I'm trying to perform fuzz test with Defensics tool towards an HTTPS server. I do not have in place mutual authentication, so Defensics side I should define only the trusted certificate to authenticate the server. But it seems that Defensics is able only to set the full certificate (in PKCS12 format) in the section Basic-TLS of Defensics GUI.
Is there a different option? I'm using HTTP-Server test-plan.
Related
I am trying to connect to my webserver with Android apps which are using okhttp. The webserver is using an SSL certificate signed by my own personal CA. The CA is added to the phone/tablet, but I get the following error:
java.security.cert.CertPathValidatorException: Trust anchor for certification path not found.
The server contains the complete certificate chain. Should this work in principle? Does okhttp trust added personal CAs?
The https connection works without problems in the browser and other apps not using okhttp.
I am working in Ec2 instance. I have connected my php files like http://13.57.220.172/phpinsert.php. But it is not secured site. So i want to convert http into https://13.57.220.172.
I have cloudflare ssl. When i try to add ssl certificate. It shows
com.amazonaws.pki.acm.exceptions.external.ValidationException: Provided certificate is not a valid self signed. Please provide either a valid self-signed certificate or certificate chain. Choose Previous button below and fix it.
i have enclose the image with it.
So how can i get the self signed certificate. is there any online tool available.
I think the error message your seeing has to do with this sentence:
If your certificate is signed by a CA, you must include the
certificate chain when you import your certificate.
from https://docs.aws.amazon.com/acm/latest/userguide/import-certificate-prerequisites.html.
Since it sounds like you're not yet in "production" mode, I'm guessing you're not particularly attached to your existing certificate, but just want a certificate to be able to do HTTPS on your web server (and don't really care if it's self-signed).
If you want to use AWS Certificate Manager, I think it would be easier to just let them (AWS) issue you a certificate instead of trying to import one from somewhere else. AWS doesn't charge anything for certificates. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/acm/latest/userguide/acm-billing.html
Even if you get the certificate setup in AWS Certificate Manager, that's not going to be installed directly on your EC2 instance, but rather (most likely) on a load balancer in front of your web server, which will add a little complexity to your setup. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/acm/latest/userguide/acm-services.html
If all you want to do is use HTTPS on your web server, Let's Encrypt (also free) is probably a simpler option. If you are using AWS Linux 2, there are instructions for getting a certificate here - https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/SSL-on-amazon-linux-2.html
Well, add to the points which #jefftrotman has already mentioned.
If your expectation is to just secure your IP address using HTTPS you can achieve that using the below approaches:
A SELF SIGNED certificate that you can create using OpenSSL.
You can also get an SSL certificate from a trust signing authority like (GoDaddy or VeriSign) or Let's encrypt.
The only requirement in the second point is that for getting a certificate from a valid signing authority you need to have a domain name like "myphpapp.com" and then use this domain to get the SSL certificate.
The below details are in case you want to use AWS ACM(Amazon Certificate Manager)
If you prefer ACM, you can get the free Public SSL certificate which you can map to the IP address and your web application will be secured.
If your requirement is to add SSL certificates (like PEM files) to a web server like
NGINX or Apache then you first need to create a Private CA using in ACM and then you using this CA you will be able to create Private SSL certificates. After creating those you can export the files and add those files to the configuration file. (try to use Amazon Linux 2) ec2 image for ease.
I'm trying to get a Spring-Boot server up and running, which provides some security via SSL. I followed steps 1 and 2 of this guide to get a self-signed certificate and am able to access my site via https. The application.properties looks like this:
server.port=8443
server.ssl.keyStore=classpath:keystore.p12
server.ssl.keyStorePassword=youd_want_to_know
server.ssl.keyStoreType=PKCS12
server.ssl.keyAlias=hs
keystore.p12 was generated with
$ keytool -genkey -alias hs -storetype PKCS12 \
-keyalg RSA -keysize 2048 -keystore keystore.p12 -validity 3650
Except for the password I didn't enter anything, all fields are "Unknown".
However, the lock in the browser isn't green. The detail message says
There are issues with the site's certificate chain (net::ERR_CERT_AUTHORITY_INVALID).
The plus-side:
Secure TLS connection
The connection to this site is using a strong protocol version and cipher suite.
Secure Resources
All resources on this page are served securely.
I guess in plain text it means that the data is transported securely, but the browser isn't fully happy with the certificate in terms of it can't track the authenticity. Therefore, I understand that this isn't worthy for production (and for now it doesn't need to be).
But, is it safe and secure for me since I own the server and know that I created the self-signed certificate myself? Or are there ways to turn this into a certificate that the browser is happy with? What do I need to do to make that work and what would the Sprint-Boot configuration look like?
Thats how the browser is supposed to behave. As long as you (or rather, browsers you or your organization owns) are the only consumers of your website, you are fine. But once you want to on-board other consumers you might need to get your certificate signed by a certificate provider
In this case the communication between browser and server is still vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attack, so this not really "secure & safe"
In a Nutshell,
Using a self signed certificate is completely unsafe unless
you control every machine between you and the server
OR
you check that the keys in the certificate are what you expect them
to be.
Only advantage is; it will block passive attacks (the attacker observes the data but does not alter it in any way) regardless of whether the CA certificate was issued by a mainstream CA or not.
Take a look here https://security.stackexchange.com/a/8112
I am currently working on a project that has the following components (all .NET 2.0)
Client Application
Web Service Invocation API
Web Service
In summary the Client Application creates and instance of the API and this calls the Web Service. Nice and simple and this all works exactly as I want it to.
The next stage of the project was to secure the Web Service with SSL. So I have created a "Self Signed CA" and from this signed a server certificate for IIS. Again, nice and simple and this all works exactly as I want it to.
The next stage of the project is to secure the Web Service by requiring the invoker to supply a client certificate. So I have created a client certificate (via the Self Signed CA). I am then adding this to the Web Service invocation call in the API:
WSBridge.Processor processor = new WSBridge.Processor();
processor.Url = this.endpoint;
processor.ClientCertificates.AddRange(this.clientCertificates);
processor.Timeout = (int)Settings.Default["DefaultTimeout"];
In debug I can see that this.clientCertificates contains the certificate I created. So in theory it is being presented to the web server.
However, when I attempt to call the Web Service I get the following exception in the API:
The request failed with HTTP status 403: Forbidden.
Fairly self explantory, but I have no idea what is causing the problem.
Other relevant information:
In my dev environment Client, API & Web Service are all running on the same machine
If I attempt to access the Web Service Description in IIS I get the following error (I am not prompted to choose a client certificate):
HTTP Error 403.7 - Forbidden
The page you are attempting to access requires your browser to have a Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) client certificate that the Web server recognizes.
The client certificate is loaded into the Personal store for the current user, the CA root is in trusted root for the local machine and current user.
If I switch off "Require SSL" and put "Client Certificates" on accept in IIS I can make my request. However when I look at HttpContext.Current.Request.ClientCertificate.Count in the Web Service this comes back as 0.
I need to be able to run my development with client certificates as portions of the service code use the CN of the client certificate to perform various actions. I could hack it in but it would be nice to be able to do a real end to end.
All the certificates mention here were generated using OpenSSL. I am developing on Windows 7 so I do not have the facility to install Microsoft CA
So, does anybody have any ideas as to the cause of this problem?
As an aside (not worth creating a new question for this) - for some reason when I enable SSL for the Web Service Visual Studio is no longer able to debug the service.
EDIT : Some more information
The client certificate has an intended purpose of <All>
Although I am working on localhost the server certificate for the web server was issued to devserver.xyz.com so I have changed my hosts file to point that to localhost. As such I can now browse (with client certs switched off in IIS) to my service descriptor page without seeing any SSL certificate warnings.
Well I have solved the problem, in summary this was due to the format of the client certificate this should have been PKCS12.
More Detail
Although the MMC Certificate plugin was showing the client certificate in the personal store for the current userm I noticed that when viewing the same store via Internet Explorer (Tools -> Internet Options -> Content -> Certificates) the certificate was not present.
After a little Googling it seems that IE will only accepts PKCS12 format for client certificates, so I convert the certificate with the following OpenSSL command:
openssl pkcs12 -export -in client_alpha.cer -inkey client_alpha.key -out client_alpha.p12
I then imported the p12 file into IE which allowed me to browse to the Web Service description page with full client/server certificated TLS.
Once I had made this change, I then retried by client application and this now works aswell. This is due to the fact that IIS, like IE, will only accept client certificates in PKCS12 format.
I am planning to implement a small standalone program that will make a https request to a server. Does that require a valid ssl certificate in the client? How does the SSL handshake work in that case? Are there any security issues in the client not have an SSL certificate?
Apart from encrypting the network traffic, HTTPS is normally used to authenticate the server. That is, to give clients reassuring information about who owns the server, etc. For that to work, the client needs to inspect the trust chain in the certificate published by the server. For that to happen automatically, the client machine should have a certificate installed that describes a Certification Authority that issued the server's certificate. Normally such certificates are found on your machine in a store called "Trusted Root Certification Authorities" and most OS come with a set of common CAs already installed.
In addition, many web servers offer a feature where the client can authenticate itself to the server by supplying a client certificate. The web server is able to inspect the certificate coming from the client and map it onto a set of permissions on the server. This "client authentication" is not necessary for a working HTTPS session however, it's just an option.
In short, you don't actually need any certificate on the client, but you will probably want to have a root CA certificate in order to validate the server's identity. If you don't have that certificate it will be impossible for you to trust the server (unless you have another good reason to do so), but you might choose to exchange data with it anyway.
If you wish to learn more about the HTTPS handshake and what is negotiated, i fully recommend you look at this excellent write up at moserware
http://www.moserware.com/2009/06/first-few-milliseconds-of-https.html
A client certificate is required only if the server requires one. A client certificate allows the server to authenticate the client, but this is only useful if the server has a list of all authorized clients. That's generally not the case with a web server, so it's quite rare for them to require client certificates.
When present, the client-side certificate does not affect establishment of the secure channel. (Only the server's certificate is required for that and adding a client certificate into the mix doesn't change the process.) Once a secure channel is established, the server will use the client's certificate the authenticate the client (generally by comparing the client's public key or name with a list of authorized clients).
You dont need a certificate to make a HTTPS connection, but you do need to if you want to know with whom you are communicating.