Data factory copy to dataverse/dynamics - how to update only - dynamics-crm

I have been struggling to work out a way of doing a simple update only when copying data to the dataverse/dynamics.
The only write behaviour it seems to support is "Upsert".
However in my scenario I don't want to insert a row if it doesnt already exist.
I cant see a way to do this and would appreciate some help or ideas.
Thanks!

Related

How to create clean table structure for posting questions in stackoverflow

I am trying to understand as to how to post clean data tables in stackoverflow to ask questions. When I try to copy questions from Excel I find it difficult to maintain clean structure and when I try to use the code sample block too I find it difficult to arrange the data when there are more than 5 columns and multiple rows.
Thanks to #Martheen.. The link https://tabletomarkdown.com/convert-spreadsheet-to-markdown/ helps convert excel and csv file data to proper table structure and it can be copied onto stackoverflow platform for asking questions!

Keeping the sqlite 3 database open using swift 3

I am able to create tables and load several of them with data but when I go to access the data again to retrieve data the program is telling the table does not exist.
I am creating the tables from within the viewcontroller. I read in one of these posts that it should not be done from within viewcontroller but from another class. My question is who should this be done. I would also like to be able to insert and retrieve data from a second viewcontroller.
How is this accomplished? What type of class needs to be set up to keep the database open throughout the entire program? I have searched the internet for answers but have not found what I am looking.
An example and some explanations would be most helpful.
If more information is needed I can provide.
Thank you in advance

Hive managed table drop doesn't delete files on HDFS. Any solutions?

While deleting managed tables from the hive, its associated files from hdfs are not being removed (on azure-databricks). I am getting the following error:
[Simba]SparkJDBCDriver ERROR processing query/statement. Error Code: 0, SQL state: org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Can not create the managed table('`schema`.`XXXXX`'). The associated location('dbfs:/user/hive/warehouse/schema.db/XXXXX) already exists
This issue is occurring intermittently. Looking for a solution to this.
I've started hitting this. It was fine for the last year then something is going on with the storage attachment I think. Perhaps enhancements going on in the back ground that are causing issues (PaaS!) As a safeguard I'm manually deleting the directly path as well dropping the table until I can get a decent explanation of what's going on or get a support call answered.
Use
dbutils.fs.rm("dbfs:/user/hive/warehouse/schema.db/XXXXX", true)
becarefull with that though! Get the path wrong and it could be tragic!
So sometimes the metadata(schema info of Hive table) itself gets corrupted. So whenever we try to delete/drop the table we get errors as, spark checks for the existance of the table before deleting.
We can avoid that if we use hive clint to drop the table, as it avoids checking the table's existence.
Please refer this wonder databricks documentation

Parse database for each username

I'm trying to make a database table for every single username. I see that for every username, I can add more columns in it's row, but I want to attribute a full table for each one. How can I do that?
Thanks,
Eli
First let me say, what you are trying to do sounds like really, really bad database design and you should rethink your idea of creating a table per user. To get help for this you should add way more detail about the reasoning to your question to get a good answer. As far as I know there is also a maximum number of classes you can create on Parse so sooner or later you will run into problems, either performance wise or due to technical limitations of the platform.
That being said, you can use the Schema API to programmatically create/delete/update tables of your Parse app. It always requires the master key, so doing this from the client side is not recommended for security reasons. You could put this into a Cloud Code function for example and call this one from your app/admin tool to create a new table for a user on the fly or delete a table of a user.
Again, better don't do it and think about a better way to design your database, it would be out of scope here to discuss it.

ADOX Rearrange Or Insert Columns Rather than Append them in Access Vb6, VB.Net or CSharp

I need to insert a field in the middle of current fields of a database table. I'm currently doing this in VB6 but may get the green light to do this in .net. Anyway I'm wondering since Access gives you the ability to "insert" fields in the table is there a way to do this in ADOX? If I had to I could step back and use DAO, but not sure how to do it there either.
If yor're wondering why I want to do this applications database has changed over time and I'm being asked to create Upgrade program for some of the installations with older versions.
Any help would be great.
This should not be necessary. Use the correct list of fields in your queries to retrieve them in the required order.
BUT, if you really need to do that, the only way i know is to create a new table with the fields in the required order, read the data from the old table into the new one, delete the old table and rename the new table as the old one.
I hear you: in Access the order of the fields is important.
If you need a comprehensive way to work with ADOX, your go to place is Allen Browne's website. I have used it to from my novice to pro in handling Access database changes. Here it is: www.AllenBrowne.com. Go to Access Tips then scroll down to ADOX Code.
That is also where I normally refer people with doubts about capabilities of Access as a database :)
In your case, you will juggle through creating a new table with the new field in the right position, copying data to the new table, applying properties to the fields, deleting original table, renaming the new table to the required (original) name.
That is the correct order. Do not apply field properties before copying the data. Some indexes and key properties may not be applied when the fields already have data.
Over time, I have automated this so I just run an application to do detect and implement the required changes for me. But that took A LOT of work-weeks.

Resources