I dont understand the explanation about why GIF files always has image resolution 72ppi.
I have tried using ImageMagick converting PNG to GIF specifying -density to be 300ppi, but the resulting GIF is still 72ppi.
The GIF format does not store any value for "ppi" or "dpi" or pixel density/resolution - see Wikipedia.
I think software assumes 72 dpi, and then loads your image, updating that assumption if it finds anything better... which it never will in the case of GIF.
In any case, the dpi/ppi is irrelevant until such time as you want to print your image, and I don't know of anyone ever using GIF as a method of submission of images to any reputable printers or publications - TIFF is probably the preferred or most common method.
Related
On OSX I converted a multi-page PDF file to PNG and (somehow) it created a multi-page PNG file.
Is there an extension to the PNG format that allows this? Or is this not something I can validly create?
~~~~
To clarify, this is a PNG file, per the builtin file command and the identify command from imagemagick.
$ file algorithms-combined-print.png
algorithms-combined-print.png: PNG image data, 1275 x 1650, 8-bit/color RGBA, non-interlaced
$ identify algorithms-combined-print.png
algorithms-combined-print.png PNG 1275x1650 1275x1650+0+0 8-bit sRGB 3.537MB 0.000u 0:00.000
And here is a pastebin of the command identify -verbose algorithms-combined-print.png: http://pastebin.com/hw1yuRKa
What is notable from that output is that the pixel count is Number pixels: 2.104M which corresponds to one page. However, the file size is 3.537MB, which is clearly sufficient to hold all the pages.
Per request, here is the output of pngcheck: http://pastebin.com/aCRMEd9L
PNG does not support "multipage" images.
MNG is a PNG variant that supports multiple images - mostly for animations, but it's not a real PNG image (diffent signature/header), and has never become popular.
APNG is a similar attempt, but more focused on animations - it's more popular and alive, though it's less official - it's also PNG compatible (a standard PNG viewer, unaware of APNG, will display it as a single PNG image).
Another possible explanation is that your image is actually a TIFF image with a wrong .png extension, and the viewer ignores it.
The only way to know for sure is to look inside the image file itself (at least to the first bytes)
Update: given the pngcheck output, it seems to be a APNG file.
I'm currently building a site in app engine that uploads images to google cloud storage and to complete basic manipulations I'm using python's PIL
I've been having problems with the following image which another stackoverflow member has mentioned is a palette-based PNG with transparency, which I've been reading may be a bit buggy in PIL
My question is really a back to basics one: What is the best way to convert this to an RGB format with transparent pixels set to #FFF? I've been able to get it to work through a combined RGBA then RGB paste but that seems redundant
However, for a direct conversion I'm getting a bad transparency mask i.e. using the solution from PIL Convert PNG or GIF with Transparency to JPG without
Also if anybody has ideas why the image degrades to terrible quality after conversion, that's entirely a bonus for me!
A way to do this is to first convert the file to jpg -- seems like a problem with the png encoding (or something related to that)
Check out this link that I used and got smooth conversion from transparent PNG to GIF:
Convert RGBA PNG to RGB with PIL
The function you are looking for is pure_pil_alpha_to_color_v2.
I also used for my image conversion tool PySmile:
https://github.com/vietlq/PySmile/blob/master/pysmile.py
I am looking for a way to "find" animated GIFs so I can remove them from a folder.
This must work on Windows 7 or Windows XP.
Edit: I am looking to distinguish between animated and regular GIFs. If I could select all GIFs that might be ok as then I could sort by size, but some GIFs are saved with the extension .jpg! That is why I think I probably need a special Image viewer program.
You can use ImageMagick to get the number of frames in a GIF like this:
identify -format "%[scene]\n" YourImage.gif[-1]
identify -format "%[scene]\n" YourImage.jpeg[-1]
It actually gets the frame number of the last frame, so if the image has 37 frames, it will tell you that frame 36 (starting at zero) is the last. So, an animated GIF will give an output of 1 or more since it has multiple frames.
This also works, if the image is mis-named by using a different name suffix. ImageMagick isn't fooled by this, it will still discover that in reality it is a GIF. If it is a standard JPEG, or a GIF with only 1 frame it will return 0.
ImageMagick is free and available for OSX, Linux and Windows - here.
I use Abbyy FineReader for ScanSnap to OCR a couple of scanned PDF files. The software claims it retains the original PDF images. The PDF file sizes pre-OCR and post-OCR are almost identical, which is good.
After the software is done, all PDF images appear anti-aliased in Acrobat X. Page navigation is much slower than before, and when I zoom in/out, the images first go to what looks like the pre-anti-aliasing version before quickly changing to anti-aliased images.
Left: Scanned PDF / Right: after OCR with Abbyy
I would like to get the original images without anti-aliasing back. Interestingly, when I open a single page from the anti-aliased PDF in Photoshop, there is no anti-aliasing and the image looks like the left one.
My limited PDF programming experience leads me to believe that Abbyy likely sets some kind of anti-alias flag for each image during OCR processing. How do I un-set this flag?
Any pointers to useful ideas would be much appreciated.
After the software is done, all PDF images appear anti-aliased in Acrobat X. Page navigation is much slower than before, and when I zoom in/out, the images first go to what looks like the pre-anti-aliasing version before quickly changing to anti-aliased images.
Actually in the original file 2013_11_15_22_51_31.pdf contains a JPEG image while the OCR'ed file 2013_11_15_22_51_31_OCR.pdf contains a JPEG2000 image.
Comparing them in third party viewers, it becomes clear that the image in the OCR'ed file is not inherently anti-alias'ed. Furthermore there is no evident flag in the PDF instructing PDF viewers to apply anti-aliasing to the JPEG2000 image. Thus, Adobe Reader seems to automatically render JPEG and JPEG2000 images differently, applying anti-aliasing to the latter but not to the former.
Comparing both images in detail, though, it becomes clear that these images are not identical but instead the image in the OCR'ed PDF is slightly rotated.
I assume Abbyy FineReader recognized that the original scanned image is not correctly oriented. Thus, it rotated it slightly to correct this orientation.
Thus, replacing the image in the OCR'ed version with the one from the original one is no option: Due to the rotation the OCR information would partially be somewhat off.
What you might want to try is to recode the JPEG2000 image to JPEG and replace the image in the OCR'ed version with this recoded one. This will mean some loss of quality but most likely you can get rid of the anti-aliasing this way.
Be aware, though, that the JPEG2000 image is slightly larger than the JPEG image to accomodate for the rotation.
PS: As #VadimR pointed out, there is indeed an /Interpolate true entry in the image dictionary of the OCR-ed version I missed when looking at the file. This does not seem to be the major issue slowing down the rendering.
There is /Interpolate true entry in image dictionary of OCR-ed version, and that's what causes 'anti-aliasing'. Whether that (and not JPEG2000 instead of JPEG compression) is a cause of slow-down, you check on large enough files.
To un-set this key, the best would be to turn it off while creating a file, and if that's not possible, to write and run a small program in suitable language.
But, since your file doesn't sport 'compressed objects' and offending key is in plain view inside a file, in the spirit of 'job done quickly' you can simply process your file e.g. like this:
perl -M-encoding -0777pe "s!/Interpolate true!' 'x17!ge" <in.pdf >out.pdf
I'm working on a Sidebar Gadget and cannot get my JPEGs to show up (PNGs work). When I try to open the file by itself in IE8 it doesn't work. Firefox, of course, can open it fine.
JPEG Details:
Dimensions: 1080X900
180 dpi
Bit depth 24
Color representation: uncalibrated
I've found some things talking about the images being compressed incorrectly (?) but I haven't been able to get it working...
Any clues?
IE8 drops support for CMYK JPEG and renders them as the infamous red X without so much as a warning.
If you have ImageMagick:
identify -verbose image.jpg
will show you the image colorspace. If it's CMYK, you can convert to RGB with:
convert broken.jpg -colorspace RGB fixed.jpg
If you need to do CMYK to RGB conversion on a whole batch of JPEG-images, this command may be helpful to you:
for i in *.jpg; do convert "$i" -colorspace RGB "$i"; done
PS: If you'd like to see what is going on, just add -verbose:
for i in *.jpg; do convert "$i" -colorspace RGB -verbose "$i"; done
I had a similar issue with IE8 not displaying two JPEG images. FF, Safari, Chrome all displayed them without complaint but IE acted as if the files were not there. I have no idea what was going on, but a quick image conversion to gif or png fixed the problem. Just another in a long line of confirmations that IE sucks.
Had similar problems with existing images, which will not show up in IE8.
Problem is, as converter42 says: CMYK-Images
Convert them to RGB colorspace and all is good
The Solution with the PNG is not the best, because PNG files can be MUUUCH larger than JPGS.
If you are using photoshop for creating the jpgs. Try the below.
Open the file and go to 'Image' menu
Go to Mode
Select RGB
Save and upload to server.
This should work.
Why are you dealing with the image at 180 dpi and not the 72dpi screen resolution? At screen resolution the image will be roughly double that size. Still, the size is manageable for any browser.
When creating a gadget, you should be using PNGs for all the elements of the gadgets. Are you having issues displaying JPEG photos?
Have you looked for the yellow bar at the top of IE that blocks certain suspicious content from being loaded (popups, activex, javascript, etc.)? If it appears, try telling it to "allow".
Lastly, what are you using to compress your images to JPEG?
EDIT: If you want to do batch conversion use the batch converter in photoshop or use the Actions panel to record the conversion process for a single image, then replay the action on an entire folder. Additionally, you can save this action to a "droplet" which is a small application containing the action that you can drop an image or folder on top to.
Alternatively, if you don't fell like learning Actions, XNView is an excellent image viewer and converter that supports something like 160 different image formats and can batch convert and batch rename huge lists of files.
I fixed this issue by opening the CMYK JPEG file in Windows Paint and then saving as a JPEG, which Paint encodes as RGB by default. Not a great solution because I'm sure that Paint's converter is not as robust as Photoshop's, but this can be a quick fix if the job needs to be done now and there's no access to the tools above.