I have a sequelize model, which needs custom validation. That custom validation relies on some foreign keys being valid (valid as in valid uuid, not checked that they exist in db) on a record. There is also another validator appended that checks for mutual exclusivity of the foreign keys (only one can be present at the same time). After all this, I access the database in another validator to fetch data from another collection. I dont want this to happen if any of above validators fail because I dont want to access the database if I dont have to and I dont want to check if uuid is valid again because that is a job for one of previous validators.
The order is like so:
check if field contains valid type (uuid) - field type validator
check that field is not clashing with another field (mutually exclusive) - model-wide validator
fetch record from another collection to do further validation - model-wide validator
I want to check if previous validator has already thrown an error and not execute the next one if it has. Even better if I can check which one has thrown an error. Sequelize executes all validators even if error was already thrown. In documentation it says:
Any error messages collected are put in the validation result object
alongside the field validation errors, with keys named after the
failed validation method's key in the validate option object. Even
though there can only be one error message for each model validation
method at any one time, it is presented as a single string error in an
array, to maximize consistency with the field errors.
I tried several ways to access this "error" object but to no avail. Is there a way at all to know if error was already thrown by one of previous validators?
Related
I created a webservice to update a column value in a table. While calling it using SOAP request xml, getting error message like: Cannot set value of column.
For users table, I am able to call similar webservice without any issue. But, this issue is coming with particular table. In which case, this message might come? Cannot set value of column.
Check the log on the server, the cause of that failure is logged in SEVERE level.
This exception if you are using non supported value. If your field is boolean type then use Y or N as value.
There is custom field "Lock Flag" in Account BC, namely in S_ORG_EXT_X table. This field is made available in Opportunity BC using join to above table. The join specification is as follows: Opportunity.Account Id = Account.Id. Account Id is always populated when creating new opportunity. The requirement is that for newly created records in Opportunity BC if "Lock Flag" is equal to 'Y', then we should not allow to create the record and we should show custom error message.
My initial proposal was to use a Runtime Event that is calling Data Validation Manager business service where validation rule is evaluated and error message shown. Assuming that we have to decide whether to write record or not, the logic should be placed in PreWriteRecord event handler as long as WriteRecord have row already commited to database.
The main problem was how to determine if it is new record or updated one. We have WriteRecordNew and WriteRecordUpdated runtime events but they are fired after record is actually written so it doesn't prevent user from saving record. My next approach was to use eScript: write custom code in BusComp_PreWriteRecord server script and call BC's method IsNewRecordPending to determine if it is new record, then check the flag and show error message if needed.
But unfortunately I am faced with another problem. That joined field "Lock Flag" is not populated for newly created opportunity records. Remember we are talking about BC Opportunity and field is placed in S_ORG_EXT_X table. When we create new opportunity we pick account that it belongs to. So it reproduceable: OpportunityBC.GetFieldValue("Lock Flag") returns null for newly created record and returns correct value for the records that was saved previously. For newly created opportunities we have to re-query BC to see "Lock Flag" populated. I have found several documents including Oracle's recomendation to use PreDefaultValue property if we want to display joined field value immediately after record creation. The most suitable expression that I've found was Parent: BCName.FieldName but it is not the case, because active BO is Opportunity and Opportunity BC is the primary one.
Thanks for your patience if you read up to here and finally come my questions:
Is there any way to handle PreWrite event and determine if it is new record or not, without using eScript and BC.IsNewRecordPending method?
How to get value of joined field for newly created record especially in PreWriteRecord event handler?
It is Siebel 8.1
UPDATE: I have found an answer for the first part of my question. Now it seems so simple to me that I am wondering how I haven't done it initially. Here is the solution.
Create Runtime Event triggered on PreWriteRecord. Specify call to Data Validation Manager business service.
In DVM create a ruleset and a rule where condition is
NOT(BCHasRows("Opportunity", "Opportunity", "[Id]='"+[Id]+"'", "AllView"))
That's it. We are searching for record wth the same Row Id. If it is new record there should't be anything in database yet (remember that we are in PreWriteRecord handler) and function returns FALSE. If we are updating some row then we get TRUE. Reversing result with NOT we make DVM raise an error for new records.
As for second part of my question credits goes to #RanjithR who proposed to use PickMap to populate joined field (see below). I have checked that method and it works fine at least when you have appropriate PickMap.
We Siebel developers have used scripting to correctly determine if record is new. One non scripting way you could try is to use RuntimeEvents to set a profileattribute during the BusComp NewRecord event, then check that in the PreWrite event to see if the record is new. However, there is always a chance that user might undo a record, those scenarios are tricky.
Another option, try invokine the BC Method:IsNewRecordPending from RunTime event. I havent tried this.
For the second part of the query, I think you could easily solve your problem using a PickMap.
On Opportunity BC, when your pick Account, just add one more pickmap to pick the Locked flag from Account and set it to the corresponding field on Opportunity BC. When the user picks the Account, he will also pick the lock flag, and your script will work in PreWriteRecord.
May I suggest another solution, again, I haven't tried it.
When new records are created, the field ModificationNumber will be set to 0. Every time you modify it, the ModificationNumber will increment by 1.
Set a DataValidationManager ruleset, trigger it from PreSetFieldValue event of Account field on Opportunity BC. Check for the LockFlag = Y AND (ModificationNumber IS NULL OR ModificationNumber = 0)) and throw error. DVM should throw error when new records are created.
Again, best practices say don't use the ModNumbers. You could set a ProfileAttribute to signal NewRecord, then use that attribute in the DVM. But please remember to clear the value of ProfileAttribute in WriteRecord and UndoRecord.
Let us know how it went !
How does validation work in database-first DbContext (EF4.3.1 & MVC3)?
I'm doing this (yes, it's VB):
If ModelState.IsValid Then
db.SaveChanges()
But the SaveChanges throws DbEntityValidationException with the following message:
Validation failed for one or more entities. See
'EntityValidationErrors' property for more details.
I expect it to return the view again with the appropriate validation messages, but clearly I'm missing something because I don't know why it should work that way! You would expect Google to help, but most examples seem to be code-first.
This is database first, so the model has been generated. I would expected the validation constraints to be generated too (at least simple ones like NOT NULL in SQL Server) , but that doesn't seem to work.
Oddly, some fields are working as expected and others aren't.
For example, I have a non-nullable text field in the database. It appears as non-nullable in the EF designer and in the generated code. But when I submit it, I get the exception instead of returning the form with the field highlighted.
On the other hand, I have a date field that is non-nullable. It is checked prior to trying to update the database, and the form is presented again with the field highlighted for correction.
My requirement is to create a custom data annotation attribute for my project. The requirement is to validate the min/ max length of a specific product from the database, which will be retrieved from the database using the ProductID. I have a dynamic page for each product where there are two fields called max length & min length. User inputs the values in these two fields which needs to be validated from the database. Product table contains all the products & one will be selected by passing a productId.
Please suggest some pointers to implement the above.
Thanks in advance.
This validation you can do only in the server side and not in client, so I see two options.
Remote Validation - You can use remote validation when you want to perform the validation and show the error message through ajax.
IValidatableObject - By implementing this interface in the class you can do both the validations at the same time and return all the validation error messages as a collection. By this way the validation will happen after the form is normally submitted.
When validating user input how deep would you go? Let say, that the user provided an ID for a database entity. The ID is valid in form, like integer, long etc. But the Entity does not exist in the database.
Should input validation go that deep?
If the entity doesn't exist then trying to access it propably causes some error or exception during execution. So you can check if the ID is valid or manage exception later.