I can't seem to figure out how to combine the result of 2 Business Objects queries.
Both queries return a set of codes and a number of hours. Query 1 can have codes that do not appear in Query 2, and Query 2 can have codes that do not appear in Query 1.
The resulting report should contain all codes from both Query 1 and Query2, a column with the sum of hours from Q1 for that code, and a column with the sum of hours from Query 2 for that code. If one of the queries doesn't have a code in it, it would return a blank or 0 total.
Example:
Q1 results:
|Code|Value|
|:---|:----|
|A|15|
|A|17|
|B|12|
|D|22|
|D|35|
|E|16|
|E|9|
|E|11|
Q2 results:
|Code|Value|
|:---|:----|
|A|5|
|A|19|
|B|33|
|C|17|
|C|24|
|E|78|
|E|12|
Report:
|Code|Value1|Value2|
|----|------|------|
|A|32|24|
|B|12|33|
|C| |41|
|D|57| |
|E|36|90|
|Total|137|188|
When I create the Business Object report table as normal, only the values of Query 1 are used, and I miss the row for value C. If I flip the queries around, I miss the row for value D.
How do I set up my report to show all the code values?
Edit: Sorry for the formatting of the tables, in the preview it looks perfect. :(
Related
I've been trying to do a report about the quantity of breakdonws of products in our company. The problem is that the QUERY function is operating as normal, but the sorting order is well - a bit strange.
The data I'm trying to sort are as follows (quantities are blacked out since I cannot share those informations):
Raw data
First column - name of the product, second, it's EAN code, third, breakdown rate for last year, last column - average breakdown rate. "b/d" means "brak danych" or no data.
What I want to achieve is to get the end table with values sorted by average breakdown rate.
My query is as follows:
=query(Robocze!A2:D;"select A where A is not null and NOT D contains 'b/d' order by D desc")
Final result
As You can see, we have descending order, but there are strange artifacts - like the 33.33% after 4,00% and before 3,92%.
Why is that!?
try:
=INDEX(LAMBDA(x; SORT(x; INDEX(x;; 4)*1; 0))
(QUERY(Robocze!A2:D; "where A is not null and NOT D contains 'b/d'"; 0));; 4)
I have two datatables, in one of them old_DataTable I have 3 results. In the other one called Output I have 4 results. I have been implementing solutions suggested in forums:
Read the two Datatables
drCommonRows = (From d1 In old_DataTable.AsEnumerable
Join d2 In Output.AsEnumerable
On d1("StartDate").toString.Trim Equals d2("StartDate").toString.Trim
Select d1).ToList
drFilteredRows=old_DataTable.AsEnumerable.Except(drCommonRows, DataRowComparer.Default).toList
If drFilteredRows.Count >0 than dtFiltered drFilteredRows.CopyToDataTable
Else dtFiltered old_DataTable.Clone
When testing it gives a good result of drCommonRows but not of drFilteredRows and in the IF condition it always goes in Else.
I even changed the : drFilteredRows=**old_DataTable**.AsEnumerable.Except(drCommonRows, DataRowComparer.Default).toList
into
drFilteredRows=**Output**.AsEnumerable.Except(drCommonRows, DataRowComparer.Default).toList but in that case it gives as result all the datatable saved in Output so gives 4 results and is not working.
> The result that I am expecting is 1 row that is the one which is
> different and is in the Output Datatable.
I have a clickhouse table that has one Array(UInt16) column. I want to be able to filter results from this table to only get rows where the values in the array column are above a threshold value. I've been trying to achieve this using some of the array functions (arrayFilter and arrayExists) but I'm not familiar enough with the SQL/Clickhouse query syntax to get this working.
I've created the table using:
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS ArrayTest (
date Date,
sessionSecond UInt16,
distance Array(UInt16)
) Engine = MergeTree(date, (date, sessionSecond), 8192);
Where the distance values will be distances from a certain point at a certain amount of seconds (sessionSecond) after the date. I've added some sample values so the table looks like the following:
Now I want to get all rows which contain distances greater than 7. I found the array operators documentation here and tried the arrayExists function but it's not working how I'd expect. From the documentation, it says that this function "Returns 1 if there is at least one element in 'arr' for which 'func' returns something other than 0. Otherwise, it returns 0". But when I run the query below I get three zeros returned where I should get a 0 and two ones:
SELECT arrayExists(
val -> val > 7,
arrayEnumerate(distance))
FROM ArrayTest;
Eventually I want to perform this select and then join it with the table contents to only return rows that have an exists = 1 but I need this first step to work before that. Am I using the arrayExists wrong? What I found more confusing is that when I change the comparison value to 2 I get all 1s back. Can this kind of filtering be achieved using the array functions?
Thanks
You can use arrayExists in the WHERE clause.
SELECT *
FROM ArrayTest
WHERE arrayExists(x -> x > 7, distance) = 1;
Another way is to use ARRAY JOIN, if you need to know which values is greater than 7:
SELECT d, distance, sessionSecond
FROM ArrayTest
ARRAY JOIN distance as d
WHERE d > 7
I think the reason why you get 3 zeros is that arrayEnumerate enumerates over the array indexes not array values, and since none of your rows have more than 7 elements arrayEnumerates results in 0 for all the rows.
To make this work,
SELECT arrayExists(
val -> distance[val] > 7,
arrayEnumerate(distance))
FROM ArrayTest;
This is too tough for me guys. It's for Jeremy!
I have two tables (although I can also envision needing to join a third table) and I want to sum one field and count rows, in the same, table while joining with another table and return the result in json format.
First of all, the data type field that needs to be summed, is numeric(10,2) and the data is inserted as params['amount'].to_f.
The tables are expense_projects which has the name of the project and the company id and expense_items which has the company_id, item and amount (to mention just the critical columns) - the "company_id" columns are disambiguated.
So, the following code:
expense_items = DB[:expense_projects].left_join(:expense_items, :expense_project_id => :project_id).where(:project_company_id => company_id).to_a.to_json
works fine but when I add
expense_total = expense_items.sum(:amount).to_f.to_json
I get an error message which says
TypeError - no implicit conversion of Symbol into Integer:
so, the first question is why and how can this be fixed?
Then I want to join the two tables and get all the project names form the left (first table) and sum amount and count items in the second table. I have tried
DB[:expense_projects].left_join(:expense_items, :expense_items_company_id => expense_projects_company_id).count(:item).sum(:amount).to_json
and variations of this, all of which fails.
I would like a result which gets all the project names (even if there are no expense entries and returns something like:
project item_count item_amount
pr 1 7 34.87
pr 2 0 0
and so on. How can this be achieved with one query returning the result in json format?
Many thanks, guys.
Figured it out, I hope this helps somebody else:
DB[:expense_projects___p].where(:project_company_id=>user_company_id).
left_join(:expense_items___i, :expense_project_id=>:project_id).
select_group(:p__project_name).
select_more{count(:i__item_id)}.
select_more{sum(:i__amount)}.to_a.to_json
I am running this query
Playlistship.order("created_at desc").select("distinct playlist_id").limit(12).offset(2)
This query does not necessarily return 12 records. It returns the number of distinct records in the set of 12 defined by the LIMIT, OFFSET and ORDER parameters.
For example if the Playlistships between id=13 and id=24 had playlist_ids of [2,3,3,5,6,3,5,6,8,11,12,12], then this query will only give return 7 records, corresponding to the first ones having the playlist_ids [2,3,5,6,8,11,12].
What I would like to find is a query that yields 12, records with distinct playlist_ids, with the correct offset so that running this query again with an OFFSET of 3 would yield the next 12 records with distinct playlist_ids.
Hopefully I didn't "over explain" this one, as I think it's a relatively straightforward question. Please ask for more details if you need them.
Thanks!
Have you tried with subqueries? Give this a try:
Playlistship.select("distinct playlist_id").limit(12).where(playlist_id: Playlistship.order("created_at desc").select('playlist_id').offset(2))