I want to set up some conditions on Thymeleaf templates like this, but it doesn't work.
<table border=2>
<thead>
<tr>
<td> Identifiant </td>
<td> Nom Formation </td>
<td> Descirption Formation </td>
<td> Adresse Formation </td>
<td>Status Formation </td>
<td> Chef Projet </td>
<td> Formateur </td>
<td>Ressource Humain</td>
<td>Update</td>
<td>Liste Devellopeur</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr th:each="formations : ${formations}">
<th:block th:if="${StatusFormation}} =='Traitement' }">
<td th:text="${formations.id}"> </td>
<td th:text="${formations.NomFormation}"> </td>
<td th:text="${formations.DescriptionFormation}"> </td>
<td th:text="${formations.StatusFormation}"> </td>
<td th:text="${formations.AdresseFormation}"> </td>
<td th:text="${formations.chef_projet}"> </td>
<td th:text="${formations.formateurs}"> </td>
<td th:text="${formations.ressourcehumain}"> </td>
</th:block>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
the erros is
Caused by: org.thymeleaf.exceptions.TemplateProcessingException: Could not parse as expression: "${StatusFormation}} =='Traitement' }" (template: "ChefProjetFormationHome" - line 29, col 11) at org.thymeleaf.standard.expression.StandardExpressionParser.parseExpression(StandardExpressionParser.java:131)
The problem is you add one extra brace in this line:
<th:block th:if="${StatusFormation}} =='Traitement' }">
you should change it to:
<th:block th:if="${StatusFormation} == 'Traitement'">
I have the following html
<table>
<tr>
<th>value</th>
<th>description</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>OverallHealthScore</td>
<td>
Overall HealthScore.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="deprecated">DESTAGED_TRACKS_PER_SEC</td>
<td>
The tracks per second saved into disks.
</td>
</tr>
</table>
There are many many tr's but this is an excerpt of the two scenario's
I need to only print out OverallHealthScore
table.css('tr').map do |row|
puts row.css('td:not(.deprecated)').map(&:text)[0]
end
Gets me just about there but prints out the "description" td on the deprecated items. I can't seem to figure out what I need to do in order to get the results I am needing.
Assuming you want to get the first td's value which are not deprecated:
<table>
<tr>
<th>value</th>
<th>description</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>OverallHealthScore</td>
<td>
Overall HealthScore.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="deprecated">DESTAGED_TRACKS_PER_SEC</td>
<td>
The tracks per second saved into disks.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AvaiableAnother</td>
<td>
Another Available HealthScore.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="deprecated">OTHER_DEPRE</td>
<td>
The tracks per second saved into disks.
</td>
</tr>
</table>
Then
puts table.css('td:first-child:not(.deprecated)').map(&:text)
# OverallHealthScore
# AvaiableAnother
I'm trying to create a page that has a table. The table has a service and then the items under the service so the table should look like this
<table class="table table-striped table-bordered table-condensed pricing_table">
<tr>
<td></td>
<td>
Short
</td>
<td>
Medium
</td>
<td>
Long
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Cut & Blow Dry
</td>
<td>
R170
</td>
<td>
R190
</td>
<td>
R220
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Blow Dry
</td>
<td>
R120
</td>
<td>
R170
</td>
<td>
R190
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Girls under 18
</td>
<td>
R130
</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Pensioners
</td>
<td>
R130
</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Gents Cut
</td>
<td>
R120
</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Boys Cut
</td>
<td>
R90
</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Upstyles - Trail
</td>
<td>
R270
</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Upstyles
</td>
<td>
R350
</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</table>
but what I'm getting is this
<table class="table table-striped table-bordered table-condensed pricing_table">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td> Cutting & Styling </td>
<td> Short </td>
<td> Medium </td>
<td> Long </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> Cut & Blow Dry </td>
<td> 150 </td>
<td> 170 </td>
<td> 190 </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> Cutting & Styling </td>
<td> Short </td>
<td> Medium </td>
<td> Long </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> Blow Dry </td>
<td> 100 </td>
<td> 120 </td>
<td> 140 </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> Cutting & Styling </td>
<td> Short </td>
<td> Medium </td>
<td> Long </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> Girls under 18 </td>
<td> 120 </td>
<td> </td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> Cutting & Styling </td>
<td> Short </td>
<td> Medium </td>
<td> Long </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> Pensioners (Ladies) </td>
<td> 70 </td>
<td> </td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> Chemical Service </td>
<td> Short </td>
<td> Medium </td>
<td> Long </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> Color </td>
<td> 150 </td>
<td> 200 </td>
<td> 250 </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> Chemical Service </td>
<td> Short </td>
<td> Medium </td>
<td> Long </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> Half Head Foils </td>
<td> 200 </td>
<td> </td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> Chemical Service </td>
<td> Short </td>
<td> Medium </td>
<td> Long </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> Full Head Foils </td>
<td> 300 </td>
<td> </td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> Chemical Service </td>
<td> Short </td>
<td> Medium </td>
<td> Long </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> Per Foil </td>
<td> 10 </td>
<td> 15 </td>
<td> 20 </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> Chemical Service </td>
<td> Short </td>
<td> Medium </td>
<td> Long </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> Brazilian </td>
<td> 700 </td>
<td> 800 </td>
<td> 900 </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> Chemical Service </td>
<td> Short </td>
<td> Medium </td>
<td> Long </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> Perm </td>
<td> 150 </td>
<td> 170 </td>
<td> 190 </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> Treatment </td>
<td> Short </td>
<td> Medium </td>
<td> Long </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> Salon Treatment </td>
<td> 100 </td>
<td> </td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> Treatment </td>
<td> Short </td>
<td> Medium </td>
<td> Long </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> Olaplex - Stand Alon </td>
<td> 180 </td>
<td> </td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
The service is always being looped and displayed. I would only like the service to be looped once and the items to be displayed under their respective service.
My pricing.blade.php
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-12 col-md-12 col-sm-12 about_content_area">
<h1>pricing</h1>
<div class="col-lg-5 col-lg-offset-3 col-md-5 col-md-offset-3 pricing_wrapper">
<table class="table table-striped table-bordered table-condensed pricing_table">
#foreach($services_options as $services)
#foreach($services->service as $service)
<tr>
<td>
{!! $service->title !!}
</td>
<td>
Short
</td>
<td>
Medium
</td>
<td>
Long
</td>
</tr>
#endforeach
<tr>
<td>
{!! $services->title !!}
</td>
<td>
{!! $services->short !!}
</td>
<td>
{!! $services->medium !!}
</td>
<td>
{!! $services->long !!}
</td>
</tr>
#endforeach
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
My controller
public function content($id)
{
$menus_child = Menu::where('menu_id', 0)->with('menusP')->get();
$menu = Menu::where('id', $id)->firstOrFail();
$layout = $menu->type;
$gallery_category = Gcategory::all();
$services_options = Price::all();
return view('open::public/'.$layout, compact('menus_child', 'menu', 'gallery_category', 'services_options'));
}
You have a loop for the header part of the table (the short, medium, long part) within the loop for each service, which is why its being output above each service row.
You just need to update pricing.blade.php to be the following
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-12 col-md-12 col-sm-12 about_content_area">
<h1>pricing</h1>
<div class="col-lg-5 col-lg-offset-3 col-md-5 col-md-offset-3 pricing_wrapper">
<table class="table table-striped table-bordered table-condensed pricing_table">
<tr>
<td></td>
<td>
Short
</td>
<td>
Medium
</td>
<td>
Long
</td>
</tr>
#foreach($services_options as $services)
<tr>
<td>
{!! $services->title !!}
</td>
<td>
{!! $services->short !!}
</td>
<td>
{!! $services->medium !!}
</td>
<td>
{!! $services->long !!}
</td>
</tr>
#endforeach
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
I have a HTML in the format of this
<tbody>
<tr>
<td> Test1 </td>
<td> .. </td>
<tr/>
<tr> ... </tr>
</tbody>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td> Test2 </td>
<td> .. </td>
<tr/>
<tr> .. </tr>
</tbody>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td> Test3 </td>
<td> .. </td>
<tr/>
<tr> .. </tr>
</tbody>
How can I iterate through all the tbody's and grab the text inside the tr/td? I tried to do the following:
items = driver.find_elements(:xpath, "//tbody/tr[1]/td[1]").map(&:text)
puts items
and
items = driver.find_elements(:xpath, ".//tbody//td[1]").map(&:text)
puts items
In both of these cases, puts is empty (its reaching that point in code I checked). How can I grab all the items inside of the tbody/tr/td?
I have a DataTable I would like massage into a new format (here is what it comes out like when attached to a gridview):
<table cellspacing="0" rules="all" border="1" id="GridView1" style="border-collapse: collapse;">
<tr>
<th scope="col">
Line
</th>
<th scope="col">
StartTime
</th>
<th scope="col">
EndTime
</th>
<th scope="col">
Attribute
</th>
<th scope="col">
Value
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Line1
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 7:30:10 AM
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 8:00:10 AM
</td>
<td>
Actual
</td>
<td>
0
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Line1
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 7:30:10 AM
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 8:00:10 AM
</td>
<td>
ProductCategory
</td>
<td>
FFAC
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Line1
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 7:30:10 AM
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 8:00:10 AM
</td>
<td>
Target
</td>
<td>
36.5
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Line2
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 7:26:50 AM
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 8:00:10 AM
</td>
<td>
Actual
</td>
<td>
69
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Line2
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 7:26:50 AM
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 8:00:10 AM
</td>
<td>
ProductCategory
</td>
<td>
FFAC
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Line2
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 7:26:50 AM
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 8:00:10 AM
</td>
<td>
Target
</td>
<td>
55.5555582046509
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Line3
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 8:00:20 AM
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 8:47:50 AM
</td>
<td>
Actual
</td>
<td>
1475
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Line3
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 8:00:20 AM
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 8:47:50 AM
</td>
<td>
ProductCategory
</td>
<td>
FFAC
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Line3
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 8:00:20 AM
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 8:47:50 AM
</td>
<td>
Target
</td>
<td>
202.430557310581
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Line4
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 7:31:30 AM
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 8:00:10 AM
</td>
<td>
Actual
</td>
<td>
1384
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Line4
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 7:31:30 AM
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 8:00:10 AM
</td>
<td>
ProductCategory
</td>
<td>
FFAC
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Line4
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 7:31:30 AM
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 8:00:10 AM
</td>
<td>
Target
</td>
<td>
3179.26381587982
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Line5
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 7:37:00 AM
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 8:00:10 AM
</td>
<td>
Actual
</td>
<td>
0
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Line5
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 7:37:00 AM
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 8:00:10 AM
</td>
<td>
ProductCategory
</td>
<td>
FHHT
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Line5
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 7:37:00 AM
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 8:00:10 AM
</td>
<td>
Target
</td>
<td>
92.6652171770756
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
P2_Bundler
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 7:35:00 AM
</td>
<td>
24/01/2013 8:00:10 AM
</td>
<td>
Actual
</td>
<td>
7
</td>
</tr>
</table>
I know that if the records have the same line, start and end times, the records are related.
What I want to do is get a sum of the Actual and Target values grouped by the ProductCategory. In other words:
ProductCategory | Sum(Actual) | Sum(Target)
FFAC | 1000 | 2000
FHHT | 200 | 175
Any guidance would be appreciated!
Regards,
Chris
You won't have any massage here ;)
The structure of your dataTable would be more usefull than the grid code, but to get what you want from your DataTable, you should do something like that.
var result = myDataTable.AsEnumerable()
.GroupBy(m => m.Field<string>("ProductCategory"))
.Select(g => new {
productCategory = g.Key,
sumActual = g.Sum(x => x.Field<decimal>("Actual")),
sumTarget = g.Sum(x => x.Field<decimal>("Target"))
});
Oi, I thought this was going to be more difficult than anticipated, but it ended up being easier and I rewrote this. You perform your grouping on the line, but then you just have to query the rows in each group to get the ProductCategory.
First, you're going to group by the main key, which in this case I believe is the Line column. So:
myDataTable.AsEnumerable()
.GroupBy(m => m.Field<string>("Line"))
Next, we're going to have to find the category for each of these groupings. Since each grouping is an IEnumerable<T>, just perform a Select after filtering our Attribute as ProductCategory and get the first value. I use a little "defensive" coding by accounting for the situation where no ProductCategory attribute exists:
...
.Select(g => new
{
ProductCategory = g.Where(r => r.Field<string>("Attribute") == "ProductCategory")
.Select(r => r.Field<string>("Value"))
.FirstOrDefault() ?? "No Category",
SumActual = g.Sum(x => x.Field<decimal>("Actual")),
SumTarget = g.Sum(x => x.Field<decimal>("Target"))
})
Edit: Alright, so now I see what you're saying. My original thoughts were correct in that you're grouping each original group (based on Line) into further groups. There really isn't an easy way, and the options aren't pretty. It's the fact that you have to group each group, but in order to group the group, you have to query the group for a single entity, then aggregate based on another 2 entities (making it very difficult to use LINQ here).
myDataTable.AsEnumerable()
.GroupBy(m => m.Field<string>("Line"))
.Select(g => new
{
ProductCategory = g.Where(r => r.Field<string>("Attribute") == "ProductCategory")
.Select(r => r.Field<string>("Value"))
.FirstOrDefault() ?? "No Category",
Actual = g.Where(r => r.Field<string>("Attribute") == "Actual")
.Select(r =>
{
decimal d = 0m;
Decimal.TryParse(r.Field<string>("Value"), out d);
return d;
}
.FirstOrDefault(),
Target = g.Where(r => r.Field<string>("Attribute") == "Target")
.Select(r =>
{
decimal d = 0m;
Decimal.TryParse(r.Field<string>("Value"), out d);
return d;
}
.FirstOrDefault()
})
.GroupBy(n => n.ProductCategory)
.Select(g => new
{
ProductCategory = g.Key,
SumActual = g.Sum(x => x.Actual),
SumTarget = g.Sum(x => x.Target)
})
Again, not very pretty... Especially since your "Value" column is string, you have to parse them in order to get a meaningful value (in this case, summing a number). The premise here is that you group all your records into "blocks", then compose these blocks into single anonymous objects. So each anonymous object represents all datarow Attribute/Value pairs for a particular Line. From there, you just group based on your desired key (ProductCategory in this case), and perform your required aggregates.
PS, I would actually perform this query on the DB side using a PIVOT. Might take a bit more setup, but then you give the system designed to perform this type of data crunching/aggregation the work that it can handle, and keep your front-end CPU cycles for something more important.