I want to insert one row for each unique b_id if the b_id doest have any row with data = x. The value for the new row will be same for
b_id, b_name but the value for data will be x and sequence will be 1 and existing sequence for that b_id should be updated by 1
DECLARE
CURSOR b_id_cursor IS
SELECT DISTINCT b_id
FROM md_details;
BEGIN
FOR b_id_rec IN b_id_cursor LOOP
IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM md_details WHERE b_id = b_id_rec.b_id AND data = 'INIT') THEN
INSERT INTO md_details (b_id, b_name, data, sequence)
SELECT b_id, b_name, 'INIT', 1
FROM md_details
WHERE b_id = b_id_rec.b_id
AND ROWNUM = 1;
UPDATE md_details
SET sequence = sequence + 1
WHERE b_id = b_id_rec.b_id;
END IF;
END LOOP;
END;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import javax.naming.directory.DirContext;
import javax.naming.directory.SearchControls;
public class AdGroupFinder {
private DirContext dirContext;
public AdGroupFinder(DirContext dirContext) {
this.dirContext = dirContext;
}
public List<String> getAdGroupsForUser(String userName) {
List<String> adGroups = new ArrayList<>();
try {
SearchControls searchControls = new SearchControls();
searchControls.setSearchScope(SearchControls.SUBTREE_SCOPE);
String searchFilter = "(&(objectClass=user)(sAMAccountName=" + userName + "))";
javax.naming.NamingEnumeration<javax.naming.directory.SearchResult> results =
dirContext.search("", searchFilter, searchControls);
while (results.hasMoreElements()) {
javax.naming.directory.SearchResult searchResult = results.nextElement();
javax.naming.directory.Attribute memberOfAttribute = searchResult.getAttributes().get("memberOf");
for (int i = 0; i < memberOfAttribute.size(); i++) {
String groupDN = (String) memberOfAttribute.get(i);
adGroups.add(groupDN.substring(0, groupDN.indexOf(",")));
}
}
} catch (javax.naming.NamingException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
return adGroups;
}
public List<String> getUsersForAdGroup(String adGroupName) {
List<String> users = new ArrayList<>();
try {
SearchControls searchControls = new SearchControls();
searchControls.setSearchScope(SearchControls.SUBTREE_SCOPE);
String searchFilter = "(&(objectClass=user)(memberOf=CN=" + adGroupName + ",OU=Groups,DC=example,DC=com))";
javax.naming.NamingEnumeration<javax.naming.directory.SearchResult> results =
dirContext.search("", searchFilter, searchControls);
while (results.hasMoreElements()) {
javax.naming.directory.SearchResult searchResult = results.nextElement();
javax.naming.directory.Attribute sAMAccountNameAttribute = searchResult.getAttributes().get("sAMAccountName");
users.add((String) sAMAccountNameAttribute.get());
}
} catch (javax.naming.NamingException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
return users;
}
}
Related
This was reported by HibernateTools Reverse Engineering, but it seems to be true.
oracle jdbc driver reports no primary key columns on a table that has a primary key.
#Test
public void checkTable() throws SQLException, IOException {
System.out.println("in check table");
assertNotNull(conn);
Statement s = conn.createStatement();
ResultSet rset = s.executeQuery("select user from dual");
rset.next();
String username = rset.getString(1);
rset.close();
try {
s.execute("drop table " + username + ".x");
} catch (Exception e) {
// nothing it might not exist
}
s.execute("create table " + username + ".x (y number)");
s.execute("alter table x add constraint x_pk primary key (y)");
DatabaseMetaData meta = conn.getMetaData();
final String[] tableTypes = new String[] { "TABLE", "VIEW" };
ResultSet rs = meta.getTables(null, username, "X",tableTypes);
rs.next();
String table = rs.getString("table_name");
System.out.println("table is " + table);
rs.close();
rs = s.executeQuery("select * from user_constraints where table_name = 'X'");
rs.next();
String type = rs.getString("constraint_type");
assertEquals("P",type); // primary key
rs.close();
rs = meta.getPrimaryKeys(null, username, "X");
rs.next();
logger.info("getting pk");
System.out.print("wtf");
int colCount = 0;
while (rs.next()) {
final String pkName = rs.getString("pk_name");
logger.info("pkName: {}", pkName);
int keySeq = rs.getShort("key_seq"); // TODO should probably be column seq
String columnName = rs.getString("column_name");
logger.warn("seq: {}, columnName: {}, keySeq, columnName");
colCount++;
}
System.out.println("colCount: " + colCount);
assertEquals(1,colCount);
}
I have a method with a projection
public IQueryable<EmpDTO> GetEmployee(Func<Employee, EmpDTO> projection = null)
{
if(projection == null)
projection = emp => new EmpDTO {
Id = emp.Id,
Name = emp.Name,
Salary = emp.Salary,
};
return entities.Employees.Where(e => e.Salary > 10000).Select(projection);
}
It can be extended as follows:
query = classInstance.GetEmployee(emp => new EmpDTO {
Id = emp.Id,
Name = emp.Name,
Salary = emp.Salary,
Address = emp.Address
});
How can I APPEND only the "Address" field to the Func without
rewriting the entire fields (repeated fields Id, Name, Salary)
Using Expression, you can build a new lambda to initialize the fields:
public IQueryable<EmpDTO> GetEmployee(Expression<Func<Employee, EmpDTO>> addProj = null) {
Expression<Func<Employee, EmpDTO>> projection = emp => new EmpDTO {
Id = emp.Id,
Name = emp.Name,
Salary = emp.Salary,
};
if (addProj != null) {
var pBody = ((MemberInitExpression)projection.Body);
var newBindings = new ReadOnlyCollection<MemberBinding>(pBody.Bindings.Concat(((MemberInitExpression)addProj.Body).Bindings).ToList());
var newBody = Expression.MemberInit(pBody.NewExpression, newBindings);
projection = (Expression<Func<Employee, EmpDTO>>) Expression.Lambda(newBody, projection.Parameters);
}
return entities.Employees.Where(e => e.Salary > 10000).Select(projection);
}
You could also build the entire lambda from scratch, but that seemed like more work to me. Plus you can encapsulate the combine init logic into an extension method:
public static Expression<Func<TIn, TOut>> Add<TIn, TOut>(this Expression<Func<TIn, TOut>> proj, Expression<Func<TIn, TOut>> addProj = null) {
if (addProj != null) {
var pBody = ((MemberInitExpression)proj.Body);
var newBindings = new ReadOnlyCollection<MemberBinding>(pBody.Bindings.Concat(((MemberInitExpression)addProj.Body).Bindings).ToList());
var newBody = Expression.MemberInit(pBody.NewExpression, newBindings);
proj = (Expression<Func<TIn, TOut>>)Expression.Lambda(newBody, proj.Parameters);
}
return proj;
}
which reduces the GetEmployee body to:
public IQueryable<EmpDTO> GetEmployee(Expression<Func<Employee, EmpDTO>> addProj = null) {
Expression<Func<Employee, EmpDTO>> projection = emp => new EmpDTO {
Id = emp.Id,
Name = emp.Name,
Salary = emp.Salary,
};
if (addProj != null)
projection = projection.Add(addProj);
return entities.Employees.Where(e => e.Salary > 10000).Select(projection);
}
I have 2 objects (lists loaded from XML) report and database (showed bellow in code) and i should analyse them and mark items with 0, 1, 2, 3 according to some conditions
TransactionResultCode = 0; // SUCCESS (all fields are equivalents: [Id, AccountNumber, Date, Amount])
TransactionResultCode = 1; // Exists in report but Not in database
TransactionResultCode = 2; // Exists in database but Not in report
TransactionResultCode = 3; // Field [Id] are equals but other fields [AccountNumber, Date, Amount] are different.
I'll be happy if somebody could found time to suggest how to optimize some queries.
Bellow is the code:
THANK YOU!!!
//TransactionResultCode = 0 - SUCCESS
//JOIN on all fields
var result0 = from d in database
from r in report
where (d.TransactionId == r.MovementID) &&
(d.TransactionAccountNumber == long.Parse(r.AccountNumber)) &&
(d.TransactionDate == r.MovementDate) &&
(d.TransactionAmount == r.Amount)
orderby d.TransactionId
select new TransactionList()
{
TransactionId = d.TransactionId,
TransactionAccountNumber = d.TransactionAccountNumber,
TransactionDate = d.TransactionDate,
TransactionAmount = d.TransactionAmount,
TransactionResultCode = 0
};
//*******************************************
//JOIN on [Id] field
var joinedList = from d in database
from r in report
where d.TransactionId == r.MovementID
select new TransactionList()
{
TransactionId = d.TransactionId,
TransactionAccountNumber = d.TransactionAccountNumber,
TransactionDate = d.TransactionDate,
TransactionAmount = d.TransactionAmount
};
//Difference report - database
var onlyReportID = report.Select(r => r.MovementID).Except(joinedList.Select(d => d.TransactionId));
//TransactionResultCode = 1 - Not Found in database
var result1 = from o in onlyReportID
from r in report
where (o == r.MovementID)
orderby r.MovementID
select new TransactionList()
{
TransactionId = r.MovementID,
TransactionAccountNumber = long.Parse(r.AccountNumber),
TransactionDate = r.MovementDate,
TransactionAmount = r.Amount,
TransactionResultCode = 1
};
//*******************************************
//Difference database - report
var onlyDatabaseID = database.Select(d => d.TransactionId).Except(joinedList.Select(d => d.TransactionId));
//TransactionResultCode = 2 - Not Found in report
var result2 = from o in onlyDatabaseID
from d in database
where (o == d.TransactionId)
orderby d.TransactionId
select new TransactionList()
{
TransactionId = d.TransactionId,
TransactionAccountNumber = d.TransactionAccountNumber,
TransactionDate = d.TransactionDate,
TransactionAmount = d.TransactionAmount,
TransactionResultCode = 2
};
//*******************************************
var qwe = joinedList.Select(j => j.TransactionId).Except(result0.Select(r => r.TransactionId));
//TransactionResultCode = 3 - Transaction Results are different (Amount, AccountNumber, Date, )
var result3 = from j in joinedList
from q in qwe
where j.TransactionId == q
select new TransactionList()
{
TransactionId = j.TransactionId,
TransactionAccountNumber = j.TransactionAccountNumber,
TransactionDate = j.TransactionDate,
TransactionAmount = j.TransactionAmount,
TransactionResultCode = 3
};
you may try something like below:
public void Test()
{
var report = new[] {new Item(1, "foo", "boo"), new Item(2, "foo2", "boo2"), new Item(3, "foo3", "boo3")};
var dataBase = new[] {new Item(1, "foo", "boo"), new Item(2, "foo22", "boo2"), new Item(4, "txt", "rt")};
Func<Item, bool> inBothLists = (i) => report.Contains(i) && dataBase.Contains(i);
Func<IEnumerable<Item>, Item, bool> containsWithID = (e, i) => e.Select(_ => _.ID).Contains(i.ID);
Func<Item, int> getCode = i =>
{
if (inBothLists(i))
{
return 0;
}
if(containsWithID(report, i) && containsWithID(dataBase, i))
{
return 3;
}
if (report.Contains(i))
{
return 2;
}
else return 1;
};
var result = (from item in dataBase.Union(report) select new {Code = getCode(item), Item = item}).Distinct();
}
public class Item
{
// You need also to override Equals() and GetHashCode().. I omitted them to save space
public Item(int id, string text1, string text2)
{
ID = id;
Text1 = text1;
Text2 = text2;
}
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Text1 { get; set; }
public string Text2 { get; set; }
}
Note that you need to either implement Equals() for you items, or implement an IEqualityComparer<> and feed it to Contains() methods.
Consider very simple database table:
CREATE TABLE UkTest(
id int NOT NULL,
uk int NOT NULL
)
Primary Key on id
Unique Key on uk
Then add 2 rows:
INSERT INTO UkTest (id,uk) VALUES(1,1);
INSERT INTO UkTest (id,uk) VALUES(2,2);
Then do 2 tests.
OK:
var db = new Database1Entities();
var element1 = db.UkTest.FirstOrDefault(e => e.id == 1);
var element2 = db.UkTest.FirstOrDefault(e => e.id == 2);
element1.uk = 0;
element2.uk = 1; // overrides previous element1.uk value
var count = db.SaveChanges();
Fails (before test revert uk values to 1 and 2!):
var db = new Database1Entities();
var element1 = db.UkTest.FirstOrDefault(e => e.id == 1);
var element2 = db.UkTest.FirstOrDefault(e => e.id == 2);
element2.uk = 0;
element1.uk = 2; // overrides previous element2.uk value
var count = db.SaveChanges();
// Cannot insert duplicate key row in object 'dbo.UkTest' with unique index 'UK_UkTest'
See that ObjectContext.SaveChanges() checks rows in the order of primary index.
Is there any way to force own order?
Unless you call SaveChanges() twice, no, there is no way to control the order of SQL statements Entity Framework will send to the database. You could wrap the multiple SaveChanges() calls into an outer transaction to ensure still a transactional behaviour for the whole operation:
using (var scope = new TransactionScope())
{
using (var db = new Database1Entities())
{
var element1 = db.UkTest.FirstOrDefault(e => e.id == 1);
var element2 = db.UkTest.FirstOrDefault(e => e.id == 2);
element2.uk = 0;
db.SaveChanges();
element1.uk = 2;
db.SaveChanges();
}
scope.Complete();
}
Thanks to Slauma. I've found the solution. The key is to keep elements in several ObjectContext instances.
public class SavingElementsWithTransactionInOwnOrder
{
public void SaveElements ()
{
var db = new Database1Entities();
var element1 = db.UkTest.FirstOrDefault(e => e.id == 1);
element1.db = db;
db = new Database1Entities();
var element2 = db.UkTest.FirstOrDefault(e => e.id == 2);
element2.db = db;
element2.uk = 0;
element1.uk = 2;
var scope = new TransactionScope();
try{
element2.db.SaveChanges();
element1.db.SaveChanges();
scope.Complete();
}
finally{
scope.Dispose();
}
}
}
public partial class UkTest
{
public Database1Entities db { get; set; }
}
How can I project the row number onto the linq query result set.
Instead of say:
field1, field2, field3
field1, field2, field3
I would like:
1, field1, field2, field3
2, field1, field2, field3
Here is my attempt at this:
public List<ScoreWithRank> GetHighScoresWithRank(string gameId, int count)
{
Guid guid = new Guid(gameId);
using (PPGEntities entities = new PPGEntities())
{
int i = 1;
var query = from s in entities.Scores
where s.Game.Id == guid
orderby s.PlayerScore descending
select new ScoreWithRank()
{
Rank=i++,
PlayerName = s.PlayerName,
PlayerScore = s.PlayerScore
};
return query.ToList<ScoreWithRank>();
}
}
Unfortunately, the "Rank=i++" line throws the following compile-time exception:
"An expression tree may not contain an assignment operator"
Well, the easiest way would be to do it at the client side rather than the database side, and use the overload of Select which provides an index as well:
public List<ScoreWithRank> GetHighScoresWithRank(string gameId, int count)
{
Guid guid = new Guid(gameId);
using (PPGEntities entities = new PPGEntities())
{
var query = from s in entities.Scores
where s.Game.Id == guid
orderby s.PlayerScore descending
select new
{
PlayerName = s.PlayerName,
PlayerScore = s.PlayerScore
};
return query.AsEnumerable() // Client-side from here on
.Select((player, index) => new ScoreWithRank()
{
PlayerName = player.PlayerName,
PlayerScore = player.PlayerScore,
Rank = index + 1;
})
.ToList();
}
}
Ok, that did the trick. Thanks.
Here is my final code...
Server:
public List<Score> GetHighScores(string gameId, int count)
{
Guid guid = new Guid(gameId);
using (PPGEntities entities = new PPGEntities())
{
var query = from s in entities.Scores
where s.Game.Id == guid
orderby s.PlayerScore descending
select s;
return query.ToList<Score>();
}
}
Client:
void hsc_LoadHighScoreCompleted(object sender, GetHighScoreCompletedEventArgs e)
{
ObservableCollection<Score> list = e.Result;
_listBox.ItemsSource = list.Select((player, index) => new ScoreWithRank()
{
PlayerName = player.PlayerName,
PlayerScore = player.PlayerScore,
Rank = index+=1
}).ToList();
}
You could also make just a slight adjustment to your original code to get it working. Word of caution, if you databind or access the object again, the Rank will increment each time. In those cases the top answer is better.
let Rank = i++
and
Rank.ToString()
Full code:
public List<ScoreWithRank> GetHighScoresWithRank(string gameId, int count)
{
Guid guid = new Guid(gameId);
using (PPGEntities entities = new PPGEntities())
{
int i = 1;
var query = from s in entities.Scores
let Rank = i++
where s.Game.Id == guid
orderby s.PlayerScore descending
select new ScoreWithRank()
{
Rank.ToString(),
PlayerName = s.PlayerName,
PlayerScore = s.PlayerScore
};
return query.ToList<ScoreWithRank>();
}
}
This solution worked for me.
http://www.dotnetfunda.com/articles/article1995-rownumber-simulation-in-linq.aspx
.Select((x, index) => new
{
SequentialNumber = index + 1
,FieldFoo = x.FieldFoo
}).ToList();
List<Emp> Lstemp = GetEmpList();
int Srno = 0;
var columns = from t in Lstemp
orderby t.Name
select new {
Row_number=++Srno,
EmpID = t.ID,
Name = t.Name,
City = t.City
};