I am currently working on an ePubv3 book and have run into a problem. I'm using Sigil as the IDE. My goal is to allow the reader to type in the page number that they would like to jump to. Here is my code:
<head>
<title>testing</title>
<script>
function goToPage() {
var pageNumber = document.getElementById('page-number').value;
</script>
</head>
<body>
<p> </p>
<form method="post" onsubmit="goToPage" action="#">
<label for="page-number">Enter page number:</label>
<input type="text" id="page-number" name="page-number"><BR>
<p class="submit">
<input type="submit" value="Go to page"></input>
</p>
</form>
</body>
</html>
I have tried a few different ways. With and without the "class" option, changing the javascript. But haven't been able to get it to work.
Would someone please tell me what I am doing wrong?
Thank you
The goal is to allow the reader to type in a number to go to that page. An example being that they want to go to page 33 (from say page 2). They would just type in 33 in the input box and go to that page.
Related
I am using ckeditor in a web application, when I added the ckeditor.replace code in the html template I get an error " Uncaught TypeError: Cannot call method 'getEditor' of undefined ". On the same page if I endter CKEDITOR.replace('id_taskDetails'); in the console I see all the buttons.
BTW, I get the alert.
I tried the solution from here: Inline CKEditor with toolbar on generated code
This stops the error but still no toolbar.
What am I missing?
<script>
alert('foo');
CKEDITOR.replace('id_taskDetails');
</script>
<div id="content">
<form action="/createTask/Test1/" enctype="multipart/form-data" method="post" class="basic-grey">
<p><label for="id_taskName">Task Name:</label> <input id="id_taskName" maxlength="64" name="taskName" type="text" /></p>
<p><label for="id_taskDetails">Details:</label> <textarea cols="60" id="id_taskDetails" name="taskDetails" rows="40">
</textarea></p>
<input type="submit" class="button" name="save" value="Next">
</form>
Looks like I need to post a question on StackOverflow before I get it right.
I used the jquery load function to make sure the page completely loaded before calling the ckeditor replace call and it works fine now.
<script>
$(window).load(function () {
CKEDITOR.replace('id_taskDetails');
});
</script>
CKEDITOR.replace must be executed when the element which you try to replace exists, so after it.
<p><label for="id_taskDetails">Details:</label> <textarea cols="60" id="id_taskDetails" name="taskDetails" rows="40">
</textarea></p>
<script>
CKEDITOR.replace('id_taskDetails');
</script>
I am working on one website where I want to integrate Magento default search two times on a page. I have two search fields and want to search from two stores. Is that possible ?
I can do that for one store and default Magento also support one store at a time. If someone suggest some hints or guidelines it will be appreciated.
you try the blog file using below code...
<?php
echo $this->getLayout()->createBlock('core/template')->setTemplate('catalogsearch/form.mini.phtml')->toHtml() ?>
?>
You could attempt to change the store view using a querystring parameter in the search action. Replace YOUR_STORE below with the store view code you're wanting to search. This will take you to the search results of the other store.
<form id="search_mini_form" action="/index.php/catalogsearch/result/?___store=YOUR_STORE" method="get">
<div class="form-search">
<label for="search">Search:</label>
<input id="search" type="text" name="q" value="" class="input-text" maxlength="128" autocomplete="off">
<button type="submit" title="Search" class="button"><span><span>Search</span></span></button>
<div id="search_autocomplete" class="search-autocomplete" style="display: none;"></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
//<![CDATA[
var searchForm = new Varien.searchForm('search_mini_form', 'search', 'Search entire store here...');
searchForm.initAutocomplete('/index.php/catalogsearch/ajax/suggest/', 'search_autocomplete');
//]]>
</script>
</div>
</form>
If you wanted to integrate both sets of search results into one search results page then that would require some additional coding.
I think this may be a bug in Jquery Mobile, but it could also be user error (mine).
For a jquery mobile page, I am manually calling $(..).trigger("create") after loading in some html asynchronously. I am finding an odd - to me anyway - behaviour, which is that <input>s of type text on the loaded html are not enhanced to have JQM's styling, whereas <input>s that are of type button are.
Here's a stripped-down version that replicates the problem. Basically, a page loads and injects foo.html. Part of foo.html is a placeholder div that is subsequently loaded and injected with bar.html. bar.html contains a link that opens a popup. When it's clicked and the popup opens, buttons are styled correctly; inputs are not.
Note: I call trigger("create") on the parent of the injected content.
Further note: calling trigger("create") on the grandparent of where bar.html is injected makes everything be styled correctly, including inputs on the popup. See below for code.
in the body of my basic html page:
<div data-role="page" id="grandparent" data-theme="a">
<h3>A very basic page</h3>
</div>
the script in that page's head:
<script type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function() {
var path = "pathToFiles/";
$("#grandparent").load(path + "foo.html", null, function() {
$("#grandparent").trigger("create");
//now load bar
$("#bar_placeholder").load(path + "bar.html", null, function() {
/*this does NOT enhance text <input> on popup*/
$("#bar_placeholder").trigger("create");
/*this DOES enhance text <input> on popup*/
//$("#grandparent").trigger("create");
});
});
});
</script>
here is foo.html
<div data-role="content" id="foo">
<h3>Foo before placeholder...</h3>
<div id="bar_placeholder" data-role="content"></div>
<h3>...foo after placeholder</h3>
<label for="foo_input" class="ui-hidden-accessible">foo input IS enhanced:</label>
<input id="foo_input" value="" placeholder="i AM enhanced" data-theme="a" type="text" />
<input type="button" id="foo_button" value="Foo Button"/>
</div>
and here is bar.html:
bar popup button
<div data-role="popup" id="popupLogin" data-theme="a" class="ui-corner-all">
<h3>Bar header</h3>
<label for="bar_input" class="ui-hidden-accessible">bar text input NOT enhanced</label>
<input name="bar_input" id="bar_input" placeholder="i am NOT enhanced" data-theme="a" type="text"/>
<input type="button" data-theme="a" value="bar button"/>
</div>
I am trying to implement something like this.
http://app.maqetta.org/mixloginstatic/LoginWindow.html
I want the login page to load but if you click the signup button then an ajax will replace the login form with the signup form.
I have got this to work using this code
dojo.xhrGet({
// The URL of the request
url: "'.$url.'",
// The success callback with result from server
load: function(newContent) {
dojo.byId("'.$contentNode.'").innerHTML = newContent;
},
// The error handler
error: function() {
// Do nothing -- keep old content there
}
});'
the only problem is the new form just loads up as a normal form, not a dojo form. I have tried to return some script with the phaser but it doesnt do anything.
<div id="loginBox"><div class="instructionBox">Please enter your details below and click <a><strong>signup</strong>
</a> to have an activation email sent to you.</div>
<form enctype="application/x-www-form-urlencoded" class="site-form login-form" action="/user/signup" method="post"><div>
<dt id="emailaddress-label"><label for="emailaddress" class="required">Email address</label></dt>
<dd>
<input 0="Errors" id="emailaddress" name="emailaddress" value="" type="text"></dd>
<dt id="password-label"><label for="password" class="required">Password</label></dt>
<dd>
<input 0="Errors" id="password" name="password" value="" type="password"></dd>
<dt id="captcha-input-label"><label for="captcha-input" class="required">Captcha Code</label></dt>
<dd id="captcha-element">
<img width="200" height="50" alt="" src="/captcha/d7849e6f0b95cad032db35e1a853c8f6.png">
<input type="hidden" name="captcha[id]" value="d7849e6f0b95cad032db35e1a853c8f6" id="captcha-id">
<input type="text" name="captcha[input]" id="captcha-input" value="">
<p class="description">Enter the characters shown into the field.</p></dd>
<dt id="submitButton-label"> </dt><dd id="submitButton-element">
<input id="submitButton" name="submitButton" value="Signup" type="submit"></dd>
<dt id="cancelButton-label"> </dt><dd id="cancelButton-element">
<button name="cancelButton" id="cancelButton" type="button">Cancel</button></dd>
</div></form>
<script type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function() {
var widget = dijit.byId("signup");
if (widget) {
widget.destroyRecursive(true);
}
dojo.parser.instantiate([dojo.byId("loginBox")]);
dojo.parser.parse(dojo.byId("loginBox"));
});
</script></div>
any advice on how i can get this to load as a dojo form. by the way i am using Zend_Dojo_Form, if i run the code directly then everything works find but through ajax it doesnt work. thanks.
update
I have discovered that if I load the form in my action and run the __toString() on it it works when i load the form from ajax. It must do preparation in __toString()
Firstly; You need to run the dojo parser on html, for it to accept the data-dojo-type (fka dojoType) attributes, like so:
dojo.parser.parse( dojo.byId("'.$contentNode.'") )
This will of course only instantiate dijits where the dojo type is set to something, for instance (for html5 1.7+ syntax) <form data-dojo-type="dijit.form.Form" action="index.php"> ... <button type="submit" data-dojo-type="dijit.form.Button">Send</button> ... </form>.
So you need to change the ajax contents which is set to innerHTML, so that the parser reckognizes the form of the type dijit.form.Form. That said, I urge people into using a complete set of dijit.form.* Elements as input fields.
In regards to:
$(document).ready(function() {});
This function will never get called. The document, youre adding innerHTML to, was ready perhaps a long time a go.
About Zend in this issue:
Youre most likely rendering the above output form from a Zend_ Dojo type form. If the renderer is set as programmatic, you will see above html a script containing a registry for ID=>dojoType mappings. The behavior when inserting <script> as an innerHTML attribute value, the script is not run under most circumstances (!).
You should try something similar to this pseudo for your form controller:
if request is ajax dojoHelper set layout declarative
else dojoHelper set layout programmatic
I am successfully validating and arresting the submission of a form using Validate by the bassistance.de guy.
Problem is, I am halting submission too much as there is a hidden set of inputs which requires validation only if ONE other radio button is checked.
I am calling my validation scheme from a remote script on page load and I was "TRYING" to remove the validation rule on the form page when the contingent element is clicked.
Thing is, the page acts as though the rule is still there.
Here's some pseudo:
<html>
<head>
<script src="jquery.js"></script>
<script src="jq.validate.js"></script>
<script src="formproc.js"></script>
</head>
<body>
<form method="" action="" id="whatever">
<input type="radio" name="answer" value="1008" id="yes" /><label for="yes">Yes</yes>
<input type="radio" name="answer" value="1009" id="no" /><label for="no">No</label>
<input type="radio" name="answer" value="1010" id="un" /><label for="un">Not sure</label>
<div id="somedivthatshidden">
<input type="radio" name="nother" value="1009" id="ok" /><label for="ok">OK</label>
<input type="radio" name="nother" value="1010" id="noway" /><label for="noway">No Way</label>
</div>
<script src="jQ_funx_that_handle_the_show_hide_etc.js"></script>
<input type="submit" value="doit" />
</form>
</body>
</html>
So, when the user clicks on any of the FIRST 3 radio buttons that DO NOT reveal "SOMEDIVETHATSHIDDEN", I also call for the rule removal. Is this wrong?
I've tried putting the rule removal inline in the document, at the end of my function listing, so on and so forth... no dice. Still hangs on that required second set of radios even if they're not displayed
Thanks much,
Rob
You can use depends config option to make a field conditionally required.