpoint.java
Why do we need "#Component" annotation for Jersey resource when using spring-boot -starter-jersey project?
If I remove it, the Jersey servlet can still serve resources.
So what is the need for "#Component"?
You don't need it. Jersey uses HK2 as it's internal DI framework, and HK2 has a Spring bridge. This is what's used internally to bridge Spring components into the HK2 IoC container, so that they can be injected into Jersey components. And Jersey implements an AutowiredInjectionResolver1 that allows for injection of Spring components using #Autowired. You don't even need #Autowired though. All the Spring components can be injected with the normal #Inject.
The only drawback I've ran into, not making the Jersey components a Spring #Component is that it doesn't support #Value when you want to inject property values.
The one thing I don't like is that when you declare something a Spring #Component, it automatically makes it a singleton. But Jersey resources are by default request scoped. You can add a Spring #Scope("request"), and it should change the resource to a request scoped resource. Jersey has declared the Spring RequestScope, so we can use it. How exactly it ties in to Jersey's request scope, I am not a hundred percent sure. I ran into a problem a while back. I can't remember what it was, but that has kept me from ever using the Spring request scope again.
Assuming I want to keep all my resources request scoped, I would take sticking to the normal Jersey request scope, and not being able to inject #Values, over having to use Spring's request scope. Maybe I'm imagining things, and there was no issue using it, but personally I'll just stick to what I know works :-)
UPDATE
Another thing that does't work if you don't make the resource a Spring #Component is Spring's AOP. That's fine with me though as HK2 also has AOP.
1 - An InjectionResolver allows you to use custom annotations to create injection targets.
When you remove #Component jersey takes control of the scope of the instance. With #Component a singleton instance is created, removing it you can use the following jersey annotations:
• Request scope (Default):
By using the #RequestScope annotation or none, we can have a life-cycle till
the request lasts. This is the default scope of the root-resource classes. For
each new request, a new root-resource instance is being created and served
accordingly for the first time. However, when the same root-resource method
is being called, then the old instance will be used to serve the request.
• Per-lookup scope:
The #PerLookup annotation creates root-resource instances for every request.
• Singleton:
The #Singleton annotation allows us to create only a single instance
throughout the application.
Try different behaviors using a counter inside your class...
public class MyWebResource {
private int counter;
#GET
#Path("/counter")
#Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
public Response getCounter() {
counter++;
return Response.status(Status.OK).entity(counter).build();
}
}
I'm new to Spring and I'm confused about something basic. Are the classes that are stereotyped (Service, Controller, Repository) treated as beans? I'm confused as to when you actually need to annotate/configure something as a bean and when you don't. Is it for the classes that aren't stereotyped?
Thanks!
From spring documentation:
In Spring, the objects that form the backbone of your application and
that are managed by the Spring IoC container are called beans. A bean
is an object that is instantiated, assembled, and otherwise managed by
a Spring IoC container. Otherwise, a bean is simply one of many
objects in your application. Beans, and the dependencies among them,
are reflected in the configuration metadata used by a container.
Service, Controller, Repository are managed by the Spring IoC container, so they are called beans. You annotate a class as #Serivice, #Controller, #Repository, or more in general #Component when you want spring to manage it: spring will manage the instance of annotated class in regard of the scope you select (not all these scope are always available):
singleton – Return a single bean instance per Spring IoC container
prototype – Return a new bean instance each time when requested
request – Return a single bean instance per HTTP request
session – Return a single bean instance per HTTP session
globalSession – Return a single bean instance per global HTTP
session
I'm new to Spring and a little confused about how it works. I get that I can use the application context to instantiate beans and have them populated. However, is the idea that I should be able to just write Bean b = new Bean() and then have Spring to somehow automagically populate that Bean?
I'm experimenting with Spring in a web application, and as far as I can see I need to inject the ApplicationContext into, say, the servlets to be able to instantiate other beans (services, daos etc.) from there. It's a bit cumbersome, but probably works.
However, is Spring meant to be able to hook into any object instantiation which happens on classes defined as beans in applicationContext.xml?
Spring is an Inversion of Control container. A bean is an object whose life cycle is managed by Spring. If you want Spring to populate an object, it needs to go through Spring, ie. it needs to be bean.
is Spring meant to be able to hook into any object instantiation
which happens on classes defined as beans in applicationContext.xml?
Spring doesn't hook into anything. You configure your beans and the relationships between them with Spring and Spring handles creating the instances and linking them up.
For domain objects, Spring provides a solution via the #Configurable annotation: http://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/4.0.0.RELEASE/spring-framework-reference/htmlsingle/#aop-atconfigurable
It requires compile- or load-time-weaving and, thus, introduces some additional complexity but having the convenience of using the standard new Bean() syntax plus Spring's autowiring is worth it in my opinion.
Alternatively, you could define your domain objects as beans with prototype scope and use some factory to create them using the Spring ApplicationContext.getBean() method. With a scope of prototype a new instance will be returned every time and since you go through the ApplicationContext, Spring will do all the dependency injection magic as usual.
As for services and other beans with singleton scope, you would typically NOT retrieve them by first injecting the ApplicationContext and using it but instead you would inject them via either a constructor, setter or annotation-based strategy. The documentation covers that in detail: http://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/4.0.0.RELEASE/spring-framework-reference/htmlsingle/#beans-factory-collaborators
In XML file in spring we have two bean with different id but same class. They have the same properties offcourse. Now I have InitializingBean interface and in afterPropertySet() I am just printing the value of properties.
Its printing the values two times for me?
According Spring Documentation:
afterPropertySet()
Invoked by a BeanFactory after it has set all bean properties supplied (and satisfied BeanFactoryAware and ApplicationContextAware).
So the short answer on your question is: yes
Spring doesn't manipulate classes or object. Spring manipulates Bean Entity. It is the simplest object manipulated by Spring IOC. Bean has additional behaivior rules introduced by Spring.
If you create two beans for example with Singleton scope and not Lazy initializated Spring creates two instances of your class.
Probably you are calling this Class also invoking a Test or by launching a Integration test like this . check the breakpoints , if you are using SpringRunner, try to mock the component