I'm trying to use the NetVips library in my VB.NET project, i've added the NetVips.Native.win-x86 in my project from NuGet, the issue is that instead of adding the reference to the Bin folder it's add the NetVips.Native.win-x86 in a folder inside bin called packages and when i'm trying to reference to the library methods in the project i'm unable to...
And if i try manually to add the references to all the NetVips dll i get the error that it's unable to reach assembly or COM.
So how can i make NetVips work?
It is normal behavior.
The NetVips.Native.win-x86 nuget package's runtimes folder's dlls are not the type of COM. Only COM dlls can be referenced under the project. They are native binaries.
And these three dlls are not for assembly references from the author's design.
And that is the folder runtimes folder's function. See this document.
These three dlls from the runtimes folder provide the necessary services for your application when your project is running and deployed. It is just that these three dlls are not the type of COM, which caused your problem.
Instead, you should use NetVips nuget package. The dlls from it are the type of COM. And you can use it.
Update
use Release mode, then move dlls like libvips-42.dll ... from runtimes folder into bin folder, get it.
I've been going circles on this one for over a day now. I have a WPF project that is making use of sqlite-net-pcl.
I'm ready to package this project up into an MSI for distribution (x64). The first hitch was that I need to directly add the nuget for the dependency (SQLitePCLRaw.bundle_green). I've come across this before when a nuget package contains content files that need to find their way into the final release. Smooth sailing.
At this point, the bin/x64/release is good and runs fine. However, when I build an installer and run the installed version I get the following exception:
System.BadImageFormatException: Could not load file or assembly 'System.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe, Version=4.0.4.1, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a' or one of its dependencies. Reference assemblies should not be loaded for execution. They can only be loaded in the Reflection-only loader context. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80131058) ---> System.BadImageFormatException: Cannot load a reference assembly for execution.
Doing a file compare between my release folder and the application install folder I find the following:
Binary Difference: System.Buffers.dll
Binary Difference: System.Numerics.Vectors.dll
Binary Difference: System.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe.dll
Installer Only: netstandard.dll
Installer Only: System.Diagnostics.Tracing.dll
Installer Only: System.IO.Compression.dll
Installer Only: System.IO.Compression.FileSystem.dll
Installer Only: System.Net.Http.dll
After inspecting further and digging in to the DLLs, I find if I overwrite System.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe.dll with the binary from my release folder everything works.
Digging in even further and inspecting the installer version of CompilerServices.Unsafe I realize that the installer is grabbing the dotnet core version of the DLL.
I've isolated this down to a single console app with a fresh installer project and only adding the content and output to the installer.
Why is the installer insisting that the dependency is a dotnet core version?
I'd like to find a real solution, but in the meantime I found some confirmation and a dirty workaround in this thread: https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/content/problem/810090/visual-studio-installer-projects-extensions-incorr.html
Workaround option 1: In addition to adding the “Primary Output” of the project containing the package reference also add “Locally-Copied Items” for that project. This will result in the lib version of the assembly overwriting the ref version, giving you the behavior you want. However, you’ll also get a warning about the duplicate file being added, since as I said the lib version will be overwriting the ref version. This also could bring in additional files like xml doc files that should have no impact at runtime but may increase the size of the installer. These can also be individually excluded from the setup project.
I have a C# 4.0 application that is referencing a type library from a C++ application. This is used for some secure COM interop, a question I originally had asked here.
On my development machine this second application is installed so I can compile without any issues. If I attempt to compile on our automated build server, or any machine with Visual Studio installed but without this second program, I receive the following errors and compilation fails:
Text for google:
The type or namespace name could not be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)
Cannot get the file path for type library "guid...." version 1.0. Library not registered. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x8002801D (TYPE_E_LIBNOTREGISTERED))
The referenced component 'SecurityAgentLib' could not be found
Picture for readability:
I'm not sure how to get around this other than by installing the application that registers the actual dll that implements these types, but I don't want to do that on our build server. The code that uses these types are wrapped in a class that is never instantiated unless prerequisite checks are run to verify the app is actually installed, so there is no chance of a runtime error. In fact I can run my app just fine on a machine without the second app installed - I just can't compile it there.
In visual studio the reference points to the .tlb file which is included in the solution directory, so the tlb file itself is present.
I can't imagine it should work this way, and I've searched around, but I'm apparently not searching for the right terms.
EDIT:
Running tlbimp.exe generates a dll but the type library should be sufficient for compilation, I thought at least. There is also an issue of broken references. I was reading this article Troubleshooting Broken References and it says that if the reference was to a COM component that is not installed than installing the component corrects the error, which is true.
Installing it on the build server really isn't an option. Opening visual studio and re-adding a reference if the path was broken doesn't work either.
I was able to use tlbimp to create a dll and used visual studio add a reference to that dll. That let me compile, but how would this work in an unattended build server?
EDIT
Okay I came up with two solutions that worked given my requirement of this all being unattended
Ran tlbimp to create a dll from the type library. I removed the reference to the tlb from my project and added a reference to the dll itself. When the source code was copied over to a new computer it compiled without issues.
In this scenario ideally we would checkout from SVN on the build server and copy the latest DLL from the second project, then compile this project.
I also removed the tlb and added the dll in visual studio and did a diff on the .csproj file. I don't see any downside to just having a reference to the dll instead of the tlb but if needed the build server could make modifications directly to this file to remove the tlb section and add a reference to the dll following a build of the second product.
Here are a couple options that each worked.
Ran tlbimp to create a dll from the type library. I removed the reference to the tlb from my project and added a reference to the dll itself. When the source code was copied over to a new computer it compiled without issues.
In this scenario ideally we would checkout from SVN on the build server and copy the latest DLL from the second project, then compile this project.
I also removed the tlb and added the dll and did a diff on the .csproj file. I don't see any downside to just having a reference to the dll instead of the tlb but the build server could make modifications directly to this file to remove the tlb
I have a solution that includes a mix of .NET 3.5 and 4.0 projects. The 3.5 projects cannot be upgraded due to external dependencies.
The solution uses a simple plugin mechanism and I've set the output path on all projects to a common bin folder in the solution folder so that plugin assemblies can be discovered and loaded when debugging.
I have .NET 3.5 projects referencing a 3rd party assembly and .NET 4.0 projects referencing the 4.0 version of the same assembly, which has the same file name as the 3.5 version. When I build, one version of the 3rd party assembly overwrites the other version.
I'd like to have these dependencies output to different subfolders so I can then set the probing private path in config but I can't see how to do this in the build process.
In all projects which overwrites referenced assembly, use CopyLocal: None property option for that reference in all projects using that assembly being referenced to, and using build events, copy that assembly to the output folder from it's original path in your primary build solution, to the places you required for the plugins. That will copy the required dll for the plugins only once after the primary builds up.
We have several external DLL files being referenced in our Web Application Project. We have a deployment project for installing on the hosting servers. When we were using .NET 3.5 and Visual Studio 2008 the DLL files were being copied to the bin folder. Since we have upgraded to .NET 4 and Visual Studio 2010 this no longer happens, and we are getting server errors since the references cannot be found.
CopyLocal is set to true, and I cannot find anything inside the web.config which suggests this is being set elsewhere.
There is a bug in Visual Studio 2010. By default the XML in the solution file looks like this:
<Reference Include="DevExpress.SpellChecker.v11.1.Core,
Version=11.1.5.0,
Culture=neutral,
PublicKeyToken=b88d1754d700e49a,
processorArchitecture=MSIL">
<HintPath>..\References\DevExpress.SpellChecker.v11.1.Core.dll</HintPath>
</Reference>
Whereas MSBuild is expecting this below, so that the DLL file will be included in the deployment:
<Reference Include="DevExpress.SpellChecker.v11.1.Core,
Version=11.1.5.0,
Culture=neutral,
PublicKeyToken=b88d1754d700e49a,
processorArchitecture=MSIL">
<HintPath>..\References\DevExpress.SpellChecker.v11.1.Core.dll</HintPath>
<Private>True</Private>
</Reference>
The trick is to set Copy Local to False, save the project and then reset it to True - save again. This includes the Private node correctly, which MSBuild respects.
It appears that the default for no included private node (Copy Local) in Visual Studio 2010 is True, while MSBuild reads that missing node as False.
I was getting the same problem and rather than add a "BeforeBuild" step I created a test that simply did this
[TestMethod]
public void ReferenceAssemblyThatDoesNotCopyToBuildFolder()
{
Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.ExceptionHandling.Logging.LoggingExceptionHandler referenceThisButDoNotUseIt = null;
}
And that fixed the error The type 'Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.ExceptionHandling.Logging.LoggingExceptionHandler...' cannot be resolved
Something weird had happened to my deployment project. When I saw it had no detected dependencies, I removed the primary output and re-added it.
The dependencies are now showing up and being placed in the bin folder when installed.
I was getting exactly the same issue. We have a Visual Studio 2008 project which references the EnterpriseLibrary. When we run our integrated build using TFS and our Web deployment project, all the DLL files are copied over. When we upgraded to Visual Studio 2010, TFS 2010 and WDP 2010, some of the DLL file's were missing. Strangely, this only occurs to some DLL files and not others.
For example, we get the Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.ExceptionHandling.dll copied in both cases, but not the Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.ExceptionHandling.Logging.dll.
As a workaround I copied the files accross using a "BeforeBuild" step.
It now seems to build OK.
I just had the same issue and wanted to share what I found as it might help someone:
The reason in my case was that the assembly was installed in the GAC during an installation of some third-party application.
If the DLL file is in the GAC, the compiler won't bother to copy it to the destination folder, unless you specifically mark it for "copy local" using the "Private" node in the project file as mentioned by Junto.
The thing is that if you don't add that node, and you develop on one machine and build on a different one, and the DLL file is only in the GAC of the build machine, the default behavior without the private node will cause the file to be copied correctly on the development machine, but not on the build machine.
The bigger problem is if the DLL file is not referenced directly, but the project references a second project that in turn references the DLL file. In that case, you cannot mark the DLL file to be "copy local" in the project, as it is not referenced by it. So if the DLL file exists in the GAC - it won't get copied to your output folder.
Possible solutions to this case are:
Uninstall the DLL file from the GAC
Add a direct reference to the DLL file in the end project(s)
Re-sign the DLL file with a new strong name, which will differentiate it from the DLL file in the GAC.
I am not sure how it was set up in Visual Studio 2008, but I am almost positive that you might have been using the Post-Build event command line. In there you can tell to copy the DLL files you need for deployment. An example is given below:
mkdir $(SolutionDir)\Deployment
copy "$(SolutionDir)Your_Library_Name\Your_Dll_ForDeployement.dll"
$(SolutionDir)\Deployment\
I didn't meet the same problem but similar. I had WPF main project and referenced project where the referenced did not copy. I found that in my case the main project was set for NET 4.0 Client Profile and the referenced for NET 3.5. When I set the main project to 3.5 the compiled dll of the referenced project started to copy.
(I don't know why because I solved it by practice)
I too ran into a similar issue where referenced dlls were not copied into the bin in published folder. I was using a TFS checked out copy that didn't include the bin folder into the application.
-> So just included the bin folder.
-> Built the referenced applications
-> Published the website project
Now I see all the referenced dlls in bin in the published folder
I had a similar issue with VS 2012 Express. I used Tesseract libraries in my project. Everything worked well until I used this project in a solution where were more than one project. Problem was that some DLLs (liblept168.dll, libtesseract302.dll) that are normally placed in folders bin/debug/x86 or bin/debug/x64 were copied only when I rebuilt whole solution.
Changing a single line and building it again caused that the DLLs were deleted and not copied back.
I solved this issue by adding a reference of the project that creates missing DLLs to the startup project.
rzen and others, thanks - your comments led to a solution for us.
We have a project that targets version 10 of the Microsoft.ReportViewer.Common.dll and Microsoft.ReportViewer.WebForms.dll assemblies (separate "libs" folder we created at the 'src' level). But when we did a build, the output included version 12, which was recently installed on the build server.
Using comments here, we ensured that 'Copy Local' was set to True and that the flag was set in the project file. However, it was still deploying version 12. So what we found that did the trick was ensuring that the 'Specific Version' property was also set on the two references. Voila, version 10 of each file is now being deployed!
There was much rejoicing.
JH
If your project does not directly load the library, it won't always be deployed, even if it is referenced explicitly! I got confused because I could see it in a local Bin directory but not when deployed. The dll in the Bin directory was an old file that wasn't removed during Clean which is why I was confused.
A full clean and rebuild and it wasn't in my local Bin folder either which showed me the problem (I only use it in web.config). I then referenced the dll file itself in the project and set it to copy to output to make sure it gets deployed.
We can use the <Private>False</Private> to not to copy the referenced DLL files to the bin directory. This is useful when we are building applications in a separate TFS build server where we need to build the application and not to copy the DLL files to the bin directory.
Check the framework of the project in which the DLL file has been referenced. The framework should be .NET 4.0. Please correct it if the framework is Client Profile.
Adding the parameter
/deployonbuild=false
to the msbuild command line fixed the issue.
Got a similar issue when upgrading old WebSites into WebApplications.
The "Clean Solution" command would wipe out all external DLL files I purposely left in my bin folders.
Besides, it was not possible to bring those DLL back automatically simply by referencing them all, since many of them have the same file name (it happens when you work with many language specific resources)
Like stevie_c did, I took advantage of the Pre-Build command, but made it simpler:
I just used a xcopy command in the Pre-Build operation of the WebApplication project's properties. This way I could bring over the necessary external DLL files just before the build would start.