So, reading this documentation:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/visualstudio/ide/reference/immediate-window?view=vs-2022
It looks like the question mark (?) is an alias for the command >Debug.Print, which basically, will evaluate the expression and show the result.
So, in debug mode, instead of running this:
>Debug.Print DoSomething()
I can run this:
? DoSomething()
This is even better because I'm getting the autocomplete suggestions.
Now, the issue is that I can run the same line without a command at all, and it does exactly the same:
DoSomething()
So far looks like there is no need for the command >Debug.Print or the alias ?.
At first, I suspected that using ? will only print the result without changing the values, but this is not the case (When I assign a value to a variable using ? it is assigned and the new value is printed)
So, am I missing something here? Are there any other differences between these 3 options?
According to the documentation, if you want to use Visual Studio command, you need to add greater than sign before the command. If you run 'Debug.Print' without adding greater than sign, you will get an error.
My point is that the question mark ('?') is unnecessary if you in the Immediate Window, it is used to distinguish the typed expression from the result.
Related
When in debug mode in Pycharm, the Evaluate Expression -> Code Fragment tool doesn't seem to be able to assign and display a variable in one go. The only case that seems to be evaluated correctly is when the first line is a constant value.
eg.
10
results as expected in
result = {int} 10
but when trying to obtain the same result with:
c = 10
c
the output is
result = {NoneType} None
However, if I hover over each variable in fragment window, the values are shown as a popup.
Edits to sum up the comments (thanks Vaibhav Mishra):
Unfortunately, this seems to be the default behavior: (won't fix bug)
My understanding of this feature:
Although Pycharm will display a None result when evaluating multiple lines, they are all executed in the context of the currently selected stack frame. One of the consequences being the update of the namespace. Subsequently using single-line evaluations in the same context (or mouse hover) will display the expected values.
Two potential usages:
The Evaluate Code Fragment dialog is automatically prompted when evaluating multiple lines from the editor: Select a block | Evaluate Expression (Alt+F8). May be useful to tweak a couple of lines and run evaluation in one go.
As an alternative to the Debug Command Line, the code fragment mode supports loops and if/else. Although the inspection seems a bit tipsy (mistakenly unresolved variables), it can be ignored, and the editing assistance provided there can be put to good use.
I'm using SWI-Prolog interactively. When I run my query, I get a prefix of the output and the rest is taken off (marked using the string ...|...). Is this normal or should I go back and fix my program?
The number of items shown is controlled by a prolog flag.
You can remove it by issuing
remove_max_depth:-
current_prolog_flag(toplevel_print_options,Options),
select(max_depth(_), Options, NOptions)->
set_prolog_flag(toplevel_print_options, NOptions); true.
Nothing to worry about. It's just abbreviating it visually... just press 'w' (write) to display the complete internal representation of the list.
I was reading the JMeter documentation and came across this info box about "If Controllers":
No variables are made available to the script when the condition is interpreted as Javascript. If you need access to such variables, then select "Interpret Condition as Variable Expression?" and use a __javaScript() function call. You can then use the objects "vars", "log", "ctx" etc. in the script.
I don't quite follow this. Does this mean if I want access to a "User Defined Parameter" then I can access it only by writing some JavaScript? The example that follows this box then refers to "${COUNT}"
Could someone clarify the usage of the If Controller, maybe with an example or two?
All these answers are wrong! You need to put the variable reference in quotes, like so:
"${my_variable}"=="foo"
You can simply use something like
${my_variable}=='1'
Sometimes JMeter documentation can be confusing :)
Edit 27 september 2017:
The answer here works but has a very bad performance impact when number of threads exceeds 40.
See below for correct and most performing answer:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/46976447/460802
See:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61675
UNCHECK the CHECKBOX
"Interpret condition as variable expression"
I wasted a couple of hours without unchecking this checkbox. It worked with and without semicolon(;) at the end of the statement. Make sure that you have set the User-Defined Variables before calling the if controller.
All the following variations worked for me in Jakarta Jmeter 1.5
${__javaScript("${HOMEPAGE}"=="Y")}
${__javaScript("${HOMEPAGE}"=="Y")};
"${HOMEPAGE}"=="Y"
"${HOMEPAGE}"=="Y";
If Controller will internally use javascript to evaluate the condition but this can have a performance penalty.
A better option (default one starting from JMeter 4, see https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61675) is to check "Interpret Condition as Variable Expression?", then in the condition field you have 2 options:
Option 1 : Use a variable that contains true or false. For example If you want to test if last sample was successful, you can use
${JMeterThread.last_sample_ok}
or any variable you want that contains true/false
${myVar}
Option 2 : Use a function (${__jexl3()} is advised) to evaluate an expression that must return true or false.
For example if COUNT is equal to 1:
${__jexl3("${COUNT}"== "1",)}
OR
${__jexl3(${COUNT}== 1,)}
Starting with 4.0, if you don't use the "Interpret Condition as Variable Expression?", a warning in RED will be displayed:
If you'd like to learn more about JMeter and performance testing this book can help you.
God bless the http://habrahabr.ru
Have tried until found these.
Using the quotes was my solution.
As Gerrie said you need to check your variable
${my_var} == 'value'
But be careful with the 'User Defined Variables'
Note that all the UDV elements in a
test plan - no matter where they are -
are processed at the start.
That basically means that you cannot define 'User Defined Variables' inside an 'If Controller'. Take a look to the 'BeanShell' instead.
Replace:
${my_variable}=='1'
with
"${my_variable}" == "1"
if it's string value pass as below and its performance effective
${__groovy("${key}"=="value")}
I have used ${code_g1}== 200 in condition and it worked for me.
I have a common issue when working with code in the IDE:
string.Concat("foo", "bar");
and I need to change it to:
string.Concat("bar", "foo");
Often I have several of these that need to be swapped at once. I would like to avoid all the typing. Is there a way to automate this? Either a shortcut or some sort of macro would be great if I knew where to start.
Edit: changed to string.Concat to show that you can't always modify the method signature. I am only looking to change the order of the params in the method call, and nothing else.
<Ctrl> + <Shift> + <t> will transpose two words, so it would work in your case. Unfortunately I don't see this working (without multiple presses) for functions with larger parameter lists...
I had a lot of code with this function:
SetInt(comboBox1.Value + 1, "paramName", ...
SetInt(comboBoxOther.Value, "paramName", ...
And I needed to swap only the first two parameters;
I ended up using some text editor with regular expression management (like Scite), and using this one saved me hours:
Find: SetInt(\([.a-z0-9]+[ + 1]*\), \("[a-z0-9]+"\)
Replace: SetInt(\2, \1
Whilst debugging in Xcode_3.1.2 I am pretty sure I could see the contents of my NSString arrays. However after upgrading to 3.2 I only see the following ...
I know I can print the object in (gdb) using "po planetArray" or simply click in the debugger and "print description to console" I am just curious, as I am sure it worked prior to upgrading. Anyone know anything about this?
cheers gary
edit: data formatters is on and it shows what you see above ...
This is because GDB acts as if the variable you are viewing is out of scope while it really just is confused about what each part function or method call of the data formatter is returning (the data formatter is the "{(unichar *)Xcode_CFStringSummary($VAR, $ID)}:s" part you are seeing.
When you are debugging and you are in a method where you know a local variable must be in scope right now, open the debugger window and the area where you can see "Variable", "Value" and "Summary" column titles double click the "Summary" row entry for the variable you are interested in and enter the following (for array types like NSArray or NSCFArray):
"{(int)[$VAR count]} objects {(NSString *)[(NSArray *)$VAR description]}:s"
then press return. You have now overwritten the default data formatter provided by Xcode's GDB extension (to be found in various plists at "/Developer/Library/Xcode/CustomDataViews/") with your own data formatter string.
Your own overrides are saved at "~/Library/Application Support/Developer/Shared/Xcode/CustomDataViews/CustomDataViews.plist" and if you want to have the Apple default data formatter back just double click the row for a variable of the same type and delete whatever is there.
The nitty-gritty details: In the custom expression above the "{}" construct tells GDB to execute a command (as if you where executing it from GDB's debugger command line, which means the same restrictions apply: you need to specify the return type in cast parens in front of every function or method which returns something). The ":s" behind the closing curly brace tells Xcode and GDB to reference the "Summary" column. Also valid would be ":v" which references the "Value" column which most of the time is just the pointer value. Everything that is outside of the curly braces is shown verbatim.
Unfortuntely curly braces can't be nested which invalidates ternary operator conditionals.
So with the above data formatter you should see the following for an empty NSArray:
"0 objects (\n)"
If you want to write your own data formatters as GDB extensions (equivalent to specifying a function akin to Xcode_CFStringSummary above) you can do so. Take a look at the following header: "/Developer/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/PlugIns/GDBMIDebugging.xcplugin/Contents/Headers/DataFormatterPlugin.h"
it will tell you all you need to know. But it can be hard to get it right. It might be easier and less error prone to just define another method on your class and call that from the data formatter string instead of "description".
In the Run > Variables View menu in Xcode, is "Use Data Formatters" enabled?
I am not sure if this helps but if you select the array value to wish to see in the debugger window and the go to the Menu : Run > Variables View > View Variable As
you can change it from "NSCFString *" to "NSString *". You then see the value so "Planet_1" for example.
Cheers,
Kevin