I have some servers with a lot of wordpress instances, who I ask them what versions they have.
- name: CONTADOR WP VERSIONES
shell: mycommand
register: wp_versions
- debug: msg: "{{ wp_versions.stdout_lines }}"
For example:
TASK [debug] *********************************************************************
ok: [server1] => {
"msg": [
"5.1.13"
]
}
ok: [server2] => {
"msg": [
"5.1.12",
"5.1.13"
]
}
ok: [server3] => {
"msg": [
"5.1.10",
"5.1.13",
]
}
I need to list a unique values like this:
"msg": [
"5.1.10",
"5.1.12",
"5.1.13",
]
I have tried all that i found but nothing works as I want.
Thanks
Use special variable ansible_play_hosts and extract the variables from the hostvars
- set_fact:
all_vers: "{{ ansible_play_hosts|
map('extract', hostvars, ['wp_versions', 'stdout_lines'])|
flatten|unique }}"
run_once: true
gives
all_vers:
- 5.1.13
- 5.1.12
- 5.1.10
You could do something like this:
- hosts: all
gather_facts: false
tasks:
- name: CONTADOR WP VERSIONES
shell: mycommand
register: wp_versions
- hosts: localhost
gather_facts: false
tasks:
# This tasks builds a flattened list of all the
# wp_versions.stdout_lines values collected from your hosts.
- name: Collect wp_versions information
set_fact:
all_wp_versions_pre: "{{ all_wp_versions_pre + hostvars[item].wp_versions.stdout_lines }}"
loop: "{{ groups.all }}"
vars:
all_wp_versions_pre: []
# Here we use the `unique` filter to produce a list of
# unique versions.
- name: Set all_wp_versions fact
set_fact:
all_wp_versions: "{{ all_wp_versions_pre|unique }}"
- debug:
var: all_wp_versions
Given you examples, this would produce the following output:
TASK [debug] ********************************************************************************************
ok: [localhost] => {
"all_wp_versions": [
"5.1.13",
"5.1.12",
"5.1.10"
]
}
Related
I am working on a project aimed at populating the IP's of some routers based on East/West locations. The first host will always be the primary and the second will always be the secondary.
Based on the location passed, I flip the inventory. I see the inventory being flipped, but Ansible get the value from the list in the same order.
It doesn't matter what order the inventory list is read. I need for the first host to read the first element e.g. 20.21.22.23 and then the second host to read the second element 28.29.30.31.
Right now, ATL is always the first element and LAX the second.
ok: [ATL_isr_lab] => {
"msg": [
"20.21.22.23",
"24.25.26.27",
"24.25.26.28"
]
}
ok: [LAX_isr_lab] => {
"msg": [
"28.29.30.31",
"32.33.34.35",
"32.33.34.36"
]
}
------------------ Inventory Flipped -------------------------------
ok: [LAX_isr_lab] => {
"msg": [
"28.29.30.31",
"32.33.34.35",
"32.33.34.36"
]
}
ok: [ATL_isr_lab] => {
"msg": [
"20.21.22.23",
"24.25.26.27",
"24.25.26.28"
]
}
---
- hosts: test_hosts
vars:
region: east
_Hub_IP: [ 20.21.22.23, 28.29.30.31]
_Transit_IP: [ 24.25.26.27, 32.33.34.35]
_Neighbor_IP: [24.25.26.28, 32.33.34.36]
_idx: "{{ groups.all.index(inventory_hostname) }}"
#flips inventory if west
order: "{{ (region == 'east')|ternary('reverse_inventory', 'inventory') }}"
become: yes
ignore_unreachable: true
gather_facts: false
tasks:
- name: "Configure Router"
debug:
msg:
- "{{ _Hub_IP[_idx|int] }}"
- "{{ _Transit_IP[_idx|int] }}"
- "{{ _Neighbor_IP[_idx|int] }}"
Well, the issue is not coming with the reverse_inventory and inventory value of the order parameter like you seems to think it is.
The issue is to think that groups.all is indeed reversed when you do use the reverse_inventory value.
Here is an example of this, with the playbook:
- hosts: localhost
gather_facts: no
order: "{{ (region == 'east')|ternary('reverse_inventory', 'inventory') }}"
tasks:
- debug:
var: groups.all
Running it with, with the region as an extra-vars:
ansible-playbook play.yml --inventory inventory.yml --extra-vars "region=east"
Will yield:
ok: [localhost] =>
groups.all:
- LAX_isr_lab
- ATL_isr_lab
ansible-playbook play.yml --inventory inventory.yml --extra-vars "region=west"
Will yield:
ok: [localhost] =>
groups.all:
- LAX_isr_lab
- ATL_isr_lab
Still the sorting works, see:
- hosts: all
gather_facts: no
order: "{{ (region == 'east')|ternary('reverse_inventory', 'inventory') }}"
tasks:
- debug:
Run with:
ansible-playbook play.yml --inventory inventory.yml --extra-vars "region=east"
Will yield
ok: [ATL_isr_lab] =>
msg: Hello world!
ok: [LAX_isr_lab] =>
msg: Hello world!
ansible-playbook play.yml --inventory inventory.yml --extra-vars "region=west"
Will yield
ok: [LAX_isr_lab] =>
msg: Hello world!
ok: [ATL_isr_lab] =>
msg: Hello world!
So, what ends up being wrong is your _idx value.
To fix this, you could use the reverse filter of jinja with the same ternary as you are using in the order parameter, like this:
_idx: "{{ ((region == 'east')|ternary(groups.all|reverse, groups.all)).index(inventory_hostname) }}"
Working playbook:
- hosts: all
gather_facts: no
order: "{{ (region == 'east')|ternary('reverse_inventory', 'inventory') }}"
vars:
_Hub_IP: [20.21.22.23, 28.29.30.31]
_Transit_IP: [24.25.26.27, 32.33.34.35]
_Neighbor_IP: [24.25.26.28, 32.33.34.36]
_idx: "{{ ((region == 'east')|ternary(groups.all|reverse, groups.all)).index(inventory_hostname) }}"
tasks:
- debug:
msg:
- "{{ _Hub_IP[_idx|int] }}"
- "{{ _Transit_IP[_idx|int] }}"
- "{{ _Neighbor_IP[_idx|int] }}"
Running examples:
ansible-playbook play.yml --inventory inventory.yml --extra-vars "region=east"
Will yield:
ok: [ATL_isr_lab] =>
msg:
- 20.21.22.23
- 24.25.26.27
- 24.25.26.28
ok: [LAX_isr_lab] =>
msg:
- 28.29.30.31
- 32.33.34.35
- 32.33.34.36
ansible-playbook play.yml --inventory inventory.yml --extra-vars "region=west"
Will yield:
ok: [LAX_isr_lab] =>
msg:
- 20.21.22.23
- 24.25.26.27
- 24.25.26.28
ok: [ATL_isr_lab] =>
msg:
- 28.29.30.31
- 32.33.34.35
- 32.33.34.36
Got it working as posted originally. I had to upgrade to ansible version 2.11.6. I'm running Debian 10 and apt-get update/apt-get upgrade did not find a newer version.
My solution involved deleting the version and installing it again through pip. After that, I ran the code and it worked flawlessly.
I need to create a variable of ip addresses that are derived from the run state of all hosts. I expect to insert a new string value and have it appended to the list.
When I run the following ansible-playbook, it creates what looks to be a new list instance for each host instead of modifying the playbook level vars.
My understanding is the set_fact below should concatenate the lists and assign them back to the play scoped var ip_list_from_terraform. Why am I getting host scoped results?
---
- name: Bootstrap nodes
hosts: all
become: true
gather_facts: true
vars:
ip_list_from_terraform: ['Verify']
tasks:
- name: assign a list of all the physical network private IPs
set_fact:
ip_list_from_terraform: "{{ ip_list_from_terraform + [ item ] }}"
with_items: " {{ hostvars[inventory_hostname]['ansible_' + ansible_default_ipv4['interface']]['ipv4']['address'] }} "
register: ip_list_from_terraform_list
- name: Debug global var
debug:
var: ip_list_from_terraform
- name: Debug register result
debug:
var: ip_list_from_terraform_list
Expected:
ok: [shrimp-master-0] => {
"ip_list_from_terraform": [
"Verify",
"10.0.2.41",
"10.0.2.172",
"10.0.2.33",
"10.0.2.215",
"10.0.2.131",
"10.0.2.168",
"10.0.2.118"
]
}
Actual:
TASK [Debug global var] ********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
ok: [shrimp-master-0] => {
"ip_list_from_terraform": [
"Verify",
"10.0.2.12"
]
}
ok: [shrimp-master-1] => {
"ip_list_from_terraform": [
"Verify",
"10.0.2.33"
]
}
ok: [shrimp-master-2] => {
"ip_list_from_terraform": [
"Verify",
"10.0.2.215"
]
}
ok: [shrimp-worker-0-super-wallaby] => {
"ip_list_from_terraform": [
"Verify",
"10.0.2.131"
]
}
ok: [shrimp-gpu-worker-0-settled-wombat] => {
"ip_list_from_terraform": [
"Verify",
"10.0.2.151"
]
}
Let's simplify the case. Given the inventory
shell> cat hosts
host1 test_ip=10.0.2.41
host2 test_ip=10.0.2.172
host3 test_ip=10.0.2.33
the playbook
- hosts: host1,host2,host3
vars:
ip_list_from_terraform: ['Verify']
tasks:
- set_fact:
ip_list_from_terraform: "{{ ip_list_from_terraform + [ item ] }}"
with_items: "{{ hostvars[inventory_hostname]['test_ip'] }}"
- debug:
var: ip_list_from_terraform
gives
ok: [host2] =>
ip_list_from_terraform:
- Verify
- 10.0.2.172
ok: [host1] =>
ip_list_from_terraform:
- Verify
- 10.0.2.41
ok: [host3] =>
ip_list_from_terraform:
- Verify
- 10.0.2.33
As a side-note, with_items is needed because the argument is a string. loop would crash with the error 'Invalid data passed to ''loop'', it requires a list,.
Q: "set_fact should concatenate the lists"
A: Run once and loop ansible_play_hosts. For example
- set_fact:
ip_list_from_terraform: "{{ ip_list_from_terraform +
[hostvars[item]['test_ip']] }}"
loop: "{{ ansible_play_hosts }}"
run_once: true
gives
ip_list_from_terraform:
- Verify
- 10.0.2.41
- 10.0.2.172
- 10.0.2.33
How to get the sum of two hosts with Jinja2 filtering ansible
host1 and host 2
---
- name: Count Check
hosts: MYGROUP
gather_facts: true
user: sv_admin
tasks:
- name: count check
shell: cat /etc/hosts | wc -l
register: command_result
- debug:
var: command_result.stdout
- set_fact:
total_result: "{{ command_result.stdout | map('int') | sum(start=0) }}"
- debug:
msg: "Total count: {{ total_result }}"
Playbook Output
TASK [debug] *****************************************************************
ok: [Host-01] => {
"msg": "Total count: 134"
}
ok: [Host-02] => {
"msg": "Total count: 133"
}
Use extract and sum. For example, the playbook below
shell> cat playbook.yml
- hosts: test_01:test_03
gather_facts: false
tasks:
- shell: cat /etc/hosts | wc -l
register: command_result
- debug:
var: command_result.stdout
- set_fact:
total_result: "{{ ansible_play_hosts_all|
map('extract', hostvars, ['command_result', 'stdout'])|
map('int')|
sum }}"
run_once: true
- debug:
var: total_result
gives (abridged)
shell> ansible-playbook playbook.yml
PLAY [test_01:test_03] ****
TASK [shell] ****
changed: [test_01]
changed: [test_03]
TASK [debug] ****
ok: [test_01] => {
"command_result.stdout": " 62"
}
ok: [test_03] => {
"command_result.stdout": " 31"
}
TASK [set_fact] ****
ok: [test_01]
TASK [debug] ****
ok: [test_03] => {
"total_result": "93"
}
ok: [test_01] => {
"total_result": "93"
}
See serial
See the difference between ansible_play_hosts and ansible_play_hosts_all
You can use custom stats to do that: https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/modules/set_stats_module.html
So for your case it would look like
---
- name: Count Check
hosts: MYGROUP
gather_facts: true
user: sv_admin
tasks:
- name: count check
shell: cat /etc/hosts | wc -l
register: command_result
- debug:
var: command_result.stdout
- set_fact:
host_result: "{{ command_result.stdout }}"
- debug:
msg: "Count for this host: {{ host_result }}"
- set_stats:
data: "{{ { 'total_count': host_result | int } }}"
Then if you run it with ANSIBLE_SHOW_CUSTOM_STATS=yes it will show you the result at the end:
$ ANSIBLE_SHOW_CUSTOM_STATS=yes ansible-playbook -i inventory pb.yml
... (usual output)
CUSTOM STATS: *************************************************************
RUN: { "total_count": 267}
The set_stats task adds results together from all the hosts by default, which is what you are looking for. You need to make sure the values are integers though, because if they are strings it will just concatenate them and you will end up with something like RUN: { "total_count": "134133"}. That's why I have put the data: bit the way I have - if you try to create the dictionary in regular yaml, like
data:
total_count: "{{ host_result | int }}"
you will see that the value is still a string (due to the way yaml/jinja works) and it won't work properly.
Sorry if there are many posts about variables inside variable my use case is different.
Trying to access an element from a variable list "efs_list" based on the index-number of the current host. There are three hosts in the inventory
vars:
efs_list:
- efs1
- efs2
- efs3
sdb_index: "{{ groups['all'].index(inventory_hostname) }}"
The values should be as follows
host1- efs1
host2- efs2
host3- efs3
Tried accessing it through efs_list.{{ sdb_index }}
for - debug: var=efs_list.{{ sdb_index }} the output is as intended
ok: [10.251.0.174] => {
"efs_list.0": "efs1"
}
ok: [10.251.0.207] => {
"efs_list.1": "efs2"
}
ok: [10.251.0.151] => {
"efs_list.2": "efs3"
}
But for
- debug:
msg: "{{ efs_list.{{ sdb_index }} }}"
fatal: [10.251.0.174]: FAILED! => {"msg": "template error while templating string: expected name or number. String: {{ efs_list.{{ sdb_index }} }}"}
---
- name: SDB Snapshots Creation
hosts: all
remote_user: "centos"
become: yes
vars:
efs_list:
- efs1
- efs2
- efs3
sdb_index: "{{ groups['all'].index(inventory_hostname) }}"
tasks:
- debug: var=efs_list.{{ sdb_index }}
- debug:
msg: "{{ efs_list.{{ sdb_index }} }}"
- name: Get Filesystem ID
become: false
local_action: command aws efs describe-file-systems --creation-token "{{ efs_list.{{ sdb_index }} }}"
--region us-east-1 --query FileSystems[*].FileSystemId --output text
register: fs_id
It should attribute the element of list to current indexenter code here
extract filter will do the job. The input of the filter must be a list of indices and a container (array in this case). The tasks below
- set_fact:
sdb_index: "{{ [] + [ groups['all'].index(inventory_hostname) ] }}"
- debug:
msg: "{{ sdb_index|map('extract', efs_list)|list }}"
give
ok: [host1] => {
"msg": [
"efs1"
]
}
ok: [host2] => {
"msg": [
"efs2"
]
}
ok: [host3] => {
"msg": [
"efs3"
]
}
If the hosts are not sorted in the inventory it's necessary to sort them in the play
- set_fact:
my_hosts: "{{ groups['all']|sort }}"
- set_fact:
sdb_index: "{{ [] + [ my_hosts.index(inventory_hostname) ] }}"
- debug:
msg: "{{ sdb_index|map('extract', efs_list)|list }}"
I got the example code in Ansible:
- name: testing
hosts: localhost
vars:
svc:
https: ['tcp/443']
app_svc: ['tcp/5543', 'udp/5543', 'tcp/3100']
tasks:
- name: print
debug:
msg: port={{item.key}} value={{item.value}}
with_dict:
- "{{svc}}"
And this outputs to:
ok: [127.0.0.1] => (item=None) => {
"msg": "port=app_svc value=[u'tcp/5543', u'udp/5543', u'tcp/3100']"
}
ok: [127.0.0.1] => (item=None) => {
"msg": "port=https value=[u'tcp/443']"
}
What I would like to achieve is, when there is more than one element in list of values it would split like this:
- name=https, prot=tcp, port=443
- name=app_svc, prot=tcp, port=5543
- name=app_svc, prot=udp, port=5543
- name=app_svc, prot=tcp, port=3100
with_dict stanza only displays me a whole list and I couldn't find a way do do it differently. Is it possible to do it like that without reorganizing the var section? Thanks in advance for input.
To see the syntax errors run
# ansible-lint <YOUR-PLAYBOOK>
Correct syntax should be
- hosts: localhost
gather_facts: no
vars:
svc:
https: ['tcp/443']
app_svc: ['tcp/5543', 'udp/5543', 'tcp/3100']
tasks:
- name: print
debug:
msg: "port={{ item.key }} value={{ item.value }}"
with_dict: "{{ svc }}"
gives
"msg": "port=app_svc value=[u'tcp/5543', u'udp/5543', u'tcp/3100']"
"msg": "port=https value=[u'tcp/443']"
Change the loop
- name: print
debug:
msg: "name={{ item.0.key }},
prot={{ item.1.split('/')[0] }},
port={{ item.1.split('/')[1] }}"
loop: "{{ lookup('subelements', svc|dict2items, 'value') }}"
to get the format
"msg": "name=app_svc, prot=tcp, port=5543"
"msg": "name=app_svc, prot=udp, port=5543"
"msg": "name=app_svc, prot=tcp, port=3100"
"msg": "name=https, prot=tcp, port=443"
dict2items is available since version 2.6 . Without "dict2items" transform the data first. See below (not tested).
https:
- {key: 'https', value: ['tcp/443']}
- {key: 'app_svc', value: ['tcp/5543', 'udp/5543', 'tcp/3100']}