I have a problem when I want to set delivery delay for each message (IBM MQ and Spring boot). Normal way is to use jmsTemplate.deliveryDelay = 324234 but the problem is we are changing the property of the jmsTemplate which is a global object (Singlteon). So I would like to send different delivery delays per message not a delay for all the messages (delay can be varied for each message).
It seems the right way is to set this delivery in header for each message like code below. but when I tried it, it didn't work. I received messages immediately.
jmsMessage.setLongProperty(
DELAY_DELIVERY_TAG,
deliveryDelayService.delay(message)
)
Does anyone know how I can set delivery delay per message?
The IBM docs on JMS 2.0 delivery delay says you can set it only on the producer (i.e. the JmsTemplate), not the message:
An application can specify a delivery delay in milliseconds, when it sends a message, by using either MessageProducer.setDeliveryDelay(long deliveryDelay) or JMSProducer.setDeliveryDelay(long deliveryDelay)
It is fine to create a new JmsTemplate per invocation; just read the Caching Connection Resources carefully and follow the advice written in the JmsTemplate Java API:
NOTE: The ConnectionFactory used with this template should return pooled Connections (or a single shared Connection) as well as pooled Sessions and MessageProducers. Otherwise, performance of ad-hoc JMS operations is going to suffer
Related
For a Spring Framework app working with ActiveMQ and with/without WebSocket
The requirement is prior to send any message to a Topic a check should be done about Number Of Consumers, if it returns 1 the message can be sent safely. If it returns 0, the message can't be sent.
The clients could be come from websocket and consider there is no durable subscription. Thus if a message is sent, and there are no clients, the message arrives to the Topic and practically is lost (never consumed) and Messages Enqueued increments +1
I already did a research and I have read the following:
JMSTemplate check if topic exists and get subscriber count
Notify ActiveMQ producer if consumer on the destination is down
ActiveMQ get number of consumers listening to a topic from java
Detect change in Consumers of an ActiveMQ topic
Practically all is based on Advisory Message. I already have read:
Advisory Message
Handling Advisory Messages
Apache ActiveMQ Advisory Example
I understand that if exists a Topic named abc.xyz then ActiveMQ creates ActiveMQ.Advisory.Consumer.Topic.abc.xyz, until here I am ok with this pattern. I can confirm this approach through ActiveMQ Web Console
What is confuse for me is that practically all the examples available from the previous links works around creating a Session and uses mostly the onMessage method. For the latter I know it works how a listener.
Question 01: Thus who is expected to call that ActiveMQ.Advisory.Consumer.Topic.abc.xyz? It to trigger that onMessage method? That is my confusion.
What I need is work with the Spring Framework API (The app is already working and running with a CachingConnectionFactory, thus a Connection can be retrieved and other #Beans about infrastructure about ActiveMQ) and get access to that ActiveMQ.Advisory.Consumer.Topic.abc.xyz destination and retrieve the Number Of Consumers value.
Note: even when exists ActiveMQTopic declared with #Bean and is possible to retrieve that Destination for some #Component, sadly the API does not offer a method such getConsumers().
Question 02: How can be accomplished this?
I am assuming the JMS API for 2.0.x could help perhaps in someway.
So using JMS and ActiveMQ, I can be sure that my message sent from my Spring Boot application using JmsTemplate will reach it's destination application even if that destination application is down at the time I send the message to ActiveMQ. As when the destination application starts up, it grabs the message from the queue. Great!
However.
What happens if my Spring Boot application tries to send a JMS message to a queue on the ActiveMQ server, but the ActiveMQ server is down at that point or the network is down and I get a connection refused exception?
What is the recommended way to make sure my application keeps trying to re-sends the message to ActiveMQ until it is successful? Is this something I have to develop into my application myself? Are there any nifty Spring tools or annotations which do this for me? Any advice on best practice or how I should be handling this scenario?
You can try Spring-Retry. Has lots of fine grain controls for it:
http://www.baeldung.com/spring-retry
https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-retry
If it is critical that you don't lose this message, you will want to save it to some alternative persistent store (e.g. filesystem, local mq server) along with whatever retry code you come up with. But for those occasional network glitches or a very temporary mq shutdown/restart, Spring-Retry alone should do the trick.
Couple of approaches I can think of
1. You can set up another ActiveMq as fallback. In your code you don't have to do anything, just change your broker url from
activemq.broker.url=tcp://amq01.blah.blah.com:61616
to
activemq.broker.url=failover:(tcp://amq01.blah.blah.com:61616,tcp://amq02.blah.blah.com:61616)?randomize=false
The rest is automatically taken care of. i.e. when one of them is down, the messages are sent to other.
Another approach is to send to a internal queue (like seda, direct) when activemq is down and read from there.
Adding failover to the url is one appropriate way.
And another reasonable way is to making sure activemq always online , as activemq has the master-slave mode(http://activemq.apache.org/masterslave.html) to get high availability.
An exclusive consumer in Activemq is one that is sent every message from a broker until the consumer dies or goes away, at which time the broker switches consumer.
What is it that defines when the switchover takes place? How do you configure this in Spring JMS/ActiveMQ?
It's not Spring JMS doing the checking; it's the JMS provider, ActiveMQ.
JMS is an API specification; an empty framework, essentially. ActiveMQ provides the implementation backing for managing connections, message brokering, load-balancing, fail-over, etc.
The ActiveMQ broker handles switching-over consumers based on queue properties (you don't need to do anything special in your code):
queue = new ActiveMQQueue("TEST.QUEUE?consumer.exclusive=true");
The switch-over takes place when either the consumer disconnects gracefully or the broker determines that the consumer has disappeared (via the wireFormat.maxInactivityDuration elapsing without any messages or keep-alives being received). You don't have to configure anything if you're happy with the default value of wireFormat.maxInactivityDuration (30 seconds), but you can tweak that if you want to change how long it takes before the broker gives up on a client.
In weblogic it is possible to create a message bridge between two JMS message queues. While configuring this bridge, a message filter can be applied so that the bridge will route messages that match the filter only.
Is it possible to achieve the same with Websphere?
Specifically I'm trying to achieve this scenario.
I have one source queue on which messages are received. Each message will have a custom JMS property set up. I would like to forward the messages on the source queue, to separate queues based on the JMS property and its value. This is easily configured in WLS using message bridges with filtering. How can I do the same in WAS?
Thanks
Savio
You need to use SIB Mediation.
The WAS info center have an example called writing a routing mediation which seems like what you need.
At the bottom of the example there is a link to what to do next which also explains how to configure WAS to use that mediation.
Without writing custom code (as per your comment on Aviram's answer), it is not possible to achieve the exact same thing, but nonetheless it is possible to achieve same effect;
You say that a 'source queue' distributes messages to other 'separate queues' according to a custom JMS property. I'm assume that you have MDBs (message driven beans) configured to process messages in these separate queues.
What you can do with WebSphere is distribute messages to these MDBs directly from the 'source queue', without having to filter/distribute them to separate queues.
This is managed by using JMS Message Selectors. You can point all your MDBs to the source queue using activation specification definitions, and for each (one for each type of message) MDB, define a JMS Message Selector that matches the ones you use in WLS. This way each message is only delivered the MDB whose filter matches the message's properties. This effectively filters/distributes messages to different MDB's as in WLS.
You may read details on configuring message selectors (during development in RAD, or at/after deploy time) at infocenter. Below is a quote to give you an idea about what it look like;
messageSelector
This attribute determines the JMS message selector
that is used to select which messages the message-driven bean
receives. For example:
JMSType='car' AND color='blue' AND weight>2500
The selector string can refer to fields in the JMS message header and
fields in the message properties. Message selectors cannot reference
message body values.
For the record, we finally ended up writing our own routing algorithm within the application to ensure that messages are sent to separate queues for each client. This way we are independent of app server implementations and the integration effort is the same across app servers, viz., adding custom queues per integrating client.
In brief, We published a JMS custom property that must be set. Using a published convention, we look up for a queue and send responses to the queue. If the property is not set, a default queue is created to route all messages. If the property is set, and the queue cannot be found an exception is raised and processing halted.
This suited our purpose. Hope it helps...
All,
i am new to JMS and i have a question about Session.rollBack() method in JMS. AFAIK, this method is used to roll back all operations to JMS server (sending/receiving) by the session when using *SESSION_TRANSACTED* acknowledge mode. Now suppose I am calling this method in a catch block of a receiving/processing operation (is reasonable?), to tell JMS server to redeliver the message for processing, But even if it is redelivered the processing still throws the same exception which cause the JMS server to redeliver the message again, so it seems a infinite process. How to handle this problem? or are there any other JMS features that is designed for it? Thanks in advance!
The rollback method in JMS will rollback any message sends and receives in that "transaction". Transaction here is local to the JMS session.
Whether a redelivery will cause a problem really depends on why the exception occurred. If it was due to some transitory issue then a redelivery may work. If you have the kind of problem that is once it occurs will always occur (an example of this would be a JMS TextMessage whose body should contain XML, but doesn't).
The JMS API doesn't provide any solution to this itself. This is typically taken care of by the JMS provider and how it behaves will depend on which one you use. WebSphere MQ for instance will redeliver up to a configurable maximum at which point it will move it off to a queue for bad messages. The Service Integration Bus in WebSphere Application Server has similar behaviour. I suggest you consult your JMS provider documentation to determine exactly how it behaves in this situation.
If you are running in an application server rollback typically doesn't do anything because the application server will be managing transactions for you.