Makefile dependency modification detection - makefile

I'm writing a makefile for handling the dependency of build units ONE and TWO -> build unit LIB.
By "build unit" I mean a directory containing directories src, lib, include and bin, as well as a makefile for compiling the source code in src. Libraries are placed in "lib" and library header-files in "include". The compiled binary is placed in "bin". A build unit accepts "make", "make all", "make lint" and "make clean".
When a change is made to a header-file in LIB, this makefile is meant to detect it and recompile + install (copy .a+.h-files to ONE and TWO) the new version of LIB before compiling.
.PHONY: ONE TWO CLEAN LINT
ALL: ONE TWO
%.a %.h:
#echo ---------- Compiling LIB ----------
#cd LIB && gmake.exe LIB
LIB_HEADERS := $(wildcard LIB/src/*.h)
ONE: ONE/lib/libLIB.a $(subst LIB/src/,ONE/include/,$(LIB_HEADERS))
#echo ---------- Compiling $# ----------
#cd $# && gmake.exe
TWO: TWO/lib/libLIB.a $(subst LIB/src/,TWO/include/,$(LIB_HEADERS))
#echo ---------- Compiling $# ----------
#cd $# && gmake.exe
CLEAN LINT:
#cd ONE && gmake.exe $#
#cd TWO && gmake.exe $#
#cd LIB && gmake.exe $#
(Assume the makefile for LIB handles copying into ONE and TWO)
How come make does not run the rule "%.a %.h:" when I make a change to one of the header-files in LIB/src?
How do I generalize ONE and TWO into a single rule? I want to do this (but a target cannot be used in dependencies, at least this way):
ONE TWO: $#/lib/libLIB.a $(subst LIB/src/,$#/include/,$(LIB_HEADERS))
#echo ---------- Compiling $# ----------
#cd $# && gmake.exe
UPDATE:
I found the solution by taking a step back, drawing Directed Acyclic Graphs, and thinking in terms of single files, instead of all files of a certain type.
Here is the (not very elegant) solution, for completeness:
.PHONY: ONE TWO CLEAN LINT
ALL: ONE TWO
LIB_HEADERS := $(sort $(subst name.h,,$(wildcard LIB/src/*.h)))
# ------------------------------------------------------------
ONE/include/%.h: LIB/src/%.h
#echo Copying $< to $#
#mkdir ONE\\include 2> NUL || :)
#copy $(subst /,\,$<) ONE\\include\\ 1> NUL
TWO/include/%.h: LIB/src/%.h
#echo Copying $< to $#
#mkdir TWO\\include 2> NUL || :)
#copy $(subst /,\,$<) TWO\\include\\ 1> NUL
# ------------------------------------------------------------
ONE/lib/liblib.a: LIB/bin/liblib.a
#echo Copying $< to $#
#mkdir ONE\\lib 2> NUL || :)
#copy $(subst /,\,$<) ONE\\lib\\ 1> NUL
TWO/lib/liblib.a: LIB/bin/liblib.a
#echo Copying $< to $#
#mkdir TWO\\lib 2> NUL || :)
# Windows-equivalent of touch (discarding any output to stdout):
#copy $(subst /,\,$<) TWO\\lib\\ 1> NUL
# ------------------------------------------------------------
LIB/bin/liblib.a: $(LIB_HEADERS) $(wildcard LIB/src/*.cpp)
#echo ---------- Looking for changes to liblib ----------
#cd LIB && gmake.exe LIB
#copy /b $(subst /,\,$#) +,, 1> NUL || :)
# ------------------------------------------------------------
ONE: ONE/lib/liblib.a $(subst LIB/src/,ONE/include/,$(LIB_HEADERS))
#echo ---------- Compiling ONE ----------
#cd ONE && gmake.exe
TWO: TWO/lib/liblib.a $(subst LIB/src/,TWO/include/,$(LIB_HEADERS))
#echo ---------- Compiling TWO ----------
#cd TWO && gmake.exe
# ------------------------------------------------------------
CLEAN LINT:
#cd ONE && gmake.exe $#
#cd TWO && gmake.exe $#
#cd LIB && gmake.exe $#
I very much welcome tips on how to generalize ONE and TWO further.

For question 1 : Maybe you need to move the LIB_HEADERS definition up and change the rule to
%.a %.h: $(LIB_HEADERS)
?

I'm sorry to have to tell you this, but your build system is a monstrosity. You are attempting to do sophisticated dependency handling by means of extravagant use of recursive Make; recursive Make has its uses, but one of its drawbacks is that it defeats Make's native ability to handle dependencies. There are other problems that indicate that the author of this system didn't really understand how Make works, or what a good makefile should look like.
The reason Make doesn't run this %.a %.h: rule when you change a header file in LIB/src/ is that this rule has no dependencies, and nothing in this makefile depends on a header file that doesn't exist. If that makes no sense to you, then you don't understand how Make rules work.
These rules:
ONE: ONE/lib/libLIB.a $(subst LIB/src/,ONE/include/,$(LIB_HEADERS))
#echo ---------- Compiling $# ----------
#cd $# && gmake.exe
TWO: TWO/lib/libLIB.a $(subst LIB/src/,TWO/include/,$(LIB_HEADERS))
#echo ---------- Compiling $# ----------
#cd $# && gmake.exe
can be combined into one rule:
ONE TWO: % : %/lib/libLIB.a $(addprefix %/include/,$(notdir $(LIB_HEADERS)))
#echo ---------- Compiling $# ----------
#cd $# && gmake.exe
But don't do this. Instead, eliminate ONE/include/ and TWO/include/, since they bring nothing but headaches. Then the rule here can be
ONE TWO: % : %/lib/libLIB.a $(LIB_HEADERS)
#echo ---------- Compiling $# ----------
#cd $# && gmake.exe
and the makefiles in ONE/ and TWO/ can refer to LIB/src/.

Related

Makefile target dependency in variable

I can't figure out how target dependencies works, here is what I wrote to execute a target for each file in my directory :
FILES= $(wildcard *.txt)
all: $(FILES)
#echo $(FILES)
%.txt:
#echo "Runned $#"
This only echo the lists of the files and doesn't enter %.txt target, I want it to execute the target %.txt for all .txt files present in the directory (no matter if they have changed)
The basic problem is that any target name matching %.txt already exists and has no dependencies so make sees no reason to rebuild it. If you really want the commands to be rerun every time the simplest way is probably to introduce a phony target as a dependency...
FILES= $(wildcard *.txt)
all: $(FILES)
#echo $(FILES)
.PHONY: .FORCE
%.txt: .FORCE
#echo "Runned $#"

GNU Make Skipping Straight to Linking

I have a makefile that for various reasons relies on a supporting python script to run every time and grab files from several external locations, copy into working directory, and run through a separate preprocessor before compiling.
This makefile must be able to be run in parallel (-j8) so the order of processing cannot be guaranteed.
In trying to explicitly specify prerequisites, I have created a situation where make skips all object files, goes straight to linking, and fails because the necessary objects do not exist. On a second run, all the objects already exist (the preprocess step skips the files that already exist) and all the files are compiled and linked properly.
When run without -j# everything works fine, but the moment I add -j2, the skipping begins.
Following is an example make file:
GEN_FILES := file1.cpp file2.cpp file3.cpp
CXX_FILES := bin_main.cpp $(GEN_FILES)
OBJ_FILES := $(patsubst %.cpp,%.o,$(CXX_FILES))
.PHONY : all clean prepare
all : bin_file
prepare :
# Copy and preprocess all source files
[ -f file1.cpp ] || cp d1/file1.cpp .
[ -f file2.cpp ] || cp d2/file2.cpp .
[ -f file3.cpp ] || cp d3/file3.cpp .
$(OBJ_FILES) : prepare
bin_file : $(OBJ_FILES)
[ -f file1.o ] && [ -f file2.o ] && [ -f file3.o ] && touch bin_file
%.o : %.cpp
#echo "Compiling $<..."
[ -f $< ] && touch $#
clean :
$(RM) *.o
$(RM) file*
$(RM) bin_file
How can I get this to build in one go, first running prepare to collect all files and then compiling and linking as necessary?
As code_fodder mentions the issue is the creation of the source files.
Basically what happens is, you have not told make how to create these source files, so as far as make knows they don't exist and there's no way to create them. So when make wants to build, for example, file1.o it looks at your pattern rule and finds it could build file1.o from file1.cpp. So then it looks for how to build file1.cpp. No file1.cpp exists, and there is no rule that make knows of that will build it, so make ignores that pattern rule as not matching.
Then make sees the target:
$(OBJ_FILES) : prepare
so it thinks there's no recipe needed to create the object files, and just runs the link line. The next time through, make sees the prepared source files (from the previous build) and then it can use your pattern rule.
If you change your pattern rule to a static pattern rule, where you explicitly tell make exactly what rule to use instead of providing it with a possible rule to use that it can ignore if it doesn't match (which is what a pattern rule is), you'll see the error:
$(OBJ_FILES): %.o : %.cpp
#echo "Compiling $<..."
sleep 1
[ -f $< ] && touch $#
will tell you:
make: *** No rule to make target 'file1.cpp', needed by 'file1.o'. Stop.
Remember, make is looking for a matching pattern rule BEFORE it actually builds anything: it doesn't want to build every possible prerequisite of every possible matching pattern rule, to decide whether or not at the end of it the rule can be used. The rule is matched based on the current state of the filesystem plus rules you have given make about changes it could make. Make has no idea that if it were to invoke the prepare target the source files it was looking for would magically come into existence.
Your basic problem is that this statement is the wrong dependency relationship:
$(OBJ_FILES) : prepare
It's not really true that the object files depend on prepare; what's true is that the PREPARED SOURCE FILES depend on prepare. The object files depend only the "prepared" source files, as your pattern rules shows. This rule should be written, instead:
$(GEN_FILES): prepare
If you do this with -j everything will wait as you want.
Yeah, this gets messy / difficult. The problem you have is that you can specify prerequisite lists - that can work in order, but as soon as you start to use -j then make can start processing prerequisites in any old order. So bin_file requires $(OBJ_FILES) which require prepare. Then %.o requires the same named %.cpp file - which it can do for main.o, but not the filex.o since they don't exist yet - but it tries anyway and fails - in the mean time make (in parallel) is potentially starting to generate the .cpp files, but by this time its too late...etc...
My Prerequisites Build Pattern
I use a very specific prerequisites pattern of my own design - some might frown upon - but I have carefully considered this over the years and found it to be optimal for me.
I create a rule called build or something - which requires build_prerequisites target and then calls make to do the actual build once this is complete:
.PHONY: build
build: build_prerequisites
build:
#echo "start_build"
#$(MAKE) bin_file
This means that build_prerequisites is always run first before the recipe runs. You cant seem to achieve the same forcing of order (at least not easily) using just dependencies. I.e. a list of dependencies can be run in any order with -j, but the rule recipe is always run last.
Now we have this pattern we can fill in the rest. First the build_prerequisites target which does your file generation - I am using echo in my example because I don't have your python script:
.PHONY: build_prerequisites
build_prerequisites:
#echo "build_prerequisites"
echo "create file1" > file1.cpp
echo "create file2" > file2.cpp
echo "create file3" > file3.cpp
Finally add in the c++ compile and link stages - these will be run with the single recursive make call from build - i.e. $(MAKE) bin_file (again I am using echo to create the files in my example):
%.o : %.cpp
#echo "compiling: $<"
##echo "$(CXX) $(SRC_INCLUDES) $(LIB_INCLUDES) $(CXXFLAGS) -c $< -o $#"
#echo "touch" > $#
bin_file : $(OBJ_FILES)
#echo "linking: $<"
#echo $(CXX) $(SRC_INCLUDES) $^ $(LIB_INCLUDES) $(LDFLAGS) -o $#
#echo "touch" > $#
Output
Here is the output from my test program (using echo) and main.cpp already exists usingn -j10:
make -j10
build_prerequisites
echo "create file1" > file1.cpp
echo "create file2" > file2.cpp
echo "create file3" > file3.cpp
start_build
make[1]: Entering directory '/mnt/d/software/ubuntu/make'
compile: bin_main.cpp
compile: file1.cpp
compile: file2.cpp
compile: file3.cpp
link: bin_main.o
g++ bin_main.o file1.o file2.o file3.o -o bin_file
make[1]: Leaving directory '/mnt/d/software/ubuntu/make'
Note: if I put a sleep 1 in the "compile" rule - this still takes only 1 second for all 4 files to compile.
Put it all together
GEN_FILES := file1.cpp file2.cpp file3.cpp
CXX_FILES := bin_main.cpp $(GEN_FILES)
OBJ_FILES := $(patsubst %.cpp,%.o,$(CXX_FILES))
###### STAGE 1
.PHONY: build
build: build_prerequisites
build:
#echo "start_build"
#$(MAKE) bin_file
.PHONY: build_prerequisites
build_prerequisites:
#echo "build_prerequisites"
copy_and_pp_files.py $(CXX_FILES) $(SEARCH_DIRS) .
copy_and_pp_files.py $(CFG_FILES) $(SEARCH_DIRS) .
###### STAGE 2
%.o : %.cpp
#echo "compiling: $<"
#$(CXX) $(SRC_INCLUDES) $(LIB_INCLUDES) $(CXXFLAGS) -c $< -o $#
bin_file : $(OBJ_FILES)
#echo "linking: $<"
#$(CXX) $(SRC_INCLUDES) $^ $(LIB_INCLUDES) $(LDFLAGS) -o $#
###### OTHER RULES
.PHONY: clean
clean :
#$(RM) *.o
#$(RM) file*
I have attempted to use your actual code, but I have no way to test this so there may be a bug in there. I split it up into 2 "stages" for clarity. Stage 1 is done in your makeor make build call, then state 2 is done in the recursive make call in the build recipe.

Impose an order for the prerequisites of a target

I have a makefile snippet:
all: $(objects)
fresh: clean all
clean: ;rm $(objects)
Here, I want to ensure that when I do make fresh - clean should precede all.
But how can I make sure this, given that when I do make all, clean should not be made?
I can imagine that one way could be like this
fresh: clean
make all
Is it the right (or the only) way to solve this issue?
If you use GNU make:
all:
#echo $#
#sleep 1
#echo end $#
clean:
#echo $#
#sleep 1
#echo end $#
fresh:: clean
fresh:: all
.PHONY: clean fresh all
Please note the double colon after targets fresh! See the documentation:
The double-colon rules for a target are executed in the order they
appear in the makefile.
If you run make -j2 fresh it shows it works as expect:
clean
end clean
all
end all
But with fresh:: clean all doesn't work properly parallel (maybe unexpected).
With BSD make:
all:
#echo $#
#sleep 1
#echo end $#
clean:
#echo $#
#sleep 1
#echo end $#
fresh: clean all
#echo $#
.ORDER: clean all
.PHONY: clean all fresh
Note the line begin with .ORDER. It works well in parallelization too (see man make). Without parallelization the order of dependencies in line fresh: counts.
As you already suggest in your question, calling make recursively on the same makefile for the target all in a recipe whose prerequisite is clean:
# At the very beginning of the makefile
CURRENT_MAKEFILE := $(lastword $(MAKEFILE_LIST))
# ...
.PHONY: fresh
fresh: clean
$(MAKE) -f $(CURRENT_MAKEFILE) all
This imposes an order, since the target fresh depends on the prerequisite clean, clean's recipe will be executed before fresh's recipe, which in turn will execute all's recipe.
Note that I'm using here $(MAKE) instead of make for the recursion.

Have Make build a variable number of sub-directories

In my project, I have a subfolder called samples, in which there are a number of directories, one for each sample.
I'd like make to build and all of the samples via rules, without maintaining a list of them.
So far, I have this:
test-samples: $(wildcard samples/**/Cargo.toml)
samples/%/Cargo.toml : samples/%/context.toml flowc
#echo ""
#echo "------- Compiling and Generating code from flow: $< ----"
./target/debug/flowc $<
samples/%/target : samples/%/Cargo.toml
#echo "------- Compiling and Running generated code: $< ----"
#cargo run --quiet --manifest-path $<
If the Cargo.toml file and target directories already exist - then the dependencies work and they are re-generated.
But I can't get the rules to run if the Cargo.toml file does not yet exist (first time), or the target directory doesn't yet exist.
I think this maybe a solution using path substitution.
Let me know what you think:
sample_flows := $(patsubst samples/%,samples/%/target,$(wildcard samples/*))
test-samples: $(sample_flows)
samples/%/Cargo.toml : samples/%/context.toml ./target/debug/flowc
#echo ""
#echo "------- Compiling and Generating code from flow: $< ----"
./target/debug/flowc $<
samples/%/target : samples/%/Cargo.toml
#echo "------- Compiling and Running generated code: $< ----"
#cargo run --quiet --manifest-path $<

Create directories using make file

I want to create directories using makefile. My project directory is like this
+--Project
+--output
+--source
+Testfile.cpp
+Makefile
I want to put all the objects and output into the respective output folder. I want to create folder structure which would be like this after compiling.
+--Project
+--output
+--debug (or release)
+--objs
+Testfile.o
+Testfile (my executable file)
+--source
+Testfile.cpp
+Makefile
I tried with several options, but could not succeed. Please help me to make directories using make file. I'm posting my Makefile for your consideration.
#---------------------------------------------------------------------
# Input dirs, names, files
#---------------------------------------------------------------------
OUTPUT_ROOT := output/
TITLE_NAME := TestProj
ifdef DEBUG
TITLE_NAME += _DEBUG
else
ifdef RELEASE
TITLE_NAME += _RELEASE
endif
endif
# Include all the source files here with the directory tree
SOURCES := \
source/TestFile.cpp \
#---------------------------------------------------------------------
# configs
#---------------------------------------------------------------------
ifdef DEBUG
OUT_DIR := $(OUTPUT_ROOT)debug
CC_FLAGS := -c -Wall
else
ifdef RELEASE
OUT_DIR := $(OUTPUT_ROOT)release
CC_FLAGS := -c -Wall
else
$(error no build type defined)
endif
endif
# Put objects in the output directory.
OUT_O_DIR := $(OUT_DIR)/objs
#---------------------------------------------------------------------
# settings
#---------------------------------------------------------------------
OBJS = $(SOURCES:.cpp=.o)
DIRS = $(subst /,/,$(sort $(dir $(OBJS))))
DIR_TARGET = $(OUT_DIR)
OUTPUT_TARGET = $(OUT_DIR)/$(TITLE_NAME)
CC_FLAGS +=
LCF_FLAGS :=
LD_FLAGS :=
#---------------------------------------------------------------------
# executables
#---------------------------------------------------------------------
MD := mkdir
RM := rm
CC := g++
#---------------------------------------------------------------------
# rules
#---------------------------------------------------------------------
.PHONY: all clean title
all: title
clean:
$(RM) -rf $(OUT_DIR)
$(DIR_TARGET):
$(MD) -p $(DIRS)
.cpp.o:
#$(CC) -c $< -o $#
$(OBJS): $(OUT_O_DIR)/%.o: %.cpp
#$(CC) -c $< -o $#
title: $(DIR_TARGET) $(OBJS)
In my opinion, directories should not be considered targets of your makefile, either in technical or in design sense. You should create files and if a file creation needs a new directory then quietly create the directory within the rule for the relevant file.
If you're targeting a usual or "patterned" file, just use make's internal variable $(#D), that means "the directory the current target resides in" (cmp. with $# for the target). For example,
$(OUT_O_DIR)/%.o: %.cpp
#mkdir -p $(#D)
#$(CC) -c $< -o $#
title: $(OBJS)
Then, you're effectively doing the same: create directories for all $(OBJS), but you'll do it in a less complicated way.
The same policy (files are targets, directories never are) is used in various applications. For example, git revision control system doesn't store directories.
Note: If you're going to use it, it might be useful to introduce a convenience variable and utilize make's expansion rules.
dir_guard=#mkdir -p $(#D)
$(OUT_O_DIR)/%.o: %.cpp
$(dir_guard)
#$(CC) -c $< -o $#
$(OUT_O_DIR_DEBUG)/%.o: %.cpp
$(dir_guard)
#$(CC) -g -c $< -o $#
title: $(OBJS)
This would do it - assuming a Unix-like environment.
MKDIR_P = mkdir -p
.PHONY: directories
all: directories program
directories: ${OUT_DIR}
${OUT_DIR}:
${MKDIR_P} ${OUT_DIR}
This would have to be run in the top-level directory - or the definition of ${OUT_DIR} would have to be correct relative to where it is run. Of course, if you follow the edicts of Peter Miller's "Recursive Make Considered Harmful" paper, then you'll be running make in the top-level directory anyway.
I'm playing with this (RMCH) at the moment. It needed a bit of adaptation to the suite of software that I am using as a test ground. The suite has a dozen separate programs built with source spread across 15 directories, some of it shared. But with a bit of care, it can be done. OTOH, it might not be appropriate for a newbie.
As noted in the comments, listing the 'mkdir' command as the action for 'directories' is wrong. As also noted in the comments, there are other ways to fix the 'do not know how to make output/debug' error that results. One is to remove the dependency on the the 'directories' line. This works because 'mkdir -p' does not generate errors if all the directories it is asked to create already exist. The other is the mechanism shown, which will only attempt to create the directory if it does not exist. The 'as amended' version is what I had in mind last night - but both techniques work (and both have problems if output/debug exists but is a file rather than a directory).
Or, KISS.
DIRS=build build/bins
...
$(shell mkdir -p $(DIRS))
This will create all the directories after the Makefile is parsed.
make in, and off itself, handles directory targets just the same as file targets. So, it's easy to write rules like this:
outDir/someTarget: Makefile outDir
touch outDir/someTarget
outDir:
mkdir -p outDir
The only problem with that is, that the directories timestamp depends on what is done to the files inside. For the rules above, this leads to the following result:
$ make
mkdir -p outDir
touch outDir/someTarget
$ make
touch outDir/someTarget
$ make
touch outDir/someTarget
$ make
touch outDir/someTarget
This is most definitely not what you want. Whenever you touch the file, you also touch the directory. And since the file depends on the directory, the file consequently appears to be out of date, forcing it to be rebuilt.
However, you can easily break this loop by telling make to ignore the timestamp of the directory. This is done by declaring the directory as an order-only prerequsite:
# The pipe symbol tells make that the following prerequisites are order-only
# |
# v
outDir/someTarget: Makefile | outDir
touch outDir/someTarget
outDir:
mkdir -p outDir
This correctly yields:
$ make
mkdir -p outDir
touch outDir/someTarget
$ make
make: 'outDir/someTarget' is up to date.
TL;DR:
Write a rule to create the directory:
$(OUT_DIR):
mkdir -p $(OUT_DIR)
And have the targets for the stuff inside depend on the directory order-only:
$(OUT_DIR)/someTarget: ... | $(OUT_DIR)
All solutions including the accepted one have some issues as stated in their respective comments. The accepted answer by #jonathan-leffler is already quite good but does not take into effect that prerequisites are not necessarily to be built in order (during make -j for example). However simply moving the directories prerequisite from all to program provokes rebuilds on every run AFAICT.
The following solution does not have that problem and AFAICS works as intended.
MKDIR_P := mkdir -p
OUT_DIR := build
.PHONY: directories all clean
all: $(OUT_DIR)/program
directories: $(OUT_DIR)
$(OUT_DIR):
${MKDIR_P} $(OUT_DIR)
$(OUT_DIR)/program: | directories
touch $(OUT_DIR)/program
clean:
rm -rf $(OUT_DIR)
I've just come up with a fairly reasonable solution that lets you define the files to build and have directories be automatically created. First, define a variable ALL_TARGET_FILES that holds the file name of every file that your makefile will be build. Then use the following code:
define depend_on_dir
$(1): | $(dir $(1))
ifndef $(dir $(1))_DIRECTORY_RULE_IS_DEFINED
$(dir $(1)):
mkdir -p $$#
$(dir $(1))_DIRECTORY_RULE_IS_DEFINED := 1
endif
endef
$(foreach file,$(ALL_TARGET_FILES),$(eval $(call depend_on_dir,$(file))))
Here's how it works. I define a function depend_on_dir which takes a file name and generates a rule that makes the file depend on the directory that contains it and then defines a rule to create that directory if necessary. Then I use foreach to call this function on each file name and eval the result.
Note that you'll need a version of GNU make that supports eval, which I think is versions 3.81 and higher.
given that you're a newbie, I'd say don't try to do this yet. it's definitely possible, but will needlessly complicate your Makefile. stick to the simple ways until you're more comfortable with make.
that said, one way to build in a directory different from the source directory is VPATH; i prefer pattern rules
OS independence is critical for me, so mkdir -p is not an option. I created this series of functions that use eval to create directory targets with the prerequisite on the parent directory. This has the benefit that make -j 2 will work without issue since the dependencies are correctly determined.
# convenience function for getting parent directory, will eventually return ./
# $(call get_parent_dir,somewhere/on/earth/) -> somewhere/on/
get_parent_dir=$(dir $(patsubst %/,%,$1))
# function to create directory targets.
# All directories have order-only-prerequisites on their parent directories
# https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Prerequisite-Types.html#Prerequisite-Types
TARGET_DIRS:=
define make_dirs_recursively
TARGET_DIRS+=$1
$1: | $(if $(subst ./,,$(call get_parent_dir,$1)),$(call get_parent_dir,$1))
mkdir $1
endef
# function to recursively get all directories
# $(call get_all_dirs,things/and/places/) -> things/ things/and/ things/and/places/
# $(call get_all_dirs,things/and/places) -> things/ things/and/
get_all_dirs=$(if $(subst ./,,$(dir $1)),$(call get_all_dirs,$(call get_parent_dir,$1)) $1)
# function to turn all targets into directories
# $(call get_all_target_dirs,obj/a.o obj/three/b.o) -> obj/ obj/three/
get_all_target_dirs=$(sort $(foreach target,$1,$(call get_all_dirs,$(dir $(target)))))
# create target dirs
create_dirs=$(foreach dirname,$(call get_all_target_dirs,$1),$(eval $(call make_dirs_recursively,$(dirname))))
TARGETS := w/h/a/t/e/v/e/r/things.dat w/h/a/t/things.dat
all: $(TARGETS)
# this must be placed after your .DEFAULT_GOAL, or you can manually state what it is
# https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Special-Variables.html
$(call create_dirs,$(TARGETS))
# $(TARGET_DIRS) needs to be an order-only-prerequisite
w/h/a/t/e/v/e/r/things.dat: w/h/a/t/things.dat | $(TARGET_DIRS)
echo whatever happens > $#
w/h/a/t/things.dat: | $(TARGET_DIRS)
echo whatever happens > $#
For example, running the above will create:
$ make
mkdir w/
mkdir w/h/
mkdir w/h/a/
mkdir w/h/a/t/
mkdir w/h/a/t/e/
mkdir w/h/a/t/e/v/
mkdir w/h/a/t/e/v/e/
mkdir w/h/a/t/e/v/e/r/
echo whatever happens > w/h/a/t/things.dat
echo whatever happens > w/h/a/t/e/v/e/r/things.dat
See https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/managing-projects-with/0596006101/ch12.html
REQUIRED_DIRS = ...
_MKDIRS := $(shell for d in $(REQUIRED_DIRS); \
do \
[[ -d $$d ]] || mkdir -p $$d; \
done)
$(objects) : $(sources)
As I use Ubuntu, I also needed add this at the top of my Makefile:
SHELL := /bin/bash # Use bash syntax
I use the makefiles in windows environment and my simple solution is as follows,
Create a target makedir and add it as a prerequisites to where ever it is required.
# Default goal
all: gccversion makedir build finalize list sizeafter completed
The makedir target is (applicable only in windows environment)
makedir:
#IF NOT EXIST $(subst /,\,$(BUILD_DIR)) mkdir $(subst /,\,$(BUILD_DIR)) 2> NULL
#IF NOT EXIST $(subst /,\,$(OUTPUT_DIR)) mkdir $(subst /,\,$(OUTPUT_DIR)) 2> NULL
#IF NOT EXIST $(subst /,\,$(DEP_DIR)) mkdir $(subst /,\,$(DEP_DIR)) 2> NUL
#IF NOT EXIST $(subst /,\,$(OBJ_DIR)) mkdir $(subst /,\,$(OBJ_DIR)) 2> NUL
$(subst /,\,$(BUILD_DIR)) converts the directory separator / to \ and
mkdir $(subst /,\,$(BUILD_DIR)) 2> NUL redirects the error if any.
src_dir := src
obj_dir := obj
build_dir := build
dirs := $(src_dir) $(obj_dir) $(build_dir) # new variable
all: $(dirs) $(other_dependencies) # added dependency (*before* any others)
$(dirs): # rule which makes missing directories
mkdir $#
Won't clutter your terminal with "cannot create directory" error messages. If the directories exist, they don't need to be built.
Works like any other dependency, only requires one rule and one variable.

Resources