I am trying to use Graphql to export test cases and their execution results for any test case in a specific Test Plan. I was able to write the Graphql script to get all the details from the test execution I need, but the one problem is that the defect value returned is a string of numbers rather than the actual defect key. I tried using jira fields in the code for "links" and "linked issues", but that didn't work. Does anyone know how to just get the specific defect key associated with the test case? Here is my code:
{
getTestExecutions(jql: "key = Demo-123", limit: 100 start:0) {
results{
jira(fields: ["key", "summary"])
testRuns(limit: 100 start: 0){
total
results{
test{
jira(fields: ["key", "summary", "description"])
}
status{
name
}
comment
defects
steps {
status{
name
}
action
result
actualResult
customFields {
value
}
defects
}
}
}
}
}
}
To obtain the issue keys of the defects, currently you need to invoke Jira's REST API for that.
GET /rest/api/3/issue/{issueIdOrKey}
You need to do this for every issueId that is returned on the defects object of the test run object returned in the GraphQL request.
Here's a code snippet for achieving that, in Python:
import requests
import json
import os
from requests.auth import HTTPBasicAuth
jira_base_url = "https://yoursite.atlassian.net/rest/api/3"
jira_username = client_id = os.getenv('JIRA_USERNAME', "xxxx")
jira_password = os.getenv('JIRA_PASSWORD',"xxx") # password is actually an API token obtained from https://id.atlassian.com/manage-profile/security/api-tokens
def getIssueKeys(issueIds):
issueKeys = []
for issueId in issueIds:
# endpoint doc https://developer.atlassian.com/cloud/jira/platform/rest/v3/api-group-issues/#api-rest-api-3-issue-issueidorkey-get
response = requests.get(f'{jira_base_url}/issue/{issueId}', params={}, auth=HTTPBasicAuth(jira_username, jira_password))
res = response.json()
issueKeys.append(res["key"])
return issueKeys
issueIds = ["12933", "12933"]
print(getIssueKeys(issueIds))
Note: Xray's GraphQL API doesn't yet (as of Oct2022) provide a primitive/function for that.
Related
In our app, we are synchronizing some of the data to elasticsearch, and some of this data is users' records. The app is grails 5.1 and we are using Elasticsearch Java API Client for elasticsearch integration.
The indexing is working perfectly fine, and an example of user data looks like this:
Now, we have this following function that suppose to get the list of users by their ids:
PublicUser[] getAllByIds(Long[] ids) {
MgetRequest request = new MgetRequest.Builder()
.ids(ids.collect { it.toString() }.toList())
.index("users")
.build()
MgetResponse<PublicUser> response = elasticSearchClientProviderService.getClient().mget(
request,
PublicUser.class
)
response.docs().collect {
it.result().source()
}
}
And when the response holds at least one user record, we are getting a list of PulicUser objects -> as expected.
However, if the search result is empty, the eventual return from this function is a list with one null element.
Some investigation
response.docs() holds a single non-existing document (looks like this one is filled with the request data).
And, as a result, the return from this function is (as I mentioned above) list of one null element.
Another observation:
I expected that response object will have .hits(), for the actual results are accessible through: response.hits().hits(). But now of that exist.
The only season I started looking into docs() directly is because if this documentation: https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/master/docs-multi-get.html
There is a lack of Elasticsearch Java API Client docs. They mostly refer to REST API docs.
What is the correct way to get the list of results from mget request?
For now, I am solving this the following way. Will be glad to see if there is a better way, though.
PublicUser[] getAllByIds(Long[] ids) {
MgetRequest request = new MgetRequest.Builder()
.ids(ids.collect { it.toString() }.toList())
.index("users")
.build()
MgetResponse<PublicUser> response = elasticSearchClientProviderService.getClient().mget(
request,
PublicUser.class
)
List<PublicUser> users = []
response.docs().each {
if (it.result().found()) {
users.add(it.result().source())
}
}
users
}
I have a question regarding a small issue that I'm having. I've created a widget that will live on the Service Portal to allow an admin to Accept or Reject requests.
The data for the widget is pulling from the Approvals (approval_approver) table. Under my GlideRecord, I have a query that checks for the state as requested. (Ex. addQuery('state', 'requested'))
To narrow down the search, I tried entering addQuery('sys_id', current.sys_id). When I use this query, my script breaks and I get an error on the Service Portal end.
Here's a sample of the GlideRecord script I've written to Accept.
[//Accept Request
if(input && input.action=="acceptApproval") {
var inRec1 = new GlideRecord('sysapproval_approver');
inRec1.addQuery('state', 'requested');
//inRec1.get('sys_id', current.sys_id);
inRec1.query();
if(inRec1.next()) {
inRec1.setValue('state', 'Approved');
inRec1.setValue('approver', gs.getUserID());
gs.addInfoMessage("Accept Approval Processed");
inRec1.update();
}
}][1]
I've research the web, tried using $sp.getParameter() as a work-around and no change.
I would really appreciate any help or insight on what I can do different to get script to work and filter the right records.
If I understand your question correctly, you are asking how to get the sysId of the sysapproval_approver record from the client-side in a widget.
Unless you have defined current elsewhere in your server script, current is undefined. Secondly, $sp.getParameter() is used to retrieve URL parameters. So unless you've included the sysId as a URL parameter, that will not get you what you are looking for.
One pattern that I've used is to pass an object to the client after the initial query that gets the list of requests.
When you're ready to send input to the server from the client, you can add relevant information to the input object. See the simplified example below. For the sake of brevity, the code below does not include error handling.
// Client-side function
approveRequest = function(sysId) {
$scope.server.get({
action: "requestApproval",
sysId: sysId
})
.then(function(response) {
console.log("Request approved");
});
};
// Server-side
var requestGr = new GlideRecord();
requestGr.addQuery("SOME_QUERY");
requestGr.query(); // Retrieve initial list of requests to display in the template
data.requests = []; // Add array of requests to data object to be passed to the client via the controller
while(requestsGr.next()) {
data.requests.push({
"number": requestsGr.getValue("number");
"state" : requestsGr.getValue("state");
"sysId" : requestsGr.getValue("sys_id");
});
}
if(input && input.action=="acceptApproval") {
var sysapprovalGr = new GlideRecord('sysapproval_approver');
if(sysapprovalGr.get(input.sysId)) {
sysapprovalGr.setValue('state', 'Approved');
sysapprovalGr.setValue('approver', gs.getUserID());
sysapprovalGr.update();
gs.addInfoMessage("Accept Approval Processed");
}
...
We had some code that has been working for the past 10 months (since it was developed) and just stopped working this afternoon. It's a WebAPI code to send a channel message mentioning the bot and a user, which now is returning "Bad Request. Invalid request body was sent."
If the "Mentions" property is not provided, the call works, and the message is sent without the #mentions. So, I wonder if there was a breaking change in this API that's now expecting a different format for the "Mentions" property.
It's quite simple to reproduce by following the example code found in the Microsoft Graph documentation.
I'm posting here in the hope some fellow dev spots something obvious or is aware of an alternative way of using the API that it might stop complaining, as Microsoft takes forever to reply.
Here's the code we have that can lead me to discover the issue:
private async Task SendMentionToTheBotAsync(GraphServiceClient onBehalfOfClient, string userName, string teamId, string channelId)
{
var supportAgentUser = await onBehalfOfClient.Me.Request().GetAsync();
var chatMessage = new ChatMessage
{
Body = new ItemBody
{
ContentType = BodyType.Html,
Content = $"<at id=\"0\">{Configuration["BotName"]}</at>: This is the start of the conversation between {userName} and <at id=\"1\">{supportAgentUser.DisplayName}</at>."
},
Mentions = new List<ChatMessageMention>
{
new ChatMessageMention
{
Id = 0,
MentionText = Configuration["BotName"],
Mentioned = new IdentitySet
{
Application = new Identity
{
DisplayName = Configuration["BotName"],
Id = Configuration["BotAppId"],
AdditionalData = new Dictionary<string,object>
{
{
"applicationIdentityType", "bot"
}
}
}
}
},
new ChatMessageMention
{
Id = 1,
MentionText = supportAgentUser.DisplayName,
Mentioned = new IdentitySet
{
User = new Identity
{
DisplayName = supportAgentUser.DisplayName,
Id = supportAgentUser.Id,
AdditionalData = new Dictionary<string,object>
{
{
"userIdentityType", "aadUser"
}
}
}
}
}
}
};
await onBehalfOfClient.Teams[teamId].Channels[channelId].Messages
.Request()
.AddAsync(chatMessage);
}
Microsoft Support responded with :
"Thank you for contacting Microsoft Support.
I understand the issue is related to the post messages to Teams. Based on the screenshot, it seems you are using mention to a channel. It's possible that you are using key "conversationIdentityType#odata.type" in your request.
Could you please try to remove "conversationIdentityType#odata.type" key from the request body and try again. It should work. It is because deployment is on the way in the Asia region. Once it's 100% rolled out, this key WILL NOT be entertained in the request."
Removed the key and it worked for me.
Paulo,
Unfortunately i am not a programmer. I am using Graph calls in a Microsoft 365 Power Automate workflow. I have an app that i use to get the Authorisation Bearer token and then post to Teams messages using a graph HTTP action.
Here is the syntax of the HTTP ( purple items are variables if u r not familiar with Flow )
click to view image of Power Automate workflow HTTP action
In my hyperledger-composer app, I have a transaction processor:
async function doSomething(transaction) {
//some code
// the following line results in error message:
const connection = new BusinessNetworkConnection();
await connection.connect('admin#tmy-network');
const result = await connection.query(selectPatientByEmail, { inputValue: email });
//some more code
}
However, the line
const connection = new BusinessNetworkConnection();
causes the following error messsage:
ReferenceError: BusinessNetworkConnection is not defined
How can I define the BusinessNetworkConnection?
*******************************UPDATE**************************************
Following the comment by Paul O'Mahony, I used the following line of code in my transaction processor function (in order to get the patient with the email address 'adam#gmail.com'):
let result = await query('selectPatientByEmail', {
"email": "adam#gmail.com"
});
The query is defined in the queries.qry file as follows:
query selectPatientByEmail {
description: "Select the patient with the given email address"
statement:
SELECT org.comp.app.Patient
WHERE (email == _$email)
}
However, the query returns "undefined" (i.e. variable "result" is undefined) .
What for god's sake is wrong with the code? I just can't see what might be the causing this behaviour.
***************************Update2*****************************************
I have to correct myself ... the query returns something ... but when I want to access the id of the returned patient, this is not possible. That is,
result.id is "undefined"
How can I access the id of the patient returned?
this is because you are (above) writing client code inside a native transaction function - you don't need to set these. Transaction processor functions are automatically invoked by the runtime when transactions are submitted (eg using the BusinessNetworkConnection API under the covers, but it is already part of the transaction - you don't need to specify) . See https://hyperledger.github.io/composer/latest/reference/js_scripts for more info - and the sample networks for common use cases and examples -> https://github.com/hyperledger/composer-sample-networks/tree/master/packages/
Below is a script that helps me build an extentreport for jmeter. It is a JSR223 PostProcessor element. It's working nicely however, the problem is that I have it duplicated after every HTTP Request in the script. I have several scripts with 100's of HTTP requests that would need essentially a copy of the same PostProcessor groovy script. This = hard to maintain!
I have tried splitting common parts into an external groovy script that I tried calling on the JSR223 PostProcessor. I also tried chunking up the bits of the script and putting the values into a csv so that I could just update the csv values if anything changed.
I'm sure there's a cleaner/better way to do this but I'm still learning so I'm not sure of the best way to make this easier to maintain. Here's the JSR223 PostProcessor. The only bit that changes with each http request is the "//test result" section
import com.relevantcodes.extentreports.ExtentReports;
import com.relevantcodes.extentreports.ExtentTest;
import com.relevantcodes.extentreports.LogStatus;
import java.io.File;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Properties;
//configure object for response data
def response = prev.getResponseDataAsString();
//configure extentreports objects
ExtentReports report;
ExtentTest testLogger;
//set location for file and report config
String resultsPath = "C:/portalQA/Automation/Results/";
String configPath = "C:/portalQA/Automation/JMeter/TestReportConfig/";
String reportPath =
resultsPath+"Login_Results_${reportDate}_${currentTime}_${testenv}.html";
File file = new File(reportPath);
if (!file.exists()) {
//if file does not exist, create it
report = new ExtentReports(reportPath, true);
report.loadConfig( new File(configPath+"extent-config.xml"));
} else {
//else append to existing report
report = new ExtentReports(reportPath, false);
report.loadConfig( new File(configPath+"extent-config.xml"));
}
//test result
testLogger = report.startTest("Authenticate");
testLogger.assignCategory("Initialize Session");
if (response.contains("com.blah.portal.model.User")) {
testLogger.log(LogStatus.PASS, "Logged in with: ${username}");
testLogger.log(LogStatus.INFO, response);
} else {
testLogger.log(LogStatus.FAIL, "Could not authenticate session");
testLogger.log(LogStatus.INFO, response);
}
log.info("Authenticate");
print("Authenticate print");
report.endTest(testLogger);
report.flush();
I see two options:
I suggest using JSR223 Listener instead. First of all, that way you will only have 1 listener in your script, which resolves your original problem, but it is a better option for writing into file in general, since listener has only one instance for all running threads, so you won't be creating a race condition when writing to file.
If you rather have a post-processor, you can put it on higher level (not under any particular sampler) which will cause it to run after each request within the same scope or below.
For example, configuration like
Thread Group
Post-processor
Sampler 1
...
Sampler N
Will cause Post-processor to run after each Sampler 1...Sampler N
In both cases you may need to check which sampler you are processing, and skip those you don't want to add to your report (easiest way to do it, is to come up with some name convention for excluded samplers)
I also faced the same challenge. In my case I need to check if JSON response from REST service was correct. I solved it in the following way.
I've created a JSR223 PreProcessor under the script root. It contains my custom class to handle JSON parsing and asserts.
import groovy.json.JsonSlurper
import org.apache.jmeter.assertions.AssertionResult
class CustomAssert {
def parseResponse(json) {
def jsonSlurper = new JsonSlurper()
return jsonSlurper.parseText(json)
}
def assertResult(assertionResult, expectedResult, actualResult) {
if (!expectedResult.equals(actualResult)) {
assertionResult.setFailure(true);
assertionResult.setFailureMessage("Expected ${expectedResult} but was ${actualResult}");
}
}
}
vars.putObject('customAssert', new CustomAssert())
Note the last line:
vars.putObject('customAssert', new CustomAssert())
I put an instance of my CustomAssert to vars.
Then under my HTTP Requests I've added JSR233 Assertion
def a = vars.getObject('customAssert')
def response = a.parseResponse(prev.getResponseDataAsString())
a.assertResult(AssertionResult, 'DRY', response.sensorResultHolderUIs[0].result.toString())
a.assertResult(AssertionResult, 'DRY', response.sensorResultHolderUIs[1].result.toString())
a.assertResult(AssertionResult, 'DRY', response.sensorResultHolderUIs[2].result.toString())
It basically retrieves the instance of CustomAssert from vars and calls its methods. I can put as many JSR233 Assertions as I want. The only code that is copied is those two lines on top:
def a = vars.getObject('customAssert')
def response = a.parseResponse(prev.getResponseDataAsString())
To sum up:
Take the common part of your code (that doesn't have to be copied).
Wrap it in a class.
Put the class in JSR233 PreProcessor under the root and export its instance via vars
Take the rest of your code and adjust it to use class defined in 2.
Put that code in as many JSR233 Assertions as you want remembering to retrieve the instance created in 3. from vars
Thank you user1053510. Your advice lead me to build my own JSR223 Listener that renders the report. Below is the code in my JSR223 Listener:
import com.aventstack.extentreports.*;
import com.aventstack.extentreports.reporter.*;
import com.aventstack.extentreports.markuputils.*;
ExtentHtmlReporter htmlReporter;
ExtentReports extent;
ExtentTest test;
// create the HtmlReporter
htmlReporter = new ExtentHtmlReporter("C:/AUTO_Results/Results_${testApp}_${reportDate}_${currentTime}_${testenv}.html");
//configure report
htmlReporter.config().setCreateOfflineReport(true);
htmlReporter.config().setChartVisibilityOnOpen(true);
htmlReporter.config().setDocumentTitle("${testApp} Results");
htmlReporter.config().setEncoding("utf-8");
htmlReporter.config().setReportName("${testApp} Results ${reportDate}_${currentTime}_${testenv}");
htmlReporter.setAppendExisting(true);
// create ExtentReports
extent = new ExtentReports();
// attach reporter to ExtentReports
extent.attachReporter(htmlReporter);
extent.setReportUsesManualConfiguration(true);
// Show Env section and set data on dashboard
extent.setSystemInfo("Tool","JMeter");
extent.setSystemInfo("Test Env","${testenv}");
extent.setSystemInfo("Test Date","${reportDate}");
extent.setSystemInfo("Test Time","${currentTime}");
//stringify test info
String threadName = sampler.getThreadName();
String samplerName = sampler.getName();
String requestData = props.get("propRequestData");
String respCode = props.get("propRespCode");
String respMessage = props.get("propRespMessage");
String responseData = props.get("propResponse");
// create test
test = extent.createTest(threadName+" - "+samplerName);
//test.assignCategory("API Testing");
// analyze sampler result
if (vars.get("JMeterThread.last_sample_ok") == "false") {
log.error("FAILED: "+samplerName);
print("FAILED: "+samplerName);
test.fail(MarkupHelper.createLabel("FAILED: "+sampler.getName(),ExtentColor.RED));
} else if (vars.get("JMeterThread.last_sample_ok") == "true") {
if(responseData.contains("#error")) {
log.info("FAILED: "+sampler.getName());
print("FAILED: "+sampler.getName());
test.fail(MarkupHelper.createLabel("FAILED: "+sampler.getName(),ExtentColor.RED));
} else if (responseData.contains("{")) {
log.info("Passed: "+sampler.getName());
print("Passed: "+sampler.getName());
test.pass(MarkupHelper.createLabel("Passed: "+sampler.getName(),ExtentColor.GREEN));
}
} else {
log.error("Something is really wonky");
print("Something is really wonky");
test.fatal("Something is really wonky");
}
//info messages
test.info("RequestData: "+requestData);
test.info("Response Code and Message: "+respCode+" "+respMessage);
test.info("ResponseData: "+responseData);
//playing around
//markupify json into code blocks
//Markup m = MarkupHelper.createCodeBlock(requestData);
//test.info(MarkupHelper.createModal("Modal text"));
//Markup mCard = MarkupHelper.createCard(requestData, ExtentColor.CYAN);
// test.info("Request "+m);
// test.info(mCard);
// test.info("Response Data: "+MarkupHelper.createCodeBlock(props.get("propResponse")));
// test.info("ASSERTION MESSAGE: "+props.get("propAssertion"));
// end the reporting and save the file
extent.flush();
Then in each threadgroup I have a BeanShell Assertion with these lines:
//request data
String requestData = new String(prev.SamplerData);
//String requestData = new String(requestData);
props.put("propRequestData", requestData);
//response data
String respData = new String(prev.ResponseData);
//String respData = new String(prev.getResponseDataAsString());
props.put("propResponse", respData);
//response code
String respCode = new String(prev.ResponseCode);
props.put("propRespCode",respCode);
//response message
String respMessage = new String(prev.ResponseMessage);
props.put("propRespMessage",respMessage);