anyone knows how to create flow for finding the difference of days and minutes in power automate
how to create flow for finding the difference of days and minutes in power automate
div(sub(ticks(utcNow()),ticks(addDays(utcNow(),-1))),600000000)
div(sub(ticks(utcNow()),ticks(addDays(utcNow(),-1))),864000000000)
div(sub(ticks(utcNow()),ticks(addDays(utcNow(),-1))),36000000000)
Convert ticks into more readable unit
The result of the subtraction should be then converted into a more understandable number. You don’t want to show users the difference in billions. Use the div(…) expression to divide the number by a number representing the desired unit.
Divide by To get
864000000000 days
36000000000 hours
600000000 minutes
10000000 seconds
https://tomriha.com/how-to-calculate-difference-between-two-times-in-power-automate/
Related
I recently did an RNAseq experiment in which I had controls and experiments at 3 different time periods. My samples were distributed as following for a total of 10 samples:
T1_control1, T2_control1, T2_control2, T3_control1,
T1_exp1, T1_exp2, T2_exp1, T2_exp2, T3_exp1, T3_exp2
I did differential expression analysis with DESeq2 and from it I obtained 3 files from each time period T1, T2, and T3 that show the logFold change values from the control to the experimental for each gene. My question is how I can statistically compare the logFold change value for one gene in one period vs another time period. I am not sure what test to use since there is only one logFold change values per each time period for each gene.
Thank you in advance.
I am not sure what test to use since there is only one logFold change values per each time period for each gene.
Since RNA-sequencing is costly (for many purposes), I think most groups ensure their sequencing run is accurate is by combining multiple biological replicates in each group or sequencing deep. An argument could be made that showing only one data point for each gene at each time point is appropriate given that standard protocols were followed.
Although one option is to increase the sample size of each time period by determining fold change between each control-experimental partner. It would be important however to consult the literature and colleagues whether this is appropriate for the specific type of analysis you are doing.
I've been Googling around this problem for hours and haven't found a solution that suits my needs.
I have a large data set with agent activities and the total time in seconds each activity lasts. I'm pulling this together in a matrix, to display agent names on the left and the start date of each week across the top like so:
This is working as intended (I've used a measure to convert the seconds into hours) but I need the average of the displayed weeks as another column, or to replace the Total column.
I've tried solutions involving DAX measures but none are applicable, likely because I'm using a custom column (WeekStart) to roll up my numbers into weeks. Adding more complexity is I have 2 filters on the matrix; one to exclude any weeks older that 5 weeks in the past and another to exclude any future weeks.
In Excel I'd just add another column next to the table, averaging the 5 cells to the left of it. I could add it to the data table with a SUMIFS checking the Activity date is within the week range and dividing the result by 5. I can't do either of these in PowerBI and I'm new to the software so I'm at a loss as to how to do this.
I have a problem that I am having some trouble tackling, I am playing this game and thought it would be fun to make a calculator to calculate the most efficient builds.
Every fleet allows for 30 units, and a fleets power is the sum of every units power combined.
Every unit can give a certain amount of power ranging from 1 to 200. The price of these units is different and can vary from unit to unit, (A 200 power unit costs around 1.5, an a 50 power unit costs around 0.02)
I would like to calculate the cheapest build for a fleet of x amount of power.
At first I though I would get the price of all units, get the average price for 1 power and calculate the most efficient units based of price per power. And this gives me a list sorted from most efficient units, and then I would create a list containing the 30 most efficient PpP (Price per Power) units.
I could then do a check to see if my power of the generated fleet is equal or more than my desired amount, and if not, remove the lest powerful unit, and replace it with the next most efficient bigger one from my list, and repeat until it has enough power in the 30.
The problem is that seeing as the price grows exponentially it means that unit with 1-50 power are always the most efficient.
Does anyone know if there an algorithm that I could use or study?
I want to calculate the cheapest way of achieving a fleet of x amount of power with a maximum of 30 units. without it taking weeks to complete
I have a list of about 30 000 units containing the price and power.
Its a hard problem to explain so apologies if you don't understand anything
EDIT: Sorry I messed up in my description, the price of the units vary, meaning it could be more efficient to get, for example for a 3000 power fleet, maybe a 15 x 150power units and 15x 50power units fleet is better than 30x 100mp fleet. Sorry for the confusion
To improve the efficiency of your above algorithm you can find the unit whose power is the closest to 30 times the desired power without exceeding it. After that you use the same method removing units one by one and replacing it with the next higher unit. Since 30 of the next higher unit will always exceed the power required, this part of the algorithm only needs to run once.
How can I estimate time to read an article like docs.asp.net website
docs.asp.net
At the top of all articles, it says you need xxx minutes to read. I think they are using an algorithm to estimate time
How can I do that!
Thanks in advance
The words read per minute average is about 250-300, once you know this you just need to:
Get the article word count.
Divide this number by 275 (more or less).
Round the result to get a integer number of minutes.
According to a study conducted in 2012, the average reading speed of an adult for text in English is: 228±30 words, 313±38 syllables, and 987±118 characters per minute.
You can therefore calculate an average time to read a particular article by counting one of these factors and dividing by that average speed. Syllables per minute is probably the most accurate, but for computers, words and characters are easier to count.
Study Citation:
Standardized Assessment of Reading Performance: The New International Reading Speed Texts IReST by
Susanne Trauzettel-Klosinski; Klaus Dietz; the IReST Study Group, published in Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science August 2012, Vol.53, 5452-5461
A nice solution here, on how
to get an estimated read time of any article or blog post https://stackoverflow.com/a/63820743/12490386
here's an easy one
Divide your total word count by 200.
You’ll get a decimal number, in this case, 4.69. The first part of your decimal number is your minute. In this case, it’s 4.
Take the second part — the decimal points — and multiply that by 0.60. Those are your seconds. Round up or down as necessary to get a whole second. In this case, 0.69 x 0.60 = 0.414. We’ll round that to 41 seconds.
The result? 938 words = a 4 minute, 41 second read.
I have a sheet where I record my working hours (this is more for me to remind me to stop working than anything else). For every day, I have three possible shifts - early, normal & late, and I have a formula which will sum up any times put into these columns and give me the daily total hours.
To summarise the duration of time spent working in a day, I use the following formula: =(C41-B41)+(E41-D41)+12+(G41-F41) which is:
early end time minus early start time
normal end time minus normal start time PLUS 12 hours
late end time minus late start time
Which gives me output like this:
What I cannot seem to achieve is, the ability to sum the daily totals into something which shows me the total hours worked over 1-week. If I attempt to sum the daily totals together for the example image shown, I get some wild figure such as 1487:25:00 when formatting as 'Duration' or 23:25:00 when formatted as 'Time'!
All my cells where I record the hours worked are formatted as 'Time'
When using arithmetic operations on date values in Google Sheets, it's important to remember that the internal representation of a date is numeric, and understood as the number of days since January 1, 1970.
What follows from that, is that if you want to add 12 hours to a time duration, you should not write "+12" because that will in fact add 12 days. Instead add "+12/24". In other words, try the following formula instead of the one you are using now:
=(C41-B41)+(E41-D41)+(12/24+G41-F41)