I use blender and three.js to read the .dae file respectively, the blender shows parallel to the x and z axes, but three.js shows that it is tilted 90 degrees to the y axis.
Example file(1b03f03d-88a2-4c12-9c75-82539a48c081)
blender:
three.js:
let loaderDae = new ColladaLoader();
loaderDae.load('assets/1b03f03d-88a2-4c12-9c75-82539a48c081/untitled.dae', (dae: any) => {
this.model = dae.scene.children[0];
this.model.position.multiplyScalar(0);
this.scene.add(this.model);
});
I don't know if it's a problem with the vector in the original file, or with three.js reading it, should I modify the original file or adjust the vector through three.js?
How can I flip the model if it is through three.js?
this.model = dae.scene.children[0];
Since you are doing this, you skip a transformation of the root object that performs the up axis conversion. So just do this:
this.model = dae.scene;
In general, you should really consider the usage of Collada (as well as OBJ and FBX) since the more modern glTF is better in so many ways. At least when exporting a glTF asset from Blender, it will automatically care about proper up axis conversion.
Related
I have two geometries with the same coordinate system (Wgs84), but their data units are different, one is degree and the other is meter.
I need to perform some operations on them, like:
var g1 = GeometryEngine.Difference(geometry1, geometry2);
But I got an error:
System.ArgumentException:'Invalid argument: geometry1 and geometry2 must have equivalent spatial references.'
So I want to convert the data in degrees to the data in meters, I don’t know how to do it.
The data in meters comes from the shp file. This shp file is loaded into SceneView.
The data in degrees comes from the PreviewMouseLeftButtonDown event of SceneView:
// Get the mouse position.
Point cursorSceenPoint = mouseEventArgs.GetPosition(MySceneView);
// Get the corresponding MapPoint.
MapPoint onMapLocation = MySceneView.ScreenToBaseSurface(cursorSceenPoint);
Then I thought about whether the unit can be modified by setting SceneView.SpatialReference.Unit, but it is read-only.
A .NET solution is the best, and other languages are also acceptable.
Most geometry engine operations requires all geometries to be in the same spatial reference. As the error points to, that is not the case. Before performing any geometry engine operation, you could use the following code to bring geometry2 over to match the spatial reference of geometry1 (or vise-versa):
if (!geometry1.SpatialReference.IsEqual(geometry2.SpatialReference))
geometry2 = GeometryEngine.Project(geometry2, geometry1.SpatialReference);
The SceneView always returns coordinates in wgs84 lat/long.
var point1 = ...;
var point2= GeometryEngine.Project(point1, YourNewSpatialReference) as MapPoint;
public static Geometry? Project(Geometry geometry, SpatialReference outputSpatialReference);
public static Geometry? Project(Geometry geometry, SpatialReference outputSpatialReference, DatumTransformation? datumTransformation);
I have a 3D model in .obj format. However the coordinates for this 3D model are not (0,0,0). This a 3D render of drone imagery so the coordinates are actual georeferenced coordinates.
I'm following the example in Three.js on how to load an obj with its mtl on webgl. I use the original HTML except that I simply replace the obj listed as male02 by CerroPelaoLow and the files are placed in the obj directory. Firefox displays the model correctly but the position is the problem.
Note that this render is generated by a program this way and even though I can manipulate the model with a program such as Meshlab I'd still prefer the minimum manipulation possible.
So how can I use local coordinates of my object or focus the camera and then use a different set of controls?
You can use the boundingSphere or boundingBox of your object's geometry to determine the position and of your camera. I have already implemented a functionality to focus an object or a set objects. So, here I share some code:
// assuming following variables:
// object -> your obj model (THREE.Mesh)
// camera -> PerspectiveCamera
// controls -> I'm also using OrbitControls
// if boundingSphere isn't set yet
object.computeBoundingSphere();
var sphere = object.geometry.boundingSphere.clone();
sphere.applyMatrix4( object.matrixWorld );
// vector from current center to camera position (shouldn't be zero in length)
var s = new THREE.Vector3().subVectors( camera.position, controls.center );
var h = sphere.radius / Math.tan( camera.fov / 2 * Math.PI / 180 );
var newPos = new THREE.Vector3().addVectors( sphere.center, s.setLength(h) );
camera.position.copy( newPos );
controls.center.copy( sphere.center );
I have a face detection app, and I want a character's head to rotate according to the detected face's pose.
I've managed to get the rotation of the detected face in the form of a quaternion, but I'm unsure about how I'm supposed to translate the data from the quaternion into 3D points for the reference points of the rigged character which I believe will decide the rotation.
Let's say I have this character: http://i.imgur.com/3pcRoYx.png
One solution could be to just cut off the head and make it an own object and then set the rotation of that object according to the quaternion, but I don't want that. I want an intact character.
Is it possible to move the reference points in the head with the data from a quaternion? Or have I gotten it wrong how rigged characters turn their heads? I haven't animated before.
You can apply rotation to a single bone. Get that bone in your script. Keep a var in your class to store the last quaternion in and every update, compare it to that and rotate by the different. I don't have the actual editor here but try this psuedocode.
class NeckRotator {
public GameObject Neck;
private Quaternion LastFace;
void Start(){
LastFace = Neck.transform.Rotation;
}
void Update(){
var DetectedFace = ... // Whatever you do to get this
var Change = Quaternion.Inverse(DetectedFace) * LastFace; // Found this online real quick
Neck.Rotate(Change);
LastFace = Neck.transform.Rotation;
}
}
I've done something like that before to rotate a neck of an NPC to look at a player. It should work for your deal as well.
How can I render an exported scene (with many objects, each with different colors and different properties, such as rotation aroung an axis in the scene) from Blender (with colladaLoader -->.dae) in ThreeJs?
So, the first step is to learn how to create a scene in threeJs and learn some feature with Blender. When you are ready, create your first model and before exporting keep this in mind:
you need to an object with vertices, so if you just create a text with Blender, you have to convert it to a mesh, otherwise threeJs will not render it
be sure to choose the Blender render option and not the Cycles,
otherwise the .dae you export will not be rendered in threeJs
when applying a texture, use just colors and basic materials (basic, phong and lambert) - the others will not work using the colladaLoader
to see if the object will be rendered with color in threeJs with
colladaLoader just look at object in Blender with object mode
(solid) - if it's gray and not colored of the color you choose, it
will be rendered in threeJs the same way
if you apply the 'solidify' modifier to the object and then on threeJs set it to transparent, it will be rendered as wireframed
if you append multiple objects in the scene and 'join' them, the
respective positions and rotations will be respected in threeJs,
otherwise not: for example, if you want to renderize a flower in the
bottle (and thoose objects are different blender files which are
appended/linked in the scene), the flower will not fit in the bottle
in threeJs, but would have a different position and rotation than
the bottle
grouping the objects will not solve this: to see the scene as you see it in Blender you have to 'join' the objects (with the consequences that this entails) or manually change position and rotation on threeJs
the .dae export options don't matter for the rendering of the object in threeJs
and now, the part that regards threeJs:
be sure to import the colladaLoader with:
<script src="jsLib/ColladaLoader.js"></script>
insert this code into your init() function so the loader will load your .dae model:
var loader = new THREE.ColladaLoader();
loader.options.convertUpAxis = true;
loader.load( 'model.dae', function ( collada ) {
// with this you can get the objects of the scene; the [0] is not the first object
// you display in blender in case of many objects (which means you didn't join them)
var obj1 = collada.scene.children[0];
// you can name the object so you can use it even out of the function, if you want
// animate it for example obj1.name = "daeObj1";
// you can set here some material properties as trasparency
obj1.material.needsUpdate = true;
obj1.material.transparent = true;
obj1.material.opacity = 0.5;
obj1.hearth.material.wireframe = false;
// and now some position and rotation for good visualization
obj1.position.set(0, -5, -0.6); //x,z,y
obj1.rotation.set(0, 45, 0);
// and add the obj to the threeJs scene
scene.add(obj1);
});
and some code to the animate() function if you want to update some of your objects, with rotation for example
scene.traverse (function (object) {
if (object.name === 'daeObj1') {
object.rotation.z -= 0.01;
}
});
I hope someone will benefit from this post
I'm trying to make the following in three.js:
I made the model in sketchup with some simple coloured textures and used the collader importer, the result looks like this:
Now I want to dynamically load some photographs onto each of the different planes, however what I end up with is this:
So as you can see, each image is loaded but they are very small and repeated across the rest of the surface.
This is how I load the textures: (preloadTexture() is just a simple preloader)
for(i in cubeSidesArray)
{
preloadTexture(modelThumbsArray[i]);
var newTexture = new THREE.MeshPhongMaterial( { map: THREE.ImageUtils.loadTexture(modelThumbsArray[i]) } );
cubeSidesArray[i].material = newTexture;
}
How do I get the textures to fill the surface?
Thanks!
Edit - I played with the model in sketchup and managed to get it a little better, but not much!
Edit 2 - Still no luck, I'm starting to think building it in code from scratch would be simpler
Option 1: I would advise you to do or next.
1 -.Import the model blender
2 -.Export blender to threejs
3 -.Use this method of charging.
AgregarModeloBlender function (geometry, materials) {
console.log(materials);
material = new THREE.MeshFaceMaterial( materials );
modelo3d_ = new THREE.Mesh( geometry,material );
escenario.add(modelo3d_);
modelo3d_.add(camera);
modelo3d_.scale.set(5,5,5);
modelo3d_.position.set(-900,25,850);
modelo3d_.rotation.y=Math.PI;
}
4 -. Subsequently trabajr with textures independently.
Example: http://all.develoteca.com/builder/
Option 2: I would advise you to do or this:
1 -. Create the geometric shape (vertices) to modify each of the faces of the texture.
Example: http://develoteca.com/Panel/
Greetings.