I have a project that acts as an Identity Provider (IP) to other "child" projects, I set everything up using gam and ssologin. All of these are created with Genexus, c#
The system should work with a click on a page of the IP which leads me to a certain page of the "child" project.
The link works, but the transition is particularly slow. Also I don't understand if the double pass for the ssologin page is necessary or I am doing something wrong. If I check the elapsed time details most of it is for TTFB
This I have also shown is the best case. If, on the other hand, the system has not been used for a few hours, times get worse. It is as if the Identity Provider went into standby and put us to wake up, as shown below
Even the gamssologin code hasn't changed much compared to the standard one, the only difference is the addition of the AuthenticationTypeName to select the right type of authentication (since the projects connected to the IP are numerous)
Am I doing something wrong? Is this an inevitable behavior of the gam? Is it normal for gamssologin to be called twice?
Related
It appears that in some very rare cases GetComputerName() Windows API returns 'TENTATIVE' as a computer name. Based on information from our customers we suspect that this sometimes happens on laptops when they 'awaken' from a sleep. The odd thing is that this happens after our app is already running and able to connect to a back-end server and retrieve some information from it - i.e. the computer name is written into a log file at the time.
We are considering putting a slight delay during 'awakaning' but would like confirm that the cause is what we suspect.
We could not find anything on-line that would confirm the source of the issue.
My VB6 program uses ADODB to do a lot of SQL (2000) CRUD.
Sometimes the network connection between the remote clients and the data center somehow "drops" resulting in the impossibility to establish new connections (so users launching the program can't use it).
The issue is the following:
Anyone who is using the program at the moment of the "drop" can continue using it with no issues whatoever, perform every operation, update data, read data, and everything seems like is working normally.
User then proceeds to fire up a "sum-up" report which lists everything that was done (before or after the "drop").
If we then check the database, all data regarding whatever was done after the network drop is not there. User goes back into the program and everything is as it was before the network drop.
It seems like all queries where somehow performed in-memory ? I'm at a loss about how to even approach the issue (I'm familiar enough with VB6 to work with the source code but I don't know a lot about ADODB).
I haven't yet tried to replicate the behavior due to limited customer's availability (development environment is housed in their offices), I'll try starting up the program from the IDE then rip out the network cable.
Provided I can replicate the issue, how do I fix this ? Is there some setting I'm not aware of ?
On a side note: the issue is sporadic (it happened a handful of times during the last year, and the software is being used heavily and on a daily basis by mutiple concurrent users).
After reading up on Disconnected Recordsets, it seems that's what's behind this odd behavior I'm experiencing.
This is not something that can be simply "turned off".
I've been building some apps that connect to a SQL backend. I use ajax calls to hit WebMethods, a WebAPI, etc.
I notice that the first initial call to the SQL backend retrieves the data fairly slow. I can only assume that this is because it must first negotiate credentials first before retrieving the data. It probably caches this somewhere, and thus, any calls made afterwards come back very fast.
I'm wondering if there's an ideal, or optimal way, to initialize this connection.
My thought was to make a simple GET call right when the page loads (grabbing something very small, like a single entry). I probably wouldn't be using the returned data in any useful way, other than to ensure that any calls afterwards come back faster.
Is this an okay way to approach fixing the initial delay? I'd love to hear how others handle this.
Cheers!
There are a number of reasons that your first call could be slower than subsequent ones
Depending on your server platform, code may be compiled when first executed
You may not have an active DB connection in your connection pool
The database may not have cached indices or data on the first call
Some VM platforms may take a while to allocate sufficient resources to your server if it has been idle for a while.
One way I deal with those types of issues on the server side is to add startup code to my web service that fetches data likely to be used by many callers when the service first initializes (e.g. lookup tables, user credential tables, etc).
If you only control the client, consider that you may well wish to monitor server health (I use the open source monitoring platform Zabbix. There are also many commercial web-based monitoring solutions). Exercising the server outside of end-user code is probably better than making an extra GET call from a page that an end user has loaded.
Practical Challenge:
I have a LR script that runs against an app being mocked and do not have a logout button (yet).
The test runs fine With stable response time for about 10 minutes, but after that the response time peaks and the server goes into 99% memory usage and transactions start to fail.
I suspect this is due to the script does not terminate the vusers after each run anf it builds up a lot of running sessions against the server wich is not terminated. But I might be wrong.
Anyays I want to programatically close each run after it has competed the business process.
I have red somewhere that web_set_sockets_option ("SHUTDOWN_MODE", "ABRUPT") could be used for this, but I want to be sure that this function actually does what I want and what does 'ABRUPT' means?
Are there better ways of closing sessions? Clicking the close browser during recording does not result in anything being captured in the script.
It's a server issue on session aging. Your server admin for your website can adjust the timeout values where no activity has taken place on a given session. By default most places have this set at 30 minutes. Trim it to what you need rather than taking the default value on the server.
Also, you may have hit a leak situation if resources are constantly accumulated on the server side but never released.
Based on your question I assume you're using the WEB/HTML protocol. I agree that the core issue is that your app's sessions should expire more elegantly and probably sooner. But, in order to get beyond this while testing you can try this. It isn't a guarantee, but it has worked sometimes for me in the past when dealing with similar situations. Try changing your Run-time Settings for the script:
Run-time Settings > Browser > Browser Emulation
Make sure you have the box checked for "Simulate a new user on each iteration". You can also try playing with the other settings here, like clearing the cache each iteration. This could cause a new connection setting with the web page for each iteration depending on the server's session settings. Again, this isn't 100%, but it has worked for me from time to time.
try this:
web_set_sockets_option("CLOSE_KEEPALIVE_CONNECTIONS", "1");
I am developing a social network in ASP.NET MVC 3. Every user has must have the ability to see connected people.
What is the best way to do this?
I added a flag in the table Contact in my database, and I set it to true when the user logs in and set it to false when he logs out.
But the problem with this solution is when the user closes the browser without logging out, he will still remain connected.
The only way to truly know that a user is currently connected is to maintain some sort of connection between the user and the server. Two options immediately come to mind:
Use javascript to periodically call your server using ajax. You would have a special endpoint on your server that would be used to update a "last connected time" status, and you would have a second endpoint for users to poll to see who is online.
Use a websocket to maintain a persistent connection with your server
Option 1 should be fairly easy to implement. The main thing to keep in mind that this will increase the amount of requests coming into your server, and you will have to plan accordingly in order handle the traffic this could generate. You will have some control over the amount of load on your server by configuring how often javascript timer calls back to your server.
Option 2 could be a little more involved if you did this without library support. Of course there are libraries out there such as SignalR that make this really easy to do. This also has an impact on the performance of your site since each user will be maintaining a persistent connection. The advantage with this approach is that it reduces the need for polling like option 1 does. If you use this approach it would also be very easy to push a message to user A that user B has gone offline.
I guess I should also mention a really easy 3rd option as well. If you feel like your site is pretty interactive, you could just track the last time they made a request to your site. This of course may not give you enough accuracy to determine whether a user is "connected".