OIDC Logging out issue , How to control the browser programatically/manually? - xamarin

I’m using OIDC client in my Xamarin App(Code below) So when I make the call oidcClient.LogoutAsync browser opens, and while I’m awaiting the response back from the browser to the app if I need to minimise the app for some reason. The call then gets interrupted and the app stays on the browser, Never gives a response back, unless user manually closes the browser. Now I have no control over the browser from my app, Is there a way to avoid this. Maybe not open the browser altogether and logout silently. Please suggest a workaround.
private OidcClient InitializeAuthClient()
{
var options = new OidcClientOptions
{
Authority = Config.AuthorityURL,
ClientId = Config.ClientId,
Scope = Config.Scope,
RedirectUri = Config.RedirectUri,
ClientSecret = Config.ClientSecret,
PostLogoutRedirectUri = Config.RedirectUri,
Browser = new WebAuthenticatorBrowser(),
};
return new OidcClient(options);
}
OidcClient oidcClient = InitializeAuthClient();
LogoutResult logoutResult = await oidcClient.LogoutAsync(new LogoutRequest
{ BrowserDisplayMode = IdentityModel.OidcClient.Browser.DisplayMode.Hidden, IdTokenHint = authData.idToken });

Related

Is it possible to launch native apps using Microsoft bot framework?

I am creating a Cortana skill on the Cortana canvas, I have a button.
I wanted to know if it possible to have an 'imback' type of button to open a webpage.
Ye, for example
var message = context.MakeMessage() as IMessageActivity;
message.ChannelData = JObject.FromObject(new
{
action = new { type = "LaunchUri", uri = "skype:echo123?call" }
});
await context.PostAsync(message);
this code will start a call with echo123 user on skype
Reference: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cortana/tutorials/bot-skills/bot-entity-channel-data
You can supply an openUrl to a card action, or even use ChannelData to send a LaunchUri command, deep linking to an application. (I haven't tried this, but I assume 'http://websitename.com' will launch in the Cortana host platform's default browser.)
activity.ChannelData = new {
action = new { type = "LaunchUri", uri = "http://websitename.com"}
};

Google AUTH API Application Type, how important is it?

I've been doing a lot tinkering around with the authentication stuff using the .NET libraries provided by Google.
We have both a desktop and web-app side, and what we want to achieve is to authenticate ONCE, either on the desktop or the web side, and store the refresh token, and reuse it both on the web side and the desktop side.
So the situation is like so, on the desktop side, when there's no saved existing AccessToken's and RefreshToken's, we will ask the user to authenticate via this code:
using (var stream = new FileStream("client_secrets_desktop.json", FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read))
{
credential = await GoogleWebAuthorizationBroker.AuthorizeAsync(GoogleClientSecrets.Load(stream).Secrets,
new[] { GmailService.Scope.GmailReadonly, GmailService.Scope.GmailCompose },
"someemail#gmail.com", CancellationToken.None);
}
In this case the Client ID and Secret is of an Application type Installed Application.
On the web-application side, if there's also no refresh token yet then I'm using DotNetOpenAuth to trigger the authentication, here's the code snippet:
const string clientID = "someclientid";
const string clientSecret = "somesecret";
const string redirectUri = "http://localhost/Home/oauth2callback";
AuthorizationServerDescription server = new AuthorizationServerDescription
{
AuthorizationEndpoint = new Uri("https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/auth"),
TokenEndpoint = new Uri("https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/token"),
ProtocolVersion = ProtocolVersion.V20
};
public ActionResult AuthenticateMe()
{
List<string> scope = new List<string>
{
GmailService.Scope.GmailCompose,
GmailService.Scope.GmailReadonly,
GmailService.Scope.GmailModify
};
WebServerClient consumer = new WebServerClient(server, clientID, clientSecret);
// Here redirect to authorization site occurs
OutgoingWebResponse response = consumer.PrepareRequestUserAuthorization(
scope, new Uri(redirectUri));
response.Headers["Location"] += "&access_type=offline&approval_prompt=force";
return response.AsActionResult();
}
public void oauth2callback()
{
WebServerClient consumer = new WebServerClient(server, clientID, clientSecret);
consumer.ClientCredentialApplicator =
ClientCredentialApplicator.PostParameter(clientSecret);
IAuthorizationState grantedAccess = consumer.ProcessUserAuthorization(null);
string accessToken = grantedAccess.AccessToken;
}
Here is where I want to confirm my suspicions.
When there is a RefreshToken that exists, we use the following code snippet to call the Gmail API's
UserCredential uc = new UserCredential(flow, "someemail#gmail.com", new TokenResponse()
{
AccessToken = "lastaccesstoken",
TokenType = "Bearer",
RefreshToken = "supersecretrefreshtoken"
});
var refreshState = await uc.RefreshTokenAsync(CancellationToken.None);
var svc = new GmailService(new BaseClientService.Initializer()
{
HttpClientInitializer = uc,
ApplicationName = "Gmail Test",
});
Here's the thing I noticed is that, for me to be able to use the refresh token to refresh from either the desktop or the web side, the refresh token needs to be generated through the same client ID/secret combination. I've tested it and it seems like it's fine if we use Installed application as the application type for the Client ID for both the desktop and the web, but my question I guess is, these application type's for the client IDs, do they matter so much?
Am I doing anything wrong to do it this way?
Thanks in advance

Thinktecture IdentityModel AuthenticationConfiguration Mapping for Cookie - how?

I have a Web API based application currently set up using the amazing Thinktecture IdentityModel 4.5.
It is set up for claims-based authentication, accepting a Basic auth credential sent in on the Authorization header. The javascript client saves the returned session token and uses this for subsequent requests by including it in the Authorization header preceded by Session as the scheme.
The javascript client also saves the token to a cookie, for retrieval if the window is closed and reopened quickly, or when new windows are opened to prevent the user having to re-authenticate. The cookie is named sessionToken and it's value is the actual token.
It all works wonderfully well.
The problem is I have a link on the app page that links to a direct address (/api/controller/id/pdfdocument) and opens it in a new window (target: _blank). Therefore there is no way to include the Authorization header in this request. However, the cookie is transferred over correctly as the session is still active.
I have tried to add a mapping to the AuthenticationConfig.Mappings collection to add support for collecting the token from the cookie, however I just can't get the configuration right to get this working, and havn't been able to find any other resources online. I'm assuming there's something very simple that needs to get fixed.
My code:
private static AuthenticationConfiguration CreateAuthenticationConfiguration()
{
var sessionTokenConfiguration = new SessionTokenConfiguration();
sessionTokenConfiguration.EndpointAddress = "/Authenticate";
sessionTokenConfiguration.DefaultTokenLifetime = new TimeSpan(1, 0, 0);
var authenticationConfig = new AuthenticationConfiguration
{
ClaimsAuthenticationManager = _authenticationManager,
RequireSsl = false,
EnableSessionToken = true,
SessionToken = sessionTokenConfiguration,
SendWwwAuthenticateResponseHeaders = false
};
var securityTokenHandler = new Thinktecture.IdentityModel.Tokens.Http.BasicAuthenticationWithRoleSecurityTokenHandler(_userService.ValidateUser, _userService.GetRolesForUser);
securityTokenHandler.RetainPassword = false;
var realm = "localhost";
var authorizationMapping = new AuthenticationOptionMapping
{
Options = AuthenticationOptions.ForAuthorizationHeader(scheme: "Basic"),
TokenHandler = new System.IdentityModel.Tokens.SecurityTokenHandlerCollection { securityTokenHandler },
Scheme = AuthenticationScheme.SchemeAndRealm("Basic", realm)
};
authenticationConfig.AddMapping(authorizationMapping);
var cookieMapping = new AuthenticationOptionMapping
{
Options = AuthenticationOptions.ForCookie("sessionToken"),
TokenHandler = new System.IdentityModel.Tokens.SecurityTokenHandlerCollection { securityTokenHandler },
Scheme = AuthenticationScheme.SchemeOnly(scheme: "Session")
};
authenticationConfig.AddMapping(cookieMapping);
//authenticationConfig.AddBasicAuthentication(_userService.ValidateUser, _userService.GetRolesForUser);
return authenticationConfig;
}
This configuration is then applied like so:
HttpConfiguration config;
var authenticationConfig = CreateAuthenticationConfiguration();
config.MessageHandlers.Add(new AuthenticationHandler(authenticationConfig));
And this is what the cookie looks like in the request header:
Cookie: sessionToken=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.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.UlPeD9HzduQfwHE7NuXi9eMVo40hypi_LBK-f76VYFI; username=a
Any help most appreciated!
So after waiting a few minutes and receiving no replies and desperately needing this functionality I dived into the Thinktecture IdentityModel 4.5 source code to see what was going on and it seems this feature is not actually supported. Not only is it not supported but from the looks of it cookie mapping is not actually implemented.
I forked the repository and made a few small changes to allow for this feature:
https://github.com/ibraheemhlaiyil/Thinktecture.IdentityModel.45
and sent Dominick Baier of Thinktecture this in a pull request:
https://github.com/thinktecture/Thinktecture.IdentityModel.45/pull/95
Cookie usage has it's disadvantages, and it seems Thinktecture are trying to stay away from them as far as possible, however I could not come up with a different solution to my problem - a javascript client web applications that needs to open a new window/tab and maintain the authenticated session in the new window/tab.
If you want to use this feature, you simply set the new CookieName property on the SessionTokenConfiguration object. IdentityModel uses the HeaderName property to determine which header to look up for authentication data. In the same way, if the CookieName property is set this determines which cookie name is looked up for authentication data if no authentication data was found on the header.
In the example below, authentication data is looked for on the cookie named sessionToken if no authentication data is found on the Authorization header.
private static AuthenticationConfiguration CreateAuthenticationConfiguration()
{
var authenticationConfig = new AuthenticationConfiguration
{
ClaimsAuthenticationManager = _authenticationManager,
RequireSsl = false,
SendWwwAuthenticateResponseHeaders = false,
EnableSessionToken = true,
SessionToken = new SessionTokenConfiguration
{
EndpointAddress = "/Authenticate",
DefaultTokenLifetime = new TimeSpan(1, 0, 0),
HeaderName = "Authorization",
CookieName = "sessionToken",
SigningKey = CryptoRandom.CreateRandomKey(32)
}
};
authenticationConfig.AddBasicAuthentication(_userService.ValidateUser, _userService.GetRolesForUser);
return authenticationConfig;
}
As before, this configuration is applied like so during your application start up:
HttpConfiguration config;
var authenticationConfig = CreateAuthenticationConfiguration();
config.MessageHandlers.Add(new AuthenticationHandler(authenticationConfig));
The cookie authentication data has the exact same form as the data sent in the Authorization header, so if sent, the cookie should look like:
Cookie: sessionToken=Session eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.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.UlPeD9HzduQfwHE7NuXi9eMVo40hypi_LBK-f76VYFI
Hope someone finds this of some use!

SignalR .Net client fails to connect (upd: how to set auth. cookie?)

This thing is dragging me nuts.
I have a .net 4.0 console app and I have an MVC web app.
javascript clients can connect and talk to the server - no problems here...
but my .net client throws System.AggregateException with InnerException = "Unexpected character encountered while parsing value: <. Path...
so I created an empty MVC3 app, added SignalR libraries, and .net client surprisingly connects to that. But for some reason it doesn't to the other one. I've checked everything, both MVC3 apps, both use the same SignalR libs, the same NewtonsoftJson... I thought it must be something with the routing, I guess no - js client works.
var connection = new HubConnection("http://localhost:58746");
var hubProxy = connection.CreateProxy("myProxy");
connection.Start().Wait() // it fails here on Wait
What could it be?
UPD: I have figured... it's because FormsAuthentication on the server. Now is there any way to feed .ASPXAUTH cookie to SignalR so it can connect to the server?
The solution by Agzam was really helpful, but if anyone else uses the posted code it is critical that you close the HttpWebResponse before exiting GetAuthCookie. If you don't you will find that whenever you use SignalR to invoke a method on the server, the request (under most circumstances) will queue indefinitely on the client and will neither succeed nor fail.
Note. The original code worked in the test environment when everything was on my PC, but failed consistently when the website was hosted on a remote server.
here is the modified code I ended up using
private Cookie GetAuthCookie(string user, string pass)
{
var http = WebRequest.Create(_baseUrl+"Users/Login") as HttpWebRequest;
http.AllowAutoRedirect = false;
http.Method = "POST";
http.ContentType = "application/x-www-form-urlencoded";
http.CookieContainer = new CookieContainer();
var postData = "UserName=" + user + "&Password=" + pass + "&RememberMe=true&RememberMe=false&ReturnUrl=www.google.com";
byte[] dataBytes = System.Text.Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(postData);
http.ContentLength = dataBytes.Length;
using (var postStream = http.GetRequestStream())
{
postStream.Write(dataBytes, 0, dataBytes.Length);
}
var httpResponse = http.GetResponse() as HttpWebResponse;
var cookie = httpResponse.Cookies[FormsAuthentication.FormsCookieName];
httpResponse.Close();
return cookie;
}
its a very minor change , but it will save you a lot of debugging time.
Ok... stupid me... SignalR failed to connect because it cannot breach server's Forms authentication. So what needed to be done is to get the auth cookie and stick it to the HubConnection.CookieContainer...
so I wrote this method method to login with a username and get the cookie:
private Cookie GetAuthCookie(string user, string pass)
{
var http = WebRequest.Create(_baseUrl+"Users/Login") as HttpWebRequest;
http.AllowAutoRedirect = false;
http.Method = "POST";
http.ContentType = "application/x-www-form-urlencoded";
http.CookieContainer = new CookieContainer();
var postData = "UserName=" + user + "&Password=" + pass + "&RememberMe=true&RememberMe=false&ReturnUrl=www.google.com";
byte[] dataBytes = System.Text.Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(postData);
http.ContentLength = dataBytes.Length;
using (var postStream = http.GetRequestStream())
{
postStream.Write(dataBytes, 0, dataBytes.Length);
}
var httpResponse = http.GetResponse() as HttpWebResponse;
var cookie = httpResponse.Cookies[FormsAuthentication.FormsCookieName];
httpResponse.Close();
return cookie;
}
And used it like this:
var connection = new HubConnection(_baseUrl)
{
CookieContainer = new CookieContainer()
};
connection.CookieContainer.Add(GetAuthCookie(_user, _pass));
Works perfectly!
Just use this for reading cookies:
var cookie = response.Cookies[".AspNet.ApplicationCookie"];

listening and accessing to all the request made by firefox

I am developing an addon which will modify all the http request made by firefox. So, I want to listen and modify all the request url made by browser from different sites. How can I get an access to different http request url and modify them. Is there any event which is fired in firefox before requesting any http-request.
So, please suggest anyway to access all the request(ajax as well as document.src) made by browser and modify their url.
Thanxs!!
You should take a look at tamperdata sources which is a firefox extension to track and modify http & https requests.
You should register for nsIObserver's "http-on-modify-request" event. This will give you every request just before it is issued by the browser.
var {Cc, Ci} = require("chrome");
var httpRequestObserver =
{
observe: function(subject, topic, data)
{
if (topic == "http-on-modify-request") {
var httpChannel = subject.QueryInterface(Ci.nsIHttpChannel);
var requestURI = httpChannel.URI.spec;
// ...
}
}
};
var observerService = Cc["#mozilla.org/observer-service;1"].getService(Ci.nsIObserverService);
observerService.addObserver(httpRequestObserver, "http-on-modify-request", false);

Resources