When performing a curl with --ntlm, what is happening between the WWW-Authenticate header being sent back, and then then the second NTLM Authorization header being sent to finally return a 200?
Authorization: NTLM xxxxxxxx
< HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized
< WWW-Authenticate: NTLM xxxxxxxx
Authorization: NTLM xxxxxxxxxx
< HTTP/1.1 200 OK
I want to be able to take the first NTLM header (this stays constant with the username/password I believe), and build it into a script, take the returned header, and send the second NTLM one back to authenticate. What I don't understand is how the challenge (WWW-Authenticate header?) is taken in, and then sent back as another NTLM header.
I have tried using the WWW-Auth header as the second NTLM-Auth header, I didnt expect it to work but tried.
NTLM authentication is a multi-step process, which is achieved over HTTP as follows:
Client makes an HTTP request (no authentication data provided).
Server responds with a 401 Unauthorized, and advertises that it supports NTLM authentication via the WWW-Authenticate: NTLM header.
The client generates its first authentication token using InitializeSecurityContext and sends it to the server in the Authorization: NTLM <base64 encoded client token #1> header.
The server takes the client's token and passes it to AcceptSecurityContext, which generates the server's token. The server again responds with 401 Unauthorized, but this time includes its token in the WWW-Authenticate: NTLM <base64 encoded server token> header.
The client takes the server's token, and passes it to InitializeSecurityContext to generate its second token that it sends back to the server in the Authorization: NTLM <base64 encoded client token #2> header.
The server takes the client's second token and passes it to AcceptSecurityContext, which (assuming the authentication is successful) completes the process, and the server returns the normal 200 OK response.
Both InitializeSecurityContext and AcceptSecurityContext return some additional data on the initial call that must be included in the subsequent calls, making the authentication process stateful, so all of the above steps must occur over the same connection to the server.
NTLM is actually a three-request handshake, where the client doesn't send any credentials the first time a resource is requested. This means that the first request is anonymous, even though credentials have been configured for the resource. When Windows authentication is enabled and anonymous authentication is disabled, this anonymous request results in an HTTP 401 status.
The second request will be an NTLM challenge, in which the client resends the original request with an additional "Authorization" header containing NTLM (Type-1 message). The server then sends an NTLM challenge (Type-2 message) back to the client with an HTTP 401 status.
The third request will be the original request that the client sends again by adding a challenge-response (NTLM Type-3 message) to the Authorization header. The server then authenticates the user and returns a response with an HTTP 200 status if successful.
Related
I'm trying to figure out if it is and how possible to initiate a connection with Authorization that avoids getting a 401 back from the server on the initial call.
According to the RFC (https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4559.txt, end of section 4.2), the client should be able to send, with the initial request, an Authorization header containing a token, but for me that doesn't work. I've tried sending the same token (seems to be always the same) that is usually sent as a response to the first 401, but no luck.
Is there something in the configuration that needs to be changed to allow such behavior or do I need a different token?
Is it possible to use digest auth in jmeter.
When server answers 401 with auth header
(etc: WWW_Authenticate :SP Digest realm="SD Digest Authentication Realm", qop="auth", nonce="MTYyNTE2Mjc5MDE4NDo0ZTQ0NWJjM2Y0MWQ4OGFlMzQyODRmMjEzNWViMTYwNQ==")
on the first request from client and then client must resend original request with properly formed auth headers?
I try to use HTTP Authorization Manager with http client 4, but no luck.
Jmeter does not send any auth header and does not repeat original request.
Try removing this / from "Domain" section, I don't think it's applicable for Digest authentication, it's more for NTLM and/or Kerberos. But given server sends proper WWW-Authenticate header even given wrong HTTP Authorization Manager configuration you should be seeing the Authorization request header
Apart from this I cannot reproduce your issue using simple Apache web server with mod_auth_digest
I am sending a HTTPS request which needs a Bearer token. I have added a Header Manager to my HTTP request in JMeter and defined NAMEand VALUE in the Header Manager as Authorization and "Bearer xxxxyxyxyxz" respectively.
The request is running for 21 seconds each time and then its failed with below text
org.apache.http.conn.HttpHostConnectException: Connect to abcd.uat.xyz.com:443 [abcd.uat.xyz.com/11.222.250.10] failed: Connection timed out: connect.
Am I sending the bearer token in right way with Header Manager or is there some other way to send this kind of requests?
Note: Its(The same request and Bearer token) working perfectly in Postman and I am getting the correct response as well.
The issue is resolved after adding Proxy Server details to the request. I have added those in Advanced section of HTTP request.
In Postman, the tool using default system proxy settings, hence working without any issues but when it comes to Jmeter we need to add Proxy Server details explicitly.
Based on the exception it seems, you are trying to access HTTP server with HTTPS request.
Make sure to confirm whether "abcd.uat.xyz.com:443" support https or not..If not simply make your request HTTP by updating Protocol field.
I'm trying to access the Cloudfoundry UAAservice using Ajax.
My POST request to the <uaa-url>/oauth/token triggers a preflight Options request.
Which in Chrome and firefox sends following control header value
Access-Control-Request-Headers:accept, authorization, content-type
It works fine as UAA allows these headers in CORS response.
Issue comes with Safari which includes a new header Origin in the control header as below (for preflight Options request)
Access-Control-Request-Headers:accept, authorization, content-type, origin
In response to above request UAA sends 403 along with HTML body with message
<h1>HTTP Status 403 - Illegal header requested</h1>
I have omitted the irrelevant HTML.
My question is if UAA doesn't support Origin header in the allowed CORS headers, how is Safari ever going to make an Ajax request to the UAA service?
As safari is sending this Origin header in every preflight request. I'm lost here and considering now to make server side request to UAA.
At this point it seems impossible to make an Ajax request to Cloudfoundry UAA instance using Safari browser.
I've used Password grant type to implement custom login form with UAA. For which I'm using the Ajax so that application server doesn't know about the password.
Any suggestions to implement custom login form without sharing password with the server and without using Ajax are also welcome.
have you tried configuring the headers you wish your UAA to accept using
cors:
default:
allowed:
headers:
- accept
- authorization
- content-type
- origin
- authorization
- accept-language
- content-language
Is it OK to return an HTTP 401 status for a response to an AJAX call if you wish to convey that the user is not logged in, even though the login mechanism is form-based and not HTTP based (Basic, Digest, etc.)?
The answer here suggests that 401 should be used:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/6937030/2891365
And this post shows an actual example of someone using 401 for an AJAX response: http://www.bennadel.com/blog/2228-some-thoughts-on-handling-401-unauthorized-errors-with-jquery.htm
However, RFC 2616 for HTTP/1.1 clearly states that a special header is necessary, implying that it can only be used for HTTP authentication.
10.4.2 401 Unauthorized
The request requires user authentication. The response MUST include a WWW-Authenticate header field (section 14.47) containing a challenge applicable to the requested resource.
I guess I can probably send a bogus header like WWW-Authenticate: WebForm and still conform to W3C specs but it feels like it's violating the spirit of the WWW-Authenticate header.
In the end, I cannot seem to find an authoritative source that explicitly states whether HTTP 401 is allowed for AJAX responses. Is there an authoritative source on this that I missed?
I would say it's not ok since 401 is for telling the client to provide http authentication credentials. The proper response would be 403 Forbidden, simply telling the client it's not allowed to access the resource, for whatever reason.