Monitoring Windows API calls using system wide hooks - windows
I am trying to monitor Windows API calls. I have read about it and found there is no easier way to monitor API calls system wide than by using kernel drivers. I was wondering if there is any other method to do this system wide? Also if anyone knows of some tutorial on how to monitor API calls using kernel drivers?
I have looked at Microsoft detours and other hooking options but they don't provide for system wide hooking. Also there are other methods which only work for user32.dll
Kernel drivers, who have access to all processes and system calls, are one method for monitoring Windows API calls system-wide. However, there are alternative methods, such as the following:
ETW (Event Tracing for Windows) - ETW is a high-performance event tracing framework for monitoring various system events, including API calls.
Performance Monitoring Counters can track various system performance metrics, such as API call counts and performance.
Inline Hooking - Another technique for monitoring API calls is inline hooking, which involves overwriting the first few instructions of an API function to redirect execution to a custom handler.
The Windows Driver Kit (WDK) documentation, which provides a comprehensive guide on writing and deploying kernel drivers in Windows, contains a tutorial on monitoring API calls using kernel drivers.
It is important to note that monitoring API calls can have security implications because it requires access to system-level data and functions. It is advised to use these techniques with caution and to put proper security measures in place.
Here are some resources that you can use to learn more about Windows API call monitoring:
Event Tracing for Windows (ETW) - https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/etw/
Windows Driver Kit (WDK) - https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/
Windows System Programming, 4th Edition by Johnson M. Hart - This book provides a comprehensive guide to Windows system programming, including a chapter on kernel-mode programming, which covers the basics of kernel drivers.
Inline Hooking - https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/2082/API-hooking-revealed
Windows API Hooking Techniques - https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/2050/Windows-API-Hooking-Techniques
These resources should provide a good starting point for learning about Windows API call monitoring.
Concerning the use of ETW for monitoring API calls, it is possible that some API calls are not emitted by the system by default and must be enabled manually. If you can't find the API calls you want in the ETW trace, try configuring the trace to include the provider that exposes the events for the desired API calls. To get an output from a crypto provider in ETW, enable it and start a trace session to collect the events emitted by the provider.
here are some online references for getting started with ETW and crypto providers:
Windows Driver Kit (WDK) - ETW:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/kernel/etw/
MSDN - CryptoAPI:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/seccrypto/cryptoapi
MSDN - How to Trace Cryptographic Operations with Event Tracing for Windows (ETW):
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/etw/how-to-trace-cryptographic-operations-with-etw
Code Project - Using Event Tracing for Windows (ETW) to Debug Applications:
https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/1000189/Using-Event-Tracing-for-Windows-ETW-to-Debug-App
Related
Managed mobile application monitoring performance
What is the best mobile application monitoring solution you know? With the following requirements: Managed solution Support for Unity3d client Monitor CPU, memory Ability to send custom events Ability to send events for specific device (Ability to drill down later for this specific device) I found new relic solution for example, but it is a bit expensive, also I'm not sure about the device drill down abilities.
ALPC Windows NT API's?
I found that on Vista+ systems to connect to the new LPC ports aka ALPC you have to use new functions set: NtAlpcAcceptConnectPort NtAlpcCancelMessage NtAlpcConnectPort NtAlpcCreatePort NtAlpcCreatePortSection NtAlpcCreateResourceReserve NtAlpcCreateSectionView NtAlpcCreateSecurityContext NtAlpcDeletePortSection etc.... I was doing an intensive search but did not found any code examples from which i can learn how to use these functions. So if someone have code examples or have application that is using them so i can reverse it please share.
using mfc to get process network statistics
Now I'am working on a MFC program. What I want to know is the speed a process receive/send to the network. Suppose I have a process named chrome.exe, it may receive 1008B/s, send 2987B/s. I know I can get what I want in the Win 7 Resource Monitor. But how can I get those data in my program. Dose MFC or Win32api support this?
You can obtain this information, as well as a wealth of other performance data using WMI: Monitoring Performance Data This class is probably what you are looking for: Win32_PerfFormattedData_Tcpip_NetworkInterface From a native C++/MFC application, you'll access WMI through some COM interfaces Have fun!
What is the difference between NtFsControlFile() and DeviceIoControl() functions?
Are there any places where one is preferable to another? Is there a performance impact to using one over the other?
#Alex K.: Small remark: NtFsControlFile is documented in http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff566462(v=VS.85).aspx. Kernel mode application should use ZwFsControlFile function and user mode application can use NtFsControlFile. #vedang: From you question I would assume that you don't a developer of kernel mode driver. So I will strictly recommend you to use only DeviceIoControl to send FSCTL_XXX codes http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa364230(v=VS.85).aspx. Only if you plan to write an application which don't use Win32 subsystem and use NT native subsystem only like a small checkdisk application or disk defragmentation application which run at the beginning of the windows start (see session manager registry key) than you will have advantage in using of NtFsControlFile. In all cases of usual work you should use only DeviceIoControl.
I have no idea about implementation, but NtFsControlFile is an undocumented kernel internal and it's use comes with the risk that it will disappear/change implementation at some point in the future, whereas DeviceIoControl is part of the public Win32 API.
How can Windows API calls to an application/service be monitored?
My company is looking at implementing a new VPN solution, but require that the connection be maintained programatically by our software. The VPN solution consists of a background service that seems to manage the physical connection and a command line/GUI utilty that initiates the request to connect/disconnect. I am looking for a way to "spy" on the API calls between the front-end utilty and back-end service so that our software can make the same calls to the service. Are there any recommended software solutions or methods to do this?
Typically, communications between a front-end application and back-end service are done through some form of IPC (sockets, named pipes, etc.) or through custom messages sent through the Service Control Manager. You'll probably need to find out which method this solution uses, and work from there - though if it's encrypted communication over a socket, this could be difficult.
Like Harper Shelby said, it could be very difficult, but you may start with filemon, which can tell you when certain processes create or write to files, regmon, which can do the same for registry writes and reads, and wireshark to monitor the network traffic. This can get you some data, but even with the data, it may be too difficult to interpret in a manner that would allow you to make the same calls.
I don't understand why you want to replace the utility, instead of simply running the utility from your application. Anyway, you can run "dumpbin /imports whatevertheutilitynameis.exe" to see the static list of API function names to which the utility is linked; this doesn't show the sequence in which they're called, nor the parameter values. You can then use a system debugger (e.g. Winice or whatever its more modern equivalent might be) to set breakpoints on these API, so that you break into the debugger (and can then inspect parameter values) when the utility invokes these APIs.
You might be able to glean some information using tools such as Spy++ to look at Windows messages. Debugging/tracing tools (Windbg, or etc.) may allow you to see API calls that are in process. The Sysinternals tools can show you system information to some degree of detail of usage. Although I would recommend against this for the most part -- is it possible to contact the solution provider and get documentation? One reason for that is fragility -- if a vendor is not expecting users to utilize that aspect of the interface, they are more likely to change it without notice.