Apparently, I have completely misunderstood its semantics. I thought of something like this:
A client downloads JavaScript code MyCode.js from http://siteA - the origin.
The response header of MyCode.js contains Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteB, which I thought meant that MyCode.js was allowed to make cross-origin references to the site B.
The client triggers some functionality of MyCode.js, which in turn make requests to http://siteB, which should be fine, despite being cross-origin requests.
Well, I am wrong. It does not work like this at all. So, I have read Cross-origin resource sharing and attempted to read Cross-Origin Resource Sharing in w3c recommendation.
One thing is sure - I still do not understand how I am supposed to use this header.
I have full control of both site A and site B. How do I enable the JavaScript code downloaded from the site A to access resources on the site B using this header?
P.S.: I do not want to utilize JSONP.
Access-Control-Allow-Origin is a CORS (cross-origin resource sharing) header.
When Site A tries to fetch content from Site B, Site B can send an Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header to tell the browser that the content of this page is accessible to certain origins. (An origin is a domain, plus a scheme and port number.) By default, Site B's pages are not accessible to any other origin; using the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header opens a door for cross-origin access by specific requesting origins.
For each resource/page that Site B wants to make accessible to Site A, Site B should serve its pages with the response header:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteA.com
Modern browsers will not block cross-domain requests outright. If Site A requests a page from Site B, the browser will actually fetch the requested page on the network level and check if the response headers list Site A as a permitted requester domain. If Site B has not indicated that Site A is allowed to access this page, the browser will trigger the XMLHttpRequest's error event and deny the response data to the requesting JavaScript code.
Non-simple requests
What happens on the network level can be slightly more complex than explained above. If the request is a "non-simple" request, the browser first sends a data-less "preflight" OPTIONS request, to verify that the server will accept the request. A request is non-simple when either (or both):
using an HTTP verb other than GET or POST (e.g. PUT, DELETE)
using non-simple request headers; the only simple requests headers are:
Accept
Accept-Language
Content-Language
Content-Type (this is only simple when its value is application/x-www-form-urlencoded, multipart/form-data, or text/plain)
If the server responds to the OPTIONS preflight with appropriate response headers (Access-Control-Allow-Headers for non-simple headers, Access-Control-Allow-Methods for non-simple verbs) that match the non-simple verb and/or non-simple headers, then the browser sends the actual request.
Supposing that Site A wants to send a PUT request for /somePage, with a non-simple Content-Type value of application/json, the browser would first send a preflight request:
OPTIONS /somePage HTTP/1.1
Origin: http://siteA.com
Access-Control-Request-Method: PUT
Access-Control-Request-Headers: Content-Type
Note that Access-Control-Request-Method and Access-Control-Request-Headers are added by the browser automatically; you do not need to add them. This OPTIONS preflight gets the successful response headers:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteA.com
Access-Control-Allow-Methods: GET, POST, PUT
Access-Control-Allow-Headers: Content-Type
When sending the actual request (after preflight is done), the behavior is identical to how a simple request is handled. In other words, a non-simple request whose preflight is successful is treated the same as a simple request (i.e., the server must still send Access-Control-Allow-Origin again for the actual response).
The browsers sends the actual request:
PUT /somePage HTTP/1.1
Origin: http://siteA.com
Content-Type: application/json
{ "myRequestContent": "JSON is so great" }
And the server sends back an Access-Control-Allow-Origin, just as it would for a simple request:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteA.com
See Understanding XMLHttpRequest over CORS for a little more information about non-simple requests.
Cross-Origin Resource Sharing - CORS (A.K.A. Cross-Domain AJAX request) is an issue that most web developers might encounter, according to Same-Origin-Policy, browsers restrict client JavaScript in a security sandbox, usually JS cannot directly communicate with a remote server from a different domain. In the past developers created many tricky ways to achieve Cross-Domain resource request, most commonly using ways are:
Use Flash/Silverlight or server side as a "proxy" to communicate
with remote.
JSON With Padding (JSONP).
Embeds remote server in an iframe and communicate through fragment or window.name, refer here.
Those tricky ways have more or less some issues, for example JSONP might result in security hole if developers simply "eval" it, and #3 above, although it works, both domains should build strict contract between each other, it neither flexible nor elegant IMHO:)
W3C had introduced Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) as a standard solution to provide a safe, flexible and a recommended standard way to solve this issue.
The Mechanism
From a high level we can simply deem CORS as a contract between client AJAX call from domain A and a page hosted on domain B, a typical Cross-Origin request/response would be:
DomainA AJAX request headers
Host DomainB.com
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0
Accept text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8,application/json
Accept-Language en-us;
Accept-Encoding gzip, deflate
Keep-Alive 115
Origin http://DomainA.com
DomainB response headers
Cache-Control private
Content-Type application/json; charset=utf-8
Access-Control-Allow-Origin DomainA.com
Content-Length 87
Proxy-Connection Keep-Alive
Connection Keep-Alive
The blue parts I marked above were the kernal facts, "Origin" request header "indicates where the cross-origin request or preflight request originates from", the "Access-Control-Allow-Origin" response header indicates this page allows remote request from DomainA (if the value is * indicate allows remote requests from any domain).
As I mentioned above, W3 recommended browser to implement a "preflight request" before submiting the actually Cross-Origin HTTP request, in a nutshell it is an HTTP OPTIONS request:
OPTIONS DomainB.com/foo.aspx HTTP/1.1
If foo.aspx supports OPTIONS HTTP verb, it might return response like below:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2011 15:38:19 GMT
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://DomainA.com
Access-Control-Allow-Methods: POST, GET, OPTIONS, HEAD
Access-Control-Allow-Headers: X-Requested-With
Access-Control-Max-Age: 1728000
Connection: Keep-Alive
Content-Type: application/json
Only if the response contains "Access-Control-Allow-Origin" AND its value is "*" or contain the domain who submitted the CORS request, by satisfying this mandtory condition browser will submit the actual Cross-Domain request, and cache the result in "Preflight-Result-Cache".
I blogged about CORS three years ago: AJAX Cross-Origin HTTP request
According to this Mozilla Developer Network article,
A resource makes a cross-origin HTTP request when it requests a resource from a different domain, or port than the one which the first resource itself serves.
An HTML page served from http://domain-a.com makes an <img> src request for http://domain-b.com/image.jpg.
Many pages on the web today load resources like CSS style sheets, images and scripts from separate domains (thus it should be cool).
Same-Origin Policy
For security reasons, browsers restrict cross-origin HTTP requests initiated from within scripts.
For example, XMLHttpRequest and Fetch follow the same-origin policy.
So, a web application using XMLHttpRequest or Fetch could only make HTTP requests to its own domain.
Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS)
To improve web applications, developers asked browser vendors to allow cross-domain requests.
The Cross-origin resource sharing (CORS) mechanism gives web servers cross-domain access controls, which enable secure cross-domain data transfers.
Modern browsers use CORS in an API container - such as XMLHttpRequest or fetch - to mitigate risks of cross-origin HTTP requests.
How CORS works (Access-Control-Allow-Origin header)
Wikipedia:
The CORS standard describes new HTTP headers which provide browsers and servers a way to request remote URLs only when they have permission.
Although some validation and authorization can be performed by the server, it is generally the browser's responsibility to support these headers and honor the restrictions they impose.
Example
The browser sends the OPTIONS request with an Origin HTTP header.
The value of this header is the domain that served the parent page. When a page from http://www.example.com attempts to access a user's data in service.example.com, the following request header would be sent to service.example.com:
Origin: http://www.example.com
The server at service.example.com may respond with:
An Access-Control-Allow-Origin (ACAO) header in its response indicating which origin sites are allowed.
For example:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://www.example.com
An error page if the server does not allow the cross-origin request
An Access-Control-Allow-Origin (ACAO) header with a wildcard that allows all domains:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
Whenever I start thinking about CORS, my intuition about which site hosts the headers is incorrect, just as you described in your question. For me, it helps to think about the purpose of the same-origin policy.
The purpose of the same-origin policy is to protect you from malicious JavaScript on siteA.com accessing private information you've chosen to share only with siteB.com. Without the same-origin policy, JavaScript written by the authors of siteA.com could have your browser make requests to siteB.com, using your authentication cookies for siteB.com. In this way, siteA.com could steal the secret information you share with siteB.com.
Sometimes you need to work cross domain, which is where CORS comes in. CORS relaxes the same-origin policy for siteB.com, using the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header to list other domains (siteA.com) that are trusted to run JavaScript that can interact with siteB.com.
To understand which domain should serve the CORS headers, consider this. You visit malicious.com, which contains some JavaScript that tries to make a cross domain request to mybank.com. It should be up to mybank.com, not malicious.com, to decide whether or not it sets CORS headers that relax the same-origin policy, allowing the JavaScript from malicious.com to interact with it. If malicous.com could set its own CORS headers allowing its own JavaScript access to mybank.com, this would completely nullify the same-origin policy.
I think the reason for my bad intuition is the point of view I have when developing a site. It's my site, with all my JavaScript. Therefore, it isn't doing anything malicious, and it should be up to me to specify which other sites my JavaScript can interact with. When in fact I should be thinking: Which other sites' JavaScript are trying to interact with my site and should I use CORS to allow them?
From my own experience, it's hard to find a simple explanation why CORS is even a concern.
Once you understand why it's there, the headers and discussion becomes a lot clearer. I'll give it a shot in a few lines.
It's all about cookies. Cookies are stored on a client by their domain.
An example story: On your computer, there's a cookie for yourbank.com. Maybe your session is in there.
Key point: When a client makes a request to the server, it will send the cookies stored under the domain for that request.
You're logged in on your browser to yourbank.com. You request to see all your accounts, and cookies are sent for yourbank.com. yourbank.com receives the pile of cookies and sends back its response (your accounts).
If another client makes a cross origin request to a server, those cookies are sent along, just as before. Ruh roh.
You browse to malicious.com. Malicious makes a bunch of requests to different banks, including yourbank.com.
Since the cookies are validated as expected, the server will authorize the response.
Those cookies get gathered up and sent along - and now, malicious.com has a response from yourbank.
Yikes.
So now, a few questions and answers become apparent:
"Why don't we just block the browser from doing that?" Yep. That's CORS.
"How do we get around it?" Have the server tell the request that CORS is OK.
1. A client downloads javascript code MyCode.js from http://siteA - the origin.
The code that does the downloading - your html script tag or xhr from javascript or whatever - came from, let's say, http://siteZ. And, when the browser requests MyCode.js, it sends an Origin: header saying "Origin: http://siteZ", because it can see that you're requesting to siteA and siteZ != siteA. (You cannot stop or interfere with this.)
2. The response header of MyCode.js contains Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteB, which I thought meant that MyCode.js was allowed to make cross-origin references to the site B.
no. It means, Only siteB is allowed to do this request. So your request for MyCode.js from siteZ gets an error instead, and the browser typically gives you nothing. But if you make your server return A-C-A-O: siteZ instead, you'll get MyCode.js . Or if it sends '*', that'll work, that'll let everybody in. Or if the server always sends the string from the Origin: header... but... for security, if you're afraid of hackers, your server should only allow origins on a shortlist, that are allowed to make those requests.
Then, MyCode.js comes from siteA. When it makes requests to siteB, they are all cross-origin, the browser sends Origin: siteA, and siteB has to take the siteA, recognize it's on the short list of allowed requesters, and send back A-C-A-O: siteA. Only then will the browser let your script get the result of those requests.
Using React and Axios, join a proxy link to the URL and add a header as shown below:
https://cors-anywhere.herokuapp.com/ + Your API URL
Just adding the proxy link will work, but it can also throw an error for No Access again. Hence it is better to add a header as shown below.
axios.get(`https://cors-anywhere.herokuapp.com/[YOUR_API_URL]`,{headers: {'Access-Control-Allow-Origin': '*'}})
.then(response => console.log(response:data);
}
Warning: Not to be used in production
This is just a quick fix. If you're struggling with why you're not able to get a response, you can use this.
But again it's not the best answer for production.
If you are using PHP, try adding the following code at the beginning of the php file:
If you are using localhost, try this:
header("Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *");
If you are using external domains such as server, try this:
header("Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://www.website.com");
I worked with Express.js 4, Node.js 7.4 and Angular, and I had the same problem. This helped me:
a) server side: in file app.js I add headers to all responses, like:
app.use(function(req, res, next) {
res.header('Access-Control-Allow-Origin', req.headers.origin);
res.header("Access-Control-Allow-Headers", "Origin, X-Requested-With, Content-Type, Accept");
next();
});
This must be before all routes.
I saw a lot of added this headers:
res.header("Access-Control-Allow-Headers","*");
res.header('Access-Control-Allow-Credentials', true);
res.header('Access-Control-Allow-Methods', 'GET,PUT,POST,DELETE');
But I don’t need that,
b) client side: in sending by Ajax, you need to add "withCredentials: true," like:
$http({
method: 'POST',
url: 'url',
withCredentials: true,
data : {}
}).then(function(response){
// Code
}, function (response) {
// Code
});
If you want just to test a cross-domain application in which the browser blocks your request, then you can just open your browser in unsafe mode and test your application without changing your code and without making your code unsafe.
From macOS, you can do this from the terminal line:
open -a Google\ Chrome --args --disable-web-security --user-data-dir
In Python, I have been using the Flask-CORS library with great success. It makes dealing with CORS super easy and painless. I added some code from the library's documentation below.
Installing:
pip install -U flask-cors
Simple example that allows CORS for all domains on all routes:
from flask import Flask
from flask_cors import CORS
app = Flask(__name__)
CORS(app)
#app.route("/")
def helloWorld():
return "Hello, cross-origin-world!"
For more specific examples, see the documentation. I have used the simple example above to get around the CORS issue in an Ionic application I am building that has to access a separate flask server.
Simply paste the following code in your web.config file.
Noted that, you have to paste the following code under <system.webServer> tag
<httpProtocol>
<customHeaders>
<add name="Access-Control-Allow-Origin" value="*" />
<add name="Access-Control-Allow-Headers" value="Content-Type" />
<add name="Access-Control-Allow-Methods" value="GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, OPTIONS" />
</customHeaders>
</httpProtocol>
I can't configure it on the back-end server, but with these extensions in the browsers, it works for me:
For Firefox:
CORS Everywhere
For Google Chrome:
Allow CORS: Access-Control-Allow-Origin
Note: CORS works for me with this configuration:
For cross origin sharing, set header: 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin':'*';
Php: header('Access-Control-Allow-Origin':'*');
Node: app.use('Access-Control-Allow-Origin':'*');
This will allow to share content for different domain.
Nginx and Apache
As an addition to apsiller's answer, I would like to add a wiki graph which shows when a request is simple or not (and OPTIONS pre-flight request is send or not)
For a simple request (e.g., hotlinking images), you don't need to change your server configuration files, but you can add headers in the application (hosted on the server, e.g., in PHP) like Melvin Guerrero mentions in his answer - but remember: if you add full CORS headers in your server (configuration) and at same time you allow simple CORS in the application (e.g., PHP), this will not work at all.
And here are configurations for two popular servers:
turn on CORS on Nginx (nginx.conf file)
location ~ ^/index\.php(/|$) {
...
add_header 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' "$http_origin" always; # if you change "$http_origin" to "*" you shoud get same result - allow all domain to CORS (but better change it to your particular domain)
add_header 'Access-Control-Allow-Credentials' 'true' always;
if ($request_method = OPTIONS) {
add_header 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' "$http_origin"; # DO NOT remove THIS LINES (doubled with outside 'if' above)
add_header 'Access-Control-Allow-Credentials' 'true';
add_header 'Access-Control-Max-Age' 1728000; # cache preflight value for 20 days
add_header 'Access-Control-Allow-Methods' 'GET, POST, OPTIONS'; # arbitrary methods
add_header 'Access-Control-Allow-Headers' 'My-First-Header,My-Second-Header,Authorization,Content-Type,Accept,Origin'; # arbitrary headers
add_header 'Content-Length' 0;
add_header 'Content-Type' 'text/plain charset=UTF-8';
return 204;
}
}
turn on CORS on Apache (.htaccess file)
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# | Cross-domain Ajax requests |
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Enable cross-origin Ajax requests.
# http://code.google.com/p/html5security/wiki/CrossOriginRequestSecurity
# http://enable-cors.org/
# change * (allow any domain) below to your domain
Header set Access-Control-Allow-Origin "*"
Header always set Access-Control-Allow-Methods "POST, GET, OPTIONS, DELETE, PUT"
Header always set Access-Control-Allow-Headers "My-First-Header,My-Second-Header,Authorization, content-type, csrf-token"
Header always set Access-Control-Allow-Credentials "true"
The Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header indicates whether the
response can be shared with requesting code from the given origin.
Header type Response header
-------------------------------------------
Forbidden header name no
A response that tells the browser to allow code from any origin to
access a resource will include the following:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
For more information, visit Access-Control-Allow-Origin...
For .NET Core 3.1 API With Angular
Startup.cs : Add CORS
//SERVICES
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services){
//CORS (Cross Origin Resource Sharing)
//=====================================
services.AddCors();
}
//MIDDLEWARES
public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app, IWebHostEnvironment env)
{
app.UseRouting();
//ORDER: CORS -> Authentication -> Authorization)
//CORS (Cross Origin Resource Sharing)
//=====================================
app.UseCors(x=>x.AllowAnyHeader().AllowAnyMethod().WithOrigins("http://localhost:4200"));
app.UseHttpsRedirection();
}
}
Controller : Enable CORS For Authorized Controller
//Authorize all methods inside this controller
[Authorize]
[EnableCors()]
public class UsersController : ControllerBase
{
//ActionMethods
}
Note: Only a temporary solution for testing
For those who can't control the backend for Options 405 Method Not Allowed, here is a workaround for theChrome browser.
Execute in the command line:
"C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe" --disable-web-security --user-data-dir="path_to_profile"
Example:
"C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe" --disable-web-security --user-data-dir="C:\Users\vital\AppData\Local\Google\Chrome\User Data\Profile 2"
Most CORS issues are because you are trying to request via client side ajax from a react, angular, jquery apps that are frontend basic libs.
You must request from a backend application.
You are trying to request from a frontend API, but the API you are trying to consume is expecting this request to be made from a backend application and it will never accept client side requests.
Related
I am wondering if this header is added by Axios or if it is added by the browser... to see if I can disable it in the client or must add support for it in the server.
I added a custom token x-access-token and I'm having CORS issues.
Adding to Jon's comment: The Access-Control-Request-Headers header is added by the browser: When the client application desires to make a request (via fetch or XMLHttpRequest) that includes a "non-standard" header like x-access-token, the browser first makes a preflight request with a header like Access-Control-Request-Headers: x-access-token, and only if the preflight response contains Access-Control-Allow-Headers: x-access-token will it make the desired request.
It is your server's duty to produce the correct preflight response.
I have receive the following response when trying to access an API via an ajax request in Chrome:
"Failed to load http://localhost:1880/api_resource: Response to preflight request doesn't pass access control check: No 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header is present on the requested resource. Origin http://localhost:3000 is therefore not allowed access."
As you can see from the message, both client and API are running locally.
I understand that this situation relates to a CORS cross origin request. I see that there are similar questions about this on stack overflow, but from those answers I do not understand what the message is telling me and where it comes from.
Specifically I understand that the response header "Access-Control-Allow-Origin" must be set (typically to '*') to allow access to the API from a different domain to the one on which the API is being served. But the message seems to relate to the request and not the response, and as far as I am aware, no request ever reaches the API.
What is a preflight request and how is it failing?
As I now understand it, modern browsers will issue a 'preflight' request before the actual cross origin request. This preflight request uses the 'OPTIONS' HTTP verb along with the CORS headers Access-Control-Request-Method and Access-Control-Request-Headers to which it expects to see a response with valid Access-Control-Allow-Origin in the header that indicates that the server understands the CORS protocol and will allow the actual (GET/POST/PUT) request.
The message "Response to preflight request doesn't pass access control check" means that the browser did not see a valid "Access-Control-Allow-Origin" header in the Options response.
In my case this was because the server (implementing a REST API) was set up to respond correctly to PUT and POST requests but not setup to respond to OPTIONS requests with the CORS headers.
in my case the problem was for my website address, i'm calling all apis from the same server but i got this error.
my website address is sateh.ir
so im my ajax request i set the url: http://sateh.ir/api/...
after getting this error and working on it for some hours, i got that i had to set ajax url to: http://www.sateh.ir/api/...
i dont know why my website cant understand that i'm calling api from the same server if i dont put 'www', but that was my problem at all.
I have a server-side API on the domain api.example.com
User is visiting www.website.com where a script makes an XmlHttpRequest to api.example.com and gets a response with a cookie.
It appears the API's response cookie is not honored by the HTTP agent.
I'm aware of the non-cross-domain-leaking-cookie policy, but I thought the domain here would be api.example.com. Seems I guessed wrong.
Is there some other way that my API on api.example.com could remember user data from one site to another? If not, how could services like Criteo and other retargeting sites work, from this point of view?
Make sure your API set:
Access-Control-Allow-Credentials header to true in possible preflight response and regular response,
Access-Control-Allow-Origin header to value of the origin from the actual request,
and client sets XMLHttpRequest.withCredentials to true.
I am new to Java SOAP web services. Recently I have created a web service using the JAX-WS specification. This is deployed in the WebLogic server I am using in my machine. Now when I want to invoke the web service from the web application written in JavaScript remote machine on another server, it giving me the following error.
I have also browsed for some other similar kind of posts like this
I am sending the request using JavaScript and SoapClient.js Library.
My invocation code is:
SOAPClient.invoke("http://inhydkvaranasi1:7001/TodoWS/TodoListService",
"getTodos", p1, true, function(data) {
$("#todolist").html('');
if (Object.keys(data).length < 1) {
$("#todolist").html(
"<h4>No Todos Available right now!</h4>");
} else {
Object.keys(data).forEach(
function(key) {
$("#todolist").append(
"<li>" + data[key]["task1"]
+ "(Priority "
+ data[key]["id0"]
+ ") </p>");
});
}
});
The request sent by the XMLHttpRequest() object did not get a response header as Access-Control-Allow-Origin in the XML response.
How could I solve this problem? So that my web service can be used publicly by any user from different domain on different server.
Look at the CORS HTTP headers (from codingpedia.org):
Client side HTTP request headers. These are headers that clients may use when issuing HTTP requests in order to make use of the cross-sharing feature:
Origin: URI indicating the server from which the request initiated. It does not include any path information, but only the
server name
Access-Control-Request-Headers: used when issuing a preflight request to let the server know what HTTP headers will be used when the
actual request is made
Access-Control-Request-Method: used when issuing a preflight request to let the server know what HTTP method will be used when the
actual request is made
Server side HTTP response headers. These are the HTTP headers that the server sends back for access control requests:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: specifies the authorized domains to make cross-domain request (you should include the domains of your
clients or “*” if you want the resource public and available to
everyone – the latter is not an option if credentials are allowed
during CORS requests)
Access-Control-Expose-Headers: lets a server white list headers that browsers are allowed to access
Access-Control-Max-Age: indicates how long the results of a preflight request can be cached.
Access-Control-Allow-Credentials: indicates if the server allows credentials during CORS requests
Access-Control-Allow-Methods:
indicates the methods allowed when accessing the resource
Access-Control-Allow-Headers: used in response to a preflight request to indicate which HTTP headers can be used when making the
actual request
In my ng-resource files, I enable the ajax header:
var app = angular.module('custom_resource', ['ngResource'])
app.config(['$httpProvider', function($httpProvider) {
//enable XMLHttpRequest, to indicate it's ajax request
//Note: this disables CORS
$httpProvider.defaults.headers.common["X-Requested-With"] = 'XMLHttpRequest';
}])
app.factory('Article', ['$resource', function($resource) {
return $resource('/article/api/:articleId', {articleId: '#_id'}, {
update: {method: 'PUT'},
query: {method: 'GET', isArray: true}
})
}])
So that I can separate ajax and non-ajax request and response accordingly (to send json data like res.json(data), or to send the entire html page like res.render('a.html')
for example, in my error handler, I need to decide to render error.html page or to just send a error message:
exports.finalHandler = function(err, req, res, next) {
res.status(err.status || 500)
var errorMessage = helper.isProduction() ? '' : (err.message || 'unknown error')
if (req.xhr) {
res.json({message: errorMessage})
}
else {
res.render(dir.error + '/error_page.ejs')
}
}
But now I need to do CORS request to other sites. Is it possible to do CORS request while keeping the ajax header? or other ways I can identify ajax and non-ajax request from server?
In case my question is not clear, heres a relevant article about angular and CORS
http://better-inter.net/enabling-cors-in-angular-js/
Basically, we need to delete xhr header to enable cors for other server, but I need the header for my own server
EDIT 2:
today I tried integrating google map and I got this error:
XMLHttpRequest cannot load http://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/geocode/json?address=Singapore&sensor=false. Request header field X-Requested-With is not allowed by Access-Control-Allow-Headers.
Setting custom headers on XHR requests triggers a preflight request.
So, it doesn't disable CORS but your server is most likely not handling the preflight request.
Inspired from this post: https://remysharp.com/2011/04/21/getting-cors-working
The solution should be to use the cors module and add the following to your node.js code before your routes:
var corsOptions = {
origin: true,
methods: ['GET', 'PUT', 'POST'],
allowedHeaders: ['X-Requested-With','Content-Type', 'Authorization']
};
app.options('*', cors(corsOptions)); //You may also be just fine with the default options
You can read more at: https://github.com/expressjs/cors
you may try to use cors package
First, to address you primary concern is it possible to do CORS request while keeping the ajax header?: the answer is YES, provided the sites you are accessing allow requests from you or any other external clients at all.
You wrote:
//Note: this disables CORS
$httpProvider.defaults.headers.common["X-Requested-With"] = 'XMLHttpRequest';
But I don't understand what you mean by, it "disables CORS". The X-Requested-With header is not a standard header, and the known effect of adding a non-standard header to a request (made from a browser) is the triggering of a pre-flight request [3].
If the other sites you are interested in would set their servers to refuse processing of requests that do not originate from their own domain, then whether you set that header or not, your request should fail.
It seems everything is working fine for you, for requests sent to you own server. Otherwise you can solve the problem by appending the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header in your server responses as follows:
if you need to allow requests from specific domains
response.set("Access-Control-Allow-Origin", "one-host-domain, your-host-domain, some-other-host-domain"); // second argument is a comma-delimited list of allowed domains
(It may be better for you to actually check the request object for the origin, and if it's permitted based on presence in a pre-determined list, then send back the exact same origin).
If you need to permit all requests regardless of its origin
response.set("Access-Control-Allow-Origin", "*");
That should do, and I hope it clears your doubts for you.
More info on handling CORS when using AJAX: 0, 1 & 2.
EDIT
Following exchanges in the comment, I add the following points to support this answer further.
As it is today, the only side that needs disabling/enabling CORS in the client-server system is the server. All modern browsers allow cross origin requests by default and you don't need to do anything additional to support that capability. I understood that you're adding a custom header to distinguish AJAX requests from the rest?? AFAIK, that header changes nothing about how requests are made by browsers.
Here is how all cross-origin requests are handled by browsers today: for all request methods (but usually with the exception of GET), browsers send a pre-flight request with the OPTION method. If the destination server allows it, the actual request is then sent, otherwise the request fails. In the case where the servers, responds with a refusal there's nothing you nor whatever library you use can do about it. This is the fact from my own experience.
There are 3 solutions that come to my mind:
1. Ask site's admin to enable x-requested-with header in CORS.
2. Use proxy server.
3. Send request without x-requested-with header.
This article should make it clear how CORS works and how to make CORS requests.
Particularly "Simple requests" section and "Access-Control" section, especially access-control-allow-headers description is important in this case.
As it says: for simple requests access-control-allow-origin is enough. However if the request includes custom header (a header which is not included by default, such as x-requested-with header), the preflight request is triggered, and server's response to this request should enable this custom header in access-control-allow-headers by setting its value to either "*" or to the name of a custom header (x-requested-with).
Hope it makes it a little bit clearer.