SpringBoot Microservice with GraalVM Native Image without Spring Native Beta - spring-boot

I am exploring a possibilty to convert my existing Spring Boot facade services to be compatible with GraalVM image. I have tried to do a PoC with Spring Native (0.11). And it actually serves the purpose (solving cold-start problem). But I am skeptical to go with Spring Native in production as it's still with Beta. I am evaluating my option with Helidon & Quarkus and the performance benchmark seems to be fascinating.But as we have 100+ Microservices to convert and it will be a huge manual effort and we don't want that right now.
Is there any other option available with Spring Boot with GraalVM native image but without Spring Native Beta.My requirement is pretty simple. We are using few flavors of Spring (boot-starter, WebServiceTemplate, Spring Cloud for config server & discovery , zpipkin for logging). If I don't want to use Spring Boot what are the other stable options available within Java EE without introducing a new framework (aka Helidon or Quarkus).

Related

Is that possible to build a Quarkus native executable with a normal JavaEE and JAX-RS Project?

Let's say I've a project, which is about JavaEE and JAX-RS and normally deployed on wildfly. And now I need to implement Quarkus native.
So here is what I have:
A JavaEE project, which so far has no relation with Quarkus.
What I want to do:
1.Implement Quarkus native with a POM.
Is that possible ? Any Suggestions or Answers would be appealed.
Most JavaEE applications can be converted to Quarkus fairly easily as Quarkus has support for the most important JavaEE specs.
There are also various articles you can read up on. See this, this and this.
You can also check out the Migration Toolkit for Applications which provides insights on migrating existing applications to Quarkus.

I am developing a website I know bootstrap and learned spring I want to know what else can be done to make it better?

I want to know what spring dependencies should I use on my website to make the work easy and spring or spring boot which one is better. also, suggest some frontend technologies that I can use to make the website smart.
It's a very broad question. And it all depends on what features you want in your web site. Just listing few basic module to give you some hints.
Spring MVC - For web application with MVC Pattern
Spring Security - To secure your app
Spring ORM - If using any ORM tool like hibernate
You need to explore more on the basis of your need.
Spring Boot vs Spring:
You should use Spring Boot if you are starting new project. Spring Boot came to make development process easier when using Spring Framework. In Spring, developer had to write lots of code to configure beans and dependencies. Spring Boot automated this process so that you no longer do it by yourself but Spring Boot will take care of it. Plus it provides some extra tools (In built Web Server, in Memory DB, tool to monitor and manage Spring Boot App )
Try to create a simple web app in Spring and Spring Boot to understand the difference.
Front-end Technologies:
JavaScript based framework/lib like Angular,React,Vue etc. are the trend for front-end now a days. Again there are pros and cons of each of them. Hence you need to evaluate, what suits you better as per your requirement.

Convert project from Spring framework to Spring boot

I have a set of projects in Spring framework and I have to Find the ones which can be converted to Spring boot.
Is there anything that is related to Spring framework and cannot be converted to spring boot ? In my research, I Could not Find something like that.
But does anyone know something, like a dependency, which would force the project to stay in Spring framework ?
Spring Boot uses the Spring Framework as a foundation and improvises on it. It simplifies Spring dependencies and runs applications straight from a command line. Spring Boot provides several features to help manage enterprise applications easily. Spring Boot is not a replacement for the Spring, but it’s a tool for working faster and easier on Spring applications. It simplifies much of the architecture by adding a layer that helps automate configuration and deployment while making it easier to add new features.
Most of the changes for migrating Spring Framework application to Spring Boot are related to configurations.This migration will have minimal impact on the application code or other custom components.Spring Boot brings a number of advantages to the development.
It simplifies Spring dependencies by taking the opinionated view.
Spring Boot provides a preconfigured set of technologies/framework to reduces error-prone configuration so we as a developer focused on building our business logic and not thinking of project setup.
You really don’t need those big XML configurations for your project.
Embed Tomcat, Jetty or Undertow directly.
Provide opinionated Maven POM to simplify your configurations.
Application metrics and health check using actuator module.
Externalization of the configuration files.
Good to refer this for migrating from Spring to Spring Boot application: https://www.javadevjournal.com/spring-boot/migrating-from-spring-to-spring-boot/

How to check which Spring Boot version goes with spring-cloud-gcp-starter-data-spanner 1.1.0.RC1?

I intended to use Spring Data Cloud Spanner starter (version 1.1.0.RC1) with Spring Boot application but cannot find the official document of which Spring Boot version it goes with. Running my app and it works well with Spring Boot 2.x.x but not with Spring Boot version 1.x.x (ClassNotFoundException). Could anyone help:
Any document to show which SpringBoot version goes with Spring Data Cloud Spanner starter (version 1.1.0.RC1)?
Any way to make Data Cloud Spanner starter (ideally 1.1.0.RC1) work with SpringBoot version 1.5.17?
Thank you.
TL;DR Spring Boot 2.1 but you shouldn't have to care.
Spring Cloud Data Spanner is part of the Spring Cloud GCP project that recently joined the official Spring Cloud release train.
Rather than figuring out which version of a particular library is needed , I'd strongly recommend you to use proper dependency management in your build and let default apply. That way you can select a Spring Cloud generation (i.e. release train) and the dependencies that you need will be managed for you automatically (that is, no need to provide a version for them).
The latest 1.0 RC, RC2 at the time of writing, is part of the Greenwich release train with a RC2 release this week.
To get started with proper dependency management, go to https://start.spring.io and select "GCP Support" to get a build with the proper BOM import. Once you've done that you can add the starter without a version and things will be managed for you.
The relationships between Spring Boot version and Spring Cloud release train is documented here and on start.spring.io as well.

BPMN for spring boot 2

We have started new project on spring stack and using latest versions. But we have workflow requirement and I used activiti in past. But as I see there is no spring boot 2 support for activiti and camunda. Can anybody suggest which BPM is best that can be integrated with spring boot 2.
You will find a bunch of Spring Boot 2 starters in the Flowable github repo.
The documentation explains step-by-step how to create a BPM enabled Spring Boot application. There is also the blog post The road to Spring Boot 2.0 that the improved support for Flowable within Spring Boot as part of the Flowable 6.3.0 release.
You ask for suggestions on which BPM is best. Well, I cannot be objective since I am part of the Flowable Team, but I can say that our Spring Boot implementation is pretty neat:
All engines are supported (BPMN, CMMN, DMN), both embedded and exposing their respective REST APIs.
There is an automatic configuration of Spring Security to use the Flowable IDM engine (in case no other custom security is configured).
There is no "EE" version of the starter. Flowable provides Spring Boot 2 support 100% Open Source.
The Spring Actuator integration is quite powerful.
Did I mention Open Source? ;-)
In order to get the all engines you would need to use the flowable-spring-boot-starter(-rest) dependency. The (-rest) needs to be used if you want the Flowable REST APIs to be automatically configured.
There is also the option to run the BPMN, CMMN or DMN engines in standalone mode. For that you would need one of the following dependencies:
flowable-spring-boot-starter-process(-rest)
flowable-spring-boot-starter-cmmn(-rest)
flowable-spring-boot-starter-dmn(-rest)
So, compare for yourself, but for me, it's pretty clear and of course I am open to discussion.
The Activiti is working on Activiti Cloud fully based on Spring Boot 2 and Spring Cloud Finchley (targeting kubernetes deployments, but it can be used outside kubernetes if that is not your thing) if you are looking for a BPMN runtime for Cloud Native applications. We are working hard on releasing the first Beta1 release at the moment, and we will very welcome feedback about it. Hope this helps.
If you use the camunda-bpm-spring-boot-starter you can write self contained services running camunda process engine with spring boot 2.

Resources