spring security oatuh2: how to validate without authorization server - spring-boot

A question has arised to me when I've tried to use spring-boot-starter-oauth2-resource-server dependency and set up my service as a oauth2 resource service.
I've configured spring oauth2 resource server without spring.security.oauth2.resourceserver.jwt.issuer-uri neither jwk-set-uri properties.
Instead of that, I've instructed spring oauth2 resource server library how to decode JWT. I've just created an ReactiveJwtDecoder:
#Bean
public ReactiveJwtDecoder reactiveJwtDecoder() throws Exception {
Mac mac = Mac.getInstance("HmacSHA256");
SecretKeySpec secretKey = new SecretKeySpec("JAC1O17W1F3QB9E8B4B1MT6QKYOQB36V".getBytes(), mac.getAlgorithm());
return NimbusReactiveJwtDecoder.withSecretKey(secretKey)
.macAlgorithm(MacAlgorithm.HS256)
.build();
}
With that, I'm able to validate jwt tokens.
Question arised in my mind is:
Acording to oauth rfc6749, "Accessing Protected Resources" section, says that:
The client accesses protected resources by presenting the access
token to the resource server. The resource server MUST validate the
access token and ensure that it has not expired and that its scope
covers the requested resource. The methods used by the resource
server to validate the access token (as well as any error responses)
are beyond the scope of this specification but generally involve an
interaction or coordination between the resource server and the
authorization server.
Is spring oauth2 resource server library working well?

There is nothing wrong with such approach. The possible issue here is that
you are using symmetric key. With this approach you are using the same key for both signing a token and validating its signature. It means you need to share the key used to sign tokens with all the applications involved in the authentication process that is not always possible and resource server has too much power.
To keep key on authorization service only, there is an option in the resources server to use special endpoint, exposed by authorization service, to validate the token.
Another approach would be to use asymmetric key pair to sign and validate tokens. In this case private key will be assigned to authorization service only and public key could be shared with all the applications involved in the authentication process.
#Bean
public ReactiveJwtDecoder jwtDecoder() throws GeneralSecurityException {
RSAPublicKey key = (RSAPublicKey) KeyFactory.getInstance("RSA")
.generatePublic(new X509EncodedKeySpec(getKeySpec(properties.getPublicKey())));
return NimbusReactiveJwtDecoder.withPublicKey(key)
.signatureAlgorithm(SignatureAlgorithm.from(properties.getSignatureAlgorithm()))
.build();
}

Related

Spring Boot Authorization Server + Google OAuth2/OpenId Connect should work with access_token or id_token?

I'm a bit confused regarding whether I should be accessing my Spring Boot Resource Server via an access_token or an id_token.
First, let me quickly explain my setup:
Spring Boot app as an OAuth 2.0 Resource Server. This is configured as described in the Spring docs: Minimal Configuration for JWTs This app provides secured #Controllers that will provide data for a JavaScript SPA (eg. React)
Google's OAuth 2.0 AP / OpenID Connect already configured (Credentials, Client Id, Client Secret)
A JavaScript SPA app (eg. React) that logs the user into Google and makes requests to the Spring Boot Resource Server for secured data. These requests include the Authorization header (with Bearer token obtained from Google) for the logged in user.
For development purposes, I'm also using Postman to make requests to the Spring Boot Resource Server
I can easily configure Postman to get a token from Google. This token response from Google includes values for access_token, id_token, scope, expries_in and token_type.
However, my requests to the Resource Server are denied when Postman tries to use the value from retrieved token's access_token field as the Bearer in the Authorization header
The only way I'm able to successfully access the secured #Controllers is by using the id_token as the Bearer in the Authorization header.
Is it expected that I should use the id_token as the Bearer in the Authorization header? Or is it expected that I should use the access_token?
Some additional relevant info:
The value of the id_token is a JWT token. The value of the access_token is not a JWT token. I know this because I can decode the id_token on jwt.io but it is unable to decode the value of the access_token. Further, the Spring Boot Resource Server fails with the following when I send the access_token as the Bearer in the Authorization header:
An error occurred while attempting to decode the Jwt: Invalid unsecured/JWS/JWE header: Invalid JSON: Unexpected token ɭ� at position 2.
This blog post Understanding identity tokens says the following:
You should not use an identity token to authorize access to an API.
To access an API, you should be using OAuth’s access tokens, which are intended only for the protected resource (API) and come with scoping built-in.
Looking at at the spring-security-samples for using OAuth2 Resource Server, I see the value of there hard-coded access_token (for testing purposes) is indeed a valid JWT. As opposed to the access_token returned from Google which is not a JWT.
In summary:
I can access my Spring Boot Resource Server using the value of the id_token obtained from Google. The value of the access_token is not a JWT and fails to parse by Spring Boot.
Is there something wrong with my understanding, my configuration or what? Does Google's OpenId Connect behave differently regarding how the access_token works?
Happy to clarify or add more info if needed. Thanks for your consideration and your patience!
The blog post you mentioned is correct in my view, and I believe the OpenID Connect 1.0 spec does not intend for an id_token to be used for access purposes.
Like you, I expected that using Google as an Authorization Server would work out of the box, because Spring Security works with Google as a common OAuth2 provider for providing social login. However, this is not the case, and I believe it is not really intended, because Google is not really your authorization server. For example, I don't believe you can configure Google to work with scopes/permissions/authorities of your domain-specific application. This is different from something like Okta, where there are many options for configuring things in your own tenant.
I would actually recommend checking out Spring Authorization Server, and configuring Google as a federated identity provider. I'm working on a sample for this currently and it will be published within the next week or so (see this branch).
Having said that, if you're still interested in a simple use case where Google access tokens are used for authenticating with your resource server, you would need to provide your own opaque token introspector that uses Google's tokeninfo endpoint. It doesn't match what Spring Security expects, so it's a bit involved.
#EnableWebSecurity
public class SecurityConfiguration {
#Bean
public SecurityFilterChain securityFilterChain(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
// #formatter:off
http
.authorizeRequests((authorizeRequests) -> authorizeRequests
.anyRequest().authenticated()
)
.oauth2ResourceServer(OAuth2ResourceServerConfigurer::opaqueToken);
// #formatter:on
return http.build();
}
#Bean
public OpaqueTokenIntrospector introspector() {
return new GoogleTokenIntrospector("https://oauth2.googleapis.com/tokeninfo");
}
}
public final class GoogleTokenIntrospector implements OpaqueTokenIntrospector {
private final RestTemplate restTemplate = new RestTemplate();
private final String introspectionUri;
public GoogleTokenIntrospector(String introspectionUri) {
this.introspectionUri = introspectionUri;
}
#Override
public OAuth2AuthenticatedPrincipal introspect(String token) {
RequestEntity<?> requestEntity = buildRequest(token);
try {
ResponseEntity<Map<String, Object>> responseEntity = this.restTemplate.exchange(requestEntity, new ParameterizedTypeReference<>() {});
// TODO: Create and return OAuth2IntrospectionAuthenticatedPrincipal based on response...
} catch (Exception ex) {
throw new BadOpaqueTokenException(ex.getMessage(), ex);
}
}
private RequestEntity<?> buildRequest(String token) {
HttpHeaders headers = new HttpHeaders();
headers.setAccept(Collections.singletonList(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON));
MultiValueMap<String, String> body = new LinkedMultiValueMap<>();
body.add("access_token", token);
return new RequestEntity<>(body, headers, HttpMethod.POST, URI.create(introspectionUri));
}
}
spring:
security:
oauth2:
resourceserver:
jwt:
issuer-uri: https://accounts.google.com
jwk-set-uri: https://www.googleapis.com/oauth2/v3/certs

Spring Authorization Server: How to use login form hosted on a separate application?

I am using Spring Security along with Spring Authorization Server and experimenting with creating an auth server.
I have a basic flow allowing me to login with the pre-built login page (from a baledung guide - this is the code I'm working off ). I'm assuming this login page form comes from formLogin() like so:
http.authorizeRequests(authorizeRequests ->
authorizeRequests.anyRequest().authenticated()
)
//.formLogin(withDefaults());
return http.build();
I would like to not use this pre-built form as I have a need to host and run the login form front-end application completely separately. ie on a different server, domain and codebase.
Another way to ask this question could be:
How do I disable the built in form in authorization-server so I can use it with a completely separate form?
Are there any recommended ways of learning about how customise my SecurityFilterChain along these lines? Is this the correct place to look? I find the baledung article (and articles like that) helpful as a starting point, but seldom works for more practical use case. I'm confident Spring Security and the oauth2 libraries will allow me to do what I want, but not entirely clear.
After discussing this with you, I've gathered that what you're trying to do is essentially pre-authenticate the user that was authenticated through another (separately hosted) login page, actually a separate system. The idea is that the other system would redirect back with a signed JWT in a query parameter.
This really becomes more of a federated login problem at that point, which is what SAML 2.0 and OAuth 2.0 are aimed at solving. However, if you have to stick with things like a signed JWT (similar to a SAML assertion), we could model a fairly simple pre-authenticated authorization_code flow using the Spring Authorization Server.
Note: I haven't explored options for JWT Profile for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication and Authorization Grants but it could be a viable alternative. See this issue (#59).
Additional note: There are numerous security considerations involved with the approach outlined below. What follows is a sketch of the approach. Additional considerations include CSRF protection, using Form Post Response Mode (similar to SAML 2.0) to protect the access token instead of a query parameter, aggressively expiring the access token (2 minutes or less), and others. In other words, using a federated login approach like SAML 2.0 or OAuth 2.0 will always be RECOMMENDED over this approach when possible.
You could to start with the existing Spring Authorization Server sample and evolve it from there.
Here's a variation that redirects to an external authentication provider and includes a pre-authentication mechanism on the redirect back:
#Bean
#Order(1)
public SecurityFilterChain authorizationServerSecurityFilterChain(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
OAuth2AuthorizationServerConfiguration.applyDefaultSecurity(http);
// #formatter:off
http
.exceptionHandling(exceptionHandling -> exceptionHandling
.authenticationEntryPoint(new LoginUrlAuthenticationEntryPoint("https://some-other-sso.example/login"))
);
// #formatter:on
return http.build();
}
#Bean
#Order(2)
public SecurityFilterChain standardSecurityFilterChain(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
// #formatter:off
http
.authorizeRequests(authorize -> authorize
.anyRequest().authenticated()
)
.oauth2ResourceServer(OAuth2ResourceServerConfigurer::jwt);
// #formatter:on
return http.build();
}
#Bean
public JwtDecoder jwtDecoder(PublicKey publicKey) {
return NimbusJwtDecoder.withPublicKey((RSAPublicKey) publicKey).build();
}
#Bean
public BearerTokenResolver bearerTokenResolver() {
DefaultBearerTokenResolver bearerTokenResolver = new DefaultBearerTokenResolver();
bearerTokenResolver.setAllowUriQueryParameter(true);
return bearerTokenResolver;
}
The first filter chain operates on authorization server endpoints, such as /oauth2/authorize, /oauth2/token, etc. Note that the /oauth2/authorize endpoint requires an authenticated user to function, meaning that if the endpoint is invoked, the user has to be authenticated, or else the authentication entry point is invoked, which redirects to the external provider. Also note that there must be a trusted relationship between the two parties, since we're not using OAuth for the external SSO.
When a redirect from the oauth client comes to the /oauth2/authorize?... endpoint, the request is cached by Spring Security so it can be replayed later (see controller below).
The second filter chain authenticates a user with a signed JWT. It also includes a customized BearerTokenResolver which reads the JWT from a query parameter in the URL (?access_token=...).
The PublicKey injected into the JwtDecoder would be from the external SSO provider, so you can plug that in however it makes sense to in your setup.
We can create a stub authentication endpoint that converts the signed JWT into an authenticated session on the authorization server, like this:
#Controller
public class SsoController {
private AuthenticationSuccessHandler successHandler = new SavedRequestAwareAuthenticationSuccessHandler();
#GetMapping("/login")
public void login(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response, Authentication authentication)
throws ServletException, IOException {
this.successHandler.onAuthenticationSuccess(request, response, authentication);
}
}
The .oauth2ResourceServer() DSL causes the user to be authenticated when the /login endpoint is invoked. It requires an access_token parameter (used by the BearerTokenResolver) to pre-authenticate the user by validating the signed JWT as an assertion that the user has been externally authenticated. At this point, a session is created that will authenticate all future requests by this browser.
The controller is then invoked, and simply redirects back to the real authorization endpoint using the SavedRequestAwareAuthenticationSuccessHandler, which will happily initiate the authorization_code flow.
Re your comnent: "I'm attempting to build an Authorization Server":
Coding your own Authorization Server (AS) or having to build its code yourself is highly inadvisable, since it is easy to get bogged down in plumbing or to make security mistakes.
By all means use Spring OAuth Security in your apps though. It is hard enough to get these working as desired, without taking on extra work.
SUGGESTED APPROACH
Choose a free AS and run it as a Docker Container, then connect to its endpoints from your apps.
If you need to customize logins, use a plugin model, write a small amount of code, then deploy a JAR file or two to the Docker container.
This will get you up and running very quickly. Also, since Spring Security is standards based, you are free to change your mind about providers, and defer decisions on the final one.
EXAMPLE IMPLEMENTATION
Curity, along with other good choices like Keycloak or Ory Hydra are Java based and support plugins:
Curity Community Edition
Custom Authenticator Example

how to implement role-based security in microservices architecture [closed]

Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
I have a spring-boot application with 4 microservices, eureka server and a centralized API gateway.
All external traffic is coming via my API gateway to my microservices.
My API gateway (Zuul) is validating and verifying JWT token.
the JWT token is generated by one of my microservices after user login (the users microservice), the token contain the user Id and his roles/authorities.
Now I want to implement role-based security on methods that are present in microservices other than the gateway.
I have tried to use #PreAuthorize but it's not working out of the gateway (obviously in order to make it work I have to set a Spring Security authentication object in the SecurityContextHolder in my microservices and populate it with authorities).
So is there any solution to achieve this type of security?
What is the best design to set up security in microservice architecture?
Authentication at API gateway level and authorization at microservices level?
Do I need to use spring security within the microservices or just pass down the roles (append them to the request) after validating the JWT at API gateway level and for example create my own annotations and use Spring AOP to handle authorization?
In Spring5 microservices you will be able to find a base to develop a microservice architecture with several of the requisites you are looking for:
Registry server using Eureka.
Gateway server with Zuul.
Regarding to security, I have developed two different microservices:
Spring Oauth2 with Jwt
Spring Jwt multi-application security service to work with access and refresh Jwt tokens, with several customizations like: definition of the content of every one, work with JWS or JWE, etc
Most important ones are well documented using Swagger, as you can see here, and all documented APIs are accessible using an unique gateway Url.
For all classes of every microservice, Junit tests were developed.
Security
At this point, I took several decisions:
1. Is not the gateway the microservice that verifies the security.
Because use the gateway as "firewall" is a less flexible approach. I wanted to decide which microservices need security and every one should manage internally the roles can access to every endpoint. In summary, every microservice has to work with the authorization/authentication but it don't need to know how that functionality is done.
2. Specific microservice to deal with the security
As I told you, I developed 2 different ones, because I wanted to "play" with different options/approaches. The most important advantage is the encapsulation, if "tomorrow" I decide to change Jwt by any other option, I will only need to modify those ones, the microservices that use them will keep the same code (I will explain you soon how the integration was done)
Security integration example
I will explain how the security functionality was integrated between:
Pizza service easy microservice developed as part of the architecture.
Spring Jwt
1. Every application that manages user and roles, will include in the security microservice a folder similar to the next one, to define its models, repositories to get the required information, etc
2. Global endpoints of the security microservice are defined here. As you can see, they work basically with 2 Dtos:
AuthenticationInformationDto
UsernameAuthoritiesDto
The main advantage, only the security microservice knows the details about how that functionality was done, the other ones that use it will receive a well known Dtos with the required information.
3. In pizza-service, the security integration is mainly defined in the next 3 classes:
SecurityContextRepository to get authorization token from the header and send it to the SecurityManager.
SecurityManager call to security-jwt-service with the provided "authorization token" (it doesn't know if it is Jwt or any other thing) and receives a well know UsernameAuthoritiesDto (transforming it into an object of the Spring class UsernamePasswordAuthenticationToken)
WebSecurityConfiguration global security configuration.
Now you can include in your endpoints the required role based security:
Controller example
Custom PreAuthorize annotation
Final considerations
pizza-service was developed using Webflux, you can see an equivalent integration based on a MVC microservice one in order-service here (in this case I used the "other security service" but is easy to adapt it).
To improve the security and follow the "Oauth approach", the requests to security-jwt-service need to include the Basic authentication too. As you can see in SecurityManager class:
private String buildAuthorizationHeader(String username, String password) {
String auth = username + ":" + password;
byte[] encodedAuth = Base64.getEncoder().encode(auth.getBytes());
return "Basic " + new String(encodedAuth);
}
The table in database to store that information is the same one used to manage the security configuration of every application: security.jwt_client_details
Question is wide at the moment as the nature of the traffic to your microservices is not clear.
Assuming that all external traffic coming via your API gateway to your microservices.
You don't need to validate the JWT twice once in API gateway and then again in your internal microservice. If the JWT is invalid , the request will never reach your microservice
Then API gateway propagate the roles. In your microservice, you initialise the spring security context using the roles passed in the header. It will allow you to use #PreAuthorize etc
Assuming that external traffic can come via your API gateway as well as directly to your microservices.
Now you need to verify it in both API gateway and in your microservices
Update
I don't have knowledge about Zuul API gateway. This is just addressing the following:
I have tried to use #PreAuthorize but it's not working out of the gateway (obviously in order to make it work I have to set a Spring Security authentication object in the SecurityContextHolder in my microservices and populate it with authorities).
public class PreAuthenticatedUserRoleHeaderFilter
extends GenericFilterBean {
public void doFilter(ServletRequest servletRequest,
ServletResponse servletResponse,
FilterChain chain)
throws IOException, ServletException {
HttpServletRequest request = (HttpServletRequest) servletRequest;
String rolesString = //extract the roles
String userName = // extract the username
List<GrantedAuthority> authorities
= AuthorityUtils.commaSeparatedStringToAuthorityList(rolesString);
PreAuthenticatedAuthenticationToken authentication
= new PreAuthenticatedAuthenticationToken(
userName, null, authorities);
SecurityContextHolder.getContext().setAuthentication(authentication);
chain.doFilter(servletRequest, servletResponse);
}
}
#Configuration
#EnableGlobalMethodSecurity(prePostEnabled = true, securedEnabled = true,
jsr250Enabled = true)
public class WebSecurityConfig extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter {
#Override
protected void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
PreAuthenticatedUserRoleHeaderFilter authFilter
= new PreAuthenticatedUserRoleHeaderFilter();
http.
antMatcher("/**")
.csrf()
.disable()
.sessionManagement()
.sessionCreationPolicy(SessionCreationPolicy.STATELESS)
.and()
.addFilterBefore(authFilter,
BasicAuthenticationFilter.class)
.authorizeRequests()
.anyRequest()
.authenticated();
}
}
If you'r API gateway is also the one who create's and sign JWT token's with private key's and to authenticate you use public key's from API gateway then you are the one who specifies structure of that JWT token and you should be able to encode roles into that JWT (it could be scope parameter for example but all possible scope's are usually accessible by all users). Then you can configure spring boot to automaticaly resolve group role from that JWT (set SecurityContextHolder role's right) and #PreAuthorize annotation can be used without any modification.
If you'r API gateway is only verifying JWT token's against 3rd party authorization server (the server which signed and structured that JWT) with public key's from this server you must implement some custom mechanism for role-based access. One that come's to my mind is to implement second level Oauth2 authentication which would be only used with request's between your microservice's and API gateway using some kind of 'inner' JWT. For example see following image:
Since you define how structure of inner JWT should look by your API gateway code you can set custom attribute's like role: (admin, user etc..). This can be resolved for example from user name, id, email which you are provided from outer JWT from 3rd party authorization server. Therefore you would need to keep some mapping inside API gateway code like:
(userId: 12563) => Admin group
(userId: 45451) => User group
Since your micro-services use JWT for authentication you can use spring boot resource server to setup authentication and configure it to resolve group's (object you mentioned inside SecurityContextHolder) automatically from your custom structured inner JWT. This way you could simply use #PreAuthorize annotation inside your micro-service's and therefore you would not have to create custom annotation's. Note that this is only supposed to solve second case i have specified in first case you are in control of JWT token already.
Role based authorization is avoided these days and scope based authorization is preferred with something like service1.read, service2.full_access scopes. You could either: move role based authorization into each service and away from identity server, convert to scope based authorization, move role based authorization job to respective service rather than relay on identity server.
You can user reference token flow and invalidate token when changes occurs in your role/rights, this will help explaining it

Spring oauth2 Remotetokenservice

I have 2 microservices that I have created with spring boot. 1 microservice has a oauth2 authentication service and the other is an oauth2 resource server.
The resource server uses RemoteTokenService to check if the access token is valid. This works and when I create a rest endpoint and supply a Principal parameter the principal of the logged in user is supplied. Example:
#RequestMapping(method = RequestMethod.GET, value = "/api/user/{id:[0-9]+}")
#PreAuthorize("hasAnyAuthority('ROLE_USER')")
public User getUser(#PathVariable("id") long id, Principal principal) {
}
The thing is that the Principal contains the username and authorities of the logged in user and I also need the user info like id of the user.
I don't want to do an extra rest call to get the user data so I was wandering is there anyway to get the remotetokenservice to return more information?
The RemoteTokenServices makes nothing but calling CheckTokenEndpoint of Spring Security and return back the map values to the resources server.
If you want to get more information then you have to implement CheckTokenEndpoint::checkToken method in the Authentication server.
We managed to solve your problem by having spring-oauth2 with JWT integration. So the Authentication Server generates an access token as a claim (after authentication the user) which can hold more information that could be useful at the Resource server. The resource server in this case didn't need to have a remote call to check the token, but it verify the signature of the JWT to accept the claim.

How does Spring Security/OAuth figure out the AuthenticationPrincipal

I have a spring project that uses spring-oauth2 and spring-security for authentication using an LDAP auth provider.
In controllers I can access the current principal's UserDetails using the #AuthenticationPrincipal annotation.
However, when I hit the endpoint with a client_credential token the #AuthenticationPrincipal is a String which is the OAuth client id. I understand that there's no notion of user when you authenticate with client_credentials, but I would like to have my Principal be a richer datatype. How does spring decide to set my principal as a String and can I override that behavior?
From the Oauth2 specs
The client credentials (or other forms of client authentication) can
be used as an authorization grant when the authorization scope is
limited to the protected resources under the control of the client,
or to protected resources previously arranged with the authorization
server. Client credentials are used as an authorization grant
typically when the client is acting on its own behalf (the client is
also the resource owner) or is requesting access to protected
resources based on an authorization previously arranged with the
authorization server.
because client can also be a resource owner, therefore spring will create authentication based on your client information.
I assume that you have setup org.springframework.security.oauth2.provider.client.ClientCredentialsTokenEndpointFilter which is used to create authentication for the client.
You can create your own custom org.springframework.security.oauth2.provider.client.ClientDetailsUserDetailsService or create your own org.springframework.security.authentication.AuthenticationProvider to override how the authentication object is created, but I prefer to use org.springframework.security.oauth2.provider.token.TokenEnhancer to add additional information to the token generated.

Resources