I am using the PrefixEntityNameFormatter for prefixing topics with the environment name. I started noticing that our topics were getting prefixed multiple times and am not sure why. In the example below the prefix was supposed to be ct-16075 but was repeated 5 times.
Setup code is pretty simple
x.UsingAzureServiceBus((busContext, busConfig) =>
{
string cnString = Configuration.GetValue<string>("ConnectionStrings:ServiceBusConnection");
busConfig.Host(cnString, hostConfig =>
{
hostConfig.TransportType = ServiceBusTransportType.AmqpWebSockets;
});
string branchName = Configuration.GetValue<string>("BranchEnvironment");
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(branchName))
throw new Exception("Missing BranchEnvironment in configuration");
busConfig.MessageTopology.SetEntityNameFormatter(new PrefixEntityNameFormatter(busConfig.MessageTopology.EntityNameFormatter, branchName + "-"));
// Subcription endpoints setup here
busConfig.ConfigureEndpoints(busContext);
});
Is there an obvious reason this would prefix topic names multiple times?
Related
I'm trying to write some code in Apps Script that triggers an email each time a condition is fulfilled in a Spreadsheet.
This spreadsheet contains the age of different transgenic lines of fish (the ages of the fish are automatically updated in the spreadsheet) and each of these transgenic lines has an associated caretaker with an email address. My idea is to trigger an automatic email using Apps script that is sent to the assigned caretaker each time one of these transgenic lines becomes older than 2 years old. However, I haven't been able to make it work yet. I'm not really sure which part of my code is preventing it from working properly.
Below I attach an example of how the spreadsheet would look like, as well as an example of the code that I've been trying to use (I'm a beginner when it comes to coding, so it's possible that there are many basic errors in it):
function fishalert() {
var subject = 'Fish aging alert';
var years = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet().getSheetByName("Sheet1").getRange("C2:C10").getValues();
if (years > 2){
for(r=2;r<20;r++){
var name = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet().getSheetByName("Sheet1").getRange(r,1).getValue();
var emailaddress = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet().getSheetByName("Sheet1").getRange(r,4).getValue();
var message = 'Line ' + name + ' is more than 2 years old';
MailApp.sendEmail(emailaddress, subject, message);
}
}
}
Sending Email when conditions are met by sampling once a day
function fishalert(e) {
if (e['day-of-week'] < 6) {//sends emails mon through fri between 9 and 10 in the morning
const ss = SpreadsheetApp.getActive();
const sh = ss.getSheetByName('Sheet1');
const vs = sh.getRange(2, 1, sh.getLastRow() - 1, 4).getValues();
vs.forEach(r => {
if (r[2] > 2) {
MailApp.sendEmail(r[3], 'Fish aging alert', `Line ${r[0]} is more than 2 years old`);
}
});
}
}
Run this once:
function createTimeBasedTrigger() {
if(ScriptApp.getProjectTriggers().filter(t => t.getHandlerFunction() == 'fishalert').length == 0) {
ScriptApp.newTrigger('fishalert').timeBased().everyDays(1).atHour(9).create();
}
}
Time Driven Triggers
Time Driven Trigger Event Object
Class Range getValues() Method
For future enhancements
you will probably only want to send these emails on a less frequent schedule and probably only once when the threshold is achieved and you'll probably want to collect one email for each unique email address. But this is an answer to your current question
I am attempting to get unique values in a list of similar value distinguished only by a one element in a pipe delimited string... I keep getting at least one object must implement Icomparable. I don't understand why I keep getting that. I am able to groupBy that value... Why can't I find the max... I guess it is looking for something to compare it with. If I get the integer version will it stop yelling at me? This is the last time I am going to try using LINQ...
var queryResults = PatientList.GroupBy(x => x.Value.Split('|')[1]).Select(x => x.Max());
I know I can get the unique values some other way. I am just having a hard time figuring it out. In that List I know that the string with the highest value amongst its similar brethren is the one that I want to add to the list. How can I do that? I am totally drawing a blank because I have been trying to get this to work in linq for the last few days with no luck...
foreach (XmlNode node in nodeList)
{
XmlDocument xDoc = new XmlDocument();
xDoc.LoadXml(node.OuterXml);
string popPatInfo = xDoc.SelectSingleNode("./template/elements/element[#name=\"FirstName\"]").Attributes["value"].Value + ", " + xDoc.SelectSingleNode("./template/elements/element[#name=\"LastName\"]").Attributes["value"].Value + " | " + DateTime.Parse(xDoc.SelectSingleNode("./template/elements/element[#name=\"DateOfBirth\"]").Attributes["value"].Value.Split('T')[0]).ToString("dd-MMM-yyyy");
string patientInfo = xDoc.SelectSingleNode("./template/elements/element[#name=\"PatientId\"]").Attributes["value"].Value + "|" + xDoc.SelectSingleNode("./template/elements/element[#name=\"PopulationPatientID\"]").Attributes["enc"].Value;// +"|" + xDoc.SelectSingleNode("./template/elements/element[#name=\"AdminDate\"]").Attributes["value"].Value;
int enc = Int32.Parse(patientInfo.Split('|')[1]);
if (enc > temp)
{
lastEncounter.Add(enc, patientInfo);
temp = enc;
}
//lastEncounter.Add(Int32.Parse(patientInfo.Split('|')[1]));
PatientList.Add( new SelectListItem { Text = popPatInfo, Value = patientInfo });
}
I was thinking about using some kind of temp variable to find out what is the highest value and then add that string to the List. I am totally drawing a blank however...
Here I get the IDs in an anonymous type to make it readable.
var patientEncounters= from patient in PatientList
let PatientID=Int32.Parse(patient.Value.Split('|')[0])
let EncounterID=Int32.Parse(patient.Value.Split('|')[1])
select new { PatientID, EncounterID };
Then we group by UserID and get the last encounter
var lastEncounterForEachUser=from pe in patientEncounters
group pe by pe.PatientID into grouped
select new
{
PatientID=grouped.Key,
LastEncounterID=grouped.Max(g=>g.EncounterID)
};
Linq doesn't know how to compare 2 Patient objects, so it can't determine which one is the "greatest". You need to make the Patient class implement IComparable<Patient>, to define how Patient objects are compared.
// Compare objets by Id value
public int CompareTo(Patient other)
{
return this.Id.CompareTo(other.Id);
}
Another option is to use the MaxBy extension method available in Jon Skeet's MoreLinq project:
var queryResults = PatientList.GroupBy(x => x.Value.Split('|')[1])
.Select(x => x.MaxBy(p => p.Id));
EDIT: I assumed there was a Patient class, but reading your code again, I realize it's not the case. PatientList is actually a collection of SelectListItem, so you need to implement IComparable in that class.
I'm trying to delete all calendar entries from today forward. I run a query then call getEntries() on the query result. getEntries() always returns 25 entries (or less if there are fewer than 25 entries on the calendar). Why aren't all the entries returned? I'm expecting about 80 entries.
As a test, I tried running the query, deleting the 25 entries returned, running the query again, deleting again, etc. This works, but there must be a better way.
Below is the Java code that only runs the query once.
CalendarQuery myQuery = new CalendarQuery(feedUrl);
DateFormat dfGoogle = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd'T00:00:00'");
Date dt = Calendar.getInstance().getTime();
myQuery.setMinimumStartTime(DateTime.parseDateTime(dfGoogle.format(dt)));
// Make the end time far into the future so we delete everything
myQuery.setMaximumStartTime(DateTime.parseDateTime("2099-12-31T23:59:59"));
// Execute the query and get the response
CalendarEventFeed resultFeed = service.query(myQuery, CalendarEventFeed.class);
// !!! This returns 25 (or less if there are fewer than 25 entries on the calendar) !!!
int test = resultFeed.getEntries().size();
// Delete all the entries returned by the query
for (int j = 0; j < resultFeed.getEntries().size(); j++) {
CalendarEventEntry entry = resultFeed.getEntries().get(j);
entry.delete();
}
PS: I've looked at the Data API Developer's Guide and the Google Data API Javadoc. These sites are okay, but not great. Does anyone know of additional Google API documentation?
You can increase the number of results with myQuery.setMaxResults(). There will be a maximum maximum though, so you can make multiple queries ('paged' results) by varying myQuery.setStartIndex().
http://code.google.com/apis/gdata/javadoc/com/google/gdata/client/Query.html#setMaxResults(int)
http://code.google.com/apis/gdata/javadoc/com/google/gdata/client/Query.html#setStartIndex(int)
Based on the answers from Jim Blackler and Chris Kaminski, I enhanced my code to read the query results in pages. I also do the delete as a batch, which should be faster than doing individual deletions.
I'm providing the Java code here in case it is useful to anyone.
CalendarQuery myQuery = new CalendarQuery(feedUrl);
DateFormat dfGoogle = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd'T00:00:00'");
Date dt = Calendar.getInstance().getTime();
myQuery.setMinimumStartTime(DateTime.parseDateTime(dfGoogle.format(dt)));
// Make the end time far into the future so we delete everything
myQuery.setMaximumStartTime(DateTime.parseDateTime("2099-12-31T23:59:59"));
// Set the maximum number of results to return for the query.
// Note: A GData server may choose to provide fewer results, but will never provide
// more than the requested maximum.
myQuery.setMaxResults(5000);
int startIndex = 1;
int entriesReturned;
List<CalendarEventEntry> allCalEntries = new ArrayList<CalendarEventEntry>();
CalendarEventFeed resultFeed;
// Run our query as many times as necessary to get all the
// Google calendar entries we want
while (true) {
myQuery.setStartIndex(startIndex);
// Execute the query and get the response
resultFeed = service.query(myQuery, CalendarEventFeed.class);
entriesReturned = resultFeed.getEntries().size();
if (entriesReturned == 0)
// We've hit the end of the list
break;
// Add the returned entries to our local list
allCalEntries.addAll(resultFeed.getEntries());
startIndex = startIndex + entriesReturned;
}
// Delete all the entries as a batch delete
CalendarEventFeed batchRequest = new CalendarEventFeed();
for (int i = 0; i < allCalEntries.size(); i++) {
CalendarEventEntry entry = allCalEntries.get(i);
BatchUtils.setBatchId(entry, Integer.toString(i));
BatchUtils.setBatchOperationType(entry, BatchOperationType.DELETE);
batchRequest.getEntries().add(entry);
}
// Get the batch link URL and send the batch request
Link batchLink = resultFeed.getLink(Link.Rel.FEED_BATCH, Link.Type.ATOM);
CalendarEventFeed batchResponse = service.batch(new URL(batchLink.getHref()), batchRequest);
// Ensure that all the operations were successful
boolean isSuccess = true;
StringBuffer batchFailureMsg = new StringBuffer("These entries in the batch delete failed:");
for (CalendarEventEntry entry : batchResponse.getEntries()) {
String batchId = BatchUtils.getBatchId(entry);
if (!BatchUtils.isSuccess(entry)) {
isSuccess = false;
BatchStatus status = BatchUtils.getBatchStatus(entry);
batchFailureMsg.append("\nID: " + batchId + " Reason: " + status.getReason());
}
}
if (!isSuccess) {
throw new Exception(batchFailureMsg.toString());
}
There is a small quote on the API page
http://code.google.com/apis/calendar/data/1.0/reference.html#Parameters
Note: The max-results query parameter for Calendar is set to 25 by default,
so that you won't receive an entire
calendar feed by accident. If you want
to receive the entire feed, you can
specify a very large number for
max-results.
So to get all events from a google calendar feed, we do this:
google.calendarurl.com/.../basic?max-results=999999
in the API you can also query with setMaxResults=999999
I got here while searching for a Python solution;
Should anyone be stuck in the same way, the important line is the fourth:
query = gdata.calendar.service.CalendarEventQuery(cal, visibility, projection)
query.start_min = start_date
query.start_max = end_date
query.max_results = 1000
Unfortunately, Google is going to limit the maximum number of queries you can retrieve. This is so as to keep the query governor in their guidelines (HTTP requests not allowed to take more than 30 seconds, for example). They've built their whole architecture around this, so you might as well build the logic as you have.
What does it mean and why (if at all) is it important?
It means you can add additional "operators" to a query. It's important because you can do it extremely efficiently.
For example, let's say you have a method that returns a list (enumerable) of employees:
var employees = GetEmployees();
and another method that uses that one to return all managers:
IEnumerable<Employee> GetManagers()
{
return GetEmployees().Where(e => e.IsManager);
}
You can call that function to get managers that are approaching retirement and send them an email like this:
foreach (var manager in GetManagers().Where(m => m.Age >= 65) )
{
SendPreRetirementMessage(manager);
}
Pop quiz: How many times will that iterate over your employees list? The answer is exactly once; the entire operation is still just O(n)!
Also, I don't need to have separate methods for this. I could compose a query with these steps all in one place:
var retiringManagers = GetEmployees();
retiringManagers = retiringManagers.Where(e => e.IsManager);
retiringManagers = retiringManagers.Where(m => m.Age >= 65);
foreach (var manager in retiringMangers)
{
SendPreRetirementMessage();
}
One cool thing about this is that I can change is at run time, such that I can include or not include one part of the composition inside an if block, such that the decision to use a specific filter is made at run time, and everything still comes out nice and pretty.
I think it means that you can daisy chain your queries, like this
var peterJacksonsTotalBoxOffice
= movies.Where(movie => movie.Director == "Peter Jackson")
.Sum(movie => movie.BoxOffice);
I have a strange problem when deleteting records using linq, my suspicion is that it has something to do with the range variable (named source). After deleting a record all targets for a customer are retrieved using the following statement:
var q = from source in unitOfWork.GetRepository<db_Target>().Find()
where source.db_TargetBase.db_Person.fk_Customer == customerID
select source.FromLinq();
where FromLinq is in extention method on db_target:
public static Target FromLinq(this db_Target source)
{
return new Target
{
id = source.id,
LastModified = source.db_TargetBase.LastModified,
...
}
}
When a record is deleted both db_Target and db_TargetBase are deleted. When, for example, two users are deleting records, linq tries to retrieve a record for user2 which is deleted by user1, causing a crash on the LastModified = source.db_TargetBase.LastModified line because db_TargetBase is null.
When using the following code the problem does not occure and only the non-deleted records are retrieved:
var q = from source in unitOfWork.GetRepository<db_Target>().Find()
where source.db_TargetBase.db_Person.fk_Customer == customerID
select new Target
{
id = source.id,
LastModified = source.db_TargetBase.LastModified,
...
};
This spawns two questions:
What is happening here? Am I making a copy of the range variable source because I'm using it in a extention method?
How can I "wrap" the return new Target code? I am using this in multiple places and do not want to copy it every time. Making my code harder to maintain.
TIA,
JJ
In the first set of code - since the initializer lives an a non-translatable method (extension or otherwise), it cannot be translated - so it is run locally.
In the second set of code - the initializer is represented by an elementinit expression, which is translated (examine/compare the select clause of the generated sql for proof).
if you want to wrap this, you need to have an Expression<Func<db_Target, Target>> that anyone can grab and use in thier query. Fortunately, that's easy to do:
public Expression<Func<db_Target, Target>> GetFromLinqExpressionForTarget()
{
return
source => new Target
{
id = source.id,
LastModified = source.db_TargetBase.LastModified,
...
}
}
Which may be used like so:
var FromLinq = GetFromLinqExpressionForTarget();
var q =
(
from source in ...
...
...
select source
).Select(FromLinq);
Now ... I'm really running on a guess here and am only about 60% confident that my answer is correct. So if someone wants to confirm this, that'll make my day. :)