How can I assert query params in cypress using form data? - cypress

I am testing search functionality in one of my Cypress tests and having trouble getting to all parts of the request url. On my page, I have a form that a user can enter a number to search for. When a user clicks "Search", the system makes an ajax request with the appropriate data. Everything is working great.
In my Cypress test, I'm intercepting a GET request in one of my tests like this:
cy.intercept('GET', '/api/v1/foo/?include=**').as('myRequest');
...
That is the GET request that is made when a user clicks the submit button to search.
Within my test, I am entering text into a text field like this:
...
cy.get('[data-cy="number"]').type('12345');
The text is getting properly interred into the input.
Next, I am triggering an ajax request like this:
...
cy.get('[data-cy="search"]').should('exist').click();
cy.wait('#myRequest').then((interception) => {
console.log(interception.request.url); // /api/v1/forms/?include=foo <-- does not have filter[number]...
expect(interception.request.url).to
.include('filter[number]=12345');
});
When submitting a real request (not through cypress) the request url looks like this:
https://example.com/api/v1/foo/?include=bar&filter[number]=12345
However, when cypress makes the request, it's seemingly not picking up the query field and my test is failing.
I've also tried using expect(interception.request.query) but it is always undefined.
How can I properly pick up the filter[number] query param in my test?

It looks like there's preceding requests that are using up your cy.wait('#myRequest').
Query parameter matching is a bit tricky, but it works using a routeMatcher function and checking for the correct params, then assigning a dynamic alias.
cy.intercept('/api/v1/foo/?include=**', (req) => {
if (req.query.include === 'bar' && req.query["filter[number]"] === '12345') {
req.alias = 'myRequest' // alias for only these parameters
}
req.continue()
})
cy.get('[data-cy="search"]').should('exist').click();
cy.wait('#myRequest').then((interception) => {
...
})

Related

How to track pageviews in RemixJS?

I am building a Remix app, and wanted to record some user analytics in my database based on what page the user was viewing. I also wanted to do so on a route by route basis, rather than just simply the raw URL.
For example: I wanted to know "user viewed URL /emails/123" as well as "user viewed route /emails/$emailId"
This problem could be generalized as "I want to run a piece of server code once per user navigation"
For my tracking I'm assuming users have javascript enabled in their browser.
Solutions I tried:
Record in the loader
This would be something like:
export const loader: LoaderFunction = async ({ request, params }): Promise<LoaderData> => {
myDb.recordPageVisit(request.url);
}
This doesn't work because the loader can be called multiple times per page visit (eg. after an action is run)
It's possible that there's some value hidden in the request parameter that tells us whether this is an initial page load or if it's a later visit, but if so I couldn't find it, including when I examined the raw HTTP requests.
It's also annoying to have to put this code inside of every loader.
Record the URL in the node code
I'm using #remix-run/node as my base remix server, so I have the escape hatch of setting up node middleware, and I thought that might be a good answer:
const app = express();
app.use((req, res, next) => {
if (req.url.indexOf("_data") == -1) {
myDb.recordPageVisit(req.url);
}
next();
});
I tried ignoring routes with _data in them, but that didn't work because remix is being efficient and when the user navigates, it is using an ajax-y call to only get the loaderData rather than getting the full rendered page from the server. I know this is the behavior of Remix, but I had not remembered it before I went down this path :facepalm:
As far as I can tell it's impossible to stateless-ly track unique pageviews (ie based purely on the current URL) - you need see the user's previous page as well.
I wondered if referer would allow this to work statelessly, but it appears that the referer is not behaving how I'd hoped: the referer header is already set to the current page in the first loader request for the data for the page. So initial load and load-after-mutation appear identical based on referer. I don't know if this is technically a bug, but it's certainly not the behavior I'd expect.
I ended up solving this by doing the pageview tracking in the client. To support recording this in the DB, I implemented a route that just received the POSTs when the location changed.
The documentation for react-router's useLocation actually includes this exact scenario as an example.
From https://reactrouter.com/docs/en/v6/api#uselocation:
function App() {
let location = useLocation();
React.useEffect(() => {
ga('send', 'pageview');
}, [location]);
return (
// ...
);
}
However, that doesn't quite work in remix - the location value is changed after actions (same text value, but presumably different ref value). So I started saving the last location string seen, and then only report a new pageview when the location string value has changed.
So after adding that stateful tracking of the current location, I landed on:
export default function App() {
// ...other setup omitted...
const [lastLocation, setLastLocation] = useState("");
let location = useLocation();
const matches = useMatches();
useEffect(() => {
if (lastLocation == location.pathname) {
return;
}
// there are multiple matches for parent route + root route, this
// will give us the leaf route
const routeMatch = matches.find((m) => m.pathname == location.pathname);
setLastLocation(location.pathname);
fetch("/api/pageview", {
body: JSON.stringify({
url: location.pathname,
// routeMatch.id looks like: "/routes/email/$emailId"
route: routeMatch?.id }),
method: "POST",
}).then((res) => {
if (res.status != 200) {
console.error("could not report pageview:", res);
}
});
}, [location]);
The matches code is not necessary for tracking just raw URLs, but I wanted to extract the route form (eg /emails/$emailId), and matches.id is a close match to that value - I strip "routes/" serverside. Matches docs: https://remix.run/docs/en/v1/api/remix#usematches
Client side pageview tracking is a bit annoying since clients are flaky, but for the current remix behavior I believe this is the only real option.
Did it a different way for routes, remix is funny cuz of the whole parent route thing * so I use a route logger
Beans.io
https://www.npmjs.com/package/beansio

Returning a variable from a filter. Laravel 4

I am new to Laravel and I am trying to set up some basic routing logic. I have a route that will process a certain URL pattern. These URLs will usually be an ajax request (returning data for a popup window). However, search engines and users with javascript disabled will follow a normal link, so I want the data to be returned on a separate page. To do this, I need to determine if the request is ajax. I understand I can do this using:
if(Request::ajax()){
//
}
My plan was to do this as part of a 'before' filter attached to the route. If my thinking is correct, I would need to return a boolean ajax=true/false back from the filter. Maybe this is a very simple question, but I can't find anywhere that explains how you actually return a value like this from a filter? Everything I can find seems to assume that the default outcome of any filter logic must be a redirect.
Thanks
EDIT: I've come to the conclusion that I am simply not using the filtering method in the way it was intended, and simply placing the handler in my controller method. But I would still like to know if it is possible to return data from a filter.
In a controller:
if(Request::ajax()){
return Response::json(['message' => 'Hi. Your request was ajax!', 'status' => 1]);
}
The simple solution I found for that is to use Session::flash which populates data for the next request only and you can easily get the result anywhere. So for example :
Route::filter('something', function() {
if(false) {
View:make('error); // or whenever you want
} else {
return Session:flash('result_var', $my_result_var);
}
});

How to Remove/Register Suffix on Laravel Route?

EDIT: See below for my current problem. The top portion is a previous issue that I've solved but is somewhat related
I need to modify the input values passed to my controller before it actually gets there. I am building a web app that I want to be able to support multiple request input types (JSON and XML initially). I want to be able to catch the input BEFORE it goes to my restful controller, and modify it into an appropriate StdClass object.
I can't, for the life of me, figure out how to intercept and modify that input. Help?
For example, I'd like to be able to have filters like this:
Route::filter('json', function()
{
//modify input here into common PHP object format
});
Route::filter('xml', function()
{
//modify input here into common PHP object format
});
Route::filter('other', function()
{
//modify input here into common PHP object format
});
Route::when('*.json', 'json'); //Any route with '.json' appended uses json filter
Route::when('*.xml', 'xml'); //Any route with '.json' appended uses json filter
Route::when('*.other', 'other'); //Any route with '.json' appended uses json filter
Right now I'm simply doing a Input::isJson() check in my controller function, followed by the code below - note that this is a bit of a simplification of my code.
$data = Input::all();
$objs = array();
foreach($data as $key => $content)
{
$objs[$key] = json_decode($content);
}
EDIT: I've actually solved this, but have another issue now. Here's how I solved it:
Route::filter('json', function()
{
$new_input = array();
if (Input::isJson())
{
foreach(Input::all() as $key => $content)
{
//Do any input modification needed here
//Save it in $new_input
}
Input::replace($new_input);
}
else
{
return "Input provided was not JSON";
}
});
Route::when('*.json', 'json'); //Any route with '.json' appended uses json filter
The issue I have now is this: The path that the Router attempts to go to after the filter, contains .json from the input URI. The only option I've seen for solving this is to replace Input::replace($new_input) with
$new_path = str_replace('.json', '', Request::path());
Redirect::to($new_path)->withInput($new_input);
This however leads to 2 issues. Firstly I can't get it to redirect with a POST request - it's always a GET request. Second, the data being passed in is being flashed to the session - I'd rather have it available via the Input class as it would be with Input::replace().
Any suggestions on how to solve this?
I managed to solve the second issue as well - but it involved a lot of extra work and poking around... I'm not sure if it's the best solution, but it allows for suffixing routes similar to how you would prefix them.
Here's the github commit for how I solved it:
https://github.com/pcockwell/AuToDo/commit/dd269e756156f1e316825f4da3bfdd6930bd2e85
In particular, you should be looking at:
app/config/app.php
app/lib/autodo/src/Autodo/Routing/RouteCompiler.php
app/lib/autodo/src/Autodo/Routing/Router.php
app/lib/autodo/src/Autodo/Routing/RoutingServiceProvider.php
app/routes.php
composer.json
After making these modifications, I needed to run composer dumpautoload and php artisan optimize. The rest of those files are just validation for my data models and the result of running those 2 commands.
I didn't split the commit up because I'd been working on it for several hours and just wanted it in.
I'm going to hopefully look to extend the suffix tool to allow an array of suffixes so that any match will proceed. For example,
Route::group(array('suffix' => array('.json', '.xml', 'some_other_url_suffix')), function()
{
// Controller for base API function.
Route::controller('api', 'ApiController');
});
And this would ideally accept any call matching
{base_url}/api/{method}{/{v1?}/{v2?}/{v3?}/{v4?}/{v5?}?}{suffix}`
Where:
base_url is the domain base url
method is a function defined in ApiController
{/{v1?}/{v2?}/{v3?}/{v4?}/{v5?}?} is a series of up to 5 optional variables as are added when registering a controller with Route::controller()
suffix is one of the values in the suffix array passed to Route::group()
This example in particular should accept all of the following (assuming localhost is the base url, and the methods available are getMethod1($str1 = null, $str2 = null) and postMethod2()):
GET request to localhost/api/method1.json
GET request to localhost/api/method1.xml
GET request to localhost/api/method1some_other_url_suffix
POST request to localhost/api/method2.json
POST request to localhost/api/method2.xml
POST request to localhost/api/method2some_other_url_suffix
GET request to localhost/api/method1/hello/world.json
GET request to localhost/api/method1/hello/world.xml
GET request to localhost/api/method1/hello/worldsome_other_url_suffix
The last three requests would pass $str1 = 'hello' and $str2 = 'world' to getMethod1 as parameters.
EDIT: The changes to allow multiple suffixes was fairly easy. Commit located below (please make sure you get BOTH commit changes to get this working):
https://github.com/pcockwell/AuToDo/commit/864187981a436b60868aa420f7d212aaff1d3dfe
Eventually, I'm also hoping to submit this to the laravel/framework project.

Debugging Ajax requests in a Symfony environment

Not sure if SFDebug is any help in this situation. I am making an ajax post using jQuery. Which retrieves JSON data in my action URL and then makes a call to the Model method that executes the action. The part until my action URL, and the jQuery call to it work fine. With the data transmitted from the client to the server well received and no errors being made.
It is the part where it calls the method on the Model that is failing. My jQuery method looks like this:
$.post(url, jsonData, function(servermsg) { console.log(servermsg); }) ;
My server action is like this
public function executeMyAjaxRequest(sfWebRequest $request)
{
if($request->isXmlHttpRequest())
{
// process whatever
$servermsg = Doctrine_Core::getTable('table')->addDataToTable($dataArray);
return $this->renderText($servermsg);
}
return false;
}
The method of concern in the Table.class.php file looks like this:
public function addDataToTable($dataArray)
{
// process $dataArray and retrieve the necessary data
$data = new Data();
$data->field = $dataArray['field'];
.
.
.
$data->save();
return $data->id ;
}
The method fails up here in the model, when renderText in the action is returned and logged into the console, it returns the HTMl for SFDEBUG. Which indicates that it failed.
If this was not an Ajax call, I could debug it by seeing what the model method spat out, but this is a little tedious with Ajax in the mix.
Not looking for exact answers here, but more on how I can approach debugging ajax requests in a symfony environment, so if there are suggestions on how I can debug this, that would be great.
You must send cookie with session ide key via ajax
(Assuming you have XDEBUG configured on the server)
In order to trigger a debug session by an AJAX request you have to somehow make that request to send additional URL parameter XDEBUG_SESSION_START=1. For your example:
$.post(url + '?XDEBUG_SESSION_START=1', jsonData, function(servermsg) { console.log(servermsg); }) ;
You can also trigger it via cookie, but appending URL parameter usually easier.

dojo.io.script.get vs dojo.xhrGet

I have spent days working on this and really feel dumb. I have been working on demos and samples that never work when I try it locally with my own url. I have a web service that returns results back in json and am just basically trying to call it using dojo and for now just view the results. I took the search google example and just substituted the url and parameters. Now perhaps I still do not understand the basics so:
- io.script.get vs xhrGet
if using cross domain urls it is better to use io.script.get? correct?
now what is the callbackparam? is this the function that is being called in the webservice?
My webservice url is as follows:
http://xxx.xxx.x.xxx/WcfServices/WcfInstance/Service1.svc/RetrievData?query=Word
when I use the following code I get nothing displayed.
function searchGoogle() {
// Look up the node we'll stick the text under.
var targetNode = dojo.byId("rules");
// The parameters to pass to xhrGet, the url, how to handle it, and the callbacks.
var jsonpArgs = {
url: "http://xxx.xxx.x.xxx/WcfServices/WcfInstance/Service1.svc/RetrieveData?",
callbackParamName: "callback",
content: {
query:"dojowords"
},
load: function (data) {
// Set the data from the search into the viewbox in nicely formatted JSON
targetNode.innerHTML = "<pre>" + dojo.toJson(data, true) + "</pre>";
},
error: function (error) {
targetNode.innerHTML = "An unexpected error occurred: " + error;
}
};
dojo.io.script.get(jsonpArgs);
}
dojo.ready(searchGoogle);
Here is what the webservice results look like:
"{\"rules\":[{\"value\":\"AllState\"},
{\"value\":\"Cidade de Goa beach\"},{\"value\":\"Euro 2012\"},
{\"value\":\"Euro2012\"},{\"value\":\"European&Championship\"},
{\"value\":\"Holiday Inn Resort\"},
{\"value\":\"Holiday Inn Resort goa\"},
{\"value\":\"Hotel Goa\"},{\"value\":\"Hyatt Goa\"},{\"value\":\"I buy car\"},...
If I get this part correct then at least I know I have data which I can then bind to a datagrid or chart.
dojo.io.script.get is for all cross domain requests.
xhrGet is for same domain requests.
dojo.io.script.get uses a hack which expects jsonp or json padding as a result. This wraps the response of the web service call inside a self executing function. The function name is the callback name. This has to be wired before the call so it knows what already defined function to call when a response comes back.
All of the arguments are well documented http://dojotoolkit.org/reference-guide/1.7/dojo/io/script.html
My guess as to why your service isn't working is because you wrote the web service and it does not handle jsonp. It is not wrapping its response inside the callbackparamname.
your results should look something like
callback({json});
where callback is whatever you set up in callbackParamName
you can also remove the ? from your url, that should be handled for you.

Resources