We are moving our monolith to the microservices, and we are looking for a best practice regarding managing third party libraries, e.g: easy update in the case of security problems and so on.
It is clear that the microservices should be independent of each other, still this kind of unity in managing third party libraries would be handy.
Depends on what third party libraries do.
You have some options:
Include the library on your ms if the library is not updated frequently.
Create a new microservice that offers the library functionality. This microservice could be installed as other microservice (on a new pod) or using the sidecar pattern.
For instance, we had a validation library developed to be used with Spring Boot microservices. There was a new customer requirement: we want to develop microservices with other languages. So what we did was create a new microservice that included the validation library and that new microservice was deployed as a sidecar. The requests were validated with this microservice before entering the real microservice with the customer logic.
Related
I'm familiar with spring boot framework and I developed an Application which helps to handle online Assignments.I used few service classes to handle different tasks of the application and its structure can be seen here.
And I have seen several complex applications built as independent packages based on the task it do in the application.
(1)
My First question is can my Application be called as a MicroServices Application?? Because I have
used independent services for the application development.
(2)
And my second question is Can a application developed in MicroServices Architecture has MVC Architecture at the same time.But I have seen in several tutorials they are 2 different architectures.But a Moicroservices Application also has Models ,Views and Controllers at the same time.
So can those 2 be used at the same time??
Thank you!!
You should do some deeper research yourself about the concept and theory of microservices. Studying other applications without the basic knowledge can be misleading.
(1) Just because you are using multiple classes called services does not mean, you are building microservices application. Microservice application examples can be - student management rest api, question and answer management rest api, UI for administration, UI for public usage etc. All of them can be separate spring boot apps, or any other technology capable of handling the requirements (node.js, python, php, Asp.net ...) You should be able to deploy, test and use them as separate standalone apps.
(2)I think a microservice app does not need views, it can be a rest/soap app, log aggregation app, health check app, messaging service app etc. But different types can use different architecture, one of which can be MVC.
By definition of M. Fowler microservices are
..an approach to developing a single application as a suite of small services, each running in its own process and communicating with lightweight mechanisms, often an HTTP resource API.
As you see the definition is ambiguous. I think you are building a monolith application with a good separation of responsibilities into classes called XyServices - a possible candidates to migrate to microservices.
Microservices according to Chris Richardson
( recognized thought leader in microservices) is Microservices - also known as the microservice architecture - is an architectural style that structures an application as a collection of services that are
Highly maintainable and testable
Loosely coupled
Independently deployable
Organized around business capabilities
Owned by a small team
The microservice architecture enables the rapid, frequent and reliable delivery of large, complex applications. It also enables an organization to evolve its technology stack.
It is way of delivery and based on 12 factors
https://12factor.net/.
We use domain driven design as one of the way.
MVC is way of designing as service where we have model view and controller.
In Microservices architecture we can use MVC in one way where each component will be distributed .
Please go through the Microservice Patterns. It is very good book to understand the Microservices architecture
1.Answer to your question yes your application can be Microservices if it followed the 12 factors as mentioned in the website .
Yes Microservices can be on the pattern of mvc but they will be distributed and like we have Microservices for backend in similar fashion we have micro frontend for UI .
I'm going to begin a new project of microservice and want know about patterns that I might wan't to implement on my new microservice for that I could scale, don't have problems with load balance, have an good service with resilience.
I looking to know about patterns that might microservices should implement
Also could you provide some indications for Java microservices application?
For solve some problems that was said: [1]
Architecture: You could build small microservices as it can be, so that the scale be right focused on need to be.
You could set a Discovery service for registering the applications instances, with that making easier to the client access the right application when are lots of instances of the same service (Netflix Eureka / Spring Cloud).
You could set a Configuration outside the code source of the code, so that all the instances can be configured without human intervention right on the running code (Spring Cloud Config).
Set a way the check the health of the microservice with ease.
I circuit breaker for clear the anomalies microservices instances (Spring Cloud / Netflix Hystrix).
and following as say the Twelve-Factor App.
With lots of another things that you need to that care when building a microservice, suggesting the reading the book, if you'll use Java for building microservices Spring Microservices in Action By John Carnell , if you i'll implement in another programming language this other could guide you, Microservices in Action by Morgan Bruce and Paulo Pereira.
[1] (https://www.amazon.com.br/Spring-Microservices-Action-John-Carnell/dp/1617293989
In a micro service architecture, Is it good to have separate DAO services for all the Business services or should I have all the layers intact in the service. In my case, I am building a small Banking application where in I have below services
cbs-accountsummary
cbs-payments
cbs-accounts
cbs-loan
cbs-deposits
So should I really require below services as well
cbs-accountsummary-dao
cbs-payments-dao
cbs-accounts-dao
cbs-loan-dao
cbs-deposits-dao
Or is it fine to have DAO as part of business services. I am really wondering how it goes in real life applications.
In micro-services architecture you split your Domain to micro-services and each micro-service will have its own: api, business logic and data access.
Your example
In your case for example the micro-service "cbs-payments" will have its own API exposed, as well as a business layer(the domain logic of the payments domain) and data access layer. The micro-service will be responsible for the whole scope of the request from api to data persistence. This could include api's, business logic, cache, database and other things.
Lets say if you have a Create payment api call. You would call your micro-service REST api like POST api/payments which would process the request, apply some business rules(validation and others) and save it to the micro-service specific database. All that code would be in your micro-service.
The confusion
Maybe your where working with systems where the the architectural split was not done based on the domain but on some other criteria.
Usually micro-services are split based on some Domain boundaries like in your example. Each of these micro-services are isolated. Regardless of business logic, data access logic or any other logic it is still part of that micro-service.
Usually people use DDD(Domain Driven Design) with micro-services. It is also a common approach to use Repository and Unit Of Work design patterns. You could create Generic Repository/Unit of Work classes which help in database interaction. If you are using micro-service architecture you can extract these generic implementation to some library and use them in each micro-service(extend them if needed). Still you would use that code in your micro-service code.
As already said, I would not go for separate DAO-Services. A Microservice should control all aspects for the bounded context it is responsible for, this includes persistence.
Imagine, if there would be seperate DAO-Services, what would prevent a client from modifying, via said services, the data of the Microservice itself? The Microservice applies business logic onto its domain objects and persists them or not (in case of business rule violation). You never want this to be circumvented. See "cohesive behavior" of Sam Newmans book Building Microservices.
I saw in many tutorials that we need to go back to gateway and generate an entity after generating a microservice application with the same entity.
Can someone explain me, the architectural benefits of doing so?
What is the goal of generating those entities again in Gateway?
One of the points of doing that is to implement the Backend for Frontend pattern.
Basically you proxy all calls from your front-end to your microservices through the gateway. For convenience reasons the frontend is packaged together with the gateway.
JHipster just adapted the exisiting entity generators from monoliths to let users generate the backend and front-end of an entity separately on microservices and gateways respectively. Of course this is an optional feature and you are free to use it the way you want.
You can use different ways for different purposes to reach the service a microservice is offering to you. As mentioned here you don't have to use AngularJS or Angular, but you can also use React and/or Ionic.
In general you can use more than one gateway to all or only a choice of microservices per gateway (a very good example implementing different gateways is shown here).
I'm looking for open source applications that demonstrate the microservices pattern. In particular, I'd like to find one or more applications that can be spun up on real cloud environment up (but with fake data and requests) to demonstrate real-world deployment mechanics.
Unfortunately, I haven't found any good options yet. I'll note that Discourse is a modern 3-tier application, using Rails API, Ember.js, Postgres, and Redis, but it still is much closer to a monolith than an example of microservices. The closest I've found so far is https://github.com/kbastani/spring-cloud-microservice-example but that is more of a framework than an actual application that delivers data.
Not your typical CRUD app but Deis (a PaaS) uses REST APIs mostly to communicate between services. Peatio has a bunch of services that communicate asynchronously through a message queue.
Microsoft provides a demo webshop application based on .NET Core showing how to apply the microservices pattern:
https://github.com/dotnet-architecture/eShopOnContainers
There is also an ebook available: https://aka.ms/microservicesebook
this lagom application example is a microservices application written in Lagom . It is a akka based framework (DDD for design).
Application is complete and working. See if that serve your purpose.