I would like to configure Add bus rider dynamically into a class not into startup.
Working well with RabbitMQ.
But I don't know how to Add Rider to my bus.
private IBusControl ConfigureBus()
{
var massTransitSection = this.configuration.GetSection("MassTransit");
var url = massTransitSection.GetValue<string>("Url");
var host = massTransitSection.GetValue<string>("Host");
var userName = massTransitSection.GetValue<string>("UserName");
var password = massTransitSection.GetValue<string>("Password");
var busControl =
Bus.Factory.CreateUsingRabbitMq(cfg =>
{
cfg.Host($"rabbitmq://{url}/{host}", configurator =>
{
configurator.Username(userName);
configurator.Password(password);
});
cfg.PublishTopology.BrokerTopologyOptions = PublishBrokerTopologyOptions.MaintainHierarchy;
});
busControl.StartAsync();
return busControl;
}
Thx a lot for your help
Riders cannot be connected after the bus has been configured. Topic endpoints are also not able to be connected after the bus has been configured.
Related
Writing a dotnet core app. I need to log in with network credentials as the service (which happens to be a TFS on-prem server) uses those to authenticate. From my (and another team members') windows machine, the following code works:
Console.WriteLine("Type in your DOMAIN password:");
var pass = GetPassword(); //command line secure string magic from SO
var networkCredential = new NetworkCredential("USERNAME", pass, "DOMAINNAME");
string tfsDefaultCollection = "https://TFSURL/DefaultCollection";
string testUrl = $"{tfsDefaultCollection}/_apis/tfvc/changesets/1234/changes?api-version=2.2";
var httpClientHandler = new HttpClientHandler
{
Credentials = networkCredential
};
var client = new HttpClient(httpClientHandler)
{
BaseAddress = new Uri(testUrl)
};
httpClientHandler.PreAuthenticate = true;
var test = client.GetAsync(testUrl).Result;
Console.WriteLine(test);
But it doesn't work from my mac. I get a 401 unauthorized. Both used the same, hardwired connection. AND this works on my mac:
curl --ntlm --user "DOMAINNAME\USERNAME" "https://TFSURL/DefaultCollection/_apis/tfvc/changesets/1234/changes?api-version=2.2"
So that rules out a connectivity question, I would think. Am I missing something I need to be doing on my mac? Can anybody point me to some documentation or way to troubleshoot what both of these requests are doing at the lowest level to see if there is a difference?
Well finally some google-foo got me there. There's a bug in dotnet core for linux/mac. This issue describes the fix:
https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/issues/25988#issuecomment-412534360
It has to do with the host machine you are connecting to uses both Kerberos and NTLM authentication methods.
Implemented below:
AppContext.SetSwitch("System.Net.Http.UseSocketsHttpHandler", false);
Console.WriteLine("Type in your DOMAIN password:");
var pass = GetPassword(); //command line secure string magic from SO
var networkCredential = new NetworkCredential("USERNAME", pass, "DOMAINNAME");
string tfsDefaultCollection = "https://TFSURL/DefaultCollection";
string testUrl = $"{tfsDefaultCollection}/_apis/tfvc/changesets/1234/changes?api-version=2.2";
var myCache = new CredentialCache
{
{
new Uri(testUrl), "NTLM",
networkCredential
}
};
var httpClientHandler = new HttpClientHandler
{
Credentials = myCache
};
var client = new HttpClient(httpClientHandler)
{
BaseAddress = new Uri(testUrl)
};
httpClientHandler.PreAuthenticate = true;
var test = client.GetAsync(testUrl).Result;
Console.WriteLine(test);
Thanks to #dmcgill50 for getting me on the right googling track.
I had some code that uses PNRP to discover peers on network. Everything works fine since Windows 10 update 1803.
public void Init()
{
try
{
_ServiceUrl = Dns.GetHostAddresses(Dns.GetHostName()).Where(address => address.AddressFamily == AddressFamily.InterNetwork).Select(address => _Address = address).Select(address => $"net.tcp://{address}:{Port}/SiemensVR").FirstOrDefault();
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(_ServiceUrl)) return;
_LocalProxy = new PeerProxy(_EventAggregator, this);
_Host = new ServiceHost(_LocalProxy, new Uri(_ServiceUrl));
var binding = new NetTcpBinding();
binding.Security.Mode = SecurityMode.None;
_Host.AddServiceEndpoint(typeof(IPeerContract), binding, new Uri(_ServiceUrl));
_Host.Open();
_PeerName = new PeerName(PEER_NAME_ID, PeerNameType.Unsecured);
_PeerNameRegistration = new PeerNameRegistration(_PeerName, Port) { Cloud = Cloud.AllLinkLocal };
_PeerNameRegistration.Comment = _UserId.ToString();
_PeerNameRegistration.Start();
ResolvePeers();
}
finally { }
}
private async void ResolvePeers()
{
var resolver = new PeerNameResolver();
resolver.ResolveProgressChanged += OnResolveProgressChanged;
resolver.ResolveCompleted += (s, e) =>
{
Console.WriteLine("Completed");
};
resolver.ResolveAsync(_PeerName, this);
await Task.Delay(1000);
resolver.ResolveAsyncCancel(this);
}
Does MS have replace PNRP by something ?
I already tested to activate pnrp services, reinstall teredo tunneling and more.
Microsoft has deprecated and is in the process of removing PNRP.
You're out of luck, since its service and client APIs are being removed completely.
See https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/deployment/planning/windows-10-deprecated-features
Having the same issue here... Let me know if you find any resolution.
Previously, our application works fine, but on 1803 it doesn't work anymore. I can see the cloud start to synchronize and then each peer just ends up going to status alone.
Same issue, I found a Microsoft note to set the following services to Automatic Delayed Start:
Computer Browser (Browser) <- Set to Automatic, not delayed start
Function Discovery Provider Host (FDPHost)
Function Discovery Resource Publication (FDResPub)
Network Connections (NetMan)
UPnP Device Host (UPnPHost)
Peer Name Resolution Protocol (PNRPSvc)
Peer Networking Grouping (P2PSvc)
Peer Networking Identity Manager (P2PIMSvc)
But it didn't resolve the issue.
Any progress in resolving this?
I'm trying to use an existing Consul cluster as the membership provider for a test Orleans application.
I get this error when connecting my client app to the Silo
Could not find any gateway in Orleans.Runtime.Host.ConsulBasedMembershipTable. Orleans client cannot initialize.
Digging into the ConsulUtils class, the entries being retrieved have no ProxyPort defined - and are discarded - hence the empty result set.
I initialize the silo like this:
var clusterConfiguration = new ClusterConfiguration();
clusterConfiguration.Globals.DataConnectionString = "http://localhost:8500";
clusterConfiguration.Globals.DeploymentId = "OrleansPlayground";
clusterConfiguration.Globals.LivenessType = GlobalConfiguration.LivenessProviderType.Custom;
clusterConfiguration.Globals.MembershipTableAssembly = "OrleansConsulUtils";
clusterConfiguration.Globals.ReminderServiceType = GlobalConfiguration.ReminderServiceProviderType.Disabled;
var silohost = new SiloHost("Fred", clusterConfiguration);
silohost.InitializeOrleansSilo();
startup = Task.Factory.StartNew(() =>
{
return silohost.StartOrleansSilo();
});
return true;
And I set my client app up like this:
var config = new ClientConfiguration();
config.CustomGatewayProviderAssemblyName = "OrleansConsulUtils";
config.DataConnectionString = "http://localhost:8500";
config.DeploymentId = "OrleansPlayground";
config.GatewayProvider = ClientConfiguration.GatewayProviderType.Custom;
GrainClient.Initialize(config);
Looking at the code in ConsulUtils I can see that the ProxyPort isn't set (i.e. is 0) when the entry is saved. So I'm assuming I have a problem when initializing the silo - but I can't figure out what it is!
Without digging deep in, does sound like a bug. Please repost on GitHub and we will try to help you.
I am new to websockets.
It is expected to send data(any data) on the send websocket connection using some port(ex:8000) and the localhost should echo the same data to the browser using a different websocket connection through a different port(ex:9000).
I understand websocket supports full duplex communication on a single connection,but the above is the design to implement.
Question 1) Is the above design possible?
Question 2) If yes,how to create two websocket connections(one to send and one to receive) to a single localhost websocket server?
1) Yes.
2) Creating two separated websockets. They will be different objects though.
You could blend both objects in a composite object like this:
var compositeWebSocket = function(urlSend, urlReceive){
var me = {};
var wsSend = new WebSocket(urlSend);
var wsReceive = new WebSocket(urlReceive);
var open = 0;
wsSend.onopen = opening;
wsReceive.onopen = opening;
var opening = function(){
if(open == 2){
if(me.onopen)
me.onopen();
}
else
open++;
};
var closing = funcion(){
try{wsSend.close();}catch(){}
try{wsReceive.close();}catch(){}
if(me.onclose)
me.onclose();
}
me.send = wsSend.send;
wsReceive.onmessage = function(msg){
if(me.onmessage)
me.onmessage(msg);
}
return me;
}
(Whatch out, this code is not tested and it is just an idea)
Looking at the W3 spec on WebSockets, I see
var socket = new WebSocket('ws://game.example.com:12010/updates');
socket.onopen = function () {
setInterval(function() {
if (socket.bufferedAmount == 0)
socket.send(getUpdateData());
}, 50);
};
I understand that the socket services lives on port 12010 at game.example.com, but what is the purpose of the '/updates' resource in the URL? If the service lives at some port, what good will a resource do?
You can expose different logical WebSockets on the same port, using different URI's.
Lets take chat as an example. You could use the URI to determine the particular channel or chat room you want to join.
var socket = new WebSocket('ws://chat.example.com/games');
var socket = new WebSocket('ws://chat.example.com/movies');
var socket = new WebSocket('ws://chat.example.com/websockets');
You can also use query strings. Imagine a stock ticker:
var socket = new WebSocket('ws://www.example.com/ticker?code=MSFT');
var socket = new WebSocket('ws://www.example.com/ticker?code=GOOG');