It may be so new its not ready yet but for the life of me even with the default Blog app installed the images do not read the JSON recipe default file for which CSS is loaded BS4, BS5, etc. It only loads largest image file.
I think i read somewhere that it may be a work in progress but uncertain if it should be working in v.14.
This is the simple part of the code rendering it and tried even a custom recipe and it won't work.
#Kit.Image.Picture(link.Field("Image"), settings: imgSettings, imgAlt: altText, factor: "6/12" )
I believe the custom recipe is part of the problem.
Basically it's correct that some features are Patrons only, but that is only for CSS-Framework specific resizes and for automatic WebP. Multiple sizes should work by default all the time - if the root recipe is correct.
I suggest you try a new DNN install with the latest 2sxc and the default Content-App. You should see that it creates multiple sizes automatically.
From there, figure out what broke in your setup.
Good luck!
Related
I'm total newbie with Laravel, so the question might not be the most intelligent, be gentle, please.
I'd like to use an Open Source application made with Laravel. However, the application does not fully suit my needs, hence some customization is needed.
Naturally, I don't what to change the application files and also want to keep all my files separated.
In other PHP-based applications there are typically methods to customise the app without touching any other code. Also, it is possible to have own code nicely in one place. For instance, Wordpress has a theme concept, child theme concept, plugins and hooks in code (filters and actions). In Magento we have a simple method of overriding a core file by copying it to local code pool, as well as a more sophisticated dependency injection, which allows to override any class anywhere.
I've been trying to understand what is the correct way to customise a Laravel application in such a way, that my own modifications are separated from the base application and e.g. updating the base is possible.
Please guide me, or give pointers on how to do this.
Sounds like Packages might be your best option.
https://laravel.com/docs/master/packages
They let you customize very much in your application without touching other parts of the code, as well as keeping it separated from the other parts of the application.
Here's a getting started guide on packages:
https://medium.com/#lasselehtinen/getting-started-on-laravel-package-development-a62110c58ba1
the problem is obvious from the title, http://typeface.neocracy.org offline. It was used to convert fonts and used in conjunction with THREE.TextGeometry. But if it is offline, how is now possible to use custom fonts in three.js?
I made a new converter that outputs the same files as typeface.js.
http://gero3.github.io/facetype.js/
I loaded the source, but as far as I can see there is no chance to create the JS-font-files with this distribution. Maybe for someone with deep perl-knowledge...? In any case I installed perl, the ppm and dmake but trying to exec the Makefile only leads to errormessages about missing files. No - this is no alternative to the online-converter. Even worser: I didn't find any other converter or another side using the same one (cufon seems to create another format). So let's hope the site comes back to live - otherwise the great textfeature of three.js is worth nothing in the moment.
I have been using CKE 4.3.4 for a while (in conjunction with ASP.NET 4.0) and it is generally working fine. But I am having great trouble in configuring features in config.js where I need to specify a path - for example, for a custom stylesheet file (config.stylesSet) or a custom image browser (config.filebrowserImageBrowseUrl). I have only been able to get this to work by specifying an absolute url - e.g. //ckeditor/customstyles.js. Although this works, I am unhappy having to do so as it makes running my applications in different environments difficult and is also an issue when testing using IIS Express which does not provide a root name. I have seen suggestions elsewhere that I need to set a BASEHREF global variable, but I can't see why I shouldn't be able to do this within config.js itself rather than in some external script tag or whatever. I feel sure that I used to be able to do something similar with FCKEditor or earlier versions of CKEditor, so would be grateful if anyone could remind me of the correct syntax.
Jon
I'm developing a site for my company and I also need to modify the native component "mailto" to fit our needs.
I'm working with a joomla 2.5
I was wondering if future updates occur, what will happen to the lines I've added, for example, in "\components\com_mailto\controller.php"...
I haven't find answers on the net.
Also, for the same reason, I've modified the default layout of an article. Should I rename it? and if yes, how, because I couldn't do it (when I've tried the article did not display).
Thanks for your help
Before starting to edit core Joomla components, should should always have a look at the options you have. I don't believe in editing core file as it simply causes problems for updates when released, therefore in my opinion, you have 2 options:
I always make a note of all my requirements and start looking for a 3rd party extension that caters for my requirements.
If I cannot find a 3rd party extension and don't particularly want to start digging into it's code, I would go with developing a plugin. Plugins are used to manipulate the behavior or something and therefore come in extremely handy for when you would require core editing.
Editing the layout of an extension view is completely fine, but it's strongly recommended you make a Template Override so that if the extension does ever get updated, your changes won't get overridden.
So to answer you initial question, any line you have added to the controller.php file will get overridden when you decide to update the extension.
Hope this helps
While the answer from Lodder is totally valid, as a last resource you can also consider forking the com_mailto as a separate component.
This has some disadvantages:
you need to rename all the files involved (controllers, models, views)
you need to maintain it and keep in in sync with future updates (consider than you are now on 2.5.x and in a year you might want to upgrade to 3.x).
I am just starting out with THREE and have come across some odd failures which I believe are due to localhost / same-origin-poicy.
In short I created my own animation using armatures in Blender and exported using the three.js exporter plugin. The model displays but the animation doesn't run.
I used the online skinning animation example as the basis for the code and thought I may have incorrectly stripped out certain code that was causing it to fail but after looking for a couple of hours I have come to the conclusion I haven't ripped out anything incorrectly so...
To test if the example code worked locally I copied the online skinning animation example code including the buffalo.js/png files, modified the file references to map to my local copy and tried to run it in a local IIS server and all I get is the stats and no animation or model.
I checked the firebug console and only had a coupe of depreciation warnings no errors. I also checked with my model and code and I get no errors or warnings...
Anyone had this experience before? (I tested in chrome/firefox both had same behaviour)
Am happy to post code but the JSONLoader(ed) model is massive.
Thanks (and sorry for the long windedness of this SO question)
When it comes to running things on your local machine, have you tried the steps on this wiki page? How to run things locally
One example on the page suggests: chrome --allow-file-access-from-files
It's possible that your issue is related to the steps taken during your export. Without the exact errors or screenshots it's difficult to know where the issue originates from. Things to look out for:
Is your model being exported at the first frame?
Do you have the latest .py export plugin for Blender?
Using the latest version of Three.js?
Tried using THREE.SkinnedMesh?
Here is an article that gives you a brief overview of what is required for animated meshes within Three.js: Skeletal Animation
This second article provides a much more detailed tutorial, complete with example code at the bottom of the page: Skeletal Animation +1
In order to rule out same origin policy you can actually disable the security checks chrome uses when it starts up by adding this to the target window on your shortcut properties
--disable-web-security
see here for more information : Disable same origin policy in Chrome