I have two tables in Oracle and I have to synchronize values (Field column) between the tables. I'm using Informatica PowerCenter for this synchronization operation. The source qualifier query causes high I/O usage and I need to solve it.
Table1
Table1 has about 20M data. Field in Table1 is the actual field. Timestamp field holds create & update date and it has daily partition.
Id
Field
Timestamp
1
A
2017-05-12 03:13:40
2
B
2002-11-01 07:30:46
3
C
2008-03-03 03:26:29
Table2
Table2 has about 500M data. Field in Table2 should be as sync as possible to Field in Table1. Timestamp field holds create & update date and it has daily partition. Table2 is also target in the mapping.
Id
Table1_Id
Field
Timestamp
Action
100
1
A
2005-09-30 03:20:41
Nothing
101
1
B
2015-06-29 09:41:44
Update Field as A
102
1
C
2016-01-10 23:35:49
Update Field as A
103
2
A
2019-05-08 07:42:46
Update Field as B
104
2
B
2003-06-02 11:23:57
Nothing
105
2
C
2021-09-21 12:04:24
Update Field as B
106
3
A
2022-01-23 01:17:18
Update Field as C
107
3
B
2008-04-24 15:17:25
Update Field as C
108
3
C
2010-01-15 07:20:13
Nothing
Mapping Queries
Source Qualifier Query
SELECT *
FROM Table1 t1, Table2 t2
WHERE t1.Id = t2.Table1_Id AND t1.Field <> t2.Field
Update Transformation Query
UPDATE Table2
SET
Field = :tu.Field,
Timestamp = SYSDATE
WHERE Id = :tu.Id
You can use below approach.
SQ - Your SQL is correct and you can use it if you see its working but add a <> clause on partition date key column. You can use this SQL to speed it up as well.
SELECT *
FROM Table2 t2
INNER JOIN Table1 t3 ON t3.Id = t2.Table1_Id
LEFT OUTER JOIN Table1 t1 ON t1.Id = t2.Table1_Id AND t1.Field = t2.Field AND t1.partition_date= t2.partition_date -- You did not mention partition_date column but i am assuming there is a separate column which is used to partition.
WHERE t1.id is null -- <> is inefficient.
Then in your infa target T2 definition, make sure you mention partition_date as part of key along with ID.
Then use a update strategy set to DD_UPDATE. You can set the session to update as well.
And remove that target override. This actually applies the update query on the whole table and sometime can be inefficient abd I/O intensive.
Informatica is powerful to update data in bunch through update strategy. You can increase commit interval as per your performance.
You shouldn't try to update a 500M table in a single go using SQL. Yes, you can use PLSQL to update in a bunch.
Related
If I run the below query I m going to update an Oracle table by 7K rows. I want to do that by 300 of records per time.
INSERT INTO REQUEST
SELECT REQUEST_SEQ.NEXTVAL, REQUEST_ID, 'TEST', REF_ASK_ID, SYSDATE
FROM CITIES
INNER JOIN REFERENCE ON CITY_ID = REF_ID
WHERE REF_ASK_NM= 'DOWN'
AND CITY_WAY IN ('1', '33')
300 rows at a time? Why? To make it slower?
Anyway:
rownum will make sure to take 300 rows
not exists will make sure not to copy what you already have copied (if where condition catches them all).
I don't know which columns belong to which tables as you didn't use table aliases (and yes, you should have)
if there are duplicates for columns being used in where, you might still get duplicates as there's no guarantee that that "set" of rows will be inserted as a whole
In other words: do it all at once.
INSERT INTO offices
SELECT office_seq.NEXTVAL, office_id, office_ref
FROM city INNER JOIN reference ON office_id = ref_id
WHERE ROWNUM <= 300
AND NOT EXISTS
(SELECT NULL
FROM offices b
WHERE b.office_id = city.office_id -- or maybe reference.office_id
AND b.office_ref = city.office_ref); -- or maybe reference.office_ref
I want to join two tables, first table primary key data type is number, and second table primary key data type is VARCHAR2(30 BYTE). How to join both tables.
I tried this code but second tables all values are null. why is that?
SELECT a.act_phone_no,a.act_actdevice,a.bi_account_id, a.packag_start_date, c.identification_number,
FROM ACTIVATIONS_POP a
left JOIN customer c
on TO_CHAR(a.act_phone_no) = c.msisdn_voice
first table
act_phone_no bi_account_id
23434 45345
34245 43556
Second table
msisdn_voice identification_number
23434 321113
34245 6547657
It seems that you didn't tell us everything. Query works, if correctly written, on such a sample data:
SQL> with
2 -- Sample data
3 activations_pop (act_phone_no, bi_account_id) as
4 (select 23434, 45345 from dual union all
5 select 34245, 43556 from dual
6 ),
7 customer (msisdn_voice, identification_number) as
8 (select '23434', 321113 from dual union all
9 select '34245', 6547657 from dual
10 )
11 -- query works OK
12 select a.act_phone_no,
13 a.bi_account_id,
14 c.identification_number
15 from activations_pop a join customer c on to_char(a.act_phone_no) = c.msisdn_voice;
ACT_PHONE_NO BI_ACCOUNT_ID IDENTIFICATION_NUMBER
------------ ------------- ---------------------
23434 45345 321113
34245 43556 6547657
SQL>
What could be wrong? Who knows. If you got some result but columns from the CUSTOMER table are empty (NULL?), then they really might be NULL, or you didn't manage to join rows on those columns (left/right padding with spaces?). Does joining on e.g.
on to_char(a.act_phone_no) = trim(c.msisdn_voice)
or
on a.act_phone_no = to_number(c.msisdn_voice)
help?
Consider posting proper test case (CREATE TABLE and INSERT INTO statements).
You are using Oracle ?
Please check the below demo
SELECT a.act_phone_no, a.bi_account_id, c.identification_number
FROM ACTIVATIONS_POP a
left JOIN customer c
on TO_CHAR(a.act_phone_no) = c.msisdn_voice;
SQLFiddle
I have two tables which I am trying to join based on two criteria. One of the criteria is that a date from t1 is between a date in t2 and the next date in t2. The other is that the name from t1 matches the name from t2.
I.e. if t2 looks like this:
Record Name Date
1 A1234 2016-01-03 04:58:00
2 A1234 2015-12-15 08:34:00
3 A5678 2016-01-04 03:14:00
4 A1234 2016-01-05 21:06:00
Then:
Any records from t1 for Name A1234 with dates between 2016-01-03 04:58:00 and 2016-01-05 21:06:00 would be joined to record 1.
Any records from t1 for Name A1234 with dates between 2015-12-15 08:34:00 and 2016-01-03 04:58:00 would be joined to record 2
Any records from t1 for A1234 after the date of record 4 would be joined to record 4
Any records from t1 for A5678 would be joined to record 3 because there's only one date.
My initial approach is to use a correlated subquery to find the next date. However, due to a large number of records, I determined this would take over a year to execute because it searches all of t2 for the next later date during each iteration. Original SQLite:
CREATE TABLE outputtable AS SELECT * FROM t1, t2 d
WHERE t1.Name = d.Name AND t1.Date BETWEEN d.Date AND (
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT Date from t2
WHERE t2.Name = d.Name
ORDER BY Date ASC )
WHERE Date > d.Date
LIMIT 1 )
Now, I would like to find the next date only once for all records in t2 and create a new column in t2 that contains the next date. This way, I only search for the next date about 400,000 times instead of 56 billion times, significantly improving my performance.
Thus the output of the query I'm looking for would make t2 look like this:
Record Name Date Next_Date
1 A1234 2016-01-03 04:58:00 2016-01-05 21:06:00
2 A1234 2015-12-15 08:34:00 2016-01-03 04:58:00
3 A5678 2016-01-04 03:14:00 2999-12-31 23:59:59
4 A1234 2016-01-05 21:06:00 2999-12-31 23:59:59
Then I would be able to simply query whether t1.Date is between t2.Date and t2.Next_Date.
How can I build a query that will add the next date to a new column in t2?
Rather than add the new column, you should just be able to use a query like the one below to join the tables:
SELECT
T1.*,
T2_1.*
FROM
T1
INNER JOIN T2 T2_1 ON
T2_1.Name = T1.Name AND
T2_1.some_date < T1.some_date
LEFT OUTER JOIN T2 T2_2 ON
T2_2.Name = T1.Name AND
T2_2.some_date > T2_1.some_date
LEFT OUTER JOIN T2 T2_3 ON
T2_3.Name = T1.Name AND
T2_3.some_date > T2_1.some_date AND
T2_3.some_date < T2_2.some_date
WHERE
T2_3.Name IS NULL
You can do the same with NOT EXISTS, but this method often has better performance.
You can speed up (sub)queries by using proper indexes.
To check which indexes are actually used, use EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN.
Your original query, without any indexes, would be executed by SQLite 3.10.0 like this:
0|0|0|SCAN TABLE t1
0|1|1|SEARCH TABLE t2 AS d USING AUTOMATIC COVERING INDEX (name=?)
0|0|0|EXECUTE CORRELATED SCALAR SUBQUERY 1
1|0|0|SCAN TABLE t2
1|0|0|USE TEMP B-TREE FOR ORDER BY
(The "automatic" index is created temporarily just for this query; the optimizer has estimated that this would still be faster than not using any index.)
In this case, you get the most optimal query plan by indexing all columns used for lookups:
create index i1nd on t1(name, date);
create index i2nd on t2(name, date);
0|0|1|SCAN TABLE t2 AS d
0|1|0|SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX i1nd (name=? AND date>? AND date<?)
0|0|0|EXECUTE CORRELATED SCALAR SUBQUERY 1
1|0|0|SEARCH TABLE t2 USING COVERING INDEX i2nd (name=? AND date>?)
I've used this method on tables with around 1 mil rows with success. Obviously, creating an index that will cover this query will help performance.
This approach uses RANK to create a value to join against. After creating the RANK in a CTE (I use this for readability reasons, please correct for style or personal preference), use a sub-query to join rnk to rnk + 1; aka the next date.
Here's an example of what the code looks like using your sample values.
IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#T2') IS NOT NULL
DROP TABLE #T2
CREATE TABLE #T2
(
Record INT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
Name VARCHAR(10),
[DATE] DATETIME,
)
INSERT INTO #T2
VALUES (1, 'A1234', '2016-01-03 04:58:00'),
(2, 'A1234', '2015-12-15 08:34:00'),
(3, 'A5678', '2016-01-04 03:14:00'),
(4, 'A1234', '2016-01-05 21:06:00');
WITH Rank_Dates
AS (Select *
,rank() OVER(PARTITION BY #t2.name ORDER BY #t2.date DESC) AS rnk
FROM #T2)
select RD1.Record,
RD1.Name,
RD1.DATE,
COALESCE (RD2.DATE, '2999-12-31 23:59:59') AS NEXT_DATE
FROM Rank_Dates RD1
LEFT JOIN Rank_Dates RD2
ON RD1.rnk = RD2.rnk + 1
AND RD1.Name = RD2.Name
ORDER BY RD1.Record -- ORDER BY is optional
;
EDIT: added code output below.
The code above produces the following output.
Record Name DATE NEXT_DATE
1 A1234 2016-01-03 04:58:00.000 2016-01-05 21:06:00.000
2 A1234 2015-12-15 08:34:00.000 2016-01-03 04:58:00.000
3 A5678 2016-01-04 03:14:00.000 2999-12-31 23:59:59.000
4 A1234 2016-01-05 21:06:00.000 2999-12-31 23:59:59.000
On a random note. Would using the CURRENT_TIMESTAMP in place of hard coding '2999-12-31 23:59:59.000' produce a similar result?
I am recieving information from a csv file from one department to compare with the same inforation in a different department to check for discrepencies (About 3/4 of a million rows of data with 44 columns in each row). After I have the data in a table, I have a program that will take the data and send reports based on a HQ. I feel like the way I am going about this is not the most efficient. I am using oracle for this comparison.
Here is what I have:
I have a vb.net program that parses the data and inserts it into an extract table
I run a procedure to do a full outer join on the two tables into a new table with the fields in one department prefixed with '_c'
I run another procedure to compare the old/new data and update 2 different tables with detail and summary information. Here is code from inside the procedure:
DECLARE
CURSOR Cur_Comp IS SELECT * FROM T.AEC_CIS_COMP;
BEGIN
FOR compRow in Cur_Comp LOOP
--If service pipe exists in CIS but not in FM and the service pipe has status of retired in CIS, ignore the variance
If(compRow.pipe_num = '' AND cis_status_c = 'R')
continue
END IF
--If there is not a summary record for this HQ in the table for this run, create one
INSERT INTO t.AEC_CIS_SUM (HQ, RUN_DATE)
SELECT compRow.HQ, to_date(sysdate, 'DD/MM/YYYY') from dual WHERE NOT EXISTS
(SELECT null FROM t.AEC_CIS_SUM WHERE HQ = compRow.HQ AND RUN_DATE = to_date(sysdate, 'DD/MM/YYYY'))
-- Check fields and update the tables accordingly
If (compRow.cis_loop <> compRow.cis_loop_c) Then
--Insert information into the details table
INSERT INTO T.AEC_CIS_DET( Fac_id, Pipe_Num, Hq, Address, AutoUpdatedFl,
DateTime, Changed_Field, CIS_Value, FM_Value)
VALUES(compRow.Fac_ID, compRow.Pipe_Num, compRow.Hq, compRow.Street_Num || ' ' || compRow.Street_Name,
'Y', sysdate, 'Cis_Loop', compRow.cis_loop, compRow.cis_loop_c);
-- Update information into the summary table
UPDATE AEC_CIS_SUM
SET cis_loop = cis_loop + 1
WHERE Hq = compRow.Hq
AND Run_Date = to_date(sysdate, 'DD/MM/YYYY')
End If;
END LOOP;
END;
Any suggestions of an easier way of doing this rather than an if statement for all 44 columns of the table? (This is run once a week if it matters)
Update: Just to clarify, there are 88 columns of data (44 of duplicates to compare with one suffixed with _c). One table lists each field in a row that is different so one row can mean 30+ records written in that table. The other table keeps tally of the number of discrepencies for each week.
First of all I believe that your task can be implemented (and should be actually) with staight SQL. No fancy cursors, no loops, just selects, inserts and updates. I would start with unpivotting your source data (it is not clear if you have primary key to join two sets, I guess you do):
Col0_PK Col1 Col2 Col3 Col4
----------------------------------------
Row1_val A B C D
Row2_val E F G H
Above is your source data. Using UNPIVOT clause we convert it to:
Col0_PK Col_Name Col_Value
------------------------------
Row1_val Col1 A
Row1_val Col2 B
Row1_val Col3 C
Row1_val Col4 D
Row2_val Col1 E
Row2_val Col2 F
Row2_val Col3 G
Row2_val Col4 H
I think you get the idea. Say we have table1 with one set of data and the same structured table2 with the second set of data. It is good idea to use index-organized tables.
Next step is comparing rows to each other and storing difference details. Something like:
insert into diff_details(some_service_info_columns_here)
select some_service_info_columns_here_along_with_data_difference
from table1 t1 inner join table2 t2
on t1.Col0_PK = t2.Col0_PK
and t1.Col_name = t2.Col_name
and nvl(t1.Col_value, 'Dummy1') <> nvl(t2.Col_value, 'Dummy2');
And on the last step we update difference summary table:
insert into diff_summary(summary_columns_here)
select diff_row_id, count(*) as diff_count
from diff_details
group by diff_row_id;
It's just rough draft to show my approach, I'm sure there is much more details should be taken into account. To summarize I suggest two things:
UNPIVOT data
Use SQL statements instead of cursors
You have several issues in your code:
If(compRow.pipe_num = '' AND cis_status_c = 'R')
continue
END IF
"cis_status_c" is not declared. Is it a variable or a column in AEC_CIS_COMP?
In case it is a column, just put the condition into the cursor, i.e. SELECT * FROM T.AEC_CIS_COMP WHERE not (compRow.pipe_num = '' AND cis_status_c = 'R')
to_date(sysdate, 'DD/MM/YYYY')
That's nonsense, you convert a date into a date, simply use TRUNC(SYSDATE)
Anyway, I think you can use three single statements instead of a cursor:
INSERT INTO t.AEC_CIS_SUM (HQ, RUN_DATE)
SELECT comp.HQ, trunc(sysdate)
from AEC_CIS_COMP comp
WHERE NOT EXISTS
(SELECT null FROM t.AEC_CIS_SUM WHERE HQ = comp.HQ AND RUN_DATE = trunc(sysdate));
INSERT INTO T.AEC_CIS_DET( Fac_id, Pipe_Num, Hq, Address, AutoUpdatedFl, DateTime, Changed_Field, CIS_Value, FM_Value)
select comp.Fac_ID, comp.Pipe_Num, comp.Hq, comp.Street_Num || ' ' || comp.Street_Name, 'Y', sysdate, 'Cis_Loop', comp.cis_loop, comp.cis_loop_c
from T.AEC_CIS_COMP comp
where comp.cis_loop <> comp.cis_loop_c;
UPDATE AEC_CIS_SUM
SET cis_loop = cis_loop + 1
WHERE Hq IN (Select Hq from T.AEC_CIS_COMP)
AND trunc(Run_Date) = trunc(sysdate);
They are not tested but they should give you a hint how to do it.
I'm tring to use hive to analysis our log, and I have a question.
Assume we have some data like this:
A 1
A 1
A 1
B 1
C 1
B 1
How can I make it like this in hive table(order is not important, I just want to merge them) ?
A 1
B 1
C 1
without pre-process it with awk/sed or something like that?
Thanks!
Step 1: Create a Hive table for input data set .
create table if not exists table1 (fld1 string, fld2 string ) ROW FORMAT DELIMITED FIELDS TERMINATED BY '\t';
(i assumed field seprator is \t, you can replace it with actual separator)
Step 2 : Run below to get the merge data you are looking for
create table table2 as select fld1,fld2 from table1 group by fld1,fld2 ;
I tried this for below input set
hive (default)> select * from table1;
OK
A 1
A 1
A 1
B 1
C 1
B 1
create table table4 as select fld1,fld2 from table1 group by fld1,fld2 ;
hive (default)> select * from table4;
OK
A 1
B 1
C 1
You can use external table as well , but for simplicity I have used managed table here.
One idea.. you could create a table around the first file (called 'oldtable').
Then run something like this....
create table newtable select field1, max(field) from oldtable group by field1;
Not sure I have the syntax right, but the idea is to get unique values of the first field, and only one of the second. Make sense?
For merging the data, we can also use "UNION ALL" , it can also merge two different types of datatypes.
insert overwrite into table test1
(select x.* from t1 x )
UNION ALL
(select y.* from t2 y);
here we are merging two tables data (t1 and t2) into one single table test1.
There's no way to pre-process the data while it's being loaded without using an external program. You could use a view if you'd like to keep the original data intact.
hive> SELECT * FROM table1;
OK
A 1
A 1
A 1
B 1
C 1
B 1
B 2 # Added to show it will group correctly with different values
hive> CREATE VIEW table2 (fld1, fld2) AS SELECT fld1, fld2 FROM table1 GROUP BY fld1, fld2;
hive> SELECT * FROM table2;
OK
A 1
B 1
B 2
C 1