I want to get the total quantity of the item requested from 5 columns in google sheets so I used a formula but it gives me "Argument must be a range.". I also used another formula but it only counts the total number of the word "stretch film" itself. What formula should I use?
I want to get the total quantity of the item requested from 5 columns in google sheets so I used this formula "=SUMIFS($B10="","",COUNTIF(TransInfo!K1:T,"Stretch Film"))" but it gives me "Argument must be a range.". I also used this formula "=IF($B10="","",COUNTIF(TransInfo!K1:T,"Stretch Film"))" but it only counts the total number of the word "stretch film" itself. What formula should I use?
try:
=SUMPRODUCT(FILTER(L1:T; K1:S="Stretch Film"))
Related
It's been weeks since I've been trying to solve this problem, I tried various formulas for this (ArrayFormula, ABS, SUMPRODUCT, using a negative sign on the cells), but I can't seem to get it right.
The correct way will always be manually subtracting the cells one by one but this will cause too much delay or problem if we have more than 100 rows on the sheets.
=if(D14<(E3-E4-E5-E6-E7-E8-E9-E10-E11-E12-E13),D14,E3-E4-E5-E6-E7-E8-E9-E10-E11-E12-E13)
Here's the link to the sheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fAPQHKupKglBAJpoxrcVqWP343m0P5QOj8zp1FvasEA/edit?usp=sharing
The overall idea for this is that the Total Purchased should be compared to the total sold. The 2201 value on the total sold is retrieved from another transactions sheet and it just totals every sold item, and then starting from E4 (170 in cell value) onwards, it decreases since we just need to know the number of sold items from that certain row.
Thank you very much for taking the time to read this. I'm looking forward to getting help from this as this stresses me for weeks now.
use cumulative function
=arrayformula(mmult(1*(transpose(row(D4:D))<=row(D4:D)),if(D4:D="",0,D4:D)))
and include in your formula in E4 as follows
=arrayformula(if(D4:D<($E$3-(mmult(1*(transpose(row(D4:D))<=row(D4:D)),if(D4:D="",0,D4:D)))),D4:D))
I have a matrix - 1,172 words down column A, then the same 1,172 names across row 1. Then each word is cross-referenced with all the other names to give a similarity score (this is already done).
In another sheet, I want to look up a word, and return all the words with which it has a certain similarity score - in this case, greater than or equal to 0.33. I attach a MWE, in which I give an idea of the answer I am looking for by looking it up manually.
I think it's some sort of reverse lookup. As in, instead of finding the value corresponding to a particular row and a particular column, it's finding the column based on value in the main sheet and row. I'm just really stuck at this point and would massively appreciate some help. Thanks! MWE here
If your words on the second sheet are in the same order then:
=IFERROR(TEXTJOIN(", ",,FILTER(Scores!B$1:W$1,(Scores!B2:W2>=0.33)*((Scores!B2:W2<1)))),"-")
Drag down.
Explanation:
Filter the values from row 1 according to the similarity score condition, using FILTER.
Concatenate the filtered values using TEXTJOIN.
I have a column which contains time, numbers, text, and blank cells.
Question is: How do I just count the cells containing only time values. I don't need the total (sum) of time, just need to know how many cells contain a time value. Using Google Sheets.
Try this =COUNTIF(F12:F22,"<=1.00") put you range instead of F12:F22
I am designing a report in which I filter the data and then add a group. I also add a summary field to show the sum of the cost of items in the group. But The amount of sum is not correct, it shows the sum of all items in the group without considering the criteria to filter the data (It sum the cost of all item). However, in the group I have 5 items and the sum should show the sum of cost for these 5 items not all items. But If I use the running total for the cost, it shows the right amount. How can I solve the problem in using the summary field?
Are you putting the summary field in the group footer? A running total field in CR will come up with different sums depending on where you put it in the report, so you have to be a bit careful.
I have this dataset containing world bilateral trade data for a few years.
I would like to determine which goods were the most exported ones in the timespan considered by the dataset.
The dataset is composed by the following variables:
"year"
"hs2", containing a two-digit number that tells which good is exported
"exp_val", giving the value of the export in a certain year, for that good
"exp_qty", giving the exported quantity of the good in a certain year
Basically, I would like to get the total sum of the quantity exported for a certain good, so an output like
hs2 exp_qty
01 34892
02 54548
... ...
and so forth. Right now, the column "hs2" gives me a very large number of observations and, as you can understand, they repeat themselves multiple times (as the variables vary across both time and country of destination). So, the task would be to have every hs2 number just once, with the correspondent value of "total" exports.
Also (but that would be just a plus, I could just check the numbers by myself) it would be nice to get a result sorted by exp_qty, so to have a ranking of the most exported goods by quantity.
The following might be a start at what you need.
collapse (sum) exp_qty, by(hs2)
gsort -exp_qty
collapse summarizes the data in memory to one observation per value of hs2, summing the values of exp_qty. gsort then sorts the collapsed data by descending value of exp_qty so the first observation will be the largest. See help collapse and help gsort for further details.