I have that Makefile that sets up some variables while running, for example foo = bar.
When make was run, I want to access these variables.
Unfortunately echo $foo returns nothing.
Is there a way to export variables from make back into the environment?
Your question is a bit confusing, but based on the subject line I assume you mean, there's a make variable set in your makefile like foo = bar, then after make has run and exited you want to see the value of foo in your shell that invoked make?
No, this is not possible. It has nothing to do with make: it's never possible for a child process of any kind to modify the environment of its parent process (in a POSIX-type system). The only way this can be done is that the child process generates output that sets the variable, and the parent shell evaluates this output. So for example, if you wrote a rule in your makefile like this:
show-foo: ; #echo 'foo=$(foo)'
then you could run this from your shell:
eval `make show-foo`
and it would set the value in your shell.
Related
I'm looking how to export from a Makefile environment variables to be exposed in the userland environment so exporting these variables from the Makefile should be accessible from the user shell.
I have tried make's export but as I understand and have tried does not export to outside of Makefile.
The idea of this is to populate Docker Compose environment variables in a elegant way and have these variables ready to use in the user shell also.
This is a fragment of what I've tried with make's export:
include docker.env
export $(shell sed -n '/=/p' docker.env)
SHELL := /bin/bash
run:
#docker-compose -f my-service.yml up -d
According with ArchWiki, each process of Bash...
Each process stores their environment in the /proc/$PID/environ file.
so once Make execute a source, export or any other command to set a new environment variable it will be applied only for that process.
As workaround I've written in the bash startup file so the variables will be in the global environment as soon as a new bash shell is loaded:
SHELL := /bin/bash
RC := ~/.bashrc
ENV := $(shell sed -n '/=/p' docker.env)
test:
#$(foreach e,$(ENV),echo $(e) >> $(RC);) \
EDIT completely reworked the answer after the OP explained in a comment that he wants the environment variables to be defined for any user shell.
If your goal is to have a set of environment variables defined for any user shell (I assume this means interactive shell), you can simply add these definitions to the shell's startup file (.bashrc for bash). From GNU make manual:
Variables in make can come from the environment in which make is run.
Every environment variable that make sees when it starts up is
transformed into a make variable with the same name and value.
However, an explicit assignment in the makefile, or with a command
argument, overrides the environment. (If the ‘-e’ flag is specified,
then values from the environment override assignments in the makefile.
See Summary of Options. But this is not recommended practice.)
Example:
$ cat .bashrc
...
export FOOBAR=foobar
export BARFOO="bar foo"
...
$ cat Makefile
all:
#printf '$$(FOOBAR)=%s\n' '$(FOOBAR)'
#printf 'FOOBAR='; printenv FOOBAR
#printf '$$(BARFOO)=%s\n' '$(BARFOO)'
#printf 'BARFOO='; printenv BARFOO
$ make
$(FOOBAR)=foobar
FOOBAR=foobar
$(BARFOO)=bar foo
BARFOO=bar foo
If you want to keep these definitions separate, you can just source the file from .bashrc:
$ cat docker.env
export FOOBAR=foobar
export BARFOO="bar foo"
$ cat .bashrc
...
source <some-path>/docker.env
...
And finally, if you don't want to add the export bash command to your file, you can parse the file in your .bashrc:
$ cat docker.env
FOOBAR=foobar
BARFOO="bar foo"
$ cat .bashrc
...
while read -r line; do
eval "export $$line"
done < <(sed -n '/=/p' <some-path>/docker.env)
...
Of course, there are some constraints for the syntax of your docker.env file (no unquoted special characters, no spaces in variable names, properly quoted values...) If your syntax is not bash-compatible it is time to ask another question about parsing this specific syntax and converting it into bash-compatible syntax.
Make cannot change the calling shell's environment without its cooperation. Of course, if you are in control, you can make the calling shell cooperate.
In broad terms, you could replace the make command with a shell alias or function which runs the real make and also sets the environment variables from the result. I will proceed to describe in more detail one way to implement this.
Whether you call this alias or function of yours make or e.g. compose is up to you really. To wrap the real make is marginally harder -- inside the function, you need to say command make, because just make would cause an infinite loop with the alias or function calling itself recursively -- so I will demonstrate this. Let's define a function (aliases suck);
make () {
# run the real make, break out on failure
command make "$#" || return
# if there is no env for us to load, we are done
test -f ./docker.env || return 0
# still here? load it
. ./docker.env
}
If you want even stricter control, maybe define a variable in the function and check inside the Makefile that the variable is set.
$(ifneq '${_composing}','function_make')
$(error Need to use the wrapper function to call make)
$(endif)
The error message is rather bewildering if you haven't read this discussion, so maybe it needs to be improved, and/or documented in a README or something. You would change the make line in the function above into
_composing='function_make' \
command make "$#" || return
The syntax var=value cmd args sets the variable var to the string value just for the duration of running the command line cmd args; it then returns to its previous state (unset, or set to its previous value).
For this particular construction, the name of the variable just needs to be reasonably unique and transparent to a curious human reader; and the value is also just a reasonably unique and reasonably transparent string which the function and the Makefile need to agree on.
Depending on what you end up storing in the environment, this could introduce complications if you need this mechanism for multiple Makefiles. Running it in directory a and then switching to a similar directory b will appear to work, but uses the a things where the poor puny human would expect the b things. (If the variables you set contain paths, relative paths fix this scenario, but complicate others.)
Extending this to a model similar to Ruby's rvm or Python's virtualenv might be worth exploring; they typically add an indicator to the shell prompt to remind you which environment is currently active, and have some (very modest) safeguards in place to warn you when your current directory and the environment disagree.
Another wart: Hardcoding make to always load docker.env is likely to produce unwelcome surprises one day. Perhaps hardcode a different file name which is specific to this hook - say, .compose_post_make_hook? It can then in turn contain something like
. ./docker.env
in this particular directory.
I am trying to create something like a global variable that I will use in order to make my project easy to deploy for other developers.
I would like to have an .sh file where there is a variable defining the location of the project.
Later on I want to export this variable and make it accessable in every makefile that I am creating so that I can use this design to keep everything constant and in one place.
This is an example of what I am trying to build:
Creating and exporting the variables in script.sh:
#!/bin/bash
DIRECTORY='some path value here'
Importing the values in multiple Makefiles:
# start script and fetch the value
VAR := $(shell ./script.sh | sed -n '/^result: /s/^.*: //p')
all:
#echo VAR=$(VAR)
I would like to see how other people are dealing with the same problem.
Being a better developer is my goal here. :)
Feedback always welcomed.
Environment variables exported in the shell are visible from make, so in a shell script like this:
#!/bin/sh
VAR=value
export VAR
make $*
The Makefile will start with VAR defined to value. That's one way to get variables from a shell script into make.
If you don't want the shell script to run make, you can have a user source it:
$ source script.sh
$ make
The variables set in the script will be visible to make this way too.
Or course there doesn't seem to be any reason you need a shell script here. Stick your configuration into a fragment of a Makefile (which would look almost exactly like your shell script, but not use quotes for multiple word values) and then include Makefile.inc in your main makefile.
Also note that syntax like this:
#!/bin/sh or another commment
VAR=value
export VAR
It equally valid included in a Makefile or sourced into a shell script. So sometimes it's possible to use the same include file in both places!
I have something like that in a shell script
cd /some/folder1
savedCFLAGS=${CFLAGS-}
export CFLAGS="-fexceptions ${CFLAGS-}"
./configure --some-option -what-ever
make
export CFLAGS=${savedCFLAGS}
cd /some/folder2
./configure --some-option -what-ever
make
This works more or less correctly but has one serious flaw.If CFLAGS was unset previously, after the first block it will be set and empty.Sometimes, this is a problem, because some configure scripts use default values for variables only if they are actually unset - default value will not be used if the variable is simply empty.
Let me also state that I have such constructs multiple times in the script, with multiple different variables(this is a script used to build complete GCC-based toolchain).
What would be the easiest way to have the variable either restored to previous value (if it actually was set previously) or unset (if it was unset before my modifications)? I could set savedCFLAGS to some special token if it was unset, and then test whether savedCFLAGS has a value equal to that token.However, maybe there's something much simpler?
Just run your setenv+configure+make in a subshell using parentheses:
(export CFLAGS="-fexceptions ${CFLAGS-}";./configure --some-option -what-ever; make)
It inherits the environment in a copy, so when exiting the sub-shell you get the exact same "previous" state: no env. variables are ever changed in your script, and further configure commands work properly.
From what I've read, is it correct to assume that the only thing export does is make the variable visible to child processes?
What would be a scenario where you would want to make a variable only visible to the scope it was initialized in, and what would be a scenario in which you would want a variable available to all child scopes?
In general, you only need to export a variable that another process will look for in its environment. How do you know which variables those are? You have to read their documentation.
Whether or not a variable is marked for export makes no difference to the current shell.
Let's construct a demonstration.
$ printf 'echo "foo=$foo"\n' > script
$ bash script
foo=
$ foo=3
$ bash script
foo=
$ export foo
bash script
foo=3
The first time and second time you run script, foo is undefined in its environment because its parent process (the current shell) did not export foo. The third time it is called, the parent adds foo to the script's initial environment because foo was exported.
In response to your comment, the term "environment" has a very precise meaning here. All processes, not just shells, receive an array of strings from its parent on startup, referred to as its environment. There are no particular semantics associated with these strings; it's up to the receiving program how to interpret them.
The shell, for example, ignores strings in its environment that do not have the form name=value, where name is a valid shell identifier. For each such string, the shell defines a shell variable with the given name and value, and marks its export attribute. This is what we mean by an environment variable. You can also "promote" a regular shell variable at any time to an environment variable using the export command, but this doesn't affect the meaning of the variable in the current process.
When any process creates a new process, a copy of its environment is given to the new process. The shell additionally creates name=value strings to pass on from each of its environment variables.
So, to compile my executable, I need to have the library locations set up correctly. The problem is, the setup comes from a bunch of scripts that do the env variable exporting, and what needs to be set up may change (beyond my control) so I need to use those scripts instead of copying their functionality. To compile in regular command line, I need to do something like:
setup library1
setup library2
source some_other_setup_script.bash
g++ blah.c
# setup is a executable on my system that run some scripts
How would I write a makefile that accomplishes that? As far as I tried, the env variable exporting does not carry over (i.e. "export VAR=remember; echo $VAR" won't work)
You can also add environment variables properly with the machinery of GNU make, like so:
export TEST:="Something Good!"
test:
echo $$TEST
This (I think) has different semantics from:
TEST2:="Something not quite so useful?"
test2:
echo ${TEST2}
Which (again, I think) does the substitution within make before passing along to the shell. Note that the export command doesn't work within a target block, just unindented as an immediately executed command.
If variable exporting is not working the way it does on your command line, that suggests that Make is choosing a shell different from the one you're using, with different syntax for handling variables (export VAR=remember; echo $VAR works fine for me). Make uses /bin/sh by default, but you can override this with the SHELL variable, which Make does not import from the environment. I suggest setting SHELL (in the Makefile) to whatever you're using in your environment and trying the export VAR=remember experiment again.
Ultimately you will need to define the variable and execute the compiler in a shell list or even a script, rather than in separate make commands. There are a couple of refinements you could add, however. You could tell make about the script:
maintarget: script.sh blah.c
source script.sh; g++ blah.c
script.sh:
setup include script here
Another thing would be to just execute all that stuff in the same shell
maintarget: blah.c
run this; run that; run the other thing; g++ blah.c
I believe all make versions will run a ; list in the same shell, but you can always force a subshell with (list) or by calling specifically a shell script as a compiler command wrapper.
Don't forget to have the appropriate targets depend on your scripts themselves. BTW, some make versions (pmake aka bsd make) can execute a command when defining a make variable, and all versions of make then exports those. But I don't think gmake can do that.
You could write another shell script that executes all those commands, then prints out variable assignments that make can use. Run the script, pipe its output to a file, then include that file from your Makefile. For example:
Makefile:
all:
echo $(FOO)
test.mk: test.sh
./$< > $#
include test.mk
test.sh
echo "FOO=1"
Running "make" in the directory containing this Makefile produces:
make: Entering directory `/home/luser/build/mktest'
Makefile:7: test.mk: No such file or directory
./test.sh > test.mk
make: Leaving directory `/home/luser/build/mktest'
make: Entering directory `/home/luser/build/mktest'
echo 1
1
make: Leaving directory `/home/luser/build/mktest'
make creates test.mk by running the shell script, then includes it. test.mk contains the output of test.sh, and is parsed as a Makefile. See http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/make.html#Include for more details.
We use a variant of this in Mozilla's client.mk to let you define options in a "mozconfig" file:
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/client.mk#138
Restatement: How do I get a shell variable into a make file?
Something like:
MYVAR := $(shell echo $(MYVAR)) <any_makefile_additions_here>
So, this defines MYVAR inside a MAKEFILE when an environment variable named MYVAR is also set.
It might be of interest, that, in order to override an option that is already defined in a makefile, make supports (I am referring to GNU Make 3.82, but other version probably too) the option -e.
Example:
Makefile:
CC=gcc
...
Run make:
CC=gcc-4.7
make -e
will use gcc-4.7 instead of gcc.