I'm a bit new to PL-SQL coming from T-SQL.
I have a requirement that only one phone number is allowed per user ID, but the phone number column can be null as many times as required.
So table is:
User ID
Phone Number
1
NULL
1
9735152122
1
NULL
2
NULL
3
NULL
1
2124821212
It's that last one I need to block, although the first three are fine. In this case I'm talking about the sample table I've posted, not the actual table order. I just need to allow the NULLs through but block if there are duplicate phone numbers per a given User ID.
I've read about functional indexes but not sure exactly how to apply them here.
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX my_index ON my_table (
CASE WHEN phone_number IS NULL THEN NULL ELSE user_id END,
phone_number
)
With this logic, if phone_number is NULL, then both values in the index will be NULL, so that row will be excluded from the index. If phone_number is not NULL, then the row will be included in the index with the actual values for user_id and phone_number, and uniqueness will be enforced.
P.S. This is not "PL/SQL", it is Oracle SQL. PL/SQL is the procedural language used to write such things as triggers, functions, etc.
Related
Using Oracle, I have a procedure to create unique ID numbers. Currently the ID number is built with the sysdate year concatenated with a "-". I then update the ID number to concatenate a value from within the table after the dash.
EX: 2022-8501.
Instead of using a table value, I want to increment the number after the dash by 1, and it should start back at 1 every year.
EX: 2022-1, 2022-2, 2022-3 // (Next year) 2023-1, 2023-2, 2023-3
What would be the best way to approach this? I have attached my current code below.
INSERT INTO PLANE_INFO.ID_NUMBERS (PLANE_ID)
VALUES (TO_CHAR(SYSDATE, 'YYYY')||'-')
RETURNING ENTRY_ID INTO v_entry_id;
UPDATE PLANE_INFO.ID_NUMBERS
SET PLANE_ID = PLANE_ID || LPAD(v_entry_id,5,'0')
WHERE ENTRY_ID = v_entry_id;
The "best" way? Use a sequence.
create sequence seq;
insert into plane_info.id_numbers (plane_id)
values (extract (year from sysdate) ||'-'|| seq.nextval);
[TL;DR] Just use a normal sequence and if you want to generate the pseudo-sequence that restarts every year then you can calculate it for display purposes (but you should not use it as a referential constraint).
If you have the table:
CREATE TABLE PLANE_INFO.ID_NUMBERS (
id NUMBER
GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY
CONSTRAINT table_name__id__pk PRIMARY KEY,
year NUMBER(4)
CONSTRAINT table_name__year__nn NOT NULL
);
Note: IDENTITY columns are available from Oracle 12.
Then you have an incrementing sequence (that you can use as the primary key and for any referential constraints) and a year column.
You can generate your pseudo-sequence (for display purposes, rather than as a referential constraint) using the ROW_NUMBER() analytic function and string concatenation:
SELECT t.*,
YEAR
|| '-'
|| LPAD(ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY YEAR ORDER BY id), 5, '0')
AS pseudo_seq
FROM PLANE_INFO.ID_NUMBERS t
db<>fiddle here
I have an oracle table. Table's DDL is (not have the primary key)
create table CLIENT_ACCOUNT
(
CLIENT_ID VARCHAR2(18) default ' ' not null,
ACCOUNT_ID VARCHAR2(18) default ' ' not null,
......
)
create unique index UK_ACCOUNT
on CLIENT_ACCOUNT (CLIENT_ID, ACCOUNT_ID)
Then, the data's scale is very huge, maybe 100M records. I want to traverse this whole table's data with batch.
Now, I use the table's index to batch traverse. But I have some oracle grammar problems.
# I want to use this SQL, but grammar error.
# try to use b-tree's index to locate start position, but not work
select * from CLIENT_ACCOUNT
WHERE (CLIENT_ID, ACCOUNT_ID) > (1,2)
AND ROWNUM < 1000
ORDER BY CLIENT_ID, ACCOUNT_ID
Has the fastest way to batch touch table data?
Wild guess:
select * from CLIENT_ACCOUNT
WHERE CLIENT_ID > '1'
and ACCOUNT_ID > '2'
AND ROWNUM < 1000;
It would at least compile, although whether it correctly implements your business logic is a different matter. Note that I have cast your filter criteria to strings. This is because your columns have a string datatype and you are defaulting them to spaces, so there's a high probability those columns contain non-numeric values.
If this doesn't solve your problem, please edit your question with more details; sample input data and expected output is always helpful in these situations.
Your data model seems odd.
Your columns are defined as varchar2. So why is your criteria numeric?
Also, why do you default the key columns to space? It would be better to leave unpopulated values as null. (To be clear, NULL is not a good thing in an indexed column, it's just better than a space.)
When I am learning oracle index, I encountered with the situation that I am not able to understand.
create unique index u_index1 on table_a(case when code is not null then company_id end, code)
I am not able to understand the purpose of this code, Does this index mean that, if code is not null then index on code, company_id is created? or if code is null then index is created on code column only? or what?
The meaning of this index(ultimately unique constraint) is:
When you insert NULL into code then uniqueness will be checked on (NULL, CODE). Ok but code is also NULL so index will be on (NULL, NULL). means on nothing.
When code is not null then index will be on (COMPANY_ID, CODE)
Now, let's take this in this way:
COMPANY_ID can have multiple duplicates with NULL CODE but for a single COMAPNY_ID, There must be a unique CODE
Cheers!!
Brief model overview:
I have a student and a course tables. As it's many to many relation there is also a junction table student_course (id_student, id_course), with unique constraint on both columns (composite).
The problem I want to solve:
On account of a mistake, there is no a unique constraint on the code column of the course table. It should as code column should uniquely identify a course. As a result there are two rows in the course table with the same value in the code column. I want to remove that duplicate, check that there is no other duplicates and add a unique constraint on the code column. Without loosing relations with student table.
My approach to solve the issue:
I have create a procedure that should do what I want.
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE REMOVE_COURSES
(
v_course_code IN VARCHAR2,
v_course_price IN VARCHAR2
)
AS
new_course_id NUMBER;
BEGIN
INSERT INTO course (CODE, PRICE) VALUES (v_course_code, v_course_price)
RETURNING ID INTO new_course_id;
FOR c_course_to_overwrite IN (SELECT *
FROM course
WHERE code = v_course_code AND id != new_course_id) LOOP
UPDATE student_course SET id_course = new_course_id WHERE id_course = c_course_to_overwrite.id;
DELETE FROM course WHERE id = c_course_to_overwrite.id;
END LOOP;
END REMOVE_COURSES;
/
Main problem I want to solve:
The procedure keeps giving me an error about unique constraint violation on student_course table. But I am really not sure how it's possible as I am using new_course_id, so there is no chance that in the junction table there are two rows with the same id_student, id_course. What do I need to fix ?
Miscellaneous:
I want to solve that issue using procedure only for learning purposes
EDITED:
CREATE TABLE student (
id NUMBER GENERATED BY DEFAULT ON NULL AS IDENTITY,
name VARCHAR2(150) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (id)
);
ALTER TABLE student MODIFY ID
GENERATED BY DEFAULT ON NULL AS IDENTITY (START WITH LIMIT VALUE);
CREATE TABLE course (
id NUMBER GENERATED BY DEFAULT ON NULL AS IDENTITY,
code VARCHAR2(255) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (id)
);
ALTER TABLE course MODIFY ID
GENERATED BY DEFAULT ON NULL AS IDENTITY (START WITH LIMIT VALUE);
CREATE TABLE student_course (
id_student NUMBER NOT NULL,
id_course NUMBER NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (id_student, id_course),
CONSTRAINT student_fk FOREIGN KEY (id_student) REFERENCES student (id),
CONSTRAINT course_fk FOREIGN KEY (id_course) REFERENCES course (id)
);
insert into student (name) values ('John');
INSERT INTO course (ID, CODE) VALUES (1, 'C_13');
INSERT INTO course (ID, CODE) VALUES (2, 'C_13');
commit;
INSERT INTO STUDENT_COURSE (ID_STUDENT, ID_COURSE) VALUES (1, 1);
INSERT INTO STUDENT_COURSE (ID_STUDENT, ID_COURSE) VALUES (1, 2);
commit;
CALL REMOVE_COURSES('C_13');
[23000][1] ORA-00001: unique constraint (SYS_C0014983) violated ORA-06512: near "REMOVE_COURSES", line 8
Rather than removing one of the duplicate codes, you're creating a third course with the same code, and trying to move all students on either of the old courses onto the new one. The error suggests you have students who are already enrolled on both of the old courses.
Your cursor loop query is:
SELECT *
FROM course
WHERE code = v_course_code AND id != new_course_id
That will find all junction records for both old versions of the code, and the update then sets all of those junction records to the same new ID.
If there are any students listed against both old IDs for the code - which would be allowed by your composite unique key - then they will both be updated to the same new ID.
So say the courses you're looking at are [updated for your example code]:
ID CODE
-- ----
1 C_13
2 C_13
and you have junction records for a student for both courses, like:
ID_STUDENT ID_COURSE
---------- ---------
1 1
1 2
You are creating a new course:
ID CODE
-- ----
3 C_13
Your cursor loop looks for code = 'ABC' and ID != 3, which finds IDs 1 and 2. So in the first iteration of the loop up update the rows with ID 1, so now you have:
ID_STUDENT ID_COURSE
---------- ---------
1 3
1 2
Then in the second iteration you try to update the rows with ID 2, which would attempt to produce:
ID_STUDENT ID_COURSE
---------- ---------
1 3
1 3
which would break the unique constraint - hence the error.
You probably don't want to create a new course at all, but either way, you need to remove duplicate records from student_course - that is, rows which will become duplicates when updated. Basically you need to find students with entries for both existing course IDs, and delete either of them. If you don't care which this would do it:
delete from student_course sc1
where id_course in (
select id
from course
where code = 'C_13'
)
and exists (
select null
from student_course sc2
join course c on c.id = sc.id_course
where sc2.id_student = sc1.id_student
and sc2.id_course > sc1.id_course
and c.code = 'C_13'
);
but there are other (probably better) ways.
You then have the choice of updating all remaining junction records for both old IDs to your new ID; or to consolidate on one of the old IDs and remove the other.
(Your question implies you want to solve the overall task yourself, so I'll refrain from trying to provide a complete solution - this just hopefully helps you understand and resolve your main problem...)
In SQL we will be having a sequence. But it should be appended to a variable like this
M1,M2,M3,M4....
Any way of doing this ?
Consider having the prefix stored in a separate column in the table, e.g.:
CREATE TABLE mytable (
idprefix VARCHAR2(1) NOT NULL,
id NUMBER NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT mypk PRIMARY KEY (idprefix, id)
);
In the application, or in a view, you can concatenate the values together. Or, in 11g you can create a virtual column that concatenates them.
I give it 99% odds that someone will say "we want to search for ID 12345 regardless of the prefix" and this design means you can have a nice index lookup instead of a "LIKE '%12345'".
select 'M' || my_sequence.nextval from dual;