How to do integration tests for endpoints that use ZeroCopyHttpOutputMessage - spring

I have an endpoint that casts the org.springframework.http.server.reactive.ServerHttpResponse to org.springframework.http.ZeroCopyHttpOutputMessage.
#SneakyThrows
#GetMapping("/document/{documentId}")
public Mono<Void> serveDocument(#PathVariable final String documentId, final ServerHttpResponse response) {
final Path documentLocation = fileManipulatorService.newFile(stagingConfigurationProperties.location(), documentId);
return ((ZeroCopyHttpOutputMessage) response)
.writeWith(documentLocation, 0, fileManipulatorService.size(documentLocation))
.then(deleteIfExists(documentLocation));
}
Usually, this works well but when calling the endpoint with org.springframework.test.web.reactive.server.WebTestClient the call fails with the following exception:
2022-12-30T18:49:07.678+01:00 ERROR 1392 --- [ parallel-1] a.w.r.e.AbstractErrorWebExceptionHandler : [1848ca22] 500 Server Error for HTTP GET "/document/11c92bad-6fe4-4c85-9d54-4bf4bbad3581"
java.lang.ClassCastException: class org.springframework.mock.http.server.reactive.MockServerHttpResponse cannot be cast to class org.springframework.http.ZeroCopyHttpOutputMessage (org.springframework.mock.http.server.reactive.MockServerHttpResponse and org.springframework.http.ZeroCopyHttpOutputMessage are in unnamed module of loader 'app')
at com.github.bottomlessarchive.loa.stage.view.document.controller.StageDocumentController.serveDocument(StageDocumentController.java:53) ~[main/:na]
Suppressed: reactor.core.publisher.FluxOnAssembly$OnAssemblyException:
Error has been observed at the following site(s):
*__checkpoint ? HTTP GET "/document/11c92bad-6fe4-4c85-9d54-4bf4bbad3581" [ExceptionHandlingWebHandler]
This is what my test looks like:
#Test
void testServeDocument() {
final UUID documentId = UUID.randomUUID();
final byte[] content = {1, 2, 3, 4};
final Path contentPath = setupFakeFile("/stage/" + documentId, content);
when(fileManipulatorService.newFile("/stage/", documentId.toString()))
.thenReturn(contentPath);
final byte[] responseBody = webTestClient.get()
.uri("/document/" + documentId)
.exchange()
.expectStatus()
.isOk()
.expectBody()
.returnResult()
.getResponseBody();
assertThat(responseBody)
.isEqualTo(content);
assertThat(contentPath)
.doesNotExist();
}
For me, everything seems to be right. Is there a reason why MockServerHttpResponse doesn't extend ZeroCopyHttpOutputMessage? I wanted to file a bug report to Spring Boot because of this, but before doing so, I came to the conclusion that it might be a better idea to ask first on Stackoverflow.

Firstly, MockServerHttpResponse is a general use mock implementation of a response for tests without an actual server, so it's implemented in a way that is just sufficient and convenient for testing.
Secondly, it doesn't look like any guarantees were ever given that a response in a ServerWebExchange must implement ZeroCopyHttpOutputMessage so I wouldn't blindly cast it without prior type checking.
Another caveat, on Netty even if a response is a ZeroCopyHttpOutputMessage, the transfer will use zero-byte copy only when the specified path resolves to a local file system File, and compression and SSL/TLS are not enabled. Otherwise chunked read/write will be used.
( https://projectreactor.io/docs/netty/release/api/reactor/netty/NettyOutbound.html#sendFile-java.nio.file.Path-long-long- ).
Considering all this I'd refactor your controller to something like this:
#SneakyThrows
#GetMapping("/document/{documentId}")
public Mono<Void> serveDocument(#PathVariable final String documentId, final ServerHttpResponse response) {
...
if (response instanceof ZeroCopyHttpOutputMessage zeroCopyHttpOutputMessage) {
return zeroCopyHttpOutputMessage
.writeWith(documentLocation, 0, ...)
...
}
return response
.writeWith(DataBufferUtils.read(documentLocation, response.bufferFactory(), bufferSize))
...
}
To test the ZeroCopyHttpOutputMessage part of this controller in your integration tests you can use a real (non-mocked) web environment and bind your WebTestClient to that like so:
#SpringBootTest(webEnvironment = SpringBootTest.WebEnvironment.RANDOM_PORT)
class IntegrationTests {
#LocalServerPort
private Integer serverPort;
...
#Test
void testServeDocument() {
WebTestClient webTestClient = WebTestClient
.bindToServer()
.baseUrl("http://localhost:" + serverPort)
.build();
...

Related

WebClient Integration Test with MockWebServer

I dont know if my configuration is wrong or something with mockwebserver.
I have method in one of my services
public UserResponse getUsername(String username) {
return webClient.get()
.uri("http://user-service/api/user",
uriBuilder -> uriBuilder.queryParam("username", username).build())
.retrieve()
.bodyToMono(UserResponse.class)
.block();
}
And I want to test this method by MockWebServer as below
public class CardWebClientTest {
private MockWebServer server;
private CardService service;
#BeforeEach
void setup() {
server = new MockWebServer();
WebClient webClient = WebClient.builder().baseUrl(server.url("").toString()).build();
service = new CardService(webClient);
}
#Test
void test() {
server.enqueue(new MockResponse().setBody("{\"id\": 12345}")
.addHeader("Content-Type", "application/json")
.setResponseCode(200));
var result = service.getUsername("john");
assertThat(result.getId()).isEqualTo(12345L);
}
Am I missing something? It's propably something trivial but I can't find solution.
CardService which is calling UserService are communicating in EurekaServer with loadbalancer but Im assuming MockWebServer can handle this without any further configuration or not - idk. I will appreciate any help.
UserResponse dto looks like this
public class UserResponse
private Long id;
I forgot to mention error message. It's always
Failed to resolve 'user-service' after 2 queries ; nested exception is java.net.UnknownHostException: Failed to resolve 'user-service' after 2 queries
Alright. Now I can see that mockwebserver has different hostname - it's calling http://kubernetes.docker.internal:52654/api/user and webclient is asking for http://user-service. But still I dont know how to configure mockwebserver to get response. I should set somehow hostname or maybe leave like that and just test webclient.get() to see if response is correct?

Unable to save data received by Spring Boot WebCliet

The things I want to do is: to get data from https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/ and save those data into my machine. I want to save the posts from this site. I want to do it by Spring Boot WebClient. I have followed several tutorials, articles, and also WebClient documentation. But Unable to save the response in my local database.
The below URL will return one post.
https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1
If I want to return the post as the response of another API it is working fine, but not able to use the inside program. I have tried with WebClient .block(), but it is working for standalone applications but not for web application.
GitLab link of the project
Controller :
#Autowired
private PostService postService;
// working fine.
#GetMapping(value = "posts", produces = MediaType.TEXT_EVENT_STREAM_VALUE)
#ResponseStatus(HttpStatus.OK)
public Flux<Post> findAll() {
return postService.findAll();
}
#GetMapping(value = "postsSave")
#ResponseStatus(HttpStatus.OK)
public String saveAll() {
return postService.saveAll();
}
Service:
#Override
public String saveAll() {
// Post posts = webClient.get()
// .uri("/posts")
// .retrieve()
// .bodyToFlux(Post.class)
// .timeout(Duration.ofMillis(10_000)).blockFirst();
String url = "https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1";
WebClient.Builder builder = WebClient.builder();
Post p = builder.build()
.get()
.uri(url)
.retrieve()
.bodyToMono(Post.class)
.block(); // this line generating error.
postRepository.save(p);
return "saved";
}
Exception StackTrace:
2022-12-07 14:35:44.070 ERROR 6576 --- [ctor-http-nio-3] a.w.r.e.AbstractErrorWebExceptionHandler : [b48b7f19-1] 500 Server Error for HTTP GET "/postsSave"
java.lang.IllegalStateException: block()/blockFirst()/blockLast() are blocking, which is not supported in thread reactor-http-nio-3
at reactor.core.publisher.BlockingSingleSubscriber.blockingGet(BlockingSingleSubscriber.java:83) ~[reactor-core-3.3.9.RELEASE.jar:3.3.9.RELEASE]
Suppressed: reactor.core.publisher.FluxOnAssembly$OnAssemblyException:
Error has been observed at the following site(s):
|_ checkpoint ⇢ HTTP GET "/postsSave" [ExceptionHandlingWebHandler]
Stack trace:
at reactor.core.publisher.BlockingSingleSubscriber.blockingGet(BlockingSingleSubscriber.java:83) ~[reactor-core-3.3.9.RELEASE.jar:3.3.9.RELEASE]
at reactor.core.publisher.Mono.block(Mono.java:1680) ~[reactor-core-3.3.9.RELEASE.jar:3.3.9.RELEASE]
at com.quantsys.service.PostService.saveAll(PostService.java:53) ~[classes/:na]
at com.quantsys.controller.PostController.saveAll(PostController.java:26) ~[classes/:an]
But the same code of snippet is working within the Bootstrap class:
#SpringBootApplication
public class QuanrsysPostService {
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(QuanrsysPostService.class, args);
String url = "https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1";
WebClient.Builder builder = WebClient.builder();
Post p = builder.build()
.get()
.uri(url)
.retrieve()
.bodyToMono(Post.class)
.block(); // working here.
System.out.println(p.toString());
}
}

Can I use Spring WebFlux to implement REST services which get data through Kafka request/response topics?

I'm developing REST service which, in turn, will query slow legacy system so response time will be measured in seconds. We also expect massive load so I was thinking about asynchronous/non-blocking approaches to avoid hundreds of "servlet" threads blocked on calls to slow system.
As I see this can be implemented using AsyncContext which is present in new servlet API specs. I even developed small prototype and it seems to be working.
On the other hand it looks like I can achieve the same using Spring WebFlux.
Unfortunately I did not find any example where custom "backend" calls are wrapped with Mono/Flux. Most of the examples just reuse already-prepared reactive connectors, like ReactiveCassandraOperations.java, etc.
My data flow is the following:
JS client --> Spring RestController --> send request to Kafka topic --> read response from Kafka reply topic --> return data to client
Can I wrap Kafka steps into Mono/Flux and how to do this?
How my RestController method should look like?
Here is my simple implementation which achieves the same using Servlet 3.1 API
//took the idea from some Jetty examples
public class AsyncRestServlet extends HttpServlet {
...
#Override
protected void doGet(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse resp) throws ServletException, IOException {
String result = (String) req.getAttribute(RESULTS_ATTR);
if (result == null) { //data not ready yet: schedule async processing
final AsyncContext async = req.startAsync();
//generate some unique request ID
String uid = "req-" + String.valueOf(req.hashCode());
//share it to Kafka receive together with AsyncContext
//when Kafka receiver will get the response it will put it in Servlet request attribute and call async.dispatch()
//This doGet() method will be called again and it will send the response to client
receiver.rememberKey(uid, async);
//send request to Kafka
sender.send(uid, param);
//data is not ready yet so we are releasing Servlet thread
return;
}
//return result as html response
resp.setContentType("text/html");
PrintWriter out = resp.getWriter();
out.println(result);
out.close();
}
Here's a short example - Not the WebFlux client you probably had in mind, but at least it would enable you to utilize Flux and Mono for asynchronous processing, which I interpreted to be the point of your question. The web objects should work without additional configurations, but of course you will need to configure Kafka as the KafkaTemplate object will not work on its own.
#Bean // Using org.springframework.web.reactive.function.server.RouterFunction<ServerResponse>
public RouterFunction<ServerResponse> sendMessageToTopic(KafkaController kafkaController){
return RouterFunctions.route(RequestPredicates.POST("/endpoint"), kafkaController::sendMessage);
}
#Component
public class ResponseHandler {
public getServerResponse() {
return ServerResponse.ok().body(Mono.just(Status.SUCCESS), String.class);
}
}
#Component
public class KafkaController {
public Mono<ServerResponse> auditInvalidTransaction(ServerRequest request) {
return request.bodyToMono(TopicMsgMap.class)
// your HTTP call may not return immediately without this
.subscribeOn(Schedulers.single()) // for a single worker thread
.flatMap(topicMsgMap -> {
MyKafkaPublisher.sendMessages(topicMsgMap);
}.flatMap(responseHandler::getServerResponse);
}
}
#Data // model class just to easily convert the ServerRequest (from json, for ex.)
// + ~#constructors
public class TopicMsgMap() {
private Map<String, String> topicMsgMap;
}
#Service // Using org.springframework.kafka.core.KafkaTemplate<String, String>
public class MyKafkaPublisher {
#Autowired
private KafkaTemplate<String, String> template;
#Value("${topic1}")
private String topic1;
#Value("${topic2}")
private String topic2;
public void sendMessages(Map<String, String> topicMsgMap){
topicMsgMap.forEach((top, msg) -> {
if (topic.equals("topic1") kafkaTemplate.send(topic1, message);
if (topic.equals("topic2") kafkaTemplate.send(topic2, message);
});
}
}
Guessing this isn't the use-case you had in mind, but hope you find this general structure useful.
There is several approaches including KafkaReplyingRestTemplate for this problem but continuing your approach in servlet api's the solution will be something like this in spring Webflux.
Your Controller method looks like this:
#RequestMapping(path = "/completable-future", method = RequestMethod.POST)
Mono<Response> asyncTransaction(#RequestBody RequestDto requestDto, #RequestHeader Map<String, String> requestHeaders) {
String internalTransactionId = UUID.randomUUID().toString();
kafkaSender.send(Request.builder()
.transactionId(requestHeaders.get("transactionId"))
.internalTransactionId(internalTransactionId)
.sourceIban(requestDto.getSourceIban())
.destIban(requestDto.getDestIban())
.build());
CompletableFuture<Response> completableFuture = new CompletableFuture();
taskHolder.pushTask(completableFuture, internalTransactionId);
return Mono.fromFuture(completableFuture);
}
Your taskHolder component will be something like this:
#Component
public class TaskHolder {
private Map<String, CompletableFuture> taskHolder = new ConcurrentHashMap();
public void pushTask(CompletableFuture<Response> task, String transactionId) {
this.taskHolder.put(transactionId, task);
}
public Optional<CompletableFuture> remove(String transactionId) {
return Optional.ofNullable(this.taskHolder.remove(transactionId));
}
}
And finally your Kafka ResponseListener looks like this:
#Component
public class ResponseListener {
#Autowired
TaskHolder taskHolder;
#KafkaListener(topics = "reactive-response-topic", groupId = "test")
public void listen(Response response) {
taskHolder.remove(response.getInternalTransactionId()).orElse(
new CompletableFuture()).complete(response);
}
}
In this example I used internalTransactionId as CorrelationId but you can use "kafka_correlationId" that is a known kafka header.

How to mock Spring WebFlux WebClient?

We wrote a small Spring Boot REST application, which performs a REST request on another REST endpoint.
#RequestMapping("/api/v1")
#SpringBootApplication
#RestController
#Slf4j
public class Application
{
#Autowired
private WebClient webClient;
#RequestMapping(value = "/zyx", method = POST)
#ResponseBody
XyzApiResponse zyx(#RequestBody XyzApiRequest request, #RequestHeader HttpHeaders headers)
{
webClient.post()
.uri("/api/v1/someapi")
.accept(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
.contentType(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
.body(BodyInserters.fromObject(request.getData()))
.exchange()
.subscribeOn(Schedulers.elastic())
.flatMap(response ->
response.bodyToMono(XyzServiceResponse.class).map(r ->
{
if (r != null)
{
r.setStatus(response.statusCode().value());
}
if (!response.statusCode().is2xxSuccessful())
{
throw new ProcessResponseException(
"Bad status response code " + response.statusCode() + "!");
}
return r;
}))
.subscribe(body ->
{
// Do various things
}, throwable ->
{
// This section handles request errors
});
return XyzApiResponse.OK;
}
}
We are new to Spring and are having trouble writing a Unit Test for this small code snippet.
Is there an elegant (reactive) way to mock the webClient itself or to start a mock server that the webClient can use as an endpoint?
We accomplished this by providing a custom ExchangeFunction that simply returns the response we want to the WebClientBuilder:
webClient = WebClient.builder()
.exchangeFunction(clientRequest ->
Mono.just(ClientResponse.create(HttpStatus.OK)
.header("content-type", "application/json")
.body("{ \"key\" : \"value\"}")
.build())
).build();
myHttpService = new MyHttpService(webClient);
Map<String, String> result = myHttpService.callService().block();
// Do assertions here
If we want to use Mokcito to verify if the call was made or reuse the WebClient accross multiple unit tests in the class, we could also mock the exchange function:
#Mock
private ExchangeFunction exchangeFunction;
#BeforeEach
void init() {
WebClient webClient = WebClient.builder()
.exchangeFunction(exchangeFunction)
.build();
myHttpService = new MyHttpService(webClient);
}
#Test
void callService() {
when(exchangeFunction.exchange(any(ClientRequest.class)))
.thenReturn(buildMockResponse());
Map<String, String> result = myHttpService.callService().block();
verify(exchangeFunction).exchange(any());
// Do assertions here
}
Note: If you get null pointer exceptions related to publishers on the when call, your IDE might have imported Mono.when instead of Mockito.when.
Sources:
WebClient
javadoc
WebClient.Builder
javadoc
ExchangeFunction
javadoc
With the following method it was possible to mock the WebClient with Mockito for calls like this:
webClient
.get()
.uri(url)
.header(headerName, headerValue)
.retrieve()
.bodyToMono(String.class);
or
webClient
.get()
.uri(url)
.headers(hs -> hs.addAll(headers));
.retrieve()
.bodyToMono(String.class);
Mock method:
private static WebClient getWebClientMock(final String resp) {
final var mock = Mockito.mock(WebClient.class);
final var uriSpecMock = Mockito.mock(WebClient.RequestHeadersUriSpec.class);
final var headersSpecMock = Mockito.mock(WebClient.RequestHeadersSpec.class);
final var responseSpecMock = Mockito.mock(WebClient.ResponseSpec.class);
when(mock.get()).thenReturn(uriSpecMock);
when(uriSpecMock.uri(ArgumentMatchers.<String>notNull())).thenReturn(headersSpecMock);
when(headersSpecMock.header(notNull(), notNull())).thenReturn(headersSpecMock);
when(headersSpecMock.headers(notNull())).thenReturn(headersSpecMock);
when(headersSpecMock.retrieve()).thenReturn(responseSpecMock);
when(responseSpecMock.bodyToMono(ArgumentMatchers.<Class<String>>notNull()))
.thenReturn(Mono.just(resp));
return mock;
}
You can use MockWebServer by the OkHttp team. Basically, the Spring team uses it for their tests too (at least how they said here). Here is an example with reference to a source:
According to Tim's blog post let's consider that we have the following service:
class ApiCaller {
private WebClient webClient;
ApiCaller(WebClient webClient) {
this.webClient = webClient;
}
Mono<SimpleResponseDto> callApi() {
return webClient.put()
.uri("/api/resource")
.contentType(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
.header("Authorization", "customAuth")
.syncBody(new SimpleRequestDto())
.retrieve()
.bodyToMono(SimpleResponseDto.class);
}
}
then the test could be designed in the following way (comparing to origin I changed the way how async chains should be tested in Reactor using StepVerifier):
class ApiCallerTest {
private final MockWebServer mockWebServer = new MockWebServer();
private final ApiCaller apiCaller = new ApiCaller(WebClient.create(mockWebServer.url("/").toString()));
#AfterEach
void tearDown() throws IOException {
mockWebServer.shutdown();
}
#Test
void call() throws InterruptedException {
mockWebServer.enqueue(new MockResponse().setResponseCode(200)
.setHeader(HttpHeaders.CONTENT_TYPE, MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON_VALUE)
.setBody("{\"y\": \"value for y\", \"z\": 789}")
);
//Asserting response
StepVerifier.create(apiCaller.callApi())
.assertNext(res -> {
assertNotNull(res);
assertEquals("value for y", res.getY());
assertEquals("789", res.getZ());
})
.verifyComplete();
//Asserting request
RecordedRequest recordedRequest = mockWebServer.takeRequest();
//use method provided by MockWebServer to assert the request header
recordedRequest.getHeader("Authorization").equals("customAuth");
DocumentContext context = >JsonPath.parse(recordedRequest.getBody().inputStream());
//use JsonPath library to assert the request body
assertThat(context, isJson(allOf(
withJsonPath("$.a", is("value1")),
withJsonPath("$.b", is(123))
)));
}
}
I use WireMock for integration testing. I think it is much better and supports more functions than OkHttp MockeWebServer. Here is simple example:
public class WireMockTest {
WireMockServer wireMockServer;
WebClient webClient;
#BeforeEach
void setUp() throws Exception {
wireMockServer = new WireMockServer(WireMockConfiguration.wireMockConfig().dynamicPort());
wireMockServer.start();
webClient = WebClient.builder().baseUrl(wireMockServer.baseUrl()).build();
}
#Test
void testWireMock() {
wireMockServer.stubFor(get("/test")
.willReturn(ok("hello")));
String body = webClient.get()
.uri("/test")
.retrieve()
.bodyToMono(String.class)
.block();
assertEquals("hello", body);
}
#AfterEach
void tearDown() throws Exception {
wireMockServer.stop();
}
}
If you really want to mock it I recommend JMockit. There isn't necessary call when many times and you can use the same call like it is in your tested code.
#Test
void testJMockit(#Injectable WebClient webClient) {
new Expectations() {{
webClient.get()
.uri("/test")
.retrieve()
.bodyToMono(String.class);
result = Mono.just("hello");
}};
String body = webClient.get()
.uri(anyString)
.retrieve()
.bodyToMono(String.class)
.block();
assertEquals("hello", body);
}
Wire mocks is suitable for integration tests, while I believe it's not needed for unit tests. While doing unit tests, I will just be interested to know if my WebClient was called with the desired parameters. For that you need a mock of the WebClient instance. Or you could inject a WebClientBuilder instead.
Let's consider the simplified method which does a post request like below.
#Service
#Getter
#Setter
public class RestAdapter {
public static final String BASE_URI = "http://some/uri";
public static final String SUB_URI = "some/endpoint";
#Autowired
private WebClient.Builder webClientBuilder;
private WebClient webClient;
#PostConstruct
protected void initialize() {
webClient = webClientBuilder.baseUrl(BASE_URI).build();
}
public Mono<String> createSomething(String jsonDetails) {
return webClient.post()
.uri(SUB_URI)
.accept(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
.body(Mono.just(jsonDetails), String.class)
.retrieve()
.bodyToMono(String.class);
}
}
The method createSomething just accepts a String, assumed as Json for simplicity of the example, does a post request on a URI and returns the output response body which is assumed as a String.
The method can be unit tested as below, with StepVerifier.
public class RestAdapterTest {
private static final String JSON_INPUT = "{\"name\": \"Test name\"}";
private static final String TEST_ID = "Test Id";
private WebClient.Builder webClientBuilder = mock(WebClient.Builder.class);
private WebClient webClient = mock(WebClient.class);
private RestAdapter adapter = new RestAdapter();
private WebClient.RequestBodyUriSpec requestBodyUriSpec = mock(WebClient.RequestBodyUriSpec.class);
private WebClient.RequestBodySpec requestBodySpec = mock(WebClient.RequestBodySpec.class);
private WebClient.RequestHeadersSpec requestHeadersSpec = mock(WebClient.RequestHeadersSpec.class);
private WebClient.ResponseSpec responseSpec = mock(WebClient.ResponseSpec.class);
#BeforeEach
void setup() {
adapter.setWebClientBuilder(webClientBuilder);
when(webClientBuilder.baseUrl(anyString())).thenReturn(webClientBuilder);
when(webClientBuilder.build()).thenReturn(webClient);
adapter.initialize();
}
#Test
#SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
void createSomething_withSuccessfulDownstreamResponse_shouldReturnCreatedObjectId() {
when(webClient.post()).thenReturn(requestBodyUriSpec);
when(requestBodyUriSpec.uri(RestAdapter.SUB_URI))
.thenReturn(requestBodySpec);
when(requestBodySpec.accept(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)).thenReturn(requestBodySpec);
when(requestBodySpec.body(any(Mono.class), eq(String.class)))
.thenReturn(requestHeadersSpec);
when(requestHeadersSpec.retrieve()).thenReturn(responseSpec);
when(responseSpec.bodyToMono(String.class)).thenReturn(Mono.just(TEST_ID));
ArgumentCaptor<Mono<String>> captor
= ArgumentCaptor.forClass(Mono.class);
Mono<String> result = adapter.createSomething(JSON_INPUT);
verify(requestBodySpec).body(captor.capture(), eq(String.class));
Mono<String> testBody = captor.getValue();
assertThat(testBody.block(), equalTo(JSON_INPUT));
StepVerifier
.create(result)
.expectNext(TEST_ID)
.verifyComplete();
}
}
Note that the 'when' statements test all the parameters except the request Body. Even if one of the parameters mismatches, the unit test fails, thereby asserting all these. Then, the request body is asserted in a separate verify and assert as the 'Mono' cannot be equated. The result is then verified using step verifier.
And then, we can do an integration test with wire mock, as mentioned in the other answers, to see if this class wires properly, and calls the endpoint with the desired body, etc.
I have tried all the solutions in the already given answers here.
The answer to your question is:
It depends if you want to do Unit testing or Integration testing.
For unit testing purpose, mocking the WebClient itself is too verbose and require too much code. Mocking ExchangeFunction is simpler and easier.
For this, the accepted answer must be #Renette 's solution.
For integration testing the best is to use OkHttp MockWebServer.
Its simple to use an flexible. Using a server allows you to handle some error cases you otherwise need to handle manually in a Unit testing case.
With spring-cloud-starter-contract-stub-runner you can use Wiremock to mock the API responses. Here you can find a working example I described on medium. The AutoConfigureMockMvc annotation starts a Wiremock server before your test, exposing everything you have in the classpath:/mappings location (probably src/test/resources/mappings on disk).
#SpringBootTest
#AutoConfigureMockMvc
#AutoConfigureWireMock(port = 0)
class BalanceServiceTest {
private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(BalanceServiceTest.class);
#Autowired
private BalanceService service;
#Test
public void test() throws Exception {
assertNotNull(service.getBalance("123")
.get());
}
}
Here is an example for what a mapping file looks like. The balance.json file contains any json content you need. You can also mimic response delays or failures in static configuration files or programatically. More info on their website.
{
"request": {
"method": "GET",
"url": "/v2/accounts/123/balance"
},
"response": {
"status": 200,
"delayDistribution": {
"type": "lognormal",
"median": 1000,
"sigma": 0.4
},
"headers": {
"Content-Type": "application/json",
"Cache-Control": "no-cache"
},
"bodyFileName": "balance.json"
}
}
I wanted to use webclient for unit testing, but mockito was too complex to setup, so i created a library which can be used to build mock webclient in unit tests. This also verifies the url, method, headers and request body before dispatching the response.
FakeWebClientBuilder fakeWebClientBuilder = FakeWebClientBuilder.useDefaultWebClientBuilder();
FakeRequestResponse fakeRequestResponse = new FakeRequestResponseBuilder()
.withRequestUrl("https://google.com/foo")
.withRequestMethod(HttpMethod.POST)
.withRequestBody(BodyInserters.fromFormData("foo", "bar"))
.replyWithResponse("test")
.replyWithResponseStatusCode(200)
.build();
WebClient client =
FakeWebClientBuilder.useDefaultWebClientBuilder()
.baseUrl("https://google.com")
.addRequestResponse(fakeRequestResponse)
.build();
// Our webclient will return `test` when called.
// This assertion would check if all our enqueued responses are dequeued by the class or method we intend to test.
Assertions.assertTrue(fakeWebClientBuilder.assertAllResponsesDispatched());
I highly recommend using Okhttp MockWebServer over mocking. The reason being MockWebServer is a much much cleaner approach.
Below is the code template you can use for unit testing WebClient.
class Test {
private ClassUnderTest classUnderTest;
public static MockWebServer mockWebServer;
#BeforeAll
static void setUp() throws IOException {
mockWebServer = new MockWebServer();
mockWebServer.start();
}
#BeforeEach
void initialize() {
var httpUrl = mockWebServer.url("/xyz");
var webClient = WebClient.create(httpUrl.toString());
classUnderTest = new ClassUnderTest(webClient);
}
#Test
void testMehod() {
var mockResp = new MockResponse();
mockResp.setResponseCode(200);
mockResp.addHeader("Content-Type", "application/json");
mockResp.setBody(
"{\"prop\":\"some value\"}");
mockWebServer.enqueue(mockResp);
// This enqueued response will be returned when webclient is invoked
...
...
classUnderTest.methodThatInvkesWebClient();
...
...
}
#AfterAll
static void tearDown() throws IOException {
mockWebServer.shutdown();
}
}
Pay special attention to the initialize method. That's the only thing tricky here.
Path /xyz is not the base url, rather your resource path.
You don't need to tell the base url to MockWebServer.
Reason being, MockWebServer will spin up a server on the local host with some random port. And if you provide your own base url, your unit test will fail.
mockWebServer.url("/xyz")
This will give you base url i.e. the host and port on which MockWebServer is listening plus the resource path, say localhost:8999/xyz. You will need to create WebClient with this url.
WebClient.create(httpUrl.toString())
This will create the WebClient that make calls to the MockWebServer for your unit tests.

MocMVC giving HttpMessageNotReadableException

I'm still learning my way around testing and I'm trying to get a MockMvc test to work for me. It's a simple REST controller that at this point is only doing some authentication using information from json in the post. I've actually implemented the code, so I know it's working because I get back both the correct response with the correct input and the error messages I've put together, both in a json format. My problem is that the test keeps failing with a HttpMessageNotReadableException, even though the actual code works, so I'm assuming I don't have my test set up right. Any help you guys can give would be great.
Here's my controller
#Controller
public class RequestPaymentController {
protected final Log logger = LogFactory.getLog(getClass());
private PaymentService paymentService;
private LoginService loginService;
#Autowired
public void setPaymentService(PaymentService paymentService){
this.paymentService = paymentService;
}
#Autowired
public void setLoginService(LoginService loginService){
this.loginService = loginService;
}
#RequestMapping(value = "/requestpayment", method = RequestMethod.POST, headers="Accept=application/json")
#ResponseBody
public ResponseEntity<PaymentResult> handleRequestPayment(#RequestBody PaymentRequest paymentRequest, HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response, BindingResult result) throws Exception{
ResponseEntity<PaymentResult> responseEntity = null;
new LoginValidator().validate(paymentRequest, result);
boolean valid = loginService.isLoginValid(paymentRequest, result);
if (valid){
responseEntity = setValidResponse(paymentRequest);
}else {
throw new TumsException("exception message");
}
return responseEntity;
}
private ResponseEntity<PaymentResult> setValidResponse(PaymentRequest paymentRequest){
PaymentResult paymentResult = paymentService.getResults(paymentRequest);
return new ResponseEntity<PaymentResult>(paymentResult, HttpStatus.OK);
}
}
And here's my test code:
public class RequestPaymentControllerTest {
PaymentService mockPaymentService;
RequestPaymentController requestPaymentController;
HttpServletRequest mockHttpServletRequest;
HttpServletResponse mockHttpServletResponse;
PaymentRequest mockPaymentRequest;
BindingResult mockBindingResult;
LoginService mockLoginService;
PaymentResult mockPaymentResult;
MockMvc mockMvc;
#Before
public void setUp() throws Exception {
mockPaymentService = createMock(PaymentService.class);
mockHttpServletRequest = createMock(HttpServletRequest.class);
mockHttpServletResponse = createMock(HttpServletResponse.class);
mockPaymentRequest = createMock(PaymentRequest.class);
requestPaymentController = new RequestPaymentController();
mockBindingResult = createMock(BindingResult.class);
mockLoginService = createMock(LoginService.class);
requestPaymentController.setPaymentService(mockPaymentService);
mockPaymentResult = createMock(PaymentResult.class);
mockMvc = MockMvcBuilders.standaloneSetup(new RequestPaymentController()).build();
}
#After
public void tearDown() throws Exception {
mockPaymentService = null;
mockHttpServletRequest = null;
mockHttpServletResponse = null;
mockPaymentRequest = null;
requestPaymentController = null;
mockBindingResult = null;
mockLoginService = null;
mockPaymentResult = null;
mockMvc = null;
}
#Test
public void testHandleRequestPayment() throws Exception{
initializeStateForHandleRequestPayment();
createExpectationsForHandleRequestPayment();
replayAndVerifyExpectationsForHandleRequestPayment();
}
private void initializeStateForHandleRequestPayment(){
}
private void createExpectationsForHandleRequestPayment(){
mockPaymentRequest.getServiceUsername();
expectLastCall().andReturn("testuser");
mockPaymentRequest.getServicePassword();
expectLastCall().andReturn("password1!");
mockLoginService.isLoginValid(mockPaymentRequest,mockBindingResult);
expectLastCall().andReturn(true);
mockPaymentService.getResults(mockPaymentRequest);
expectLastCall().andReturn(mockPaymentResult);
}
private void replayAndVerifyExpectationsForHandleRequestPayment() throws Exception{
replay(mockPaymentService, mockBindingResult, mockHttpServletRequest, mockHttpServletResponse, mockPaymentRequest, mockLoginService);
requestPaymentController.setLoginService(mockLoginService);
requestPaymentController.handleRequestPayment(mockPaymentRequest, mockHttpServletRequest, mockHttpServletResponse, mockBindingResult);
mockMvc.perform(post("/requestpayment")
.contentType(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
.accept(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON))
.andDo(print())
.andExpect(status().isBadRequest());
verify(mockPaymentService, mockBindingResult, mockHttpServletRequest, mockHttpServletResponse, mockPaymentRequest, mockLoginService);
}
}
The results of the andDo(print()) are:
MockHttpServletRequest:
HTTP Method = POST
Request URI = /requestpayment
Parameters = {}
Headers = {Content-Type=[application/json], Accept=[application/json]}
Handler:
Type = portal.echecks.controller.RequestPaymentController
Method = public org.springframework.http.ResponseEntity<portal.echecks.model.PaymentResult> portal.echecks.controller.RequestPaymentController.handleRequestPayment(portal.echecks.model.PaymentRequest,javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest,javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse,org.springframework.validation.BindingResult) throws java.lang.Exception
Resolved Exception:
Type = org.springframework.http.converter.HttpMessageNotReadableException
ModelAndView:
View name = null
View = null
Model = null
FlashMap:
MockHttpServletResponse:
Status = 400
Error message = null
Headers = {}
Content type = null
Body =
Forwarded URL = null
Redirected URL = null
Cookies = []
Process finished with exit code 0
As you can see, the test passes when I'm expecting a bad request status, but I've put in logging and I know that the ResponseBody I'm sending back has a 200 status. Like I said, this is my first time with MockMvc, so I assume I've not set something up right. Any suggestions?
An HttpMessageNotReadableException is
Thrown by HttpMessageConverter implementations when the read method
fails.
You also get a 400 Bad Request in your response. This should all tell you that you are not sending what your server is expecting. What is your server expecting?
#RequestMapping(value = "/requestpayment", method = RequestMethod.POST, headers="Accept=application/json")
#ResponseBody
public ResponseEntity<PaymentResult> handleRequestPayment(#RequestBody PaymentRequest paymentRequest, HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response, BindingResult result) throws Exception{
The main thing here is the #RequestBody annotated parameter. So you are telling your server to try and deserialize a PaymentRequest instance from the body of the HTTP POST request.
So let's see the request you are making
mockMvc.perform(post("/requestpayment")
.contentType(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
.accept(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON))
.andDo(print())
.andExpect(status().isBadRequest());
I don't see you providing a body to the request. There should be a content(String) call somewhere in there to set the content of the POST request. This content should be a JSON serialization of a PaymentRequest.
Note that because you are using the StandaloneMockMvcBuilder, you might need to set the HttpMessageConverter instances yourself, ie. a MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter to serialize and deserialize JSON.
Note that the BindingResult parameter should come immediately after the parameter to which it's related. Like so
#RequestMapping(value = "/requestpayment", method = RequestMethod.POST, headers="Accept=application/json")
#ResponseBody
public ResponseEntity<PaymentResult> handleRequestPayment(#Valid #RequestBody PaymentRequest paymentRequest, BindingResult result, HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response) throws Exception{
Don't forget the #Valid.
Note that this
requestPaymentController.setLoginService(mockLoginService);
requestPaymentController.handleRequestPayment(mockPaymentRequest, mockHttpServletRequest, mockHttpServletResponse, mockBindingResult);
is completely unrelated to the MockMvc test you are doing.
In my case, as sprint mvc w/ jackson (jackson-mapper-asl, v-1.9.10) deserialization requires JSON parser. And jackson requires a default constructor for http request message deserialization, if there's no default constructor, jackson will have a problem w/ reflection and throws HttpMessageNotReadableException exception.
This is to say, all the classes/sub-classes which used as Request body, (in this case) requires a default constructor. This costed me a few moments after I tried adding custom converter and other suggestions I got in stackoverflow in vain.
Or you can add Custom Deserializer or Mixin annotation to avoid adding default constructor hierachically everywhere. as described here: http://blogs.jbisht.com/blogs/2016/09/12/Deserialize-json-with-Java-parameterized-constructor. Check this if you're interested.
Seems duplicated here > Spring HttpMessageNotReadableException.
Make sure of the following:
return object implements Serializable
#ResponseBody annotation used on the controller method
On your unit test
#ExtendWith(SpringExtension.class)
#ContextConfiguration(classes = {....})
#WebMvcTest
#AutoConfigureMockMvc
Probably too late to answer but just in case someone is still looking at this page.
As #Sotirios Delimanolis mentions, the problem is due to a bad request - a '#RequestBody' is specified in the parameter but never supplied in the request body. So, if you add that to request using 'content(someRequestString)' as below, it should work.
PaymentRequest paymentRequest = new PaymentRequest(...);
String requestBody = new ObjectMapper().valueToTree(paymentRequest).toString();
mockMvc.perform(post("/requestpayment")
.content(requestBody)
.contentType(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON))
.andExpect(status().isOk())
.andExpect(jsonPath("$.status").value("SUCCESS"))
.andExpect(jsonPath("$.paymentAmount", is(20)));
jsonPath may be used to verify the attributes on the response. In the above example, say PaymentResponse has attributes status and paymentAmount in the json response. These parts can be verified easily.
You may run into errors like -
NoClassDefFoundError: com/jayway/jsonpath/Predicate
while using jsonPath. So, make sure it is added to classpath explicitly as it is an optional dependency in spring-test and will not be available transitively. If using maven, do this:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.jayway.jsonpath</groupId>
<artifactId>json-path</artifactId>
<version>2.4.0</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>

Resources