My Interactive Grid has column caled "EMPL_STAT1".
I use the code below to get the return value of the select list from selected record.
Works fine but I was wondering how to change that code to get the return value of the select list from each record (not selected only) in "EMPL_STAT1" column?
Could you give me any advice?
var reg = apex.region('ig_emp').widget();
var grid = reg.interactiveGrid("getViews","grid");
var model = reg.interactiveGrid("getViews","grid").model;
var selectedRecords = grid.getSelectedRecords();
for (i = 0; i < selectedRecords.length; i++)
{
record = model.getRecord(selectedRecords[i][0]);
itemcodeField = model.getFieldKey("EMPL_STAT1");
alert(record[itemcodeField].v);
}
The Javascript you shared, gets the selected row records only.
Let's say my IG's static ID is igTest
var model = apex.region("igTest").widget().interactiveGrid("getViews", "grid").model;
model.forEach(function(igrow) {
console.log(igrow[model.getFieldKey("FIRST_NAME")]);
});
This will loop through all the records in the IG.
Related
I have two spreadsheets:
Column A on sheet 6th&7thRoster lists all IDs in a sample, contains 853 items.
Column C on sheet alreadySubmitted contains the IDs of users who've completed a task. Contains 632 items.
I'm trying to parse through both columns. If a user from Column A of sheet 6th&7thRoster matches a user from Column C of sheet sandboxAlreadySubmitted, I want to write the word "Yes" on Column I of the current row of sheet 6th&7thRoster. When using the code below, I'm not seeing not seeing any instances of the word "Yes" on Column I of 6th&7thRoster, even though I know there's multiple places where that should be the case.
function checkRoster() {
var mainSheet = SpreadsheetApp.openById('XXXXXXX');
var roster = mainSheet.getSheetByName('6th&7thRoster');
var submissions = mainSheet.getSheetByName('alreadySubmitted');
var rosterLastRow = roster.getLastRow();
var submissionsLastRow = submissions.getLastRow();
var rosterArray = roster.getRange('A2:A853').getValues();
var submissionsArray = submissions.getRange('C2:C632').getValues;
var i;
var x;
for (i = 1; i < 853; i++) {
for (x = 1; x < 632; x++){
if (rosterArray[i] == submissionsArray[x]){
roster.getRange(i, 9).setValue("Yes");
}
}
}
}
Feedback on how to solve and achieve this task will be much appreciated. For confidentiality, I cannot share the original sheets.
You want to compate the values of A2:A853 of 6th&7thRoster and C2:C632 of alreadySubmitted.
When the values of C2:C632 of alreadySubmitted are the same with the values of A2:A853 of 6th&7thRoster, you want to put Yes to the column "I".
If my understanding is correct, how about this modification? Please think of this as just one of several possible answers.
Modified script:
function checkRoster() {
var mainSheet = SpreadsheetApp.openById('XXXXXXX');
var roster = mainSheet.getSheetByName('6th&7thRoster');
var submissions = mainSheet.getSheetByName('alreadySubmitted');
var rosterLastRow = roster.getLastRow();
var submissionsLastRow = submissions.getLastRow();
var rosterArray = roster.getRange('A2:A853').getValues();
var submissionsArray = submissions.getRange('C2:C632').getValues(); // Modified
// I modified below script.
var obj = submissionsArray.reduce(function(o, [v]) {
if (v) o[v] = true;
return o;
}, {});
var values = rosterArray.map(function([v]) {return [obj[v] ? "Yes" : ""]});
roster.getRange(2, 9, values.length, values[0].length).setValues(values);
}
Flow:
Retrieve values from A2:A853 of 6th&7thRoster and C2:C632 of alreadySubmitted.
Create an object for searching the values from the values of alreadySubmitted.
Create the row values for putting to 6th&7thRoster.
References:
reduce()
map()
If I misunderstood your question and this was not the direction you want, I apologize.
How do I remove or hide the data value not required from table in birt tool?
I tried with the values it works in some places but now in groups which has multiple values.
I need to filter some of the values which should not be displayed in the data tab of the table.
I have a column which does not have any value that I need to filter out (But its not an empty value because when I check I got to know that it has some blank spaces). It should display only the columns with non-blank value.
How can I remove those columns from the data set.
You can of course try scripting the data source query but you can also run a script on the table when it is created to hide the empty column.
Try this script in the table's onCreate event:
var mycolumnCount = this.getRowData().getColumnCount();
var DisNull = false;
for(i=1;i<mycolumnCount;i++) {
var temp = this.getRowData().getColumnValue(i)
if(this.getRowData().getColumnValue(i) == "") {
DisNull = true;
}else{
DisNull = false;
i = mycolumnCount+1;
}
}
if(DisNull == true) {
this.getStyle().display = "none"
}
I want to bind the object list to dataGridView.
Now i want the desired column to be the way i definde them. i.e., I want the objects to be order the way i want.
Like
var dataSource = linkItemListCommon.Select(x => new DataToBind { Select = x.Default, FileName = x.Text, CurrentDate = x.Date+" "+x.Time , PreviousDate = string.Empty, Size = x.Size }).ToList();
var filenamesList = new BindingList<DataToBind>(dataSource);
dgvDownLoadMaster.DataSource = filenamesList;
I want the datagrid columns to be in the order that i define.
Like here i expect them to be in order given below:
Select FileName CurrentDate PreviousDate Size
But the column list is appearing not as per my requirements.
How to Do that.Please help.
Create columns by hand and then you can order them easily. You can add columns trough designer and just set each column DataPropertyName to corresponding field.
Or you can create each column programmatically:
var col = new DataGridViewTextBoxColumn();
col.DataPropertyName = "Select ";
col.HeaderText = "Select";
col.Name = "ColSelect";
dgvDownLoadMaster.Columns.Add(col);
you have to do this for each column and do it before databinding.
I have a form where the user submits a query and then have a Servlet that processes this query and returns the results in XML. With this result trying to populate a table dynamically via Ajax, for such, I use the following code below.
var thead = $("<thead>");
var rowsTHead = $("<tr>");
var tbody = $("<tbody>");
var numberOfColumns;
$(xml).find("head").each(function(){
var variable = $(this).find("variable");
numberOfColumns = variable.length;
for (var i = 0; i < variable.length; i++){
var name = $(variable[i]).attr("name");
rowsTHead.append($("<th>").html(name));
}
});
thead.append(rowsTHead);
$(xml).find("result").each(function(){
var literal = $(this).find("literal");
var rowsTBody = $("<tr class=\"even\">");
literal.length = numberOfColumns;
for (var j = 0; j < literal.length; j++){
var tdBody = $("<td>");
tdBody.html($(literal[j]).text());
rowsTBody.append(tdBody);
}
tbody.append(rowsTBody);
});
$(".tablesorter").empty()
.append(thead)
.append(tbody);
This code works perfectly until it was used in a UNION query. When using a UNION the returned xml comes in the following way http://pastebin.com/y7hXK1Zy
As can be observed, this query has 4 variables that are: gn1, indication1, gn2, indication2.
What is going wrong is that the values of all the variables being written in columns corresponding to gn1 and indication1.
What I wish I was to write the value of each variable in its corresponding column. I wonder what should I change in my code to make this possible.
You need to respect the name values of the binding elements, and relate them back to the columns that you correctly built from parsing the element. When you are doing the find "literal", you are skipping the parsing of the binding elements. You should find "binding", respect the name and look up which column to use based on that, and then for each of those, find the "literal" elements for the actual values.
I'm trying to work with a LINQ result set of 4 tables retrieved with html agility pack. I'd like to process each one slightly differently by setting a variable for each (switch statement below), and then processing the rows within the table. The variable would ideally be the index for each of the tables in the set, 0 to 3, and would be used in the switch statement and to select the rows. I haven't been able to locate the index property, but I see it used in situations such as SelectChildNode.
My question is can I refer to items within a LINQ result set by index? My "ideal scenario" is the last commented out line. Thanks in advance.
var ratingsChgs = from table in htmlDoc.DocumentNode
.SelectNodes("//table[#class='calendar-table']")
.Cast<HtmlNode>()
select table;
String rtgChgType;
for (int ratingsChgTbl = 0; ratingsChgTbl < 4; ratingsChgTbl++)
{
switch (ratingsChgTbl)
{
case 0:
rtgChgType = "Upgrades";
break;
case 1:
rtgChgType = "Downgrades";
break;
case 2:
rtgChgType = "Coverage Initiated";
break;
case 3:
rtgChgType = "Coverage Reit/ Price Tgt Changed";
break;
//This is what I'd like to do.
var tblRowsByChgType = from row in ratingsChgs[ratingsChgTbl]
.SelectNodes("tr")
select row;
//Processing of returned rows.
}
}
ElementAt does what you're asking for. I don't recommend using it in your example, though, because each time you call it, your initial LINQ query will be executed. The easy fix is to have ratingsChgs be a List or Array.
You can also refactor out the switch statement. It is overkill when you only need to iterate through a list of items. Here is a possible solution:
var ratingsChgs = from table in htmlDoc.DocumentNode
.SelectNodes("//table[#class='calendar-table']")
.Cast<HtmlNode>()
select table;
var rtgChgTypeNames = new List
{
"Upgrades",
"Downgrades",
"Coverage Initiated",
"Coverage Reit/ Price Tgt Changed"
};
var changeTypes = ratingsChgs.Zip(rtgChgTypeNames, (changeType, name) => new
{
Name = name,
Rows = changeType.SelectNodes("tr")
});
foreach( var changeType in changeTypes)
{
var name = changeType.Name;
var rows = changeType.Rows;
//Processing of returned rows.
}
Also, why not store your rating change types in the HTML doc? It seems odd to have table information defined in the business logic.