var longlinq = viewModel.Where(x => (x.Systems.Storage == SelectOption || x.Systems.Laptop == SelectOption ||
x.Systems._2In1 == SelectOption ||
x.Systems.Convertible == SelectOption )
||
(x.Component.Components == SelectOptionComp ||
x.Component.Boards == SelectOptionComp)
||
( x.Service.Services == SelectOptionSer ||
x.Service.DevelopmentTools_andServices == SelectOptionSer )
||
(x.Software.Softwares == SelectOptionSoft ||
x.Software.Analytics == SelectOptionSoft)
||
(x.Application.Applications == SelectOptionApp ||
x.Application.PrintImaging_andOfficeAutomation ));
Let me explain my question with an example:
For instance SelectOptionComp equals "-", then I want to ignore the parts where I used
SelectOptionComp in longlinq or set SelectOptionComp to " " in the longlinq.
I don't want to use ifs because of large number of combinations.
How do I do that?
I have used ternary operator Use the ternary operator: (SelectOptionComp == "-" ? true : (x.Component.Components == SelectOptionComp || x.Component.Boards == SelectOptionComp))
Related
I have used the following custom column render code for hiding handsontable column
function getCustomRenderer() {
return function(instance, td, row, col, prop, value, cellProperties) {
Handsontable.renderers.TextRenderer.apply(this, arguments);
if (colsToHide.indexOf(col) > -1) {
td.hidden = true;
} else {
td.hidden = false;
}
}
but when i set colHeaders: true, the column headers does not get hidden.
http://jsfiddle.net/LkLkd405/91/
Correct, you can't hide the column headers that way since the rendering happens independently of the column renderers. I will go ahead and assume your endgoal is to put in data into your data object that you would like to hide, like a database ID. The solution is to use the columns definition.
This option, if you read the documentation carefully, allows you to define which columns to show. So, for example, if you had 3 columns plus your ID column, you would have:
var colHeaders = ['col1', 'col2', 'col3', 'ID'];
// assume `dataArray` is an aray you previously defined, with row Objects with 4 keys each, corresponding to the first 3 real data columns and the fourth as the ID.
columns: [{
data: colHeaders[0],
type: 'text'
},{
data: colHeaders[1],
type: 'text'
},{
data: colHeaders[2],
type: 'text'
}]
Now you don't even need to have a custom renderer as the table will omit that fourth value.
hot.addHook('afterGetColHeader', RemoveUnWantedHeader);
function RemoveUnWantedHeader(col, th) {
if (th.textContent == "A" || th.textContent == "B" || th.textContent == "C"
|| th.textContent == "D" || th.textContent == "E"
|| th.textContent == "F" || th.textContent == "G" || th.textContent == "H"
|| th.textContent == "I" || th.textContent == "J"
|| th.textContent == "K" || th.textContent == "L" || th.textContent == "M"
|| th.textContent == "N" || th.textContent == "O"
|| th.textContent == "P" || th.textContent == "Q" || th.textContent == "R"
|| th.textContent == "S" || th.textContent == "T"
|| th.textContent == "U" || th.textContent == "V" || th.textContent == "W"
|| th.textContent == "X" || th.textContent == "Y" || th.textContent == "Z"
|| th.textContent == "AQ" || th.textContent == "AR" || th.textContent == "AS"
|| th.textContent == "AT" || th.textContent == "AU" || th.textContent == "AV" || th.textContent == "AW") {
th.style.display = 'none';
}
}
I have used hook to remove the headers I need to. I tried the same inside my HandsonTable it doesn't work so I tried the same using addHook and worked like charm.
afterGetColHeader: It is a function which will be rendered when header is called.
RemoveUnWantedHeader: It is my own callback. You can have your own conditions and can remove.
Reference: Handsontable Add Hooks
I'm trying to execute the following linq query and it seems to be ignoring order of operations. (Parentheses first)
var result = _repo.Transactions.Where(t =>
t.DateEntered > EntityFunctions.AddDays(DateTime.Now, -7)
&& ( t.TranDesc != "BALANCE FORWARD" && t.Withdrawl == 0 && t.Deposit == 0 ) );
Here's the where clause that generates:
WHERE ([Extent1].[dateentered] > (DATEADD (day, -7, SysDateTime())))
AND (N'BALANCE FORWARD' <> [Extent1].[TranDesc])
AND (cast(0 as decimal(18)) = [Extent1].[Withdrawl])
AND (cast(0 as decimal(18)) = [Extent1].[Deposit])
Any ideas what I'm doing wrong?
EDIT:
This is actually what I wanted and it solved my problem. Just didn't think it all the way though. Thanks.
var result = _repo.Transactions.Where(t =>
t.dateentered > EntityFunctions.AddDays(DateTime.Now, -7)
&& ((t.TranDesc == "BALANCE FORWARD" && (t.Withdrawl != 0 || t.Deposit != 0))
|| (t.TranDesc != "BALANCE FORWARD")));
There is no difference between a && (b && c && d) and a && b && c && d, and that's why parentheses within generated SQL are not exactly the same as in your LINQ query. But at the end there is no difference between these queries.
var locations = (from location in session.Query<Location>()
where
(location.MB_ID == 0 || location.MB_ID == null) &&
(location.hide != "Y" || location.hide == null) &&
(location.locationNameRaw != "" && location.locationNameRaw != null) &&
((location.isIPCapableText != "" && location.isIPCapableText != null) || (
(location.ISDNNumber1 != null && location.ISDNNumber1 != "") ||
(location.ISDNNumber2 != null && location.ISDNNumber2 != "") ||
(location.ISDNNumber3 != null && location.ISDNNumber3 != "") ||
(location.ISDNNumber4 != null && location.ISDNNumber4 != "") ||
(location.ISDNNumber5 != null && location.ISDNNumber5 != "") ||
(location.ISDNNumber6 != null && location.ISDNNumber6 != "")
))
&& (location.privateRoom == "N" || location.privateRoom == "" || location.privateRoom != null)
&& (
from lll in session.Query<LocationLonLat>()
where
location.locationID == lll.locationId
select lll.locationId
).Any()
&& (location.LastUpdatedTime > lastUpdateTime)
&& location.LocationTimes.Count() > 0
/*&& (
from lt in session.Query<LocationTimes>()
where
location.locationID == lt.LID
select lt.LID
).Any()*/
select location
)
.ToList();
There is a relationship between Location (1) and LocationTimes (many), and I only want to return a dataset of locations that have at least one LocationTime record.
I tried a couple of things...
When I add the line:
&& location.LocationTimes.Count() > 0
or if I add the line:
&& (
from lt in session.Query<LocationTimes>()
where
location.locationID == lt.LID
select lt.LID
).Any()
The underlying connection was closed: A connection that was expected to be kept alive was closed by the server.
I suspect that this may because of the size of the dataset or something...
Is there a better way of doing this? Like with a 'left outer join' or something?
I think a simple join should do it.
from locationTime in Query<LocationTime>()
join location in Query<Location>() on locationTime.Location.LocationId equals location.LocationId
join locationLat in Query<LocationLat>() on location.LocationLat.LocationLatId equals locationLat.LocationLatId
where ...
select location;
On long if statements where they take up more than one line, do you put the conditions like AND or OR on a new line like this:
if (something
&& something else)
Or like this:
if (something &&
something else)
For complex conditions, consider extracting it into a function or a variable:
if (complexCondition(foo)) { ..
As a bonus, the name of the function or variable can be used to communicate what the condition means. This makes your code easier to read.
I typically do it the second way, since I can line up the statements. However, either way is fine when you're writing code, as long as you're consistent.
I prefer a rendition of the first. My reasoning is that deleting a condition via cut/paste/comment for any testing purposes is easier. It's a lot easier to comment out a line than it is to delete the and from the line above and comment out a line. This is more when I'm doing where clauses in SQL than in an if statement in any other given language, but is similar.
Given my druthers, I'd avoid long if tests in the first place. I'd rather do something like:
bool fTest1 = A == B ;
bool fTest2 = C ;
bool fTest3 = f(1,2,3) ;
bool fSuccess = ( fTest1 | ftest2 ) & fTest3 ;
if ( fSuccess )
...
Otherwise something like this:
if ( A == B
&& ( C == D
|| E == F
)
&& Z > Y
) {
...
}
else
{
...
}
YMMV, of course.
The former is far easier to debug, test, log, etc.
I usually format using the IDE formatter and then rearrange a bit to make it look beautiful.
I'm working in VSC and recently managed to not only write, but make readable very long conditions in nested if statements. Just use brackets and new lines like this. It should make automatic indentations:
foreach ($panstwa as $key => $value) {
if (is_object($value)) {
if (
(
($value->checkbox1 === true) && (is_string($value->panstwoZListy)) && ($value->panstwoZListy !== 'none') && ($value->panstwo === '') && ($value->panstwoZListy !== '')
) ||
(
(
($value->checkbox2 === true &&
($value->checkbox2_1 === true || $value->checkbox2_2 === true || $value->checkbox2_3 === true || $value->checkbox2_4 === true || $value->checkbox2_5 === true || $value->checkbox2_6 === true)
) ||
($value->checkbox3 === true &&
($value->checkbox3_1 === true || $value->checkbox3_2 === true)
) ||
($value->checkbox4 === true &&
(
(
($value->checkbox4_1 === true || $value->checkbox4_2 === true || $value->checkbox4_3 === true || $value->checkbox4_4 === true || $value->checkbox4_5 === true || $value->checkbox4_6 === true || $value->checkbox4_7 === true) && ($value->checkbox4_8 === false)
) ||
(
($value->checkbox4_1 === false && $value->checkbox4_2 === false && $value->checkbox4_3 === false && $value->checkbox4_4 === false && $value->checkbox4_5 === false && $value->checkbox4_6 === false && $value->checkbox4_7 === false) && ($value->checkbox4_8 === true) && (sprawdzRegexTextInput($value->prawnieUzasadnionyInteres)) && (is_object($value->dokumentacjaOceny) || is_string($value->dokumentacjaOceny))
)
)
)
) &&
(is_string($value->panstwo)) && ($value->panstwoZListy === 'none') && ($value->panstwo !== '') && (sprawdzRegexTextInput($value->panstwo)
)
) &&
((is_int($value->panstwoid) && is_numeric($value->panstwoid)) || (is_bool($value->panstwoid) && $value->panstwoid === false)) &&
(is_bool($value->zmiana))
) {
echo "ok";
//nie robię nic
} else {
$flagaPanstwa = false;
}
} else {
$flagaPanstwa = false;
}
}
i am trying to get some data, but i dont know how can i do a if in linq, this is how i am trying to do
from so in db.Operations
where ((opType!= "0" ? so.Operation == int.Parse(opType) : false)
&& (idState!=0 ? so.State == idState : false)
&& (start != null ? so.StartDate == start : false)
&& (end !=null ? so.EndDate == end : false))
select so
the optype is a Int,
the idState is a Int,
end is a datetime,
start is a datime
what i am trying to do is, if those aren't null they add to the query function, so i can get all data together
for example: in c# code
if((opType!= "0")
where (so.Operation == int.Parse(opType)
if(idState!=0)
where (so.Operation == int.Parse(opType) && so.State == idState
.......
so if that isn't null, that sentence in that sql query (the TRUE part, i dont want to use the false part), add it to the where, so i can search all parameters that aren't null or 0
Since you're &&'ing them, looks like you want : true instead of : false.
Well not sure what you want exactly but here is a try:
var query = db.Operations.AsQueryable();
if (opType != null && opType != "0")
query = query.Where(x => x.Operation == int.Parse(opType);
if (idState != 0)
query = query.Where(x => x.State == idState);
if (start != null) // assuming that start is of type DateTime? otherwise use DateTime.MinValue
query = query.Where(x => x.StartDate.Date == start); // maybe >= is more appropriate
if (end != null) // also DateTime? assumed
query = query.Where(x => x.EndDate.Date == end); // maybe <= is more appropriate
var result = query.ToList(); // e.g. could also do an foreach, depending what you want to do
The trick in this approach is to build up the query successively. The query will not be enumerated until .ToList() or foreach is used to enumerate the list.
Actually this should yield the same:
from so in db.Operations
where ((opType != null && opType!= "0" ? so.Operation == int.Parse(opType) : true)
&& (idState!=0 ? so.State == idState : true)
&& (start != null ? so.StartDate.Date == start : true)
&& (end !=null ? so.EndDate.Date == end : true))
select so
opType!= "0" ? so.Operation == int.Parse(opType) : false
you should not use so.operation == int.parse.... instead use so.operation = int.Parse(opType)
You can use conditional parameters.
Change:
where ((opType!= "0" ? so.Operation == int.Parse(opType) : false)
To:
where ((opType!= "0" ? so.Operation == int.Parse(opType) : so.Operation == Operation)
and so on...