I am trying to increase the size of the icons in JSTree to anything above the tiny 32px. I've been trawling the internet for what seems like days to try and find anything. In the themes folder I can see an image for 40px and in the documentation it says if I set it to "responsive" it should use the 40px style but I just can't get it to work regardless of what I try. Any ideas?
$('#libraryTreeview').jstree({
"core": {
},
'data': [
{ "id": "ajson1", "parent": "#", "text": "Simple root node", "type": "file" },
{ "id": "ajson2", "parent": "#", "text": "Root node 2" },
{ "id": "ajson3", "parent": "ajson2", "text": "Child 1" },
{ "id": "ajson4", "parent": "ajson2", "text": "Child 2", "type": "file" },
]
},
"themes": {
variant: 'responsive',
dots: false
},
"types": {
"folder": {
"icon": "WebsiteImages/LibraryIcons/Folder48.png"
},
"file": {
"icon": "WebsiteImages/LibraryIcons/Image48.png"
}
},
"plugins": ["types","themes","dnd","wholerow"]
})
Bonus points if anyone has a stylesheet already done that uses 48px or 64px!!!!
Related
Is there any way to create a new task within a Planner (Task) tab within a channel by using webhooks?
Either directly or having a button on the incoming message that then creates the task once the end user presses it?
I'm new to webhooks but having a look on Google, Power Automate is a way of doing it but not sure we have access to that.
I think I went down the wrong rabbit hole of task modules as I want to use what's already configured within the Planner tab and not create something bespoke. The button also doesn't work, comes up with an error message saying "This card action is disabled because it is not supported for Connectors". But this is what I have at the moment:
{
"type":"message",
"attachments":[
{
"contentType":"application/vnd.microsoft.card.adaptive",
"contentUrl":null,
"content":{
"$schema":"http://adaptivecards.io/schemas/adaptive-card.json",
"type":"AdaptiveCard",
"version":"1.2",
"body":[
{
"type": "Container",
"id": "066de76b-17da-e6f7-8ab3-81d36d8a6162",
"padding": "None",
"items": [
{
"type": "FactSet",
"id": "10eebecd-851c-2080-24f4-9b6044821d90",
"facts": [
{
"title": "**ID**",
"value": "EXAMPLE ID"
},
{
"title": "**Name**",
"value": "EXAMPLE NAME"
}
]
}
]
},
{
"type": "Container",
"id": "879303cd-81de-618a-8e99-e66be9f22ac1",
"padding": "None",
"items": [
{
"type": "TextBlock",
"id": "0833d313-657b-b587-d4d3-f4a961e6434a",
"text": "EXAMPLE ERROR MESSAGE.",
"wrap": true
},
{
"type": "Container",
"id": "de1d9a46-b8d4-443a-5afc-8843c445cf7b",
"padding": "None",
"items": [
{
"type": "ActionSet",
"id": "3b0c8763-dba8-3d88-98f5-7189ced1fe60",
"actions": [
{
"type": "Action.Submit",
"id": "btnCreateTask",
"title": "Create Task",
"card": {
"type": "AdaptiveCard",
"padding": "None",
"$schema": "http://adaptivecards.io/schemas/adaptive-card.json"
}
}
]
}
]
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
Thanks in advance for any help/suggestions
Due to a (somehow) special requirement to store data alongside a FHIR resource, I am looking for the cleanest way to extend it to maintain such extra data, which is basically dynamic key-value lists.
On the one hand I have something like the following, with 0..* sets of key-value, that I have tried to store nesting three extensions (adjusting the context by level) being the last a single limitation to the accepted types (string/integer), although it does not allow me to repeat ids, anyway I am getting around it using prefixes XD.
"n-lists-of-key-value": [
{
"list1-key1": "list1-value1",
"list1-key2": "list1-value1",
"list1-key3": "list1-value1"
},
{
"list2-key1": "list2-value1",
"list2-key2": "list2-value2"
}
]
becomes:
···,
"extension": [ {
"id": "n-lists-of-key-value",
"url": "http://x.org/fhir/Extension/NListOfKeyValueExtension",
"extension": [ {
"id": "list_1",
"url": "http://x.org/fhir/Extension/ListKeyValueExtension,
"extension": [ {
"id": "list1-key1",
"url": "http://x.org/fhir/Extension/KeyValueExtension,
"valueString": "list1-value1"
}, {
"id": "list1-key2",
"url": "http://x.org/fhir/Extension/KeyValueExtension,
"valueString": "list1-value1"
}, {
"id": "list1-key3",
"url": "http://x.org/fhir/Extension/KeyValueExtension,
"valueString": "list1-value1"
} ]
}, {
"id": "list_2",
"url": "http://x.org/fhir/Extension/ListKeyValueExtension,
"extension": [ {
"id": "list2-key1",
"url": "http://x.org/fhir/Extension/KeyValueExtension,
"valueString": "list2-value1"
}, {
"id": "list2-key2",
"url": "http://x.org/fhir/Extension/KeyValueExtension,
"valueString": "list2-value2"
} ]
} ]
} ],
But on the other hand I have this, which is what I find most difficult to model, because trying to reuse the extension definitions I run into (conceptual?) difficulties with slicing and the use of the discriminators, failing to get past the error "Element matches more than one slice".
"my-3-fixed-named-sets": {
"fixed-named-set1": {
"list1-key1": "list1-value1",
"list1-key2": "list1-value2",
"list1-key3": "list1-value3"
},
"fixed-named-set2": {
"list2-key1": "list2-value1",
"list2-key2": "list2-value2"
},
"fixed-named-set3": {
"list2-key1": "list2-value1",
"list2-key2": "list2-value2"
}
}
becomes:
···,
"extension": [ {
"id": "my-3-fixed-named-sets",
"url": "http://x.org/fhir/Extension/NListOfKeyValueExtension",
"extension": [ {
"id": "fixed-named-set1",
"url": "http://x.org/fhir/Extension/ListKeyValueExtension,
"extension": [ {
"id": "list1-key1",
"url": "http://x.org/fhir/Extension/KeyValueExtension,
"valueString": "list1-value1"
}, {
"id": "list1-key2",
"url": "http://x.org/fhir/Extension/KeyValueExtension,
"valueString": "list1-value2"
}, {
"id": "list1-key3",
"url": "http://x.org/fhir/Extension/KeyValueExtension,
"valueString": "list1-value3"
} ]
}, {
"id": "fixed-named-set2",
"url": "http://x.org/fhir/Extension/ListKeyValueExtension,
"extension": [ {
"id": "list2-key1",
"url": "http://x.org/fhir/Extension/KeyValueExtension,
"valueString": "list2-value1"
}, {
"id": "list2-key2",
"url": "http://x.org/fhir/Extension/KeyValueExtension,
"valueString": "list2-value2"
} ],
}, {
"id": "fixed-named-set3",
"url": "http://x.org/fhir/Extension/ListKeyValueExtension,
"extension": [ {
"id": "list2-key1",
"url": "http://x.org/fhir/Extension/KeyValueExtension,
"valueString": "list2-value1"
}, {
"id": "list2-key3",
"url": "http://x.org/fhir/Extension/KeyValueExtension,
"valueString": "list2-value3"
} ]
} ]
} ],
I am aware that by indiscriminately including new extensions with different names/urls, I can end up ingesting all the data, but I suspect that there is a much cleaner way and that I am failing in , probably, the way to include an extra condition into the discriminator (https://hl7.org/fhir/profiling.html#slicing), so that I could point to the proper slide? or de fact of extending extensions or extending value[x] slices?
"discriminator": [
{
"type": "value",
"path": "url"
},
{ "???": "??Extension.value.slideName??
···
Then my specific question would be... can I slice the value[x] of the extension of a specific profile, and which in turn make them extensions? this lasy is to get having n key value lists
Any comment is very welcome :)
I have a payload for Claim.
I want to add an additional field LOB (Line of business) using extension, and POST it to FHIR Server, and then search the resource using that field like:
GET: http://fhir_server/Claim?lob=value
In the payload I have added the extension block:
{
"resourceType": "Claim",
"status": "active",
"extension" : [{
"url" : "<i entered some random url>",
"valueString" : "MAPD"
}],
"identifier": [{
"value": "TEST"
}],
"type": {
"coding": [{
"system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/claim-type",
"code": "institutional"
}]
},
"use": "claim",
"patient": {
"reference": "f8d8477c-1ef4-4878-abed-51e514bfd91f",
"display": "John_Smith"
},
"billablePeriod": {
"start": "1957-04-12T21:08:35+05:30",
"end": "1957-04-12T21:23:35+05:30"
},
"created": "1957-04-12T21:23:35+05:30",
"provider": {
"reference": "urn:uuid:Organization",
"display": "PCP79032"
},
"priority": {
"coding": [{
"system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/processpriority",
"code": "normal"
}]
},
"facility": {
"reference": "Location",
"display": "PCP79032"
},
"diagnosis": [{
"sequence": 1,
"diagnosisReference": {
"reference": "0316a0c4-0e46-e3fa-a7bf-9e4f3b9c9e92"
}
}, {
"sequence": 2,
"diagnosisReference": {
"reference": "932432b0-ac67-0f7a-1382-26c48050c62f"
}
}],
"insurance": [{
"sequence": 1,
"focal": true,
"coverage": {
"display": "Blue Cross Blue Shield"
}
}],
"item": [{
"sequence": 1,
"productOrService": {
"coding": [{
"system": "http://snomed.info/sct",
"code": "162673000",
"display": "General examination of patient (procedure)"
}],
"text": "General examination of patient (procedure)"
},
"encounter": [{
"reference": "67062d00-2531-3ebd-8558-1de2fd3e5aab"
}]
}, {
"sequence": 2,
"diagnosisSequence": [1],
"productOrService": {
"coding": [{
"system": "http://snomed.info/sct",
"code": "713458007",
"display": "Lack of access to transportation (finding)"
}],
"text": "Lack of access to transportation (finding)"
}
}, {
"sequence": 3,
"diagnosisSequence": [2],
"productOrService": {
"coding": [{
"system": "http://snomed.info/sct",
"code": "73595000",
"display": "Stress (finding)"
}],
"text": "Stress (finding)"
}
}],
"total": {
"value": 786.3299999999999,
"currency": "USD"
}
}
and created a SearchParameter using POST:
{
"resourceType" : "SearchParameter",
"id": "21761828-b929-416a-8813-d3646cf288f4",
"name": "lob",
"status": "active",
"url" : "https://fhir_server/StructureDefinition/f971fc4998167948838f8a8831ea914c",
"description": "Returns a Claim with extension.valueString matching the specified one in request.",
"code" : "lob",
"base" : [ "Claim" ],
"type" : "string",
"expression": "Claim.extension.where(url ='https://fhir_server/StructureDefinition/f971fc4998167948838f8a8831ea914c').value.string"
}
but while fetching the result (GET: https://fhirserver/Claim?lob=MAPD), I am getting the full dataset instead of the filtered result.
I also did a $reindex on the /Claim/<resource_id>/$reindex, but its not listing the field lob.
Am I missing something ?
Servers need to be configured to support new search parameters - you can't search by arbitrary elements, only by specific SearchParameters the server supports. That's true for both searching on extensions as well as core elements. You'll have to work with the owner of the server to support your desired search capability. Did you try posting on http://chat.fhir.org to find out if there was a non-extension mechanism to represent "line of business" on a Claim?
I have an array object like this:
{
"Items":[
{
"ShortName":"Product short name",
"Image":"https://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/cfperron/cats/images/cat8.jpg",
"ManufacturerName":"MMM",
"CatalogName":"cats"
},
{
"ShortName":"Product2 short name",
"Image":"https://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/cfperron/cats/images/cat7.jpg",
"ManufacturerName":"SSS",
"CatalogName":"Dogs"
}
]
}
how to get Images in ImageSet dynamically in adaptive cards? I was able to get rest of the values in FactSet. But stuck with images.
Ok I figured it out.
{
"type": "AdaptiveCard",
"body": [
{
"type": "TextBlock",
"size": "medium",
"weight": "bolder",
"text": "Search Results"
},
{
"type": "Container",
"items": [
{
"type": "ImageSet",
"imageSize": "medium",
"images": [
{
"type": "Image",
"url": "${Image}",
"size": "Medium"
}
]
},
{
"type": "FactSet",
"facts": [
{
"title": "Short Name",
"value": "${ShortName}"
},
{
"title": "Supplier Name",
"value": "${SupplierName} "
},
{
"title": "Price ",
"value": "${PriceAmount} "
}
]
}
],
"$data": "${$root['Items']}"
}
],
"$schema": "http://adaptivecards.io/schemas/adaptive-card.json",
"version": "1.2"
}
But next issue I am facing is if image url is empty, it throws an error "Adaptive Card Rendered error:
{
"message": "Cannot read property 'style' of null"
}"
How can we give a null check inside adaptive card for Image property?
How do I search for a person with BOTH given names I provide?
I have the following 2 patients who are "close". Everything (in the Human Name area) is the same except one of the GivenNames are the same.
Note "Apple" vs "Banana".
{
"resourceType": "Bundle",
"id": "269caf66-0ccc-43e7-b9a5-f16f84db0149",
"meta": {
"lastUpdated": "2019-11-20T19:30:26.858917+00:00"
},
"type": "searchset",
"link": [
{
"relation": "self",
"url": "https://localhost:44348/Patient?given=Jingerheimer"
}
],
"entry": [
{
"fullUrl": "https://localhost:44348/Patient/504f6bd3-e9b4-4846-8948-97bf09c70722",
"resource": {
"resourceType": "Patient",
"id": "504f6bd3-e9b4-4846-8948-97bf09c70722",
"meta": {
"versionId": "1",
"lastUpdated": "2019-11-20T19:26:11.005+00:00"
},
"identifier": [
{
"system": "ssn",
"value": "111-11-1111"
},
{
"system": "uuid",
"value": "da55d068e0784b359fa97498a11543c5"
}
],
"name": [
{
"family": "Smith",
"given": [
"John",
"Apple",
"Jingerheimer"
]
}
]
},
"search": {
"mode": "match"
}
},
{
"fullUrl": "https://localhost:44348/Patient/10054ce9-6141-4eca-bc5b-0978f8c8afcb",
"resource": {
"resourceType": "Patient",
"id": "10054ce9-6141-4eca-bc5b-0978f8c8afcb",
"meta": {
"versionId": "1",
"lastUpdated": "2019-11-20T19:26:48.962+00:00"
},
"identifier": [
{
"system": "ssn",
"value": "222-22-2222"
},
{
"system": "uuid",
"value": "52d09f9436d44591816fd229dd139523"
}
],
"name": [
{
"family": "Smith",
"given": [
"John",
"Banana",
"Jingerheimer"
]
}
]
},
"search": {
"mode": "match"
}
}
]
}
One has GivenNames that include "Apple". The other includes GivenNames that include "Banana".
This search works fine:
https://localhost:44348/Patient/?given=Jingerheimer
What I have tried is:
https://localhost:44348/Patient/?given=Jingerheimer&given=Apple
but that gives me no results.
Note, omitting "given=Jingerheimer" is not an option....that filters a bunch of others.
I'm trying to get
"Has BOTH of the given names I provide"
Your syntax is correct, so I think the server does not handle the search correctly. Can you check the self link for your second search to see if it reflects the search you performed? Does the result Bundle have an OperationOutcome detailing something went wrong? If all that seems okay, you'll need to check your server's code.